Connect with us

Oregon

Oregon secretary of state candidates cite similar goals but different strategies to restore trust in office

Published

on

Oregon secretary of state candidates cite similar goals but different strategies to restore trust in office


The frontrunners to become Oregon’s next secretary of state, Treasurer Tobias Read and state Sen. James Manning, are running on broadly similar platforms, saying their top priority is to restore voters’ trust in an office whose last elected leader resigned amid scandal.

The two Democrats each point to professional experience they say proves they’re right for the job: Read cites his what he says has been steady, reliable leadership of a complex state agency, the treasury, while Manning points to his decades of service in the U.S. Army, where his work as an inspector general aligned with the audit function of the secretary of state.

Both candidates said they would work to protect Oregon’s vote by mail system and ensure the office conducts factual and data-driven audits of state agencies. The winner of the May Democratic primary will be heavily favored heading into the fall general election. Oregon voters have only elected a Republican to serve as secretary of state once since 1985, and Democrats currently hold every statewide elected office.

The election will take place just over a year after former Secretary of State Shemia Fagan resigned following Willamette Week’s revelation that she had taken a $10,000 a month consulting gig with an affiliate of embattled marijuana company La Mota while her office was auditing the cannabis industry.

Advertisement

Secretary of State LaVonne Griffin-Valade, whom Gov. Tina Kotek appointed to replace Fagan, is not running.

The secretary of state oversees elections, serves as the state’s chief auditor and heads the Oregon Corporation Division. They also sit on the Oregon State Land Board and chair the Oregon Sustainability Board. The elected agency head is first in line to become governor should the state’s top officeholder step down or die.

In making their cases to voters, Read has stressed his methodical leadership style while Manning has emphasized his commitment to integrity and public trust.

Read represented Beaverton in the Oregon House from 2007 until becoming state treasurer in 2017, rising to the powerful positions of speaker pro tempore and co-chair of the budget committee before announcing his candidacy for statewide office. He said his experience overseeing the state treasury qualifies him to take the reins as secretary of state. If elected, Read said he would explore programs to improve voter access and select which programs and agencies to audit based on data, not politics.

“A key part of my administration will be bringing the stability and performance that I’ve led as treasurer to the Secretary of State’s Office,” Read wrote in a response to an Oregonian/OregonLive questionnaire.

Advertisement

Read said he recognizes that he is not a flashy candidate but said his understated leadership style would be an asset for an office that has been in turmoil. He previously worked for Nike in product development and marketing roles from 2004 until 2012. During his time in the Legislature, he championed a bill that funded full-day kindergarten. In 2022, Read ran for governor but lost to Kotek by a huge margin in the Democratic primary.

Manning, a U.S. Army veteran and state senator since his appointment in late 2016, said one of his priorities in office would be to conduct thorough audits of agencies to address equity-related issues, such as the disproportionate hiring of men and a lack of racial diversity.

The secretary of state leads the Oregon Audits Division, which performs regular audits of state agencies and programs to measure their performance and effectiveness.

“A reporter once asked me, ‘You do know the secretary of state doesn’t pay a lot?’” Manning wrote in response to The Oregonian/OregonLive’s questionnaire. “I reminded them that serving 24 years active duty in the U.S. Army didn’t pay a lot either. I do it for the love of country and because it is public service.”

State Sen. James Manning, candidate to become Oregon’s next secretary of state, says his military career and legislative experience has prepared him to take on the statewide office.Courtesy of James Manning campaign

Advertisement

Manning said his experience as an assistant inspector general in the Army for three years and as the state Senate’s president pro tempore since 2021 have given him valuable experience. Manning retired from the Army in 2007 and moved to Eugene, where he served on nonprofit boards and school and local commissions, including six years as a member of the Eugene police commission, before joining the Legislature. He also served on Oregon’s Commission on Black Affairs from 2013 to 2017.

Read has brought in more than triple the campaign contributions of Manning.

Manning has raised nearly $200,000 and spent about $183,000. He’s received $20,000 from Stuart Barr, the owner of Eugene-based manufacturing company Industrial Finishes; $12,000 from advocacy organization Imagine Black; and $5,000 apiece from the political arm of the Native American Youth and Family Center, Oregon AFSCME, manufacturing company Greenhill Reload, real estate company ATR Services and political strategist Johnell Bell.

Read has brought in roughly $632,000 and spent about $234,000. The Democratic Lieutenant Governors Association gave him $26,250. Five other groups or individuals contributed $25,000: an Oregon electricians union; Gideon Yu, co-owner of the San Francisco 49ers and former CFO of Facebook; Eugene-based construction equipment company The Pape Group; Springboard Group, a Lake Oswego-based nonprofit that focuses on Yamhill County economic well-being and gives widely to political candidates; and Avamere Health Services, a senior health care and nursing home provider.

Dozens of lawmakers and notable Oregon politicians have endorsed a candidate in the race.

Advertisement

Manning has received endorsements from 20 Democratic state lawmakers, Oregon Planned Parenthood, the Oregon Sierra Club and the Oregon chapters of the Service Employees International Union and the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees.

Read has received endorsements from 10 Democratic state lawmakers, former governors Barbara Roberts, Ted Kulongoski and John Kitzhaber, U.S. Reps. Suzanne Bonamici, Val Hoyle and Andrea Salinas, the Oregon Education Association and former Secretaries of State Jeanne Atkins and Phil Keisling.

Former attorney James Crary, retired attorney and former securities analyst Dave Stauffer and retired electrical engineer Paul Wells are also vying for the Democratic nomination. In response to a questionnaire from The Oregonian/OregonLive, Crary said he would focus on data and software audits to minimize agencies’ security risks and establish an electronic candidate forum, which voters could access to directly contact political candidates. If elected, Stauffer said he would work to fight misinformation and take his role of chief auditor seriously. Wells declined to respond to the candidate questionnaire.

The three Republicans competing for their party’s bid are state Sen. Dennis Linthicum, who cannot seek reelection to the Senate this year because of his participation in a Republican-led walkout of the Senate in 2023, small business owner Brent Barker and business analyst Tim McCloud. McCloud has not held office and unsuccessfully ran for governor in 2022. Barker also has not held office and unsuccessfully ran for labor commissioner in 2022.

All Republican candidates said they would attempt to end Oregon’s vote-by-mail system, if elected. Linthicum and McCloud said they believe voter fraud has impacted state and federal election results in recent years. There is no evidence of widespread voter fraud at the state or federal level.

Advertisement

Plans to oversee audits, fight misinformation

If elected, Manning said he would lead the office by example and reduce corruption by setting an office-wide expectation of transparency. He said he would demand audits of state agencies with known problems, such as the Oregon Employment Department, which continues to struggle with long wait times and slow claims processing amid a transition to a new computer system.

Read said he would focus on protecting Oregonians’ right to vote and providing sufficient support to staff to ensure that audits are carefully selected and done with the right intentions. He said audits should not be driven “by a particular agenda, but by efficiency and effectiveness.”

Tobias Read campaigning

State Treasurer Tobias Read said his experience overseeing the state treasury qualifies him to take the reins as secretary of state.Courtesy of Tobias Read campaign

One major task for the next secretary of state will be implementing historic limits on political contributions that lawmakers approved earlier this year. The new law calls for the Secretary of State’s Office to create a comprehensive dashboard to track campaign contributions and overhaul Orestar, Oregon’s online campaign finance reporting and disclosure system. Griffin-Valade told lawmakers earlier this year that the office will need more staff and money to get the job done.

Both Manning and Read said they support the desire of voters to limit political contributions and would ensure the bill is successfully carried out. Manning said he would seek long-term funding to support the overhaul of Orestar and “look to the some 36 states that have implemented [campaign finance reform] and propose best practices in regards to administration and guardrails to ensure bad actors are reigned in.”

Advertisement

Read said his experience rolling out complicated laws at the state treasury has prepared him to take on such a major task. Read has overseen the implementation of programs such as retirement-oriented OregonSaves, a system he advocated for while in the Legislature, and Oregon’s unclaimed property program.

“I will immediately roll up my sleeves, assess the capacity of the office and develop plans for implementation. My team and I know how to do this,” Read wrote. “I’m confident that with the appropriate budget and staffing, we will ensure the on-time rollout of a new transparent, publicly-accessible way for Oregonians to view campaign finance data.”

As the state’s chief elections officer, Manning said he would work to expand voters’ access to the ballot and protect Oregon’s voting system, but he did not outline specific strategies to do so. In the Legislature, he introduced or supported several bills to enhance voter access, such as a bill that died in a legislative committee this year that would have automatically registered college students to vote upon their enrollment.

“Oregon boasts the highest turnout in the nation yet we still have thousands of eligible students who remain unregistered as they are slipping through our … automatic voter registration systems,” Manning said.

If elected, Manning said he would conduct listening sessions at county election offices around the state to discuss ways to protect Oregon’s voting system and combat misinformation.

Advertisement

To improve Oregon’s voting system, Read said he would explore programs to increase voters’ confidence, such as establishing a statewide program that would text voters when their ballots are received and their votes counted and a program that would allow voters to see ballot-counting firsthand.

“Over the past six months, I have met with 24 of Oregon’s 36 county clerks to hear in part about strategies they have used to reach more voters, including satellite voting centers, increased translation services, ballot notification and outreach to rural voters in accessible locations,” Read said.

To combat misinformation, both Read and Manning said they would enhance transparency in the state’s voting system and invest in safety protocols for election workers. Read said he would do that “by not being afraid to stand up to misinformation campaigns and proving my commitment to transparency. I would also add that the safety of our election workers are under increasing threats, and I will be aggressive in protecting them.”

Manning said he would fight misinformation “through public service announcements and operating transparently in the office of secretary of state. … I will ensure investments are made in civics and in security, training and information delivery to and from our elections offices across our state.”

Oregon’s secretary of state has often taken on the additional task of redrawing the state’s congressional and legislative district boundaries after decennial census results come in. Similar to many other states, Oregon allows lawmakers to decide changes to its district boundaries, which they last redrew in 2021. However, lawmakers have only twice in the last century been able to approve new district boundaries, otherwise leaving the job to the secretary of state.

Advertisement

Good government groups have long advocated for an independent redistricting commission, arguing that Democrats as the legislative majority in 2021 redrew congressional districts in a way that gave them an unfair advantage, known as gerrymandering. A proposed ballot measure to create an independent redistricting commission was tabled earlier this year.

Read said he is open to the idea of establishing an independent commission, but he pointed out that independent panels of judges have consistently upheld redrawn boundaries decided by the Legislature or former secretary of states. He said, “I am not confident that any one system — an independent commission among them — represents a magic bullet.”

Manning said he likes the current system because lawmakers are fully accountable to voters and represent Oregon’s population better than an independent commission would.

“An unintended consequence of a so-called ‘independent commission’ appointed by lawmakers or the executive branch may be a way of removing accountability,” Manning said. “In a representative democracy, I find it appropriate that legislators are directly accountable to the people they represent.”

— Carlos Fuentes covers state politics and government. Reach him at 503-221-5386 or cfuentes@oregonian.com.

Advertisement

Our journalism needs your support. Subscribe today to OregonLive.com.



Source link

Oregon

Audit says Oregon state parks failed to complete safety inspections

Published

on

Audit says Oregon state parks failed to complete safety inspections


play

Staff at Oregon’s state parks failed to complete safety inspections of park buildings and kept inconsistent records of state property, according to an audit released April 1 by the Oregon Secretary of State.

The problems, auditors found, could risk visitor safety and taxpayer money due to lawsuits and fines if not addressed.

Advertisement

“Oregonians love their state parks and have been able to safely enjoy them for decades,” Oregon Secretary of State Tobias Read said in a statement. “The findings in this audit will help protect that important legacy and our public dollars.”

The audit was the latest hit in what’s been a rough stretch for the Oregon Parks and Recreation Department, which faces a multimillion revenue shortfall and has responded with a series of unpopular fee increases and program cuts.

In response to the audit, OPRD issued a statement saying agency officials agreed with the report’s findings “and have already begun implementing improvements, many of which were underway during the audit.”

Interim director Stefanie Coons added: “The safety of our visitors and the protection of Oregon’s state parks have always guided our decisions, and we remain committed to strengthening the systems that support that responsibility.”

Advertisement

The audit period covered June 2022 to June 2025.

OPRD doesn’t complete building safety inspections, audit finds

Auditors found that “OPRD doesn’t consistently complete or document required building inspections.”  

“When inspections are missed or aren’t recorded, it could lead to injuries to the public and reduce confidence in the safety of Oregon’s parks,” the audit said. “These gaps could affect staff safety, limit OPRD’s ability to identify hazards early and respond properly and may result in regulatory fines.”

The areas inspected were located at overnight campgrounds that offer tent and RV camping and have restrooms.

Advertisement

OPRD manages about 50 campgrounds and 250 day use sites. Many of the agency’s 2,000 buildings are over 50 years old with some beyond their expected lifespans, making the quarterly inspections critical.

“Despite these requirements, we found inspections weren’t consistently performed and documented,” the audit said. “One of the parks we visited had no records of building inspections from 2022 to 2025.”

Oregon’s state parks have seen a skyrocketing number of visitors across the past decade and a half, culminating in record-setting visits in 2024.

OPRD managers told auditors that missed inspections or lack of documentation “were due to competing priorities, including prioritizing customer service — that is, being responsive to park visitors and emergent situations over ensuring records are kept accurately.”

In the past three years, OPRD received three citations from the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, costing $10,000.

Advertisement
  • One citation was linked to a concessionaire-operated building where OPRD and the concessionaire failed to identify and address hazards due to a lack of inspection.
  • The others involved failing to check for lead paint hazards and using improperly trained forklift operators.

OPRD shows inadequate management of state property including phones, trailers

The agency is required to track and document all its capital assets — from phones to truck trailers. The audit found 38% of its assets were missing key information in state databases.

OPRD’s assets include up to $1 billion in equipment.

“Inaccurate or incomplete asset records increase the risk of theft, loss, unrecouped damages, and legal liability,” the audit said. “They can also create safety risks.”

The audit noted a backpack blower, utility trailers, an automated external defibrillator and iPhones that hadn’t been documented or had been incorrectly documented. That can mean it’s not covered by insurance.

“These types of gaps have already caused financial losses. After being destroyed by a fire, a $50,000 trash compactor had to be replaced using OPRD funds because it wasn’t listed in (state systems),” the audit said.

Advertisement

Audit suggestions for OPRD

Auditors issued recommendations to OPRD to address these problems, including:

  • Finalize and roll out policies and procedures requiring quarterly safety inspections of employee-occupied structures, with clearly defined roles and responsibilities for execution and oversight, including documentation standards.
  • Update OPRD’s asset management guidance, including clear procedures for currently uncovered asset types such as infrastructure and transportation.
  • Provide recurring training to all relevant personnel on asset management policies — including tagging, record-keeping and disposal procedures — and reinforce expectations through performance evaluations or other accountability mechanisms to ensure compliance.
  • Continue efforts to replace the Oregon Parks and Recreation Information System with a new asset management system and ensure the new system has all required fields needed for accurate reporting.

Zach Urness has been an outdoors reporter in Oregon for 18 years and is host of the Explore Oregon Podcast. He can be reached at zurness@StatesmanJournal.com or (503) 399-6801. Find him on X at @ZachsORoutdoors and BlueSky at oregonoutdoors.bsky.social



Source link

Continue Reading

Oregon

Woman missing after running out of gas on highway, leaving car

Published

on

Woman missing after running out of gas on highway, leaving car


play

Oregon State Police are asking for the public’s help in finding a woman who went missing after getting into a person’s vehicle when she ran out of gas on Highway 22 on March 28.

Maria Linda Jade Kilmer, 28, was driving from Lyons to Salem when her car ran out of fuel near milepost 15 just west of Stayton at 9 p.m. A passenger who was traveling with Kilmer told police she left with an unidentified motorist who stopped at the scene.

Advertisement

Police describe Kilmer as having dark hair, blue eyes and is approximately 5-feet-8-inches tall. She weighs 180 pounds. She frequents areas in the Willamette Valley from Salem to Portland, an OSP spokesperson said, and has a piercing in the middle of her lower lip.

Kilmer left her keys, purse, identification, phone and other belongings. She has not been seen since.

Police ask anyone with information to call 911 or Oregon State Police dispatch at *677.

Eder Campuzano is the local news editor for the Statesman Journal. He can can be reached at ecampuzano@statesmanjournal.com. Find him on Bluesky at @ederc.bsky.social or Threads @ederc.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Oregon

Is it legal to point security camera at a neighbor’s house in Oregon?

Published

on

Is it legal to point security camera at a neighbor’s house in Oregon?


play

  • The number of security cameras in the U.S. is growing, with an estimated 85 million installed by 2021.
  • In Oregon, it is legal to point security cameras on your property toward public areas like streets and sidewalks.
  • While you can generally point a camera at a neighbor’s house, aiming it into private areas like bedrooms or bathrooms is illegal.

There are millions of homes and businesses with security cameras and the number is only growing.

According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, surveillance camera installations in the U.S. were expected to grow from 47 million in 2015 to about 85 million by 2021.

Advertisement

An estimated 10 million Amazon’s Ring doorbell cameras are in use nationwide, according to a 2023 report from Politico, and dozens of other companies have made their own doorbell cameras to jump on the craze.

At the same time, concerns over surveillance are on the rise. Ring ended its partnership with Flock, a Georgia-based tech surveillance company, in February. Throughout 2025, Eugene and Springfield residents fought back against the installation of Flock license-plate reader cameras, which led to them being taken down seven months later.

On your private property, what laws exist around security cameras and where they can point? The Register-Guard looked at state and municipal laws to find out.

Can you point a security camera at the street or sidewalk?

Yes. You can absolutely point security cameras located on your property at the street.

Advertisement

There are no laws around recording video in “public view.”

“Public view” is classified as any area that can be readily seen by normal, unaided vision when viewed from a public place, including streets.

Can you point a security camera at your neighbor’s house?

Usually, yes, your surveillance cameras can be pointed toward others’ homes. While there are no specific Oregon laws against installing security cameras that are directed at your neighbor’s home, you may want to be careful where exactly it’s pointed.

If you have a doorbell camera, for example, that points directly from your front door to your neighbor’s front door across the street, that’s completely legal.

Advertisement

Anything visible in “public view” is permissible to video as long as you remain on public or your own property.

According to a city of Eugene spokesperson, there are no city laws against a private party having a security camera and what direction it is pointing.

However, it can get tricky, depending on where exactly you point your cameras. For example, if you have a two-story home and you point your security camera into your neighbor’s backyard, that might be harder to defend in court. It all hinges on ORS 163.700 — Invasion of personal privacy.

Can you point a surveillance camera into your neighbor’s bedroom or bathroom?

Effectively, no. You cannot point a camera into your neighbor’s bedroom or bathroom without risking breaking Oregon law.

This would likely be a violation of ORS 163.700, constituting an invasion of personal privacy in the second degree.

Advertisement

The law extends to any recording of another person’s “intimate area” without consent in places where the person recorded has a “reasonable expectation of privacy concerning the intimate area.” As defined by Oregon law, “intimate area” includes nudity and undergarments typically covered by other clothing.

Because people typically change their clothing in bedrooms and bathrooms, a security camera pointed into those rooms would more than likely capture them nude or in their undergarments, which would violate Oregon law.

Where a person has a reasonable expectation of privacy extends beyond bedrooms and bathrooms. According to Oregon law, it also includes, but is not limited to, locker rooms, tanning booths and any area where a person undresses in an enclosed space that is not open to public view.

Invasion of personal privacy in the second degree is a Class A misdemeanor, which can result in a fine up to $6,250.

Miranda Cyr reports on education for The Register-Guard. You can contact her at mcyr@registerguard.com or find her on X @mirandabcyr.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Trending