San Francisco, CA
Beloved firefighter tearfully reacts to insurance denial of stage 4 cancer drugs
A retired San Francisco firefighter, who spent nearly two decades willingly putting his life on the line for others, now finds himself fighting for survival while in a battle against his own insurance company.
I expected to be taken care of.
Ken Jones, former firefighter who recently received a denial from his insurance company regarding his stage 4 cancer treatment
Ken Jones and Helen Horvath hold one another in their living room. The couple, who met as fellow firefighters, have been married nearly 25 years and have spent the past year trying to navigate medical appointments, hospital bills, and insurance denials relating to Jones’ Stage 4 lung cancer which has spread to his bones, lymph nodes, and brain.
“You just automatically depend on that insurance being there,” said an emotional Ken Jones, who retired in 2012 after working for the San Francisco fire department for 17 years. “I expected to be taken care of.”
Jones, 71, was diagnosed with metastatic lung cancer last year, which has left him with painful tumors growing in his bones, lymph nodes, and brain. Jones’ doctor believes the stage 4 cancer is linked to Jones’ time on the front lines as a firefighter.
Ongoing exposure to smoke and other chemicals pose such a danger, the World Health Organization, beginning in 2022, started classifying firefighting as a “carcinogen.”
Leading up to his cancer diagnosis last year, Ken Jones has long been an avid cyclist and fitness enthusiast. His doctor believes his stage 4 lung cancer is linked to Jones’ 17 years working as a San Francisco firefighter.
The first denial letter
Part of Jones’ medical treatment, which was prescribed by his oncologist, was recently denied by his insurance company.
“It’s been horrible, said Helen Horvath, Jones’ wife. “It has been a huge burden.”
The couple met as young firefighters in San Francisco and have been married for close to 25 years.

Ken Jones and Helen Horvath met as firefighters in the 1990s and have been married close to 25 years.
Blue Shield deemed firefighter ineligible for immunotherapy
Blue Shield of California, which administers Jones’ Medicare Advantage plan, declined NBC Bay Area’s interview request.
In a denial letter to Jones, Blue Shield acknowledged the immunotherapy prescribed by Jones’ doctor is FDA approved and abides by Medicare guidelines, but only when it is used early as a “first-line therapy” following a cancer diagnosis. A Blue Shield oncologist and an independent reviewer, paid by Medicare, determined Jones is ineligible because he already underwent other types of treatments for his cancer.
“Sometimes though, there’s gray area in medicine,” said Dr. Matthew Gubens, an oncologist treating Jones. “There are gray areas and edge cases among our patients where those guidelines just don’t apply, where the data aren’t as robust, and we have to make clinical decisions in the clinic on the ground.”
Gubens, who heads UC San Francisco’s Thoracic Medical Oncology Clinic, says he is quite familiar with medical guidelines as someone who helped craft them. Gubens serves on an elite panel with the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, a self-described “not-for-profit alliance of 33 leading cancer centers.” Its guidelines for how to best treat cancer patients are widely used globally by hospitals, doctors, and insurance companies.
Dr. Matthew Gubens is Ken Jones’ oncologist and serves as medical director for UC San Francisco’s Thoracic Medical Oncology Clinic.
Oncologist blames denial on “misinterpretation” of medical guidelines
Gubens says his request for immunotherapy should be considered a continuation of Jones’ initial treatment, since it was never completed. Jones started chemo and immunotherapy last year, but his doctors urged him to stop ahead of schedule in order to try new medical trials.
“His first-line medication was interrupted,” said Horvath, who is also a registered nurse. “They thought he had a better chance with the clinical trial medication.”
The experimental drugs, however, were unable to halt the cancer’s progression as much as everyone had hoped. As a result, Jones’ medical team decided to turn back to chemo combined with immunotherapy. Then, came Blue Shield’s rejection.
The ‘appeal’ phone number that led nowhere
Gubens decided to protest the decision by calling the designated “appeal” phone number listed on Blue Shield’s denial letter. After spending hours on the telephone, however, he says he was never able to connect with the appropriate person.
“I reached people who apologized, but they weren’t the right place to send the appeal to, and often referred me back to the first person I talked to,” Gubens told the Investigative Unit. “That day, I spent about three hours calling different phone numbers for this insurance company.”
Blue Shield would not comment on why the phone number listed on its denial letter did not lead to the correct person.
Gubens, ultimately, submitted his appeal in writing to Blue Shield but it was denied.
In its denial letter to Ken Jones, Blue Shield listed a phone number to lodge an appeal, but Jones’ oncologist said after dialing in, no one on the other line was ever able to connect him with an appropriate person to complete the appeals process.
“It’s very clear what the insurance company is doing,” Horvath said. “They’re trying to limit their costs, and they are doing that by interpreting Medicare rules in a very strict and impersonal way.”
In a statement, Blue Shield said its “medical reviews follow clinical guidelines and are not based on cost.” A spokesperson for the insurer also wrote, “our hearts go out to individuals and their families who are facing a cancer diagnosis or navigating treatment.”
Medical reviews follow clinical guidelines and are not based on cost.
Blue Shield spokesperson
“Who says ‘no’ to somebody with stage four lung cancer?” said Rachel Jones, Ken Jones’ daughter who is also registered nurse. She says she initially believed the denial must have been some kind of clerical error.
“I really did,” she said. “To me saying ‘no’ is saying, ‘I’m okay with you dying.’
A tearful Rachel Jones says Blue Shield’s denial of the immunotherapy prescribed for her father took an emotional and physical toll on her and her entire family.
San Francisco health oversight board urged to intervene
Last month, Rachel Jones took her disbelief to government officials.
“Today, I’m forced to stand here and beg because an insurance company has decided that profits matter more than the life of a man who spent his career protecting this city,” she said while speaking at a Jan. 8 public meeting for the city’s health oversight board.
As Ken Jones sat masked in the back row, lines of people urged the Health Service Board to intervene since it contracted with Blue Shield to provide insurance coverage for nearly 30,000 city employees and retirees, including Jones.
Former San Francisco Fire Chief Jeanine Nicholson says when she was diagnosed with cancer about a decade ago, Ken Jones drove her to her medical appointments for six months.
Former fire chief blames Blue Shield for ‘hastening’ firefighter’s death
“They are hastening his death,” Jeanine Nicholson said while at the podium, who served roughly five years as San Francisco’s fire chief until she retired in late 2024. “Firefighters, whether active or retired, should never have to beg for their lives.”
Firefighters, whether active or retired, should never have to beg for their lives.
Jeanine Nicholson, former San Francisco Fire Chief
When Nicholson was diagnosed with cancer more than a decade ago, she said it was Ken Jones who drove her to her medical appointments for six months.
“He’s the kind of safety net that a lot of different kinds of people can talk to,” said Horvath, Jones’ wife. “He’s able to talk to everybody.”
San Francisco Mayor Daniel Lurie stands alongside Helen Horvath on the steps of City Hall at a rally organized in support of Ken Jones.
Mayor Lurie weighs into insurance debate
That may help explain why so many firefighters decided to rally in his honor last month on the steps of City Hall. While Jones was too sick to show up, his family, friends, and even the mayor did all the talking for him.
“We got to make sure we take care of you,” Mayor Daniel Lurie told the crowd of firefighters during the Jan. 16 rally. “We as a city have to look out for each other.”
We as a city have to look out for each other.
Mayor Lurie, speaking at a rally organized in support of Ken Jones
Blue Shield ultimately approved an alternative treatment for Jones that included chemo but not immunotherapy. Gubens said his patient needs both.
“We are losing ground,” he said. “Any of our cancer treatments are harder to give and less effective, the weaker a patient is when we’re seeing them.”
According to Gubens, the appeals process wasted precious time.
“Our system is complex and it’s not easy to navigate,” said Monica Bryant, the co-founder and Chief Mission Officer of Triage Cancer, a nonprofit group that helps educate patients and physicians on the insurance approval and appeals process.
“We’ve been told in the past, dealing with the practical pieces, like health insurance and navigating your rights at work, is sometimes even harder than dealing with the physical aspects of a cancer diagnosis.”
Bryant, a cancer rights attorney who created the organization alongside her sister, grew up seeing the impact of cancer since both her parents were in the medical field focused on cancer research.
“People shouldn’t end up in financial ruin just because an insurance company denies their care,” she said. “If someone does get a denial, they shouldn’t take no for an answer.”
Since 2012, Triage Cancer has provided in-person and online educational events to more than 500,000 people across all 50 states, DC, Guam, Puerto Rico, and Canada.
“We are definitely hearing it from the healthcare professionals that we train that they are spending more and more of their time on prior authorizations and denials.“

Monica Bryant is the co-founder and Chief Mission Officer for Triage Cancer, which provides free education to patients, caregivers, and medical staff on how to best navigate the insurance approval process.
Doctors increasingly dealing with denials
Physicians, with the help of their staff, each spend an average of 13 hours a week on the insurance approval process, according to a survey by the American Medical Association.
“If they’re spending more time on paperwork, they’re spending less time with patients,” Bryant said. “I think we can probably all agree that that’s not the direction we want our healthcare system to go in.”
If they’re spending more time on paperwork, they’re spending less time with patients.
Monica Bryant, co-founder of Triage Cancer, speaking about the increasing demand on medical teams to spend more time navigating the insurance approval process on behalf of their patients
Advocates say denials and even delays can often force patients to forgo medical care or go into debt trying to pay for it.
About 80 percent of physicians say denials or delays in the insurance process ‘sometimes, often,’ or even ‘always’ lead to patients paying for their own care out of pocket, according to the same American Medical Association survey.
“It’s painful especially because of how unnecessary it is,” said Horvath, Jones’ wife. “The suffering of cancer is part of the human condition, but the suffering from insurance struggles is completely unnecessary pain.”
Ken Jones Ken Jones Ken Jones recently underwent a round of immunotherapy after an online fundraiser garnered the $50,000 needed to pay for the treatment.

The unbearable cost
An online fundraiser for Ken Jones managed to raise more than $50,000 to get him a round of the immunotherapy his insurance refused to pay for. However, his doctor says to see lasting progress, Jones would need to repeat the medication every three weeks for up to two years, at a cost of more than $1.7 million dollars – money the family doesn’t have.
But that doesn’t seem to be what worries Jones the most. He says he is speaking up to continue what he spent his entire career doing – looking out for others while sounding the alarm.
“I hate to see other people having to go through this,” Jones said tearfully. “You don’t stop just caring about other people just because you’re having a hard time.”
Contact The Investigative Unit
submit tips | 1-888-996-TIPS | e-mail Bigad
San Francisco, CA
What’s Worth More Than Cash in San Francisco Real Estate? Anthropic Stock
Few things are more valuable in the Bay Area than real estate. In San Francisco, the median house price is now over $2 million. Last month, at least seven houses in the city sold for $1 million over the asking price, and buyers regularly offer to pay in cash or waive contingencies to stay competitive. Yet there is one thing that remains even more valuable than a house, and possibly more valuable than money itself: stock in Anthropic or OpenAI.
Last week, 160 Noe Street, an Edwardian home in San Francisco’s desirable Duboce Triangle neighborhood, was listed for sale at $2.9 million—or the equivalent amount in Anthropic or OpenAI shares, as based on those companies’ current valuations. Rachel Swann, the listing agent, says she was inspired to set these unusual terms after meeting several Anthropic employees at an open house for a different property. “These people have a lot of paper wealth, but they don’t always have the liquidity to do things they want,” Swann says. Some of these employees were expecting to come into as much as $50 million from their Anthropic shares, and wondered if they could use that as leverage to buy a house, according to Swann. “This kept coming up over and over again.”
Swann’s listing is unconventional, but not singular. In April, an investment banker named Storm Duncan offered to exchange his Mill Valley home and an adjacent parcel of land for Anthropic shares. And in May, Vijay Chattha, who owns an agency that does PR for tech companies, listed his Healdsburg home for $2.5 million, or $2 million in Anthropic stock. “I want to sell my house, and I want to invest in Anthropic,” Chattha says. “Why not combine the two?
Chattha’s house—a three bed, three bath with a pool and a bocce court in a part of Sonoma County that abuts some of the region’s most famous wineries—also comes with coveted short-term rental status, allowing the owner to list it on platforms like Airbnb. Only a handful of properties in Healdsburg come with that status, and only about a dozen come up for sale in a given year.
Chattha is offering a $500,000 discount to Anthropic employees because he believes the value of Anthropic shares will grow faster than any other investment, and his vacation home in wine country is the best bargaining chip he has to try to access them. “If you look at Anthropic’s growth last year, it’s insane,” he says, noting the $380 billion valuation the company claimed in February. “Now they’re raising at $965 billion. That’s three X in like three months.” He added that he was open to exchanging the house for shares in Anthropic, but not OpenAI, because he prefers using Anthropic’s products.
The real estate listings come at a time when investors are salivating at the record-high valuations of Anthropic and OpenAI, and even those considered wealthy by Bay Area standards are feeling FOMO about the affluence that could come from these companies’ debuts on the stock market. (On Monday, Anthropic submitted paperwork for its initial public offering; OpenAI is also reportedly preparing to file in the coming months.) Despite the unprecedented valuations of these companies, many people believe their stock prices will only go up, and that anyone who gets a piece now could win the jackpot.
People are clamoring to buy equity in OpenAI and Anthropic on the secondary market, leading to a frenzy of transactions that may or may not be legitimate. As a result, Anthropic updated its policy around “unauthorized Anthropic stock sales” this spring, which notes that “if someone purports to sell Anthropic shares without proper board approval, that transaction is invalid.” A spokesperson for Anthropic pointed back to this policy when asked about the possibility of exchanging company shares for real estate.
San Francisco, CA
Live Updates: San Francisco Primary Election 2026
Welcome to our running tally of Election Night results. Or, as this is California, well beyond tonight, as results continue to trickle in.
The first batch of results should arrive at 8:45 p.m., with three more to follow tonight. The Department of Elections has the breakdown.
San Francisco is voting in three special elections, for District 2 and District 4 supervisors and for a Board of Education member. Both supervisor races are referendums on housing, especially District 2, while the main backdrop of the D4 race is all the hot feelings around the fate of the Sunset Dunes Park (nee Great Highway).
The winners of all three special races will have to compete again in November for their seats.
Keeping it local, SF is also voting on four ballot measures. Prop A is for a bond to pay for an emergency water-system. B is for term limits. C and D are dueling measures related to the “overpaid CEO” tax. (Links go to our reporting on each race or issue; or click here for our Election 2026 page.)
Vote local, think national: Which two candidates will advance to the November election to replace Nancy Pelosi?
Statewide races include the primaries for governor, education superintendent, lieutenant governor, and much more.
Polls close soon. If you haven’t voted yet, find your polling station here.
Tuesday, June 2, 5:40 p.m.
Two and a half hours until our polls close. Before we go down the local rabbit hole, a reminder that other states have primary action today: New Jersey, Iowa, New Mexico, South Dakota, and Montana.
Why does it take so long to get results in California? CalMatters has you covered on that story. We shouldn’t expect a call tonight on the governor’s race.
The last big election was November 5, 2024. (Remember?) Ten days later, there were still races to call in San Francisco.
So if you’re waiting for the pundits (and maybe even us) to tell you What It All Means, you might have to wait a while.
More from The Frisc…
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco voters to decide on dueling measures on Top Executive Pay Tax changes
San Francisco voters weighed in Tuesday on two competing measures that seek to change the Top Executive Pay Tax, with one of the measures also including a change to the Gross Receipts Tax.
Should both measures pass, the one with the most votes will take effect, according to the propositions’ legal text.
Currently, the measures state that most businesses with San Francisco gross receipts up to $5 million are exempt from the Gross Receipts Tax. And businesses that use more than half of their city payroll for in-house administrative and management services pay an Administrative Office Tax instead of a Gross Receipts Tax.
The Top Executive Pay Tax is a tax some large businesses pay if their highest-paid managerial employee earns more than 100 times the median pay of their San Francisco employees. Businesses that have city gross receipts up to $5 million and are not subject to the Administrative Office Tax are exempt.
Proposition C
Proposition C states it would increase the number of businesses that could be exempt from the Gross Receipts Tax and would stop any further increases to the “Top Executive Pay Tax” after a final rate bump.
The proposed measure says it would raise the Gross Receipts Tax exemption ceiling to $7.5 million. The $7.5 million ceiling would also apply to the Top Executive Pay Tax exemption.
As for changes to the Top Executive Pay Tax, Proposition C states it would implement the 2028 tax rate increase in 2027, but then stop any future increases.
Supporting Proposition C are Rodney Fong, CEO of the San Francisco Chamber of Commerce, and Chris Wright, senior vice president of Advance SF, an organization of companies, which includes Bank of America, OpenAI, Waymo, the SF Giants CEO and others.
Fong and Wright, in their argument for the measure, say giving businesses more tax breaks would help keep more employees on payroll and would give companies the ability to “contribute to city services in a predictable and balanced way.”
Critics of Proposition C, such as the San Francisco Tenants Union, slam the measure as “billionaire-backed” and argue it would kill the Top Executive Pay Tax and would hand out more tax breaks to businesses at a time when the city is in a budget deficit and faces cuts to essential services.
Proposition D
Proposition D also seeks to change the Top Executive Pay Tax, which is collected from some large businesses where the highest-paid managerial employee earns more than 100 times the median compensation paid to other employees.
If approved, the measure would change the calculation of the tax using the compensation of all employees, not just employees based in San Francisco. Top Executive Pay Tax rates would also be increased for San Francisco gross receipts and payroll.
Supporters have billed the measure as a way to counteract federal cuts to Medicaid. A report by the City Controller’s Office said the measure could result in $250 million to $300 million in additional revenue.
“Proposition D is the solution to our budget deficit. It asks large corporations — not small businesses, not working families — to contribute a little more,” supporters said in the city’s official voter guide.
The measure has the backing of most of the Board of Supervisors, along with labor unions and Rep. Nancy Pelosi.
Opponents, including Mayor Daniel Lurie and state Sen. Scott Wiener, have argued Proposition D would negatively impact the city’s recovery following the COVID-19 pandemic.
“San Francisco is already one of the most expensive cities in the country to live and do business. Adding extreme and unpredictable tax increases risks driving employers away just as we are trying to bring jobs, workers, and foot traffic back downtown,” said Supervisor Matt Dorsey in the city’s voter guide.
-
Los Angeles, Ca41 minutes agoCalifornia primary election results: governor and L.A. mayor races
-
Detroit, MI1 hour agoAnother bribery scandal hits Detroit. It involves the People Mover
-
San Francisco, CA1 hour agoWhat’s Worth More Than Cash in San Francisco Real Estate? Anthropic Stock
-
Dallas, TX1 hour agoDallas weighs $500 million‑plus repair plans as City Hall’s future comes up for debate
-
Miami, FL1 hour agoMiami biotech executive was followed into his condo by man who allegedly threw him from 25th floor
-
Boston, MA1 hour ago
What a World Cup ‘fan zone’ is and what Boston fans can expect in 2026
-
Denver, CO2 hours agoDefensive lineman Jordan Miller has a tough battle to make the Broncos’ final 53-man roster
-
Seattle, WA2 hours agoVIDEO: Mayor Wilson proposes renewing, expanding Seattle Transit Measure by doubling the sales-tax percentage that funds it.





