Oregon
Oregon Health Authority’s slowness to respond to drug crisis stymies expansion of care – Oregon Capital Chronicle
Last August, the Oregon Health Authority asked residential addiction treatment providers to identify “shovel ready” projects to increase the state’s ability to care for adults and youth.
Within weeks, providers submitted details on 16 projects that the state could fund. Many providers had already purchased or identified buildings, secured some funding from other sources and hired contractors or obtained cost estimates to renovate or expand existing facilities.
But they all are still waiting for a funding decision, according to interviews and records obtained by the Capital Chronicle.
Providers need state money to respond to the crisis, with overdose numbers skyrocketing, hundreds dying every year and streets awash with fentanyl. Construction costs alone require a mix of funding sources, including from foundations and the community. State money is a critical part of most behavioral health and addiction projects – it can increase the size and the ability to treat more people – and nonprofits need quick responses to obtain permits, hire contractors and finalize plans.
Yet the health authority makes providers wait for decisions for months. Officials are slow to respond to requests; they cancel meetings and are slow to reschedule even when providers are ready to go and even though state lawmakers have earmarked millions of dollars to the Oregon Health Authority for more residential treatment facilities.
“What I hear from my members is the slow response and lack of clarity and untimely payment processes is very concerning to all of our members,” said Heather Jefferis, executive director of the Oregon Council for Behavioral Health, which represents providers. “They are at the point where they have to start thinking about: Can I proceed with the project that OHA has to offer because of these timeliness issues?”
A Capital Chronicle analysis of public records and interviews with behavioral health providers with potential expansions reveal an agency that’s slow to respond to the crisis, forcing providers to wait to finalize plans or move forward with scaled-down projects.
Oregon lawmakers have stepped up: In the 2023 session, with backing from Gov. Tina Kotek, legislators approved $158 million in behavioral health money for new projects and programs. Of that, $15 million was earmarked for construction and expansion of residential addiction treatment facilities.
And again this session, lawmakers have made the addiction crisis – along with housing – a priority, with wide-ranging proposals that include increasing treatment capacity.
Just this month, the health authority released a report saying the state lacks nearly 3,000 beds to care for adults who need addiction or mental health care. Yet the Oregon Health Authority plods along at a frustratingly slow pace for behavioral health providers trying to move forward on expanding treatment services.
We don’t need another blue ribbon task force. We need to get our shovels out, get our development going.
– Tim Murphy, CEO of Bridgeway Recovery Services in Salem The agency’s slowness is not new, but the stakes are higher than ever, with turmoil visible on the streets, while the available funding has rarely been higher. In the 2023 session, Oregon lawmakers, with backing from Gov. Tina Kotek, approved $158 million in behavioral health money for new projects and programs. Of that, $15 million was earmarked for construction and expansion of residential addiction treatment facilities.
Yet today, not one penny of that $15 million has been distributed, even as lawmakers look for ways to fund more projects this short session.
In 2022, the Oregon Health Authority also was flush with money to address the crisis. It had several hundred million in cannabis revenue to fund a range of services statewide under Measure 110, yet it was slow to act. Critics also were angered by the agency’s chaotic approach to awarding the first round of Measure 110 grants for addiction-related services and programs. A Secretary of State audit even said the rollout was burdened by administrative requirements and a lack of clarity around how to dole out money.
Advocates and local officials also raised concerns about the health authority’s pace at rolling out an historic $1 billion in new behavioral health investments that lawmakers allocated in the 2021 session.
Industry leaders and state government insiders who closely follow the state’s behavioral health system are growing weary of the red tape and task forces that often slow down the pace of meaningful action.
“We don’t need another blue ribbon task force,” said Tim Murphy, CEO of Bridgeway Recovery Services, which provides residential addiction treatment and other health services in Salem. “We need to get our shovels out, get our development going.”
Oregon Health Authority officials insist they are moving forward with urgency, and a spokesperson said the state plans to award money to projects this spring. But when asked, Tim Heider, an agency spokesperson, offered no examples of any changes the authority is making to get money to providers sooner.
In an interview, Dr. Sejal Hathi, the Oregon Health Authority’s new director, said the agency has identified about $87 million in funds that are “immediately available” to help projects. But she also said the needs are much higher and years of work are ahead to erase the state’s deficit of beds.
“We’ve identified a series of shovel ready projects to begin to chip away at that behavioral health providers are poised to break ground for with funding that we have received,” Hathi said. “But right-sizing that system of care is going to take more than five years and likely going to require additional investments from the Legislature of more than $500 million. And so this is a marathon. It’s not a sprint.”
Elisabeth Shepard, a spokesperson for Kotek’s office, said the OHA’s new leadership is focused on accountability and improvements. Hathi, hired from New Jersey, started in mid-January. Last year, Kotek recruited Ebony Clarke, the authority’s behavioral health director, from Multnomah County.
“She is never satisfied if things take longer than they need to,” Shepard said when asked if Kotek is satisfied with the pace of the agency’s work getting money to providers. “Her administration inherited an agency exhausted by a global pandemic and significantly lacking internal systems and leadership on behavioral health.”
Parrott Creek’s slog
A children’s services provider’s struggle offers just one example of the difficulty providers face trying to get funding from the agency.
Last year, Parrott Creek Child & Family Services in Oregon City was in the midst of planning a new youth residential facility to treat teenagers for addiction to fentanyl and other drugs. Managers at the Clackamas County-based organization recognized the growing threat of fentanyl – and the need for more young people to access treatment.
In June, they were optimistic. Annaliese Dolph, the governor’s behavioral health initiatives director at the time, connected Parrott Creek managers with Clarke. In an email on June 28, 2023, Dolph told health authority officials the group was planning a project to serve youth in addiction and needed funding.
“This project should be on the radar for you and your team,” wrote Dolph, now director of the Oregon Alcohol and Drug Policy Commission.
Parrott Creek is a well known provider in Oregon and works with children with mental health and addiction challenges who sometimes have been in the child welfare or juvenile justice systems. It opened in 1968 and has worked with tens of thousands of children, youth and families over the years. But even after an introduction from the governor’s office and months of lobbying health authority officials, Parrott Creek officials have received no money from the agency.
Records show Parrott Creek officials repeatedly stressed the urgency of the crisis and the implications of a delayed decision.
With $8 million, they told state officials they could finish Parrott Creek’s planned two-part expansion and open 40 beds by the end of 2024. Without state money, Parrott Creek only has enough funding to complete a smaller expansion of 28 beds scheduled to be open by the end of this year.
Agency officials visited the site in August, and Parrott creek submitted project details in September. On Oct. 26, Parrott Creek officials asked the health authority for a response to its request.
“We are asking for an investment of $8M from the state so that we can ensure our 40 new beds come online by November 2024 as opposed to 2025 or, most likely, 2026,” Fulford wrote in the email.
Parrott Creek managers made follow-up calls and persisted, to the point of apologizing for their repeated check-ins.
“I REALLY apologize if any of that has been annoying but I hope it shows you that we are committed to delivering this much needed additional capacity for Oregon’s kids,” Fulford wrote in October.
On Nov. 2, his team met with agency officials. But a follow-up meeting on Nov. 7 was canceled.
“Unfortunately due to the demands of legislative presentations it looks as though we will need to reschedule today’s call,” Robert Lee, the agency’s senior policy advisor, emailed the group.
Fulford tried again.
“I will continue to stress the urgency on our side to know of funding commitments so that we can plan effectively to (hopefully!) bring our 40 new beds online for Oregon youth in 12 months as opposed to 24 or 36,” Fulford wrote on Nov. 7.
Later that month, Fulford again pushed health authority officials to meet, reminding them of the state’s lack of youth residential programs. Between 2018 to 2022, nearly 300 Oregonians aged 15 to 24 died from a drug overdose, according to federal data that also shows the state has the fastest-growing rate of teen drug deaths in the country.
I’d argue that kids in Oregon can’t wait until 2026 to address their growing acute mental health and addiction needs.
– Simon Fulford, executive director of Parrott Creek Child and Family Services email to the Oregon Health Authority
“I’d argue that kids in Oregon can’t wait until 2026 to address their growing acute mental health and addiction needs,” Fulford wrote on Nov. 20.
Health authority officials scheduled another meeting for Dec. 7. About three hours before it started, health authority officials canceled it, citing “other pressing issues.”
Later that month, state officials did meet with Parrott Creek managers. Fulford is still not sure what to expect.
“We feel like we’ve become a bit of an annoyance by continuing to ask them sort of the status of that decision making,” he said in an interview. “We feel like we’re in a bit of a holding pattern with OHA.”
For now, he’s hoping that lawmakers will fund the $8 million. But now that they’ve started the first phase of the project, completion of any additional beds won’t happen until 2025 at the earliest, he said.
“If we had secured that money by the end of 2023, we would have been able to guarantee the full completion by the end of 2024,” Fulford said.
Providers in Redmond, Salem wait, too
Fulford is not alone in his frustrations.
Rick Treleaven, CEO of BestCare Treatment Services in Redmond, which provides addiction treatment to people in central Oregon, is also waiting for answers. He’s been trying to get funding for two projects. One request is for about $506,000 that would help him add 10 more beds. The other is a 16-bed residential facility to serve Latinos.
“I’ve written that and sent that in maybe six times at this point,” he said. “Somehow it gets garbled. And so we’ll see what comes out of that.”
His organization contracts with the state to provide residential addiction treatment services for Latino men. But they currently lack the space to house Latinas in residential programs. This means Latinas have no options for residential treatment, even though the population of Latinos has continued to grow, he said.
“We have 13 male beds and that’s it,” he said. “That’s a classic example of institutional racism.”
Treleaven speculated that the slowness stems from an exodus of senior staffers during the pandemic.
“My sense is that during the pandemic, most of the senior staff who had been there a long time and knew how to do these things retired out,” he said, leaving a handful of experienced top managers.
In September, Salem-based Bridgeway Recovery Services, which provides residential and outpatient behavioral health care and addiction treatment services, requested funding to purchase two-six bedroom houses that would add 10 to 14 beds to its existing 24 beds, records show.
Bridgeway officials hope lawmakers will approve about $10 million for a 34-bed detox project to help people manage their withdrawal symptoms.
Bridgeway has about $6 million of Measure 110 funding, which is enough for it to break ground, but $10 million more is necessary to complete it, Murphy said.
Murphy said he understands the state needs to be careful making funding decisions, but said officials need to move more quickly. For example, he said, it’s typical for agency officials to acknowledge a request and say they’ll respond in 30 days.
“Why can’t they get back to me within 10 days?” he said. “That would make things work a little faster.”
The need is urgent, he said.
“Because of the high need we have in the state, because of the high overdose rates, because of the homeless population, we really need to expedite the services and try to develop an easier path for providers like Bridgeway and others,” Murphy said.
‘Let’s move’
State lawmakers again this session plan to allocate money to “shovel ready” projects, and providers have submitted a list, including some submitted to the health authority last year.
Providers are seeking money for about 40 projects across the state, from rural eastern Oregon to the coast, according to a list obtained by the Capital Chronicle. Not all of them will be funded. Even if they were, the state would still have a shortage of beds. But the quicker some of them are funded, the more quickly the state can address the addiction crisis.
“I would just like to see less talk – more action,” Murphy said. “Let’s move. We’ve got people ready to go.”
GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Oregon
Oregon Ducks Address Biggest Need Through Recruiting Class
The Oregon Ducks made key signings through the 2026 recruiting class, and Oregon coach Dan Lanning and the program secured five five-star picks.
One of the biggest position needs that the Ducks addressed through recruiting is safety. According to Rivals’ rankings, seven safeties are featured in the top 100 recruits, and the Oregon Ducks made a big splash in recruiting the position.
Oregon Adds Elite Safeties Through Recruiting
One of the biggest signings for the Oregon Ducks is five-star safety Jett Washington. Washington is the No. 22 recruit in the nation, the No. 2 safety, and the No. 1 player from Nevada, per Rivals. While the Ducks signed several elite recruits, Washington could prove to be the most important signing for Oregon.
Washington is a natural athlete, and after choosing between USC, Alabama, and Oregon, the five-star recruit will find himself in Eugene in 2026. Athleticism runs in Washington’s family, as he is the nephew of NBA legend Kobe Bryant, and he can be an immediate difference maker on defense in 2026.
“I think the options are limitless when you see a player of Jett’s ability. He’s got great ball instincts, he can attack. He’s a physical hitter. You look at a lot of things that we were able to do with Dillon this year, Dillon Thieneman on his stack position, I think Jett translates to a lot of that stuff really well as well,” Lanning said of Washington.
The Oregon Ducks also signed four-star safety Devin Jackson, another top 100 recruit. According to the Rivals’ Industry Rankings, Jackson is the No. 68 recruit in the nation, the No. 5 safety, and the No. 9 player from Florida. Despite efforts from the Florida Gators and several other top programs, the effort the Oregon Ducks put in landed them another elite safety in 2026.
MORE: Dan Lanning Challenging Mike Bellotti In Oregon Coach Milestone
MORE: Oregon Ducks Recruiting Another Multi-Sport Athlete to Eugene
MORE: Oregon Ducks Who Are Still Pending NFL Draft Decisions
SIGN UP FOR OUR NEWSLETTER HERE!
Despite not being rated in the top 100, the Ducks also signed four-star safety Xavier Lherisse. Oregon has a strong history of developing players on both sides of the ball, and Lhresse has a high ceiling. With the Ducks, he could break out on the defense and become a top safety over time.
Why Recruiting At Safety Was Important For Oregon
The Oregon Ducks are earning a valuable addition at safety, which could be critical for the Ducks in 2026. After Oregon’s success in 2025, the team could be losing key defensive back depth.
One significant player who could be leaving the team after the season is safety Dillon Thieneman. He could return to the team next year, but with the season he had, Thieneman could declare for the 2026 NFL Draft.
Ducks safety Solomon Davis announced his intention to enter the NCAA Transfer Portal, and although Davis played primarily on the special teams, that is still another player set to leave the team ahead of 2026. Whether the incoming recruits are ready to play right away or not, the team needed to add depth at the position, and the Ducks landed elite talent in doing so.
Eug 031623 Uo Spring Fb 06 | Chris Pietsch/The Register-Guard / USA TODAY NETWORK
Oregon has had a top defense this season and has done well at stopping the pass. The defense allowed just 5.36 yards per attempt and 144.1 yards per game in the air.
Despite Oregon defensive coordinator Tosh Lupoi becoming the head coach of the Cal Bears, the Ducks’ defense has the same amount of potential. Notably, defensive backs coach Chris Hampton is expected to be promoted to defensive coordinator.
Not only is Oregon hiring in-house, but it is the coach who recruited the elite safeties. Hampton will set up the incoming athletes for much success, keeping Oregon as a national title contender.
RECOMMENDED ARTICLES
Oregon
Oregon Attorney General Dan Rayfield applauds court ruling blocking SNAP fines on states
(Update: Video Added)
SALEM, Ore. (KTVZ) — On Monday, a federal judge blocked efforts by the Trump administration to fine states millions of dollars for administering SNAP benefits.
Read the full press release from the Office Of The Attorney General, including a statement made by Rayfield, below:
Attorney General Dan Rayfield today (Monday) released the following statement after a federal judge in the U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon blocked the Trump administration’s efforts to penalize states with millions of dollars in fines related to their Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) operations:
“In Oregon and across the country, SNAP supports families to make ends meet throughout the year. The federal government’s threat to impose this – especially during the holiday season – created needless uncertainty for programs that help people put food on the table. Today’s ruling stops that disruption and allows Oregon to keep administering SNAP without fear of being punished for following the law.”
On November 26, Attorney General Rayfield and a coalition of 20 other attorneys general sued the Trump administration after it attempted to cut off SNAP benefits for tens of thousands of lawful permanent residents. On December 10, the administration reversed itself and issued new guidance, confirming that lawful permanent residents – including former refugees and asylees – remain eligible for SNAP benefits.
Despite that reversal, the administration continued to threaten states with millions of dollars in fines, claiming that states had missed a required “grace period” for implementing the new guidance, even though the final guidance was not issued until December 10.
Today, the U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon issued an order temporarily blocking those penalties. The court’s decision prohibits the federal government’s efforts to impose severe financial penalties on states and protects the continued operation of SNAP programs while the case proceeds.
Oregon
Oregon utility to review PGE plan over data center cost concerns
PORTLAND, Ore. (KATU) — The Citizens Utility Board (CUB) has accused Portland General Electric (PGE) of circumventing Oregon’s new POWER Act, which mandates that data centers cover their own energy costs.
CUB claims PGE’s proposed cost-sharing framework unfairly burdens residential customers with a significant portion of the expenses associated with data center growth.
The consumer advocacy group was established in 1984, as a utility watchdog over Oregon’s three investor-owned electric utilities, PGE, Pacific Power and Idaho Power.
PAST COVERAGE | Oregon House passes bill making large data centers pay for power grid costs
According to CUB, PGE’s plan would charge residential customers 34-45% of the costs for new power supply and transmission, despite data centers being the primary drivers of increased energy demand.
CUB argues that this approach contradicts the intent of the POWER Act, which aims to prevent Oregon families from subsidizing data centers.
PGE, however, defends its proposal. The company mentioned a new tool called the Peak Growth Modifier as a means to ensure that those driving peak demand growth bear the associated costs.
“The electric grid and generating resources are built to make sure customers are reliably served at moments when usage is at its highest point – this is peak demand,” PGE said. “The principle is simple: customer groups driving peak-demand growth should pay for the infrastructure needed to serve that growth.”
The Oregon Public Utility Commission is currently reviewing PGE’s plan, with a decision expected by April 2026.
The POWER Act, signed by Gov. Kotek, instructed the commission to create a new industrial customer class for those using over 20 megawatts of energy, primarily data centers.
The bill also included provisions for infrastructure cost-sharing mechanisms, customer protections, and long-term contracts for data centers.
What’s the buzz around data centers?
Data centers are facilities that house and run large computer systems. They have been expanding at a fast pace to power the fast-growing AI economy across the country.
They usually contain several computer servers, data storage devices, network equipment and other devices that allow for storing, managing, processing and transmitting data.
SEE ALSO | Exploring AI data centers’ impact on U.S. resources
Currently, residential customers account for 40% of total electricity consumption, while data centers represent only 6% in Oregon.
However, data centers are expected to grow to approximately 20% of total consumption by 2030.
Oregon currently has 138 data centers, according to Data Center Map’s database.
Data centers use a lot of electricity, especially those specifically built to support generative AI.
A new Pew Research Center analysis of federal and international data shows U.S. data centers used 183 terawatt-hours of electricity in 2024, about 4% of all electricity used nationwide, according to the International Energy Agency (IEA).
That’s roughly equal to the entire annual electricity use of Pakistan.
According to Pew and the IEA, a typical AI-optimized hyperscale center uses as much electricity as 100,000 homes a year. Newer mega-facilities could use 20 times more once they go online.
In major hubs, especially Northern Virginia, clusters of these centers now consume more than a quarter of the state’s total electricity supply, the Electric Power Research Institute reports.
Carnegie Mellon University estimates U.S. electricity bills could rise 8% by 2030 just from data centers and crypto mining alone, with even steeper hikes in the most data-center-dense regions.
Data centers in the U.S. also consumed 17 billion gallons of fresh, drinking water in 2023, mainly to cool energy-intensive AI chips.
By 2028, hyperscale centers alone could be consuming 16 to 33 billion gallons annually — roughly the yearly use of a mid-sized U.S. city.
The Associated Press and Emma Withrow of The National Desk contributed to this report.
-
Iowa2 days agoAddy Brown motivated to step up in Audi Crooks’ absence vs. UNI
-
Washington1 week agoLIVE UPDATES: Mudslide, road closures across Western Washington
-
Iowa1 week agoMatt Campbell reportedly bringing longtime Iowa State staffer to Penn State as 1st hire
-
Iowa4 days agoHow much snow did Iowa get? See Iowa’s latest snowfall totals
-
Miami, FL1 week agoUrban Meyer, Brady Quinn get in heated exchange during Alabama, Notre Dame, Miami CFP discussion
-
Cleveland, OH1 week agoMan shot, killed at downtown Cleveland nightclub: EMS
-
World1 week ago
Chiefs’ offensive line woes deepen as Wanya Morris exits with knee injury against Texans
-
Technology6 days agoThe Game Awards are losing their luster
