Connect with us

San Diego, CA

Court upholds verdict for former news anchor Sandra Maas in KUSI’s appeal of equal pay lawsuit

Published

on

Court upholds verdict for former news anchor Sandra Maas in KUSI’s appeal of equal pay lawsuit


A San Diego appeals court on Tuesday upheld the judgment and what amounted to a $1.775 million award to former news anchor Sandra Maas, who sued the company that previously owned KUSI, alleging it violated equal pay laws by paying her significantly less than her co-anchor.

The opinion comes nearly three years after a San Diego Superior Court jury also found for Maas in her whistleblower claim, in which she argued that her contract was not renewed because she pushed back for the pay disparity.

McKinnon Broadcasting Co., which had owned KUSI when Maas worked there, had challenged the verdict on various grounds, “none of which we find persuasive. We affirm the judgment,” reads the opinion issued Tuesday from the 4th District Court of Appeal, Division 1.

Maas’ attorney, Josh Gruenberg, said in an email Tuesday that the appellate court “confirmed that the jury’s findings were supported by substantial evidence and that the process was impartial and sound.” He called the opinion “a true celebration of equal pay rights and of a judicial system that holds firm — even on appeal.”

Advertisement

“Most importantly, it brings long-overdue closure to a grueling chapter in Sandra Maas’s life,” Gruenberg said. “It takes courage to come forward, and even greater courage to withstand the blocks and tackles that followed in this case.”

Attorneys for McKinnon did not immediately respond to an email requesting comment.

According to arguments and evidence in the 2023 trial, Maas was paid a lower annual salary than male co-anchor Allen Denton during their years anchoring the TV station’s flagship newscast. In 2010, when they first teamed up, she was paid $120,000 annually, and he made $200,000.

When he retired, in 2019, his annual salary was $245,000. Hers was $180,000. That same year, Maas left the station. Maas’ attorney told the jury that when Maas asked for equal compensation, her contract ultimately was not renewed.

Pam Vallero, one of Maas’ attorneys, told the jury in opening statements of the four-week trial that the two anchors had sat “side by side at the same news desk, reading from the same teleprompter, anchoring the same newscast, but paid significantly different by KUSI.” That, she told the jury, “is why we are here.”

Advertisement

The attorney for KUSI told the jury during opening statements that Maas had been “paid fairly for her work in light of her experience, in light of her work ethic, attitude and overall value.”

Maas’ counsel argued that she had worked in broadcast television for 33 years, compared to Denton’s 37 years on TV. KUSI’s attorney said Denton had 48 years of experience, counting 11 years in radio before jumping to TV.

Maas, who worked at CBS 8 in San Diego in the 1990s, started at KUSI as a morning anchor in 2004. Denton, who had worked in the Bay Area, joined KUSI in 2010.

Aside from upholding the verdict, the appeals court on Tuesday also upheld the award of more than $2.3 million for Maas’ attorneys fees.

Advertisement



Source link

San Diego, CA

Hector Estevane – San Diego Union-Tribune

Published

on

Hector Estevane – San Diego Union-Tribune



Hector Estevane


OBITUARY

It is with deep sorrow that I announce the passing of Hector F Estevane. Hector was born in Miami, AZ and passed away on March 16, 2026 in Lincoln, NE at the age of 98. Hector was surrounded by family and friends.

In the sacred silence, Hector was released into the light where his spirit will live on…knowing his time on earth was well served and complete.

Advertisement

Hector’s interment will be at Holy Cross Cemetery, 4470 Hilltop Dr., San Diego, CA 92102 on May 1, 2026 at 10:00 am. Rest in Peace Dad. I love you, cre



Source link

Continue Reading

San Diego, CA

San Diego Manager Gives Stone-Cold Response to Hirving Lozano Return Speculations

Published

on

San Diego Manager Gives Stone-Cold Response to Hirving Lozano Return Speculations


San Diego FC manager Mickey Varas emphatically shut the door on any potential U-turn regarding the club’s decision to separate record-signing Hirving Lozano from the team’s 2026 plans.

It’s been a difficult start for San Diego’s sophomore season in Major League Soccer. Winless in their last six matches, the 2025 Western Conference finalists are currently sitting 10th in the conference standings. A player of Lozano’s caliber could theoretically help San Diego end their slump, but when asked about El Chuky’s potential return to the pitch, Varas had an unequivocal two-word response.

“No chance,” he said.

Advertisement

Two words are all it took for Varas to once again confirm that, under his watch, the Chuky Lozano era in San Diego is over.

Advertisement

What Happened Between San Diego and Lozano?

Mickey Varas (left) and Hirving Lozano’s relationship fractured. | Steph Chambers/Getty Images
Advertisement

San Diego announced in January that Lozano was not part of the team’s plans for 2026 and encouraged him to look for a new team during the winter window. Lozano, who was the club’s first ever Designated Player signing, was cast aside after only one season, but why?

Advertisement

“It’s not worth getting into details,” Varas said about the situation in January. “This is a decision that was made based on an analysis of the whole year. This wasn’t just one thing that happened or something that happened at the end of the year.

“There were many things that we analyzed for us to decide we don’t fit together. This isn’t judging us as a club or him as a player, it’s simply saying that it’s not a good fit and what’s best for us is to continue without him.”

Lozano—still contracted with the MLS side through the 2028 season—has spent the entirety of 2026 training by himself, separated from his teammates, evidenced by recurring posts on his social media.

Cracks in Varas and Lozano’s relationship started at the tail-end of last season. The Mexico international was benched for the final game of the regular and one playoff match for a reported altercation with the manager, centered around the decision to substitute him at halftime in a previous outing. Disciplinary issues have been common for Lozano throughout his career.

Advertisement

The relationship between the pair fractured to a point of no return, and that’s widely regarded as the main reason for the current situation.

Advertisement

Lozano had offers to leave the club this winter, but the player refused to relinquish the fourth-highest salary in MLS, even if that meant giving up on the opportunity to represent Mexico in his third career World Cup this summer.

But with Varas doubling-down on his decision to do without Lozano, the saga will continue into the coming months.

Advertisement

Important Summer for San Diego, Lozano

El Chucky still has plenty left to offer 30-years-old. | Orlando Ramirez/Getty Images
Advertisement

The summer transfer window represents the next potential opportunity for Lozano and San Diego to go their separate ways.

Advertisement

The club could certainly use Lozano’s DP spot to target a high-caliber reinforcement, and finding a new home would allow El Chucky to get his career back on track considering he hasn’t played a single minute since Nov. 2025; however, the 30-year-old’s reluctancy to waive his lucrative salary could continue unless San Diego offers him a juicy payout.

The player seems unbothered by the situation. If Lozano has already surrendered his World Cup hopes in favor of his salary, then evidence suggests he’d have no issue continuing this way.

Alternatively, if San Diego’s struggles continue, and Varas can’t correct course, then it’s not out of the question that his manager job could potentially be at stake—especially with Lozano’s situation casting a dark cloud on the team’s season. If a new manager were to come in, then it’s not unrealistic to assume Lozano could be granted a second chance.

This last scenario is perhaps the least likely, meaning once again, Lozano and San Diego will have to make a decision on what the future holds this summer. The player has all the leverage, but how long can he continue training by himself before he decides enough is enough?

Advertisement


READ THE LATEST MLS NEWS, ANALYSIS AND INSIGHT FROM SI FC

Advertisement
Add us as a preferred source on Google





Source link

Continue Reading

San Diego, CA

Early morning beach volleyball sessions face city tickets in South Mission Beach

Published

on

Early morning beach volleyball sessions face city tickets in South Mission Beach


SAN DIEGO (FOX 5/KUSI) — For more than six decades now, South Mission Beach in San Diego has been the epicenter for Southern California Beach Volleyball.

Starting in 1965, when the nets first went up, pros and amateurs alike have been fine-tuning their skills from sunrise to sunset.

“This is the only time of day we can practice and play. Most of us work and have busy lives, so the mornings are the only time we can play, and have been for decades”, says Nathaniel Hentchel.

But as it turns out, the sunset sessions at South Mission Beach Volleyball Courts are not allowed, and never have been. Officially, the city courts do not open until 8:00 a.m. But after decades of zero enforcement, the city is suddenly threatening to issue tickets to anyone playing before that time.

Advertisement

“You know these courts have been used every morning for decades. A lot of people out here are shaking their heads, wondering why now. We don’t make noise; we clean up after ourselves. We understand the 8:00 a.m. start time. But it’s never been enforced until now,” says Richard Bailey.

According to the city, the sudden crackdown is the result of noise complaints from nearby homeowners and vacation renters. Many of the homes around here are short-term rentals. They also say it’s never been allowed, even though it happens every morning of every week and has for decades.

“To suddenly enforce it now, why? This is a cultural tradition here in San Diego. Believe me, there’s a lot more noise out here every morning than volleyball players,” says Anne Luempert.

“That’s louder than anything we do out here. Those airplanes are so loud, we have to pause our games just to hear the score called out,” says Barbara Birnbaum.

As a tight-knit culture, there is a certain amount of self policing out here. Including posted signs stating no music until 9:00 a.m., enforced by the players themselves.

Advertisement

So with the threat of losing a lifelong cultural tradition, a movement has begun within the community to change the rules and protect the precious morning tradition.

“So I started a petition on Change.Org to change the rules. We put it up two days ago and got 1,400 signatures in the first day. We now have almost 2,000. We want to have the city change the rules to reflect our community. Part of those rules will be no music until after 9:00 a.m.”

The volleyball groups have also reached out to city council members, hoping they will officially change the hours to reflect reality.

But ironically, these rules only apply to city-owned courts.

If you bring your own poles and a volleyball net, you can play from sunset to sunrise on nearby courts, and no one will harass you.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending