Connect with us

Oregon

Oregon study finds no clear link between mRNA vaccines and sudden cardiac deaths in young people

Published

on

Oregon study finds no clear link between mRNA vaccines and sudden cardiac deaths in young people


In a recent study published in the Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR), a group of researchers investigated the association between messenger Ribonucleic Acid (mRNA) coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination and sudden cardiac death in Oregon residents aged 16–30 years between June 2021 and December 2022.

Study: Assessment of Risk for Sudden Cardiac Death Among Adolescents and Young Adults After Receipt of COVID-19 Vaccine — Oregon, June 2021–December 2022. Image Credit: wacomka / Shutterstock

Background 

In December 2020, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) authorized two mRNA COVID-19 vaccines, initially allocated to healthcare workers and long-term care residents in the United States (U.S.) and later to older adults and those with high-risk conditions, before including healthy young individuals. By April 2021, all Oregonians aged ≥16 were eligible. Shortly afterward, reports emerged of myocarditis, especially in young males, with incidences estimated at 2.13 per 100,000, rising to 10.69 among young males in Israel. These cases were generally mild, with quick recoveries post-hospitalization. Despite no fatal myocarditis reports in Oregon to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), sudden deaths among young athletes raised concerns, necessitating further research to clarify any vaccine linkage.

About the study 

Under Oregon law, each death must have a completed death certificate maintained in a system that meets the data-quality standards set by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) ‘s National Center for Health Statistics, including rigorous quality assurance reviews. Although there is no independent verification for the completeness of death certificate reporting, data on Oregon residents who die outside the state are also gathered through interstate agreements. Additionally, the ALERT Immunization Information System (IIS), which serves as Oregon’s comprehensive immunization registry, required mandatory reporting of all COVID-19 vaccinations during the pandemic.

Advertisement

In an effort to examine the occurrence of sudden cardiac deaths possibly related to recent COVID-19 vaccination, researchers analyzed Oregon’s death certificate database. They focused on identifying individuals aged 16-30 who died between June 1, 2021, and December 31, 2022, and whose cause of death included terms such as “sudden death,” asystole,” “cardiac arrest,” “unknown,” “undetermined,” or “pending,” “arrhythmia,” and “myocarditis.” For those cases where a cardiac cause was likely, the team cross-referenced with the ALERT IIS to check if the deceased had received an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine within 100 days before their death. The analysis also considered gender differences in the findings. This investigation was carried out by the Oregon Health Authority, which stated that the activity was not research but was conducted in accordance with federal law and state policy.

Study results 

During the period from June 2021 to December 2022, in Oregon, a total of 1,292 deaths were recorded among individuals aged 16 to 30 years, with males comprising 72% (925) and females 28% (367) of the deceased.

For the male decedents, none of the death certificates identified vaccination as either an immediate or contributing cause of death. COVID-19 was mentioned as a cause in 17 (2%) of the male deaths. The majority of male deaths, 842 (91%), were attributed to noncardiac causes or other conditions. However, in 66 (7%) of the cases, excluding a cardiac cause was not possible based on the information on the death certificates. Within this subset, vaccination records were available for 58 (88%), with 24 (41%) having received at least one dose of an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. Of these 24, two deaths occurred within 100 days post-vaccination. The first involved a male who died from congestive heart failure 21 days after vaccination, with contributing conditions including hypertension, obesity, diabetes, and sleep apnea. The second case, recorded 45 days post-vaccination, was labeled as an undetermined natural cause, with toxicology reports negative for common illegal substances but positive for prescribed medications. The medical examiner could not definitively link or rule out the vaccine as a contributing factor.

Among the female decedents, similarly, no death certificate cited vaccination as a cause. COVID-19 was noted in 13 (4%) cases. The majority, 319 (87%), had noncardiac reasons listed on their death certificates. For the remaining 35 (10%), where a cardiac cause could not be excluded, vaccination records were available for 30 (86%), and 16 (53%) had received at least one mRNA COVID-19 vaccine dose. Only one female, who died four days after receiving her vaccine dose, had her death recorded as natural, with the immediate cause being undetermined but related to chronic respiratory failure due to mitral stenosis.

Advertisement

Conclusions 

To summarize, data from 40 U.S. healthcare systems from January 2021 to January 2022 showed that cardiac complications were significantly more common after COVID-19 infection than post-mRNA vaccination for those aged ≥5 years. In Oregon, from June 2021 to December 2022, of 1,292 deaths among residents aged 16-30, none were definitively linked to cardiac causes shortly after vaccination. During this period, 979,289 vaccine doses were administered to this group. Among 30 COVID-19-attributed deaths, only three had received the vaccine. Nationwide, vaccination is credited with preventing about 3.2 million deaths in its first two years.

Journal reference:

  • Liko J, Cieslak PR. Assessment of Risk for Sudden Cardiac Death Among Adolescents and Young Adults After Receipt of COVID-19 Vaccine — Oregon, June 2021–December 2022. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep (2024), DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7314a5, https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/73/wr/mm7314a5.htm



Source link

Oregon

Donald Trump makes emergency appeal against Oregon National Guard block

Published

on

Donald Trump makes emergency appeal against Oregon National Guard block


The Trump administration’s use of federal law to take control of state National Guard units and deploy them to Oregon and Illinois has triggered a wave of legal challenges that now test the limits of presidential authority in domestic security.

In Oregon, U.S. District Judge Karin Immergut permanently blocked the deployment to Portland, finding after a three-day hearing that the administration failed to meet the statutory requirements of § 12406 and violated the Tenth Amendment.

Newsweek contacted the DOJ and the office of the governors of Illinois and Oregon for comment via email outside of normal office hours on Monday.

Why It Matters

The escalating court battles over President Trump’s federalization of National Guard units in Illinois and Oregon matter because they will determine how far a president can go in deploying military forces inside the United States without state consent.

Advertisement

At stake are the limits of presidential authority under 10 U.S.C. § 12406, the ability of states to control their own Guard units and the degree to which courts can review a president’s judgment in domestic security matters.

The outcomes will set precedent not just for these disputes, but for how future administrations respond to protests, unrest and conflicts with state governments.

What To Know

Oregon At The Center Of The Fight

Oregon is now the central battleground in the fight over President Trump’s authority to federalize and deploy National Guard units under 10 U.S.C. § 12406.

After a three-day hearing, U.S. District Judge Karin Immergut permanently enjoined the administration from deploying any federalized Guard troops to Portland, holding that the President’s actions violated both § 12406 and the Tenth Amendment.

Advertisement

In the government’s emergency stay request now before the Ninth Circuit, federal officials portray Portland as a sustained security crisis, asserting that immigration facilities had “come under coordinated assault by violent groups intent on obstructing lawful federal enforcement action,” and arguing that “violence and threats of violence recurred more-or-less continuously,” including incidents where protesters “started fires,” “assaulted officers” and “hurled mortars at the facility.”

Oregon officials sharply dispute that rationale.

Oregon Governor, Tina Kotek is on record as saying: “I think it’s incredibly dangerous to take our citizen soldiers and to deploy them in our streets, without a real reason. The facts on the ground… do not warrant [this]. There’s not an insurrection. This is not a rebellion. This is not a national security threat,”

She added: “This is a fundamental issue for our democracy, about what the control and authority of the president is, and what the court says it is. The rule of law has to hold,” saying: “This is not a factual need on the ground in Oregon… This is an unlawful militarization of our troops here.”

However, Attorney General Dan Rayfield welcomed the ruling, saying, as per Statesman Journal: “From the start, this case has been about making sure that facts—not political whims—guide how the law is applied,” and insisting that the decision “made it clear that this administration must be accountable to the truth and to the rule of law.”

Advertisement

National Guard In Limbo As States Push Back

Even after the injunction, the Guard remains caught between state and federal authority.

About 200 members of the Oregon National Guard will remain under federal control, as reported by Oregon Capital Chronicle, but cannot yet be deployed to Portland, “…the effect of granting an administrative stay preserves the status quo in which National Guard members have been federalized but not deployed,” the judges wrote.

The Oregon standoff, however, has also drawn national scrutiny.

In an October 7 letter to Texas Governor Greg Abbott, members of Congress warned that cross-state deployments for domestic policing “violate the rule of law” and “set a dangerous precedent that states can police one another’s communities.”

Advertisement

Illinois Case Echoes Oregon—But On Narrower Grounds

Illinois faces a similar but narrower dispute. Unlike Oregon—where the administration attempted to bring in out-of-state Guard units—the Illinois case involves only the attempted federalization of the Illinois National Guard.

The Seventh Circuit is reviewing the administration’s appeal after a district court temporarily blocked federalization of the Illinois National Guard, finding “insufficient evidence of rebellion or a danger of a rebellion” and insufficient evidence that the President was “unable with the regular forces to execute the laws of the United States.”

The court of appeals wrote that “the facts do not justify the President’s actions in Illinois under § 12406.”

Illinois has also presented evidence that local police effectively managed protests near an ICE facility, including an ICE official’s email noting that agents “had not needed to interact with any protesters at all” because state and local officers “were handling everything.”

Advertisement

Across both states, the administration continues to argue that the President’s determinations under § 12406 deserve extraordinary judicial deference.

In a November 10 supplemental brief to the Supreme Court, the Solicitor General’s office asserted that the term “regular forces” refers to “the civilian forces with whom the President regularly executes the relevant laws,” and insisted that courts cannot “second-guess the Commander in Chief’s judgment.”

With appellate proceedings active and the Supreme Court weighing the meaning of “regular forces,” the legal boundaries of presidential power in domestic military deployment remain unsettled and consequential, according to Washington Examiner.

What People Are Saying

Donald Trump/the White House said, as per Military Times: “I am also authorizing Full Force, if necessary.”

Oregon Attorney General Dan Rayfield said in a statement: “From the start, this case has been about making sure that facts—not political whims—guide how the law is applied,” adding “The district court’s ruling made it clear that this administration must be accountable to the truth and to the rule of law.”

Advertisement

J.B. Pritzker. Governor of Illinois, October 4, 2025, said: “For Donald Trump, this has never been about safety. This is about control.”

What Happens Next

Appellate courts in the Seventh and Ninth Circuits—and likely the Supreme Court—must now decide whether President Trump can continue federalizing and deploying National Guard units over state objections, leaving troops in a suspended status while states pursue additional legal challenges and the administration presses its argument for broad presidential discretion under 10 U.S.C. §12406.

The outcomes will determine if deployments resume, remain blocked or trigger a broader constitutional ruling on the limits of federal power in domestic security.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Oregon

ESPN’s ‘College GameDay’ traveling to Oregon for Week 13 game vs USC

Published

on

ESPN’s ‘College GameDay’ traveling to Oregon for Week 13 game vs USC


play

ESPN’s “College GameDay” is headed back to Eugene, Oregon.

Advertisement

The three-hour college football pregame show ― featuring host Rece Davis, Kirk Herbstreit, Desmond Howard, Nick Saban and Pat McAfee ― will preview the matchup between No. 5 Oregon and No.16 Southern California.

The Ducks faithful will be hoping for a better showing on “College GameDay” than the last time the pregame show came to Eugene: Oregon lost 30-20 to Indiana on Oct. 11, its lone loss of the season.

Saturday, Nov. 22, will mark the 33rd time Oregon will be featured on “GameDay” and first time since 2007 that “GameDay” has traveled to Eugene twice in the same season. The Ducks have a 20-14 record when on the show, and 9-4 when featured as the home team.

Oregon is coming off an impressive 42-13 win over Minnesota on Friday, Nov. 14. Dante Moore threw for 308 yards and two touchdowns, while Jordon Davison added two rushing touchdowns. The Ducks have won four in a row since the loss to the Hoosiers, which snapped an 18-game home winning streak.

Advertisement

USC is coming off a 26-21 win over Iowa to extend its winning streak to three straight games since a 34-24 loss to Notre Dame on Oct. 18. The Trojans are still alive for the College Football Playoff, and a win vs. Oregon could get them right back into the thick of the race. A loss, of course, could eliminate them.

Oregon and USC are both former members of the Pac-12, which moved over to the Big Ten ahead of the 2025 season. The Trojans lead the all-time series 38-23-2, with the Ducks winning the last three games.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Oregon

How Oregon Ducks Offense Turned Heads In Blowout Win Over Minnesota

Published

on

How Oregon Ducks Offense Turned Heads In Blowout Win Over Minnesota


The No. 8 Oregon Ducks dominated the Minnesota Golden Gophers from the opening kickoff on Friday night at Autzen Stadium, earning a 42-13 win to improve to 9-1 on the season. Throughout the season, the Ducks have been dominant in the running game, and that dominance was on full display in the win against the Golden Gophers.

Oregon Ducks College Football Minnesota Golden Gophers Iowa Hawkeyes Big Ten Jordon Davison running backs Noah Whittington

Oregon running back Jordon Davison breaks away for a touchdown run as the Oregon Ducks host the Minnesota Golden Gophers on Nov. 14, 2025, at Autzen Stadium in Eugene, Oregon. / Ben Lonergan/The Register-Guard / USA TODAY NETWORK via Imagn Images

Entering the game, Oregon had averaged just under 240 rushing yards per game, which is among the top 10 in college football. In the win against Minnesota, the Ducks found success in the running game from the start, with Jordon Davison reaching 12 touchdowns on the season in the first quarter, recording two rushing scores.

One of those two scores featured a beautiful 32-yard touchdown run to give the Ducks a 14-0 lead at the end of the first quarter. Davison finished the game with seven carries for 57 yards and two touchdowns.

Fresh off a 118-yard rushing performance in the Ducks’ 18-16 come-from-behind road win over the No. 21 Iowa Hawkeyes, Oregon’s leading rusher Noah Whittington put together another impressive game against Minnesota.

Advertisement

Early in the second quarter, with the Ducks up 14-3, Whittington had arguably one of the best touchdown runs of the season, as he escaped several Minnesota defenders to take it 40 yards to the house. On top of the crazy run, Whittington lost control of the ball momentarily in the end zone. After review for being a potential fumble in the end zone and a touchback, the play stood as a touchdown.

MORE: Oregon Quarterback Dante Moore Breaks Down Adjusting Game Plan Amid Injuries

MORE: What Oregon’s New Helmet And Uniforms Say About the Program’s Identity

MORE: How to Watch Oregon Ducks vs. Minnesota In Prime Time On Friday Night 

SIGN UP FOR OUR NEWSLETTER HERE!

Advertisement
Oregon Ducks College Football Big Ten Noah Whittington Minnesota Golden Gophers Iowa Hawkeyes Dierre Hill Jr Jordon Davison

Nov 14, 2025; Eugene, Oregon, USA; Oregon Ducks running back Noah Whittington (6) loses control of the football momentarily during the first half as he scores a touchdown against the Minnesota Golden Gophers at Autzen Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Troy Wayrynen-Imagn Images / Troy Wayrynen-Imagn Images

Whittington finished the game leading Oregon in rushing with eight carries for 72 yards and a touchdown. Jay Harris, the Ducks’ fourth available running back, also added a 12-yard rushing touchdown in the fourth quarter. Between Harris and running back Dierre Hill Jr, the two combined for 10 carries for 41 yards and a touchdown. Collectively as a whole, Oregon finished the game with 179 total rushing yards.

While not as dominant as it was in the road win against the Hawkeyes, the rushing performance was consistent in a game in which Oregon relied more on its passing game, led by quarterback Dante Moore.

Dan Lanning P.J. Fleck College Football Oregon Ducks Minnesota Golden Gophers USC Trojans Washington Huskies Big Ten teams

Nov 14, 2025; Eugene, Oregon, USA; Oregon Ducks head coach Dan Lanning, left, talks to Minnesota Golden Gophers head coach P.J. Fleck after a game at Autzen Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Troy Wayrynen-Imagn Images / Troy Wayrynen-Imagn Images

Moving into Oregon’s final two games of the season against No. 17 USC at home and Washington on the road in Seattle, the Ducks’ dominance in the running game will be a strength to their offense that will be hard for opposing defenses to overcome.

At times this season, USC has struggled to defend the run, especially in its two losses to No. 10 Notre Dame and Illinois. Coach Dan Lanning’s Oregon team will aim to take advantage of that weakness against the Trojans and look to punish teams with its running game in the playoff, if the Ducks succeed in making it into the College Football Playoff for a second consecutive season.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending