Connect with us

San Diego, CA

Servicemembers can request to carry personal firearms on military bases, Hegseth announces

Published

on

Servicemembers can request to carry personal firearms on military bases, Hegseth announces


Uniformed servicemembers can request to carry their personal firearms on military installations, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said in a video posted to social media Thursday, sparking mixed reaction from veterans in a community that’s at the center of the mental health conversation and knows weapons better than anyone else.

“The War Department’s uniformed service members are trained at the highest and unwavering standards,” Hegseth said. “These warfighters, entrusted with the safety of our nation, are no less entitled to exercise their God given right to keep and bear arms than any other American.”

“Our warfighters defend the right of others to carry. They should be able to carry themselves,” he continued, signing a memo on camera that he said would direct installation commanders to allow requests “with the presumption that it is necessary for personal protection.”

Previously, privately owned firearms had to be kept off base or in some places, approved for storage in the armory.

Advertisement

Representatives for San Diego bases – including Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, Marine Corps Air Station Miramar, Marine Corps Recruit Depot San Diego and Naval Air Station North Island – pointed inquiries on how those requests would be processed and how the new policy would be implemented to the Pentagon, which has released few details beyond Hegseth’s announcement.

A release from the department said the memo makes the undersecretary of war for intelligence and security responsible for updating the manual that lays out physical security measures and will authorize officials to review those requests.

“If a request is for some reason denied, the reason for that denial will be in writing and will explain — in detail — the basis for that direction,” Hegseth said. 

He pointed to incidents on bases, including  a deadly shooting last August at Fort Stewart in Georgia, and another at a New Mexico Air Force base last month, as motivation in part for the policy change.

“In these instances, minutes are a lifetime, and our servicemembers have the courage and training to make those precious short minutes count,” Hegseth said.

Advertisement

The change inspired mixed reaction from veterans, much like the national gun debate in a microcosm: some believed it would offer more protection while others worried shootings and suicides would rise.

“I believe this is a step in the right direction for safety,” said Marine Corps veteran Lance Gilson, who spent more than six years at Camp Pendleton.

“There were a lot of times where I thought about, you know what, if something happened right here, right now, is the military police going to be able to respond quick enough?” he said.

“It is my job to protect not only myself, but the others around me and ones who can’t protect themselves,” Gilson continued. “On military bases, it’s not just military personnel. You have civilians, families that live there. And if you’re not able to respond to them in time, you know, that to me is a concerning feeling — knowing that I can respond but I don’t have the tools necessary to be able to effectively respond in that timely manner.”

“I will definitely be more on edge,” said Navy veteran Ryan McCullough, who owned a handgun before he enlisted, storing it with his parents for his five years on base. He said he never felt he needed his personal weapon and was comforted by the fact that no one else had one. “You start hearing stories about soldiers having weapons at boot camp and turning on their own people. You’re like, ‘Oh, there’s a reason why they disarm these people on the base.’”

Advertisement

“I’m not just, you know, a purple hair, left-wing, somebody from California that … wants more gun control,” he said. “There were guards 24-7, right, making the rounds. There was people within your battalion checking on you. So I felt more safe there than I had ever felt before, which is surprising because I thought, ‘Okay, at home, I feel the most safe with my weapon.’”

And after a Navy buddy committed suicide with a firearm a few years ago, McCullough said he worries about more weapons on base, cautioning civilians who may cheer the change.

“It’s different for that person to own a weapon than it is for somebody who just got trained to kill and has lots of things going on and lots more stresses than you,” McCullough said.

“That does concern me, but I do hope that there’s going to be a vetted process whenever they do go through it,” Gilson said of the suicide risk. “Especially mental health check-up, and I think that the leaders will be able to gauge that pretty well, especially at the junior level. And I think that will help mitigate any further suicides, and I pray.”

Advertisement



Source link

San Diego, CA

Opinion: Clinical trials saved my life — California shouldn’t put them at risk

Published

on

Opinion: Clinical trials saved my life — California shouldn’t put them at risk


A woman learns about clinical research studies at a nonprofit event. (File photo courtesy of CISCRP)

In 2022, my wife and I were ready to take the next step to start a family. Like many people, I began with a simple step: checking in with a doctor to make sure everything was on track with my health. I never imagined that visit would uncover a diagnosis that could take both my future and my life. And I certainly didn’t expect that my survival would depend on access to a clinical trial.

Opinion logo

Three years ago, I was diagnosed with Lynch Syndrome, an inherited genetic condition that significantly increases the risk of colorectal and other cancers. Shortly after, a colonoscopy revealed a mass in my rectum. Because of a specific biomarker linked to my condition, I qualified for a groundbreaking clinical trial.

That trial changed everything.

Instead of enduring chemotherapy, radiation and invasive surgery, I received an innovative therapy. Within three months, the mass was undetectable. What could have been a devastating, life-altering medical journey became something entirely different.

Advertisement

Stories like mine are only possible because clinical trials exist, and because the system that supports them works.

Today, that system is at risk.

California lawmakers are considering Assembly Bill 1776, legislation intended to strengthen antitrust enforcement. But as written, the bill could unintentionally disrupt the cross-sector collaborations that make clinical trials possible. It expands the state’s authority to challenge business practices deemed “anticompetitive,” creating new uncertainty for the partnerships between researchers, hospitals and innovators that drive medical progress.

In biomedical research, collaboration is foundational, not optional. The same relationships that might raise concerns in other industries are often essential to developing new treatments and bringing them to patients through clinical trials.

California leads the world in clinical research, with thousands of trials actively recruiting patients across the state. These studies are not theoretical – they are where new therapies are tested, refined and delivered to people who need them most like me. 

Advertisement

If AB 1776 disrupts the clinical trial pipeline, the consequences will be profound. Fewer clinical trials, slower research, and reduced access to cutting-edge treatments could become the new reality. For those of us facing rare or life-threatening conditions, time is not a luxury. Treatment delays can mean the difference between life and death.

I am one of the fortunate ones. My condition was caught early. A clinical trial was available. The treatment worked. 

But not everyone will be so lucky if policies like AB 1776 unintentionally undermine the very system that made my recovery possible. I urge California lawmakers to reject AB 1776 and protect the clinical trials that save lives every day. 

Jessica Acosta is a patient advocate who lives in San Diego. 



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

San Diego, CA

San Marcos fire forces hundreds to evacuate

Published

on

San Marcos fire forces hundreds to evacuate


A brush fire in San Marcos forced hundreds of families to evacuate their homes Sunday afternoon.

It happened near the Cal State San Marcos campus in the 500 Block of La Moree Road.

“I was at home when an amazing sheriff literally pounded on the door, broke in, grabbed me, grabbed my dogs and said…you’ve got to get out of here. Fire is behind your house,” Daun Everforest said.

Everforest was among hundreds of families evacuated to Mission Hills High School after a brush fire threatened their homes Sunday afternoon.

Advertisement

Neighbors said the fire came really close to homes on the nearby hillside.

“My daughter came running into our back bedroom and she said mom you’ve got to come there’s a fire on the hill,” Angel Martinez said.

“I stepped outside and I saw just everything was just blazing,” Ethan Ochoa, another neighbor said.

San Marcos Fire Department said crews responded to a call about a brush fire at around 3p.m. Sunday afternoon.

The first unit on scene found the fire spread out to about one acre with the heavy fuels.

Advertisement

A division fire marshal told NBC 7 the brush fire prompted a large response, with at least 30 fire engines, air support from Cal Fire, and Sheriff’s Deputies on the ground to help with evacuations.

Hand crews were able to establish fuel break to stop the fire from spreading and several firefighters stuck around to mop up hot spots.

Fire investigators said no one was injured, but one storage container was damaged.  

Neighbors are thankful firefighters acted quickly to stop the flames.

“I’m so grateful for you guys,” Daun Everforest said.

Advertisement

Fire crews were able to stop the forward rate of spread at 1.93 acres. at around 4 p.m.

Neighbors like Angel said this is a great reminder to always have a plan in case a fire starts in your neighborhood.

“Know your area”… “Read up on safety and get your to-go bags ready,” she said.

Investigators are looking into the possible cause of the fire.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

San Diego, CA

Lincoln High School honors Olympic legend Jackie Thompson

Published

on

Lincoln High School honors Olympic legend Jackie Thompson


SAN DIEGO (FOX 5/KUSI) — Lincoln High School students and community members are coming together this coming week to honor local Olympic legend Jackie Thompson.

Thompson competed at the Summer Olympic Games back in 1972 in the 200-meter sprint. She joined KUSI in-studio on Sunday, reflecting fondly on her time at the games that were held in Munich (see interview above).

This week, Lincoln High School will be hosting a track meet at their newly redone track where they will be hosting a ribbon cutting and dedicating the track to Thompson. The event will begin at 2 p.m. on Thursday, April 9.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending