Oregon lawmakers final 12 months gave each public faculty district in Oregon the choice to ban weapons from their premises.
Up to now, most districts have declined to take them up on the supply.
Advertisement
Since a change to Oregon regulation in September, simply 13% of the state’s public faculty districts have opted to shut an exemption that enables holders of a hid handgun license, or CHL, to hold weapons onto public property the place possessing a gun would in any other case be a felony.
Based on an OPB evaluation, that checklist contains some districts within the Portland metro space — although not but Portland Public Faculties — together with way more rural faculty techniques. Among the many 25 which have banned weapons are districts in Klamath Falls, Myrtle Level, Tillamook, Pendleton, Tigard-Tualatin, Lake Oswego and Woodburn.
The overwhelming majority of the state’s 197 public faculty districts have, to this point, taken no such motion.
Whether or not or to not prohibit weapons in colleges has been a contentious level in Oregon, the place one estimate suggests gun possession is extra prevalent than in lots of different states.
The bloodbath of 19 youngsters and two lecturers at an elementary faculty in Uvalde, Texas has many Individuals demanding measures to slender entry to firearms — a dynamic on show over the weekend, when gubernatorial candidate Betsy Johnson confronted heated questions on her pro-gun stance from a crowd in Portland.
Advertisement
Gun rights teams and sympathetic politicians, in the meantime, insist having armed residents close by throughout an assault may restrict injury from mass shootings. Opponents of the 2021 Oregon invoice have steered new restrictions are extra apt to make public areas much less protected as a result of CHL holders are overwhelmingly law-abiding. Mass shooters, they level out, don’t care about gun bans.
“I do know that gun violence is an issue,” state Sen. Fred Girod, R-Lyons, mentioned throughout a debate on the gun management invoice, Senate Invoice 554, final 12 months. “CHL holders will not be the issue.”
College districts which have put bans in place acknowledge the coverage received’t dissuade somebody bent on finishing up violence. However they are saying the stricter guidelines are one thing college students have pressed for, and that campus bans are a logical step many individuals already assumed existed.
“It is a values assertion,” mentioned Kirsten Aird, chair of the Lake Oswego faculty board, which handed a ban in December. “That is the place we’re going. It reinforces our values.”
Chipping away at gun possession
In Oregon, hid handgun license holders should be no less than 21, and are required to bear a background test and full a gun security coaching course previous to receiving a license. In trade for these steps, folks with a CHL have lengthy been granted leeway to carry their weapons into locations the place weapons are in any other case prohibited.
Advertisement
With SB 554, lawmakers chipped away at that privilege. They banned weapons within the state Capitol and the terminal of Portland Worldwide Airport, whether or not or not an individual has a CHL. They usually gave public colleges, faculties and universities the choice to implement their very own bans.
A separate provision of state regulation, unimpacted by the invoice, permits lawfully possessed weapons on faculty grounds so long as they’re unloaded and locked in a car, no matter a faculty board’s actions.
In some faculty districts, gun bans have handed with little fanfare, barely seen amid a string of lifeless agenda objects.
On the Hillsboro College District, two folks spoke up when the coverage was first launched in December, each supportive. When the ban got here up for a vote in January, one board member voiced misgivings, suggesting arming lecturers may assist thrust back attackers.
“Most shooters when confronted break off their assault or kill themselves,” board member Monique Ward mentioned earlier than voting in opposition to the coverage. It handed with assist from each different faculty board member.
Advertisement
Lake Oswego College District didn’t even see that degree of pushback when its board handed a ban final 12 months.
“This was student-led,” mentioned Aird, the board chair. “No testimony got here in opposing it. Nobody spoke up in opposition.”
However in a single district, the passage of the gun ban has been contentious.
Previous to a vote on the coverage at Eugene College District 4J earlier this month, the hardline Oregon Firearms Federation referred to as its members to motion.
The posting on the group’s web site contained deceptive verbiage, suggesting the college board may “prohibit CHL holding mother and father from being anyplace on their property,” versus banning weapons that weren’t locked and unloaded in a car.
Advertisement
“At a time when the state refuses to handle rising ranges of violence, taking away mother or father’s capacity to guard their youngsters is an act of madness,” the discover learn. “Please contact the college board and strongly object to this new assault on frequent sense.”
Some did.
On the Could 18 assembly of the college board, a gaggle of self-described conservatives stood to object that they hadn’t been in a position to converse in opposition to the brand new gun coverage — doubtlessly as a result of they’d failed to enroll to testify, the board’s chair mentioned.
The disruption led the board to take a recess and exit the room, leaving the gun rights supporters to speak amongst themselves about their criticisms.
“If you happen to take away the power to hold firearms across the faculty, you’re principally placing targets on the again of our kids,” one girl mentioned. “They’re mushy targets. They’re straightforward to take out, in addition to the lecturers.”
Advertisement
The board wound up suspending a vote till June. Board members are shifting public conferences on-line till they will organize safety for in-person conferences, particularly “contentious” ones.
Portland Public contemplating its personal coverage
Portland Public Faculties, the state’s largest district, can be nonetheless awaiting motion on a gun ban. Board member Julia Brim-Edwards mentioned final week a coverage has been working its approach via the district’s committee course of and has not attracted any opposition. It may very well be voted on as early as mid-June.
“Most individuals can be shocked that we hadn’t been allowed to ban [guns] within the first place,” Brim-Edwards mentioned. “I really feel very strongly about it as a mother or father and in addition as anyone who owns a firearm. It is a very sensible, frequent sense factor to do.”
Whereas many districts that adopted bans used coverage language crafted by the Oregon College Boards Affiliation, Brim-Edwards mentioned Portland’s is extra slender. It carries fewer alternatives for somebody to get an exemption to carry a gun onto faculty grounds however does embrace a carve-out for examples like armed guards depositing cash within the ATM at district headquarters.
Beneath the insurance policies in place in lots of districts and being thought-about in Portland, anybody violating the ban could be cited for trespassing, ejected from PPS premises, or referred to regulation enforcement. CHL holders violating faculty gun prohibitions face a category A misdemeanor punishable by as much as a 12 months in jail and a $6,250 wonderful.
Advertisement
Merely banning weapons in colleges, after all, is not going to cease an individual bent on committing violence.
To assist forestall or restrict injury from mass shootings, gun security advocates extra ceaselessly suggest insurance policies like stepped-up background checks, outlawing high-capacity magazines, and elevating the authorized age for buying weapons.
Oregon has enacted quite a lot of gun controls through the years, together with a coverage that lets the state confiscate the weapons of an individual deemed high-risk, mandating background checks for personal gun gross sales, and requiring gun house owners to lock their weapons when not in use. The group Everytown for Gun Security, which advocates insurance policies to curb shootings, charges Oregon’s legal guidelines eleventh within the nation, lagging behind California and Washington.
Backers of insurance policies banning weapons in colleges acknowledge it’s a small step. Board members in three districts OPB spoke with mentioned they may not level to an incident the place a CHL holder or their weapon had induced a problem on faculty grounds.
“It simply allowed us to finish the dedication that we already had instead of having gun-free colleges,” mentioned Melissa Barnes Dholakia, chair of the Bend-La Pine faculty board. The board handed a ban in December, receiving simply two feedback on the coverage, each of them supportive.
Advertisement
Aird, with the Lake Oswego faculty district, mentioned that the truth that lawfully hid weapons had not been a problem there was no assure they may not be sooner or later.
“Typically it’s not an issue till it’s an issue,” mentioned Aird, stressing she was talking for herself and never the board. “Then it’s too late and folks come again and say you would have finished one thing about it.”
For some college students, the chance that lawful weapons may trigger bother on campus was a major driver of their assist for a ban.
When the Hillsboro faculty board enacted the coverage in January, a highschool scholar named Ceph Tronco was amongst these voicing assist.
“What I’ve been interested by as I’ve been listening to about this coverage isn’t, ‘Is somebody going to be in place to cease an tried faculty taking pictures?’” Tronco mentioned. “It’s: ‘Is somebody going to have introduced a gun into a faculty grounds that by accident discharges? Or is anyone going to have the potential to get right into a charged argument that escalates due to the presence of a firearm?’”
Advertisement
The underside line, Tronco mentioned: “We don’t want folks to be bringing firearms onto our campuses.”
Mukumoto’s resignation was announced Thursday by Board of Forestry Chair Jim Kelly during a meeting of the board. Mukumoto answers to the board, a citizen panel appointed by the governor that helps oversee and implement forest policy.
If you purchase a product or register for an account through a link on our site, we may receive compensation. By using this site, you consent to our User Agreement and agree that your clicks, interactions, and personal information may be collected, recorded, and/or stored by us and social media and other third-party partners in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
Children are a top priority for the moms in the Legislature and a big reason why many of them are there.
Take Emerson Levy, a renewable energy attorney in Bend. When she ran for the Legislature for the first time in 2020, she was motivated by her 4-year-old daughter, June. A self-described policy nerd, she wanted to support good policies in Salem, particularly those to protect children.
“I felt this huge obligation to my young daughter,” Levy told the Capital Chronicle.
Levy lost in 2020, but she won in 2022 and now she’s headed back to Salem after winning a second term representing the Bend-based 53th District. She is among several mothers in the Legislature, both Democrat and Republican, who juggle the demands of raising children while representing their communities in Salem. Some even have other jobs as well.
Advertisement
Serving in the Legislature is supposed to be a part time job, with 35-day sessions in even-numbered years and 160-day sessions the others, but the work spills into the rest of the year.
“The Legislature may be part time, but our constituents are not part time,” said state Sen. Sara Gelser Blouin, a mother of four who represents Corvallis in Salem. “Nobody has part-time constituents.”
Being a legislator in Oregon has become a full-time job, with jam-packed “legislative days” in Salem outside sessions to discuss policies and hear from state officials, experts and Oregonians. Lawmakers also serve on task forces and spend time leading up to sessions working on policies. And they need to be available to constituents, to listen and respond to their needs.
Being a mom is also a full-time role. Balancing both is challenging and time-consuming and the legislative job is not well paid.
But Oregon’s legislator moms are passionate about their roles and fighting for issues that impact Oregon kids the most.
Advertisement
School safety
Levy said her daughter drives her policy work and one of her top priorities is school safety.
Her first year in the Oregon House, she championed funding for silent panic alarms that directly call 911 if there is a school shooting. That provision was passed last year as part of House Bill 5014 on school funding. It included $2.5 million for these alarms, which helped avert even more bloodshed at a September shooting at Apalachee High School in Winder, Ga. The provision is a “funded non-mandate,” which means school districts decide whether to install them.
“Then we can learn from them before we bring it fully statewide,” Levy said.
Levy, who’s a Democrat, has also backed bills to improve health insurance, which can be costly for families and others. Levy and Gelser Blouin, also a Democrat, along with Republican Rep. Cyrus Javadi of Tillamook, sponsored the Co-pay Fairness Bill this year to ensure that insurance companies consider financial assistance from pharmaceutical manufacturers towards patient deductibles. The bill, House Bill 4113, unanimously passed the Oregon House and Senate last March.
In states that haven’t passed such legislation, so-called “copay accumulators” do not count towards deductibles, leaving some patients with extremely high medical bills.
Advertisement
“Co-pay accumulators are one of the cruelest programs I’ve ever encountered,” Levy said.
They especially impact people with rare diseases like hemophilia or lupus, who often don’t have a generic drug option. The bill, which was signed by Gov. Tina Kotek, banned the programs on Jan. 1.
Navigating health care bureaucracy is something Levy has personal experience with because her adult brother has Down Syndrome.
“Being June’s mom and being the sister of a disabled brother informs everything I do,” Levy said.
A focus on education
Education is also a big focus for moms in the Legislature.
Advertisement
“Kids are the future,” said Rep. Emily McIntire, an Eagle Point Republican who represents the 56th House District in Jackson County. “And setting up a firm foundation for our children is going to help us exponentially in the long run.”
She is serving on the House education and higher education committees and is a member of the Joint Ways and Means Subcommittee on Education, putting her in a good position to support school spending. An example: She backed a $10.4 billion increase in 2023 to the State School Fund, which funds the state’s secondary schools.
McIntire, whose children are now 16 and 22, is also in legislative leadership, serving as the House Republican assistant leader. McIntire said she was on the Eagle Point school board when local Republicans asked members if they would run to represent the district in the Legislature. She said she felt a calling, ran and won and is now serving her second term on the board while being elected to a second legislative term.
“Everything I look at is through a lens of what’s best for kids,” she said.
Gelser Blouin is also passionate about education. Her oldest son, who has a rare developmental disability called Koolen-de Vries syndrome, is a big influence on her work. She has worked on bills on special education and focused on behavioral health, especially for children with disabilities.
Her Senate Bill 1557, which passed in last year’s session, makes it easier for children with severe emotional or behavioral disturbances to access Medicaid funds to provide extra support at school and at home.
Advertisement
“These kids have really complex needs. They’re struggling to stay at home with their families. They might be struggling to stay in school. Maybe they have a mental illness or have had contact with the juvenile justice system. Right now, many of these families know that they need help before that big crisis happens,” Gelser Blouin said.
Her bill passed both chambers in 2024 with no opposition, and she plans to introduce a related bill in this year’s session.
She said she believes that understanding the issues from the perspective of being a mom is vital.
Representative Annessa Hartman, D-Gladstone, who has two daughters who are almost 11 and 13, agrees.
“I’m constantly thinking about how [each decision] will impact them in their future,” Hartman said.
Advertisement
Hartman works for the Native American Youth and Family Center, a Portland-based nonprofit that supports the Indigenous community, and belongs to the Snipe Clan of the Cayuga Nation, which is part of the Haudenosaunee Confederacy based in New York. Her background has a major influence on her work. In crafting policies, she considers the “Seventh Generation Principle” of considering the impact of a decision on future generations.
“That’s embedded in my personal beliefs and teachings,” she said.
Her focus in the Legislature has been on championing issues around domestic violence and sexual assault, two issues that have had a severe effect on indigenous women in particular.
At home, Hartman often asks her girls what they think about what they’re seeing in school — whether it’s poor handwriting or behavioral issues. She said their insight helps shape better policy.
“When I’m sharing that perspective, whether it’s my own caucus or committee, I say, ‘This is what my kids are seeing.’ It’s a powerful tool,” she said.
Advertisement
McIntire also consults with her children on policy matters.
“When I’m home on the weekend and I have a house full of teenage boys, I’ll ask, ‘What do you guys think of this or of that?’” she said.
Juggling act
Commuting to Salem adds hours to the workday of mom legislators — and other lawmakers. Gelser Blouin has a 45-minute drive from Corvallis to Salem, and she did that every day when her children were young.
As for Levy, she spends 2.5 hours driving from Bend to Salem, while McIntire drives 3.5 hours one way from Eagle Point. Like most lawmakers, they rent apartments in Salem during the session.
Levy said she wouldn’t be a representative if it weren’t for her husband, Sean Levy, who is the general council for St. Charles Health System and manages all the school pick-ups and drop-offs.
Advertisement
“And dinner!” Levy said.
A former stay-at-home-mom, McIntire also relies on her husband for support. When she first joined the House in 2022, she struggled to stay in contact with her kids, who were then 12 and 19.
“The hours of session are so overwhelming,” she said. “I don’t know that I would have been able to do this if my kids were younger.”
Gelser Blouin, who had three under the age of five when she entered the Oregon Senate in 2005, said she paid friends and relied on family for child care. This was especially necessary as her kids entered middle and high school, when they needed to be driven to after-school activities, she said. Gelser Blouin said she focused on quality time with her kids when she was home in the evenings and weekends.
Gelser Blouin also brought her kids to the Capitol. Her son, Sam, has always loved movies and movie production, so she brought him to legislative days when lawmakers discussed a film and video tax credit. Levy and Hartman helped organize a “Kids Caucus” during spring break last year, an idea that came from Hartman’s daughter, Marley, then 12. The event, organized in part by Hartman and Levy, was for all the children of lawmakers so they could meet one another and be on the floor while their parents were working.
Advertisement
Instilling a love for public service
Some children of lawmakers follow a similar path, and many arecivically engaged.
Gelser Blouin said all four of her kids are voters and are involved in community activities. Her 24-year-old daughter Nicole is even pursuing a career in politics: She currently works as U.S. Representative Val Hoyle’s legislative aide in Washington D.C.
“That’s the job she’s wanted since middle school!” Gelser-Blouin proudly said.
Though Levy’s daughter, June, is still young at age 9 now, she seems poised to be a politician — or maybe a political strategist. June wisely noted during her mother’s reelection campaign that “it’s gonna be harder this time.” That turned out to be true, with Levy facing a more aggressive campaign with her opponent running negative ads.
June is also Levy’s toughest critic.
“Anytime she sees trash on the street or people that need housing, it’s absolutely my fault,” Levy said. “I should be working harder.”
Advertisement
Low pay
Moms in the Legislature and others say that one of the downfalls of being a legislator in Oregon is the low pay: $43,434 in 2025. That’s not enough to support a family.
“There’s no way you could raise four kids on one legislator’s salary,” Gelser Blouin said.
Two years ago, three female legislators — two of them moms — quit because of the pay. At the time, their salaries were $33,000 a year.
Lawmakers set their salaries and are reluctant to boost them too much out of concerns that voters might consider that self-serving. So legislators referred a measure to November’s ballot to create an independent committee to set the salaries of legislators and other statewide officials but voters opposed that.
McIntire believes the low salary limits the type of person who can serve.
“If you want it to be a citizens’ Legislature, then you should be able to have all citizens able to do it,” McIntire said.
Advertisement
Others, including Sen. Gelser Blouin, agreed.
“Most of us that are in elected positions in state government make less than the staff that reports to us,” Gelser Blouin said.
But the moms have made their jobs work, thanks to help from their husbands and others. And they said the difficulty in trying to make the world better for their children is worth it.
PORTLAND Ore. (KPTV) – An Oregon Climate Assessment released Wednesday, highlights the need for more wildfire preparedness, how the state’s weather is impacted by rising temperatures, and advises policymakers on steps to take.
The assessment, released by the Oregon Climate Change Research Institute at Oregon State University could serve as a major blueprint for preventing or mitigating wildfire damage in the Pacific Northwest, like those currently burning in Los Angeles.
“The hazards are real, regardless of what people think of some of the reasons why our climate is changing,” said Erica Fleishman, OCCRI Director. “We’re seeing differences in weather and climate, and it’s important to be thinking of ways to protect themselves, and the people, places, and values they have.
The Seventh iteration of the report, which is 300 pages long and meant to inform policymakers and the public alike, indicates the state has increased its average temperature by 2.2 degrees Fahrenheit in the past century and will exceed five degrees by 2074.
Advertisement
In addition, the region has received below-average precipitation for 18 of the past 24 water years. These two facts combined show a reason for caution in future years and the need for preventative action to be taken based on the difficulty of fighting wildfires in both Oregon and California.
SEE ALSO:
“One can’t prevent those fires but can impact lives and structures from being lost,” Fleishman said. “A lot of things can be done to harden structures, homes, businesses. We’ve seen some difficulty and confusion with single evacuation zones and mobility challenges of loved ones and neighbors.”
In many areas across the Portland Metro area, homes are densely constructed close to vegetation, and these recent wildfires have many paying attention to what they can do big or small to keep their communities safe.
“I know there are stark climate differences between Southern California and Northern Oregon but it’s definitely a concern because of how much worse it’s been getting throughout the years,” one resident said. “Really just being mindful in any wooded area such as this.”
Advertisement
“Knowledge of the biological, physical, and social impacts of climate change better informs society’s decisions about how to respond,” Fleishman added.
The state has made the 300-page assessment viewable to the public.