Connect with us

Oregon

Finalists for Oregon Ethics Commission director answer questions during ‘meet and greet’

Published

on

Finalists for Oregon Ethics Commission director answer questions during ‘meet and greet’


The search for the replacement for the Oregon Government Ethics Commission’s current director, Ron Bersin, who is retiring after leading the agency since 2006, is down to two candidates.

Susan Myers and Jay Messenger work in Salem as state government employees. They answered submitted questions Thursday so the commission could better understand how they would respond to potential budget cuts and their leadership style, and their knowledge about the position.

The commission enforces the state’s ethics laws, provides training for public officials and maintains the registry of required economic interest disclosures, registered lobbyists, and quarterly expenditures.

State auditors in 2021 said the nine-member commission could be strengthened and more independent. The commission last year launched an investigation into former secretary of state Shemia Fagan and her potential ethics violations of using state resources for personal benefit and reimbursement of personal expenses. The commission also made headlines after Gov. John Kitzhaber resigned amid an ethics scandal in 2015.

Advertisement

The full commission is set to conduct a final interview with the finalists this week.

Susan Myers, OGEC’s compliance and education coordinator

Meyers joined the commission in 2018 as an investigator. She received her bachelor’s in English from the University of Arizona and a master’s degree in English Literature from the University of New Mexico. She moved to Portland in the 1990s and taught English Literature for 10 years at Mt. Hood Community College and Portland Community College before returning to Arizona and attending law school. She worked at a private law firm before becoming an assistant attorney general in Arizona from 2008 through 2016, specializing in antitrust law.

Jay Messenger, internal controls officer for the Oregon Department of Revenue

Messenger was raised in Pennsylvania and attended Temple University for his undergraduate and law degree. He worked for two law firms doing securities regulatory defense and was a senior attorney in the National Association of Securities Dealers’ Department of Enforcement. He taught at Santa Clara University’s School of Law before moving to Oregon in 2010 and teaching at Willamette University’s College of Law. He also briefly worked as a chief of staff for California Assembly member Tony Thurmond in 2016. He joined the Oregon Department of Education as the legal and enforcement director from 2019 to 2022 before his latest position at the Department of Revenue.

Advertisement

Below are responses the finalists gave Thursday during what the commission called a “meet and greet.” They have been edited for length and clarity.

What is your understanding of the mission of the Oregon Government Ethics Commission?

Myers: To enforce the areas of law within its jurisdiction and to do so with impartiality. To accept complaints alleging violations of the three areas of law: ethics laws, lobbying laws and the public meetings. Our mission is to enforce those laws, but our mission also is to educate and that part of the mission, education, is, in my mind, primary. We accomplish more by educating people than simply by fining them or sanctioning them. I’m not saying the enforcement is not important but even in the enforcements, in the investigations, and so forth, the goal is still education because we don’t want people to repeat the same offenses.

Messenger: It administers and enforces Oregon government ethics and emphasizes education. Beyond the actual text of it is the government ethics commission deals with lobbying. It deals with government ethics, generally a lot of conflict-of-interest work. It deals with executive session laws. The OGEC has this body of law that they have to administer and enforce and just like any regulatory compliance practice, which I’ve been involved with most of my legal career, is making sure that those rules are adhered to. What I really appreciate about this mission is the education aspect … What any regulator wants is voluntary compliance. So you need the hammer of the enforcement but you also need to be able to teach and get the message out and help people understand … The mission is extremely important in order for people to have faith in government.

What experience do you bring that will help you be successful in this role?

Messenger: My own unique path meets the job duties of this description and would help support me … my law background deals with statutes and regulations. I spent almost a decade teaching in law schools … I’ve had significant management positions.  

Advertisement

Myers: Being an English professor, being an attorney … and the years I’ve spent at this agency. Ron Bersin has taught me a lot in those years. I’ve learned a lot. He has intentionally involved me in every aspect of the agency.

What are your top priorities for the agency in the first 30, 60 and 90 days?

Myers: In the first 30 days, the top priority is a successful transition, making sure staff understands expectations and how things will be working but outwardly facing is move the rulemaking process for public meetings law. We’re going to do rulemaking for ethics and lobby laws as well but getting the public meetings law done and getting the rules advisory committee formed is the primary goal for the next 30 to 60 days … And then we also have other items. Budgetary things that have to happen by early February as well legislative concepts … 60 to 90 days would be making sure the rulemaking process gets completed … taking steps to make our agency a little more open and transparent. That may be by providing more information on our website … figuring out where our agency could be more open and providing better information to the public.

Messenger: There’s some information I don’t have because I’m obviously on the outside. I don’t know some of these things but from being involved in the executive leadership team at the Department of Revenue certain deadlines are coming up … I don’t know if (OGEC) has any in the works but I would take a look at that … We have this short session, I don’t know what OGEC has going on in the short session so one is to deal with the legislative issues both for the short session that’s coming up and the 2025 session. What do we need to do to prepare for that? What do you need to do to get the trains running on time and keep the trains running on time … make sure while I’m learning that the work keeps flowing and maintain the high standards that the agency has … I want to make sure the staff feel supported … Getting more on-demand training available. I noticed on the OGEC website that there’s a plan to get more of it out in 2024 so I’d like to make sure that happens.

What opportunities do you see for the commission?

Myers: This has been a major transition not just in terms of Ron leaving but in terms of public meetings law. This is new not just to us, but other than the court system there has been no one in Oregon in all these years enforcing public meetings law … It is an opportunity for the commission and for the commission to meet that part of the mission that I said is preeminent: to provide education to everyone who needs it … Other opportunities are to explore outreach. Not just sending our trainers out to different parts of the state but exploring different ways of reaching our audience …There is an opportunity here for the commission and commission staff to establish better relationships with all of the public bodies that we serve … The other is something that I would propose, a difficult thing … I’ve thought about the benefits that COVID has brought us. I don’t mean COVID itself but meetings like this. We didn’t have Teams and Zoom meetings and all of that pre-COVID and now when the commission meets some of them are present in person and some are present in video … The opportunity for the commission is, as we get new commissioners … it is important that the commission be representative of the entire state. It’s well represented on a political spectrum, I would like to see, maybe, better representation on the statewide spectrum.

Messenger: I see some opportunities in outreach. I’ve been in the Oregon state government since 2019 … I took the course every state employee takes, the OGEC intro training that’s required but I don’t recall outreach done to state employees. I don’t know what outreach has been done to other public officials like local employees or local officials, people in boards and commissions across the state so I’d like to do some more outreach … More on-demand video training … And could we have little blurbs from opinions or stipulated orders that said here’s an example of a potential conflict of interest? Here’s an example of an actual conflict of interest.

Advertisement

Why do you want to lead the commission?

Messenger: The mission speaks to me. It’s a very important mission … And I feel like I could really contribute to the work of the commission.

Myers: I have worked very hard for this position … and that is because I’m very much committed to what this agency is and does and I believe I can help it do more.

Dianne Lugo covers the Oregon Legislature and equity issues. Reach her at dlugo@statesmanjournal.com or on Twitter @DianneLugo





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Oregon

What Dana Altman, Jackson Shelstad, Nate Bittle said after Oregon beat Liberty in NCAA Tournament

Published

on

What Dana Altman, Jackson Shelstad, Nate Bittle said after Oregon beat Liberty in NCAA Tournament


SEATTLE — No. 5 seed Oregon defeated No. 12 seed Liberty 81-52 in the first round of the NCAA Tournament on Friday.

Oregon coach Dana Altman, guard Jackson Shelstad and center Nate Nittle spoke after the game.

Below is a transcript of Oregon’s postgame press conference.

Advertisement

DANA ALTMAN: I thought the fellas came out with a lot of energy. The early threes kind of got us going, but I thought our defensive activity was really, really good. We moved the ball. We made some plays for each other there. Jackson and Kee, Nate hit some threes. I thought the plays that Jackson made right before half, we went 2 for 11 there mand he got a 15-footer down mand then he made a really good play diving on a loose ball and picking it up.

So then the second half we just — when we went into Nate, a lot of good things happened, 14 points, 10 boards. So all in all, I thought our energy was really good, our activity defensively was good. This is a team that you don’t win 28 games by accident, and they can really shoot it, but I thought our activity and our challenging their shots kind of got ‘em out of their rhythm. Their ball movement wasn’t the same as it’s been throughout the year.

THE MODERATOR: Questions for the student-athletes, please.

Q. Jackson, take us through you that sequence at the end of the half that Coach just referred to because it kind of epitomized just how big a gap there was in talent and game IQ tonight. At what point did you realize after the first jumper that when they’re trying to neutralize the 2 for 1 by taking the time on the inbound, that you can make a play defensively?

JACKSON SHELSTAD: I saw him throw the ball in. He kind of rolled it, so I knew if I dove on it, I could get there, so I just jumped on it, and I think they were trying to save some time on the clock, but we got the ball, then we got another possession, hit a shot. So it was just a good way to go into the second half.

Advertisement

Q. Jackson, that effort transition three you had, I think it was on your guys’ third possession or so, what’s it feel like to hit that shot and get that rhythm early and was that a shot that Dana liked from you? It kind of seemed like he yelled something at you after that.

JACKSON SHELSTAD: Yeah, I thought I had space, just tried to get my feet set. I work on those shots a lot, so just try to trust it. And then, yeah, when you hit your first couple shots, obviously it just gives you some confidence, and my teammates did a really good job just getting me open looks as well.

Q. Nate, you knew you would be bigger than anybody on the floor tonight, but you had the one sequence in particular where you just bulldozed right through a man. You don’t get to do that very much in the Big Ten. What did that feel like here and in this venue with the home crowd to literally just push your way through people tonight?

NATE BITTLE: It’s a physical game. Altman tells us all the time that growing up, if your mom told you it’s not a physical sport, it is. So we take that into consideration and it’s just one of those games where they didn’t have anybody that was bigger than 6′-8″, 6′-9″, so I knew that crashing the glass and going to the rim aggressively was what I needed to do.

Q. Jackson, the last game you guys played in March was that Creighton game. How much was that in your mind during this game and how much was it just about tonight?

Advertisement

JACKSON SHELSTAD: Yeah, I mean, that one definitely hurt. We had our chances. We had Dante and Jermaine really leading us and just trying to carry over that leadership from the experience I got last year in the tournament. We have a lot of guys first time playing in the tournament, so me, Bam, TJ, just got to bring leadership from last year with our experience.

Q. Guys, your first initial thoughts on an old friend, Arizona, in the second round, meeting them?

NATE BITTLE: Yeah, we know what we were going to have to do to beat them. It starts with defense and rebounding. We got to fight through screens like we did tonight, active hands, contest shots, deflections, and everything like that. I think if we play defense, everything will fall into place.

Q. Nate, you guys over the last several weeks, couple of months, have been playing just unreal basketball. I’ve seen nine out of the last 10 games you guys have won. I know obviously every team in this tournament is great, but do you feel like with the way you guys are playing, that you can beat any team at this moment at this stretch right now for the next couple of games that you guys continue to move on?

NATE BITTLE: Yeah, we went on that streak because we were playing defense, getting after people defensively, contesting shots, stuff like that, I just said. But the key to winning games is rebounding the ball and playing defense. Shots aren’t going to fall every night, but we can bring that defense and get aggressive and make their ball handlers dribble the ball full court against pressure and stuff like that. So if we’re active on the defense, it’s something that’s helped us win a lot of games this year.

Advertisement

THE MODERATOR: All right. We’ll let the players go and take questions for Coach Altman.

Q. To hold one of the top shooting teams in the country to, by far, a season low until garbage time a season low from 3 up until the very end there, how do you feel about your defensive effort when you knew that would be such a focal point?

DANA ALTMAN: I thought our activity was really good. We felt like if we could get some hands on some balls and disrupt their rhythm, that we could really take away some of the really good looks they have been getting. I think the first five, six minutes we had seven deflections, and that’s where we jumped out to that 18-2 lead. In that, they had one open three. They got one right in front of our bench there. But I thought our defensive activity was really good.

And then to start the second half they got a couple easy ones, but then I think TJ had, like, three steals in a row and kind of got our defense going again.

So they are a rhythm team. Just watching ‘em shoot before the game, I mean, they just — their shooting strokes, they just throw ‘em in. So I’m glad we were able to take ‘em out of their rhythm and give ourself a chance.

Advertisement

Q. At that under 12 timeout in the first half, you subbed out four to five guys. Didn’t look too pleased on the sideline. What was your thinking there? What was you looking to have changed at that point that you called that timeout and made the wholesale changes there?

DANA ALTMAN: You know, I’m not sure which timeout, but I just thought at times our ball movement wasn’t what it should be. We did have 14 turnovers. Most of ‘em were just trying to go too quick. They just got a little too much optimism with what they were doing. We need to be a little bit more patient at times.

When we got that thing moving, they really had a hard time keeping up with us. If we just get it on one side and try to attack early — I want to be aggressive, but we got to be smart. 14 turnovers is way too many. Again, it was either lack of activity or the turnovers. Those, at times, I thought we just let up just a little bit activity-wise defensively. And then, again, I would just — I thought we made too many mistakes with the 14 turnovers.

Q. The play that was referenced earlier where Jackson made the jumper, dove right before halftime to get the ball back, is that sort of — can that be sort of a — does that kind of embody the spirit you need to play with this time of year and how do you feel as a coach when you see that level of going all out?

DANA ALTMAN: Well, I sure got excited, I mean, to see him layout like that and go after that ball. No, those are the kind of plays coaches like. I’m glad he hit the three then because now he’ll do it again.

Advertisement

But, no, that was a heck of a play. It really was. We took the timeout there. We had a couple bad possessions right before then. They hit a three. I think it was 39-20. We went 2 for 1. I think we had 43 three or 44 seconds, and we just let Jackson penetrate and pop up and hit one. That was the call. We wanted to get a stop and get it back. So they realized what we were doing and tried to slow roll one in there, and Jackson picked up on it and just made a tremendous play.

So, no, it was something that I think any coach would love to see.

Q. What do you say at the half in a game like this? Do you have to say a lot?

DANA ALTMAN: Well, we were really pleased with our activity. I can’t remember — I think we were up 9 or 10 on the boards, so you compliment ‘em on things that we emphasize. We wanted to be up on the boards and we were. Our activity was good defensively. Got on ‘em a little bit about the turnovers. I think we had seven or eight at halftime, so we got to handle the ball a little bit better. Talked about the importance of the first five minutes, not letting ‘em get going and get a bunch of easy shots.

So nothing different. We try to stay consistent with the same things we do during the season, same way we prepare. We don’t change much. This was like a neutral game that we play in November. The guys realize the stakes and the media attention and everything, but as coaches, we try to keep it as consistent as possible and try to emphasize the same things we emphasize throughout the season.

Advertisement

Q. You’ve talked about the bench already throughout the season, but 11 of your players scored, nine had at least five points. What kind of a luxury is it to go to a bench that deep in March?

DANA ALTMAN: Well, you know, when we had the game in hand there, I didn’t want to play anybody too many minutes. We got a game on Sunday, and the transition that Arizona exhibited today, you know, we’re going to have a lot of running. I mean, they were pushing the tempo. We’ve played them a number of times over the last 14 years, so we know the pressure they’re going to put on in transition. And so we’re a little fortunate there that we didn’t have to play guys 35 minutes.

Q. You talked earlier this week about some of your seniors getting a first opportunity to play in the tournament, can you explain the anticipation you had for them and also I saw you at the end of the game smiling with Jason got the layup and Mookie a couple times. Can you reflect on those guys that don’t get to play a lot getting their first crack at the tournament?

DANA ALTMAN: You know, one of the hardest things is, Mookie is really talented, Jamari is talented, our walk-ons, Jason, Drew and Coop, they have been tremendous. I can’t play 12, 13 guys. It’s hard when you’re talented not to get the opportunity. We played nine extended minutes, but it’s hard to play 10 or 11. Those two are the lease experienced guys we got, so never questioned their talent, it’s just that we don’t have injuries this year, we could have sure used Mookie last year when he was out all year and Jamari, those guys would have played a lot for us last year, just it’s amazing how different seasons are. But those guys, to hang with it, be great team members, it says a lot about their character, and they have been great, whether it’s the scout team, whether it’s energy on the bench. It’s difficult when you’re talented and feel like you want to play, it’s really hard to show that character, because you’re going through adversity and you want to play more, so they have done a tremendous job.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Oregon

Updated Oregon March Madness futures odds: Final Four odds and best bets to make now

Published

on

Updated Oregon March Madness futures odds: Final Four odds and best bets to make now


After a regular season filled with ups and downs, the Oregon Ducks have officially made it to the Field of 68 in an at-large bid with aspirations of paving their way to San Antonio and cutting down the nets on April 7th.

Six games stand in the way of the Ducks’ path to becoming National Champions. The first is tonight when Oregon squares off with the Liberty Flames at 7:10 PM PST at the Climate Pledge Arena in Seattle, Washington. The game will be aired on TruTV.

Before the journey starts, I’ve researched the best Oregon national champion and tournament odds from the top sportsbooks in the industry. Let’s look closer at where you can find the best odds for your Ducks.

Latest Oregon Ducks national championship odds

*as of March 21 at 9 AM PST

Advertisement
  • Caesars: +35000
  • FanDuel +22000
  • Bet365 +20000
  • DraftKings: +18000
  • Fanatics: +15000
  • BetMGM: +15000

BetMGM and Fantics Sportsbook give Oregon the best chance to win it all this year, while Caesars Sportsbook offers the best value at +35000. The Ducks have the 32nd-best odds of winning the NCAA Tournament on the platform– the Duke Blue Devils are the betting favorite at +300.

From a historical perspective, the Ducks’ chances of winning the championship aren’t so bleak. Every National Champion since 2002 has ranked inside the top 57 of KenPom’s offensive efficiency ratings and top 37 of the defensive efficiency ratings. Oregon ranks 39th and 29th, respectively.

Other commonalities with past champions could help the stars align for those looking to wager on Oregon winning it all. The team was in the top 12 in the Week 6 AP Poll, which has had each National Champion since 2004.

Oregon has a strong rotation, with four players scoring double digits. Leading the team are sophomore guard Jackson Shelstad and senior center Nathan Bittle. Having a backcourt and frontcourt player to rely on can help the team maintain momentum regardless of matchup through the tournament.

If you want to wager on Oregon to win it all, you should consider acting with urgency. The team’s odds could start to shift even before Friday night’s tip-off as other top contenders potentially get upset and shake up the odds for each round of the bracket.

Oregon Ducks March Madness futures odds

*as of March 21 at 9 AM PST

Advertisement

Sportsbooks bring their A-game during March Madness, so finding betting markets for each market gives you a plethora of options when wagering on the Ducks for this year’s tournament.

Oregon was given the No. 5 seed in the East region for the Field of 68 and has its first game tonight against No. 12 seed Liberty. Oddsmakers favor the Ducks as 6.5 to 7.5-point favorites, depending on the platform.

Dana Altman has a head coaching record of 17-16 during March Madness. The 66-year-old head coach has now made the tournament nine times as the program’s head coach, with five Sweet 16 appearances, two trips to the Elite Eight, and one time making the Final Four.

Betting on the Ducks comes with added risk for each round increased round you take them to advance to. That also increases the risk, as the path through the bracket comes with many challenges.

The best value to consider of these select odds would be rolling with the Ducks to make the Second Round. Oregon is 8-0 in the First Round with Altman as head coach, and they project better than Liberty ahead of tip-off. At the very least, consider pairing that wager with any more lucrative lines you take to cover any potential losses later on.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Oregon

Oregon lawmaker proposes raising MLB stadium bond to $800M with ‘jock tax’

Published

on

Oregon lawmaker proposes raising MLB stadium bond to 0M with ‘jock tax’


PORTLAND Ore. (KPTV) – The push to bring a Major League Baseball team to Portland got a major show of support from Oregon’s legislature Thursday.

Democratic State Senator Mark Meek introduced an amendment asking the state to contribute five times as much as they originally signed on for back in 2003. The amendment would change the bond for the stadium from $150 million to $800 million. But the way the bond is written, none of that money would come from the pockets of everyday Oregonians.

SEE ALSO:

Going to Portland Thorns or Timbers matches just got a whole lot easier thanks to TriMet.

The bond would be funded by something called a “jock tax.” Meaning, the new baseball players and team executives would be footing the bill.

Advertisement

“How the bonding works is you take the players’ salaries, which have accelerated since 2003, and you aggregate that tax revenue and bond it over a 30-year period,” said Portland Diamond Project Founder and president Craig Cheek.

This new bond is not a done deal just yet, Cheek and the Diamond Project will go over the amendment to SB110 in a public hearing in front of the Committee on Finance and Revenue next Monday, then the committee is expected to vote on the amendment next Wednesday in a work session.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending