Connect with us

Nevada

What did the Nevada Legislature do in its first month?

Published

on

What did the Nevada Legislature do in its first month?


One month down. Three to go.

The Nevada Legislature is about 30 days through its 120-day session, and the start has been eventful, to say the least.

Legislators passed a bill that Gov. Joe Lombardo signed into law just two weeks into the session to address the rising costs of eggs.

In what could be a headlining topic of the 2025 Legislature, lawmakers heard a bill that would dramatically increase tax credits for film industries to lure a film studio and the jobs that come with it to Southern Nevada, creating a mini-Hollywood in Las Vegans’ backyard.

Advertisement

They’ve been dealing with a budget proposal that was first introduced with a $335 million deficit from the governor’s office, though they’ve made amendments and have since presented a balanced budget proposal.

Legislators have also put forward over 1,100 ideas for bills – including ones that would exempt the state from daylight saving time, change the state’s handling of public records and put in place protections for in vitro fertilization – all while potential federal budget cuts loom over their heads.

Busy beginnings

The 63-member body has introduced more bills than in previous sessions. By Feb. 21, the 19th day of the session, 502 bills had been introduced – an 18.4 percent increase from the previous session, according to data from the Legislative Counsel Bureau.

As of that day, there were still more than 659 bill draft requests submitted but not yet introduced. Most legislators’ bills must be introduced by March 17.

Advertisement

Additionally, 27 resolutions were put forward that urge Nevada or Congress to take certain actions, from protecting the area of Frenchman Mountain to entering into the National Popular Vote Compact.

Assembly Speaker Steve Yeager, D-Las Vegas, said he and Senate Majority Leader Nicole Cannizzaro have done a better job telling legislators to turn their bill draft requests around earlier.

“The sooner your bill is drafted, the better chance you have of getting a hearing,” he said during a press availability Feb. 20.

Democratic legislators have also re-introduced unsuccessful bills from the last session, which has also been helpful in getting bill texts written, Yeager said.

“The first two weeks of session was extraordinarily busy and chaotic, unlike any session I’ve been a part of,” the Assembly speaker said. “I think it had a lot to do with the budget. We had a lot of extra meetings, either public-facing meetings or with our staff, to understand the budget.”

Advertisement

Others say the start of the session hasn’t caught them off guard. Richard McCann, president of McCann Consulting and a lobbyist since 2013, said he felt the pace of business is like early weeks in previous sessions — at least for lobbyists.

“I’m not going to argue with the statistics, but there’s still way too few lobbyists in the building to anticipate that it’s like a barn-burning thing going on,” he said. “There’s still a lot of … where is everybody?’ On a personal level, a lot of my bills aren’t out yet, so I don’t see it.”

Lombardo has also announced his legislative priorities, including permanent teacher pay raises and a $1 billion investment in new housing. His five bills are due March 24, and his office will hold a series of press conferences on the bills.

“Governor Lombardo looks forward to sharing and formally introducing his five key pieces of legislation, which include mandating accountability in education, lowering housing costs, expanding healthcare access, strengthening public safety, and modernizing economic development in Nevada,” spokesperson Elizabeth Ray said in an email.

So far he has signed two bills into law: Senate Bill 1, which funds the costs of the session, and Assembly Bill 171, which allows Nevada to temporarily drop a ban on cage-free egg sale requirements in the state, an effort that was fast-tracked through the Legislature to address rising egg prices.

Advertisement

Federal budget cuts

As part of the Trump administration’s campaign to curb federal spending, the House passed a Republican budget resolution that proposes $4.5 trillion in tax cuts and a $2 trillion reduction in federal spending over a decade.

Nevada legislators have expressed concerns about what that would mean to the state’s budget. Some say they are particularly concerned about changes that could affect Medicaid coverage in the state, where about 800,000 Nevadans are enrolled.

Asked whether he felt federal budget conversations were looming over the session, Assemblymember Phillip “P.K.” O’Neill, R-Carson City, grabbed a magic 8 ball-like toy with President Donald Trump’s likeness on it with the label ‘President Predicto.’ It said: “Yes, but let’s see what happens.”

“I think a lot of it is posturing, and it’s politics at the end of the day. Who’s going to blink, what game of poker do you want to play?” O’Neill said, adding that so much can happen before the federal government’s March 14 funding deadline. His top concern was the impact on Nevada’s Medicaid program, he said.

Advertisement

Assembly Minority Leader Gregory Hafen II, R-Pahrump, said he is happy that the federal government is “finally coming to the play and following Nevada’s lead.”

Nevada has always had a lean budget and a rainy-day fund, Hafen said.

“I’m happy to see that they’re finally taking the steps to follow Nevada’s lead, be responsible with their money and hopefully be able to establish a balanced budget,” Hafen said during a Tuesday press call.

How the budget cuts affect Nevadans is a concern, Hafen said, and he is watching on a daily basis to see how the state should prepare.

“I feel pretty good. I had a really good conversation with fiscal staff this morning on where we’re at and what we might see, but I feel confident that it’ll be good,” he said.

Advertisement

Democratic lawmakers struck a different tone. Many have used the first month’s hearings to gauge how prepared the state is for reductions in federal support and to call on Congressional Republicans to vote against proposed cuts.

“We learn more every day that these cuts will devastate families, devastate their economic security, cause chaos for our health care providers, and cost our state budget billions of dollars,” Cannizzaro, D-Las Vegas, said during a Wednesday press conference before a meeting where lawmakers grilled state health care officials over potential impacts to budget cuts.

During a budget hearing for the Governor’s Office of Federal Assistance, director A’Keia Sanders said the office is evaluating possible long-term effects of a lower federal budget and finding alternative funding sources for programs in which federal funding may no longer be available.

“Our goal is to create sustainable solutions that improve efficiency, increase funding opportunities and support long-term success for our agencies and communities,” she said.

McCann said the lack of clarity in federal support makes it difficult to plan policies.

Advertisement

“When there’s uncertainty in terms of where money’s going to be coming from, we can barely take what we got,” he said. “Asking for more becomes really a problem.”

Contact Jessica Hill at jehill@reviewjournal.com and McKenna Ross at mross@reviewjournal.com. Follow @jess_hillyeah and @mckenna_ross_ on X.



Source link

Advertisement

Nevada

Nevada debuts public option amid federal health care shifts

Published

on

Nevada debuts public option amid federal health care shifts


More than 10,000 people have enrolled in Nevada’s new public option health plans, which debuted last fall with the expectation that they would bring lower prices to the health insurance market.

Those preliminary numbers from the open enrollment period that ended in January are less than a third of what state officials had projected. Nevada is the third state so far to launch a public option plan, along with Colorado and Washington state. The idea is to offer lower-cost plans to consumers to expand health care access.

But researchers said plans like these are unlikely to fill the gaps left by sweeping federal changes, including the expiration of enhanced subsidies for plans bought on Affordable Care Act marketplaces.

The public option gained attention in the late 2000s when Congress considered but ultimately rejected creating a health plan funded and run by the government that would compete with private carriers in the market. The programs in Washington state, Colorado, and Nevada don’t go that far — they aren’t government-run but are private-public partnerships that compete with private insurance.

Advertisement

In recent years, states have considered creating public option plans to make health coverage more affordable and to reduce the number of uninsured people. Washington was the first state to launch a program, in 2021, and Colorado followed in 2023.

Washington and Colorado’s programs have run into challenges, including a lack of participation from clinicians, hospitals, and other care providers, as well as insurers’ inability to meet rate reduction benchmarks or lower premiums compared with other plans offered on the market.

Nevada law requires that the carriers of the public option plans — Battle Born State Plans, named after a state motto — lower premium costs compared with a benchmark “silver” plan in the marketplace by 15% over the next four years.

But that amount might not make much difference to consumers with rising premium payments from the loss of the ACA’s enhanced tax credits, said Keith Mueller, director of the Rural Policy Research Institute.

Advertisement

“That’s not a lot of money,” Mueller said.

Three of the eight insurers on the state’s exchange, Nevada Health Link, offered the state plans during the open enrollment period.

Insurance companies plan to meet the lower premium cost requirement in Nevada by cutting broker fees and commissions, which prompted opposition from insurance brokers in the state. In response, Nevada marketplace officials told state lawmakers in January that they will give a flat-fee reimbursement to brokers.

The public option has faced opposition among state leaders. In 2024, a state judge dismissed a lawsuit, brought by a Nevada state senator and a group that advocates for lower taxes, that challenged the public option law as unconstitutional. They have appealed to the state Supreme Court.

Federal Policy Impacts

Recent federal changes create more obstacles.

Advertisement

Nevada is consistently among the states with the largest populations of people who do not have health insurance coverage. Last year, nearly 95,000 people in the state received the enhanced ACA tax credits, averaging $465 in savings per month, according to KFF, a health information nonprofit that includes KFF Health News.

But the enhanced tax credits expired at the end of the year, and it appears unlikely that lawmakers will bring them back. Nationwide ACA enrollment has decreased by more than 1 million people so far this year, down from record-high enrollment of 24 million last year.

About 4 million people are expected to lose health coverage from the expiration of the tax credits, according to the Congressional Budget Office. An additional 3 million are projected to lose coverage because of other policy changes affecting the marketplace.

Justin Giovannelli, an associate research professor at the Center on Health Insurance Reforms at Georgetown University, said the changes to the ACA in the Republicans’ One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which President Donald Trump signed into law last summer, will make it more difficult for people to keep their coverage. These changes include more frequent enrollment paperwork to verify income and other personal information, a shortened enrollment window, and an end to automatic reenrollment.

In Nevada, the changes would amount to an estimated 100,000 people losing coverage, according to KFF.

Advertisement

“All of that makes getting coverage on Nevada Health Link harder and more expensive than it would be otherwise,” Giovannelli said.

State officials projected ahead of open enrollment that about 35,000 people would purchase the public option plans. Of the 104,000 people who had purchased a plan on the state marketplace as of mid-January, 10,762 had enrolled in one of the public option plans, according to Nevada Health Link.

Katie Charleson, communications officer for the state health exchange, said the original enrollment estimate was based on market conditions before the recent increases in customers’ premium costs. She said that the public option plans gave people facing higher costs more choices.

“We expect enrollment in Battle Born State Plans to grow over time as awareness increases and as Nevadans continue seeking quality coverage options that help reduce costs,” Charleson said.

According to KFF, nationally the enhanced subsidies saved enrollees an average of $705 annually in 2024, and enrollees would save an estimated $1,016 in premium payments on average in 2026 if the subsidies were still in place. Without the subsidies, people enrolled in the ACA marketplace could be seeing their premium costs more than double.

Advertisement

Insights From Washington and Colorado

Washington and Colorado are not planning to alter their programs due to the expiration of the tax credits, according to government officials in those states.

Other states that had recently considered creating public options have backtracked. Minnesota officials put off approving a public option in 2024, citing funding concerns. Proposals to create public options in Maine and New Mexico also sputtered.

Washington initially saw meager enrollment in its Cascade Select public option plans; only 1% of state marketplace enrollees chose a public option plan in 2021. But that changed after lawmakers required hospitals to contract with at least one public option plan by 2023. Last year the state reported that 94,000 customers enrolled, accounting for 30% of all customers on the state marketplace. The public option plans were the lowest-premium silver plans in 31 of Washington’s 39 counties in 2024.

A 2025 study found that since Colorado implemented its public option, called the Colorado Option, coverage through the ACA marketplace has become more affordable for enrollees who received subsidies but more expensive for enrollees who did not.

Colorado requires all insurers offering coverage through its marketplace to include a public option that follows state guidelines. The state set premium reduction targets of 5% a year for three years beginning in 2023. Starting this year, premium costs are not allowed to outpace medical inflation.

Advertisement

Though the insurers offering the public option did not meet the premium reduction targets, enrollment in the Colorado Option has increased every year it has been available. Last year, the state saw record enrollment in its marketplace, with 47% of customers purchasing a public option plan.

Giovannelli said states are continuing to try to make health insurance more affordable and accessible, even if federal changes reduce the impact of those efforts.

“States are reacting and trying to continue to do right by their residents,” Giovannelli said, “but you can’t plug all those gaps.”

Are you struggling to afford your health insurance? Have you decided to forgo coverage? Click here to contact KFF Health News and share your story.

KFF Health News is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues and is one of the core operating programs at KFF — an independent source of health policy research, polling, and journalism. Learn more about KFF.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Nevada

NEVADA VIEWS: Planning for a resilient economic future

Published

on

NEVADA VIEWS: Planning for a resilient economic future


Southern Nevada has a proud history of competing — and winning — through boldness and reinvention. We have developed a world-class tourism economy, built globally recognized brands and demonstrated our ability to rebound from significant disruptions. In today’s fiercely competitive global economy, however, we must intentionally design the next chapter of our economic story. Communities worldwide are continuously enhancing their sophistication, and we must keep pace.

Since joining the Las Vegas Global Economic Alliance in late August of last year, I have consistently heard from community partners that we must diversify and enhance Southern Nevada’s economy. Our goal is to build upon and complement the strengths we already possess.

To achieve this, the alliance, as Southern Nevada’s regional economic development organization and designated Regional Development Agency, is embarking on a comprehensive strategic planning process. This initiative will guide our economic development priorities both in the near and long term, ensuring that we focus on areas that will yield the most positive impact.

The alliance has a history of reinvention, having been established in 1958 as the Southern Nevada Industrial Foundation, later becoming the Nevada Development Authority, and since 2011, operating under its current name in partnership with the Governor’s Office of Economic Development.

Advertisement

Economic development extends beyond merely attracting companies. It encompasses the ability of local families to access high-wage careers, the opportunity for young people to build their futures at home and the resilience of our economy to withstand disruptions.

Over the past decade, Southern Nevada has made significant strides toward economic diversification, with investment outcomes in 2025 surpassing those of 2024. However, our work is far from complete. While tourism will always be a foundational strength and source of pride for our region, over-reliance on any single sector poses risks. A diversified economy enhances stability, and stability creates opportunities. We are united in our desire for more accessible housing, expanded health care and education, and greater upward mobility for our residents.

This strategic planning effort aims to ensure that the alliance and its partners concentrate on the right initiatives in the right manner. It will validate the region’s target industries and subsectors, narrowing our focus on areas where Southern Nevada has genuine competitive advantages and long-term potential. The planning process will include community interviews, focus groups and surveys to ensure our final strategy reflects the real opportunities and challenges facing Southern Nevada. We will establish flagship goals and a prioritized strategy matrix to direct our attention and resources toward meaningful outcomes.

A crucial aspect of this process involves clarifying roles within the broader economic ecosystem. Economic development is a team sport — when organizations replicate efforts, operate in silos or compete for recognition, the region loses valuable time and credibility, allowing opportunities to slip away. I have witnessed this behavior in various markets, serving as a red flag for prospective companies.

We have already made strides in building partnerships, exemplified by a Memorandum of Understanding signed in November 2025 with the Economic Development Authority of Western Nevada to jointly support economic development education and advocacy for community leaders statewide.

Advertisement

Our strategic work will also include a organizational assessment of the alliance, evaluating our mission, resource deployment and engagement model. Economic impact requires operational excellence and measurable execution. Most importantly, this plan — which we anticipate completing by late April — will feature a three-year road map with clear timelines, recommended actions and meaningful metrics to transparently track our progress. A longtime mentor of mine often said, “What gets watched gets measured, and what gets measured gets done.”

Las Vegas has always taken the initiative to shape its own future. This strategic plan presents an opportunity for us to do what we do best: come together, think bigger, act smarter and create something lasting. Together, we can build a purposeful and resilient economic future for Southern Nevada.

Danielle Casey is president and CEO of the Las Vegas Global Economic Alliance.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Nevada

Nevada State Police averts ‘udder chaos’ in Eureka County

Published

on

Nevada State Police averts ‘udder chaos’ in Eureka County


EUREKA COUNTY, Nev. (KOLO) – On Friday, Feb. 27, the Nevada State Police assisted with a cattle crossing on State Route 306 at Interstate 80 in Eureka County.

“While not an everyday part of our job, we like to do our part to assist our local ranchers while keeping traffic from turning into udder chaos,” according to an agency Facebook post. “It was a perfect opportunity to be outside (even if our animal friends were a little moo-dy).”



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending