Connect with us

Nevada

Nevada nonprofit, BCP challenging PUCN over NV Energy’s daily demand charge

Published

on

Nevada nonprofit, BCP challenging PUCN over NV Energy’s daily demand charge


LAS VEGAS (KTNV) — A Nevada nonprofit organization and the Attorney General’s Bureau of Consumer Protection are challenging the Public Utilities Commission of Nevada in court after the organization approved new NV Energy policies.

Vote Solar is a nonprofit advocacy group that focuses on state policies affecting solar and clean energy solutions.

WATCH | Darcy Spears breaks down challenge against PUCN

Advertisement

Nevada nonprofit, BCP challenging PUCN over NV Energy’s daily demand charge

According to their petition for judicial review, they are questioning the PUCN’s decision to approve two separate policies:

  • A new daily demand charge for residential and small business customers in Southern Nevada
  • A new 15-minute net metering policy for rooftop solar customers in Northern Nevada

In the petition, Vote Solar officials claim the PUCN’s final decisions are:

  • In violation of constitutional or statutory provisions
  • In excess of the statutory authority of the Commission
  • Made upon unlawful procedure
  • Affected by other error of law
  • Clearly erroneous in view of the reliable, probative and substantial evidence on the record
  • Arbitrary or capricious or characterized by abuse of discretion

“The PUCN’s decision is a major step backward for Nevada’s clean energy future,” said Chauntille Roberts, Regional Director at Vote Solar. “Nevada deserves energy policies that protect consumers, expand access to solar, and move our state forward—not backward.”

The Attorney General Office’s Bureau of Consumer Protection has filed a separate petition for judicial review.

“The demand charge rate structure (if permitted to be implemented), the 15-minute NEM netting methodology, and the approved affiliate charges result in rates that are unjust, unreasonable, and unlawful in contravention of NRS 704.040, and undermine the Commission’s fundamental duty under NRS 704.001 to provide utility ratepayers with just and reasonable rates,” the filing states in part.

Advertisement

The filing also states commissioners approved $2.7 million worth of affiliate charges that ratepayers would cover.

“The Commission’s decision concerning affiliate charges is belied by the record as the evidence in this docket demonstrates that NPC failed to provide any evidence, let alone substantial evidence, sufficient to support the recovery of an aggregate of $2.7 million,” the filing states. “Not only is the $2.7 million in affiliate charges unsupported by actual charges, it is also unreasonable and an unsupported monetary number, resulting in the Commission’s decision being arbitrary and capricious.”

No future court hearings have been scheduled for that case, as of Friday morning.

Channel 13 has reached out to NV Energy and the PUCN to see if they would like to comment on the petition.

NV Energy sent the following statement to us.

Advertisement

“NV Energy believes the changes that were approved and reaffirmed by the Public Utilities Commission of Nevada are consistent with state law, and we will be following this filing closely.

The demand charge more accurately captures the cost of energy delivery. It also helps to fix inequities between rooftop solar and non-rooftop solar customers. Because of the current billing structure, rooftop solar customers pay less than non-rooftop solar customers for the cost of service, shifting costs to non-rooftop solar customers.

Between 2018 and 2024, the total cost shift born by non-rooftop solar customers in Southern Nevada is $424 million. The total subsidy in Southern Nevada in 2025 is expected to grow by an additional $80 million, based on expected growth for the rest of the year.

The recently approved demand charge helps fix the inequities caused by the current system, and helps ensure that customer bills more accurately reflect the cost it takes to provide them with service.”

NV Energy Spokesperson

As of the time this article was published, we have not heard back from the PUCN.

Advertisement

In September, the PUCN approved the new rate model, which has sparked controversy among many Southern Nevadans who claim this will make their energy bills continue to go up.

“It’s painful. I just wanted to express concern as a private citizen that corporate America is going to do what it’s going to do to maintain profits and dividends,” Las Vegas local Joel Tauber told us in October.

“Why can a monopoly, a utility monopoly, dictate how I live in my residence,” retiree Jody Rodarmal told us in September. “If you believe there’s not going to be any increase, then why go to a new style of billing?”

SEPTEMBER 2025: NV Energy’s new billing structure sparks concern among Las Vegas residents

Advertisement

NV Energy’s new billing structure sparks concern among Las Vegas residents

How would the daily demand charge work?

According to NV Energy, the daily demand charge will be calculated by taking the highest amount of energy used in a 15-minute period each day and multiplying it by the current kilowatt-per-hour rate.

That charge will then be added to your bill. For the average customer, NV Energy estimates this will amount to roughly $20 per month.

Advertisement

WATCH: Ryan Ketcham explains NV Energy’s new daily demand charge

NV Energy is adding a ‘daily demand charge’ to power bills. What does that mean for consumers?

In past statements to Channel 13, NV Energy officials have stressed the rate increase requests are intended to recoup the costs of projects it undertakes to shore up the power grid.

Advertisement

However, there have been questions about that over the last year after scandals involving overcharging customers and trying to pass on the costs of things like luxury hotels, travel, and liquor to ratepayers, including a $1.2 million tab at Red Rock Resort.

According to NV Energy, Nevada customers already pay a lower average rate than the rest of the country. Through June 2025, the company says its rates were 22% lower than the U.S. average and 60% lower than in California.

Do you have a concern or question about something happening in the valley? Email Darcy.Spears@ktnv.com.





Source link

Advertisement

Nevada

AC problems spike as temps rise; Nevada Legal Services shares what tenants should know

Published

on

AC problems spike as temps rise; Nevada Legal Services shares what tenants should know


LAS VEGAS (FOX5) — As temperatures rise, FOX5 hears from more viewers dealing with air conditioning problems at home.

For tenants, those issues can quickly turn into questions about safety, repairs and what to do if a landlord doesn’t respond.

Nevada Legal Services said it also sees a spike in tenant complaints when it gets hotter.

Attorneys there said tenants do have rights, but warned that there are certain steps people should take — and others they should avoid — because making the wrong move in Nevada can lead to serious problems.

Advertisement

‘Pretty common, especially in the summer’

John Brogden, a senior attorney with Nevada Legal Services, said air conditioning issues are one of the most frequent problems he sees when the weather heats up.

“It’s pretty common, especially in the summer. We get a lot of air conditioning issues,” Brogden said.

MORE: No AC for 24 days: Las Vegas family reaches out to FOX5 for home warranty help

Brogden said extreme heat in Southern Nevada can put extra stress on homes and apartments, making repairs a common issue this time of year.

Two key categories: habitability vs. essential services

Brogden said Nevada law generally breaks these types of problems into two categories: habitability issues and essential services issues.

Advertisement

“There’s a lot of overlap in the language of the two statutes, but the way that I look at it is essential services,” Brogden said. “It’s something that, without it, that unit’s pretty much uninhabitable… like you would not want to live there.”

He said habitability issues can be problems that still affect a tenant’s ability to live safely in a unit, such as a slow leak coming through the wall.

The difference matters because it can change how a tenant should respond.

Withholding rent can be risky in Nevada

Brogden said one of the first things many people consider is withholding rent, but he warned that can be risky in Nevada.

“In which case, the landlord may or may not fix the issue and the person is out on the street for however long,” Brogden said. “The eviction process here is very quick. It’s not like California.”

Advertisement

For a habitability issue, Brogden said tenants may have to wait 14 days for a landlord to make a reasonable effort to fix the problem.

And if a tenant chooses to withhold rent, Brogden said it is not as simple as just not paying.

“If it’s a habitability issue, they are required to put that money into escrow with the court,” Brogden said. “At the time they file their answer and say, ‘Hey, this is the reason I withheld my rent.’ It’s not that I just don’t want to pay my rent. So, they have to, in good faith, give that money to the court.”

Essential services: 48-hour window (excluding weekends/holidays)

When it comes to an essential service, Brogden said landlords are generally required to take a reasonable step within 48 hours — not including holidays or weekends.

Other options may include paying for certain repairs and deducting the cost from rent or, in some cases, terminating the lease — which can be complicated.

Advertisement

What tenants should do first

Brogden said the first step in either case is to notify the landlord in writing, contacting them using the method outlined in the lease, if available.

He emphasized that every situation is different and whether something counts as a habitability issue or an essential services issue depends on the facts of the case.

Brogden said tenants should get legal advice — including through Nevada Legal Services — before taking action.

Nevada Legal Services warning: Don’t use AI for legal demands

Nevada Legal Services also warned tenants not to rely on AI chatbots to draft legal claims or demands to landlords.

Attorneys said they have been seeing more of that and that chatbots can misstate Nevada law, hurt a tenant’s credibility or create problems later in court.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Nevada

Nevada Lt. Gov. Anthony fined $3K in trans-athlete ethics case

Published

on

Nevada Lt. Gov. Anthony fined K in trans-athlete ethics case



Anthony used staff time, government equipment to promote ‘Protect Women’s Sports’ task force

play

  • Ethics commission voted 3-2 against Lt. Gov. Stavros Anthony.
  • Anthony says he should be allowed to advocate for issues he feels passionately about.
  • Ethics commission director says government resources can’t be used to promote personal projects.

A Nevada ethics panel fined Lt. Gov. Stavros Anthony $3,000 over use of state resources to promote a task force to keep trans athletes out of women’s sports.

Anthony, a Republican, is running for reelection.

The March 18 vote against Anthony was 3 to 2 by the Nevada Commission on Ethics.

In addition to the fine, he’s required to obtain ethics training within 60 days and develop a social media policy for his office.

Anthony created the “Task Force to Protect Women’s Sports” in late 2024 after the Nevada women’s volleyball team made national news by refusing to play San Jose State University for having a transgender player on its team.

Advertisement

“I decided I was very passionate about protecting female athletes,” he testified before the Nevada Legislature in February 2025. “I wanted to support the University of Nevada, Reno volleyball team who came out very courageously on their stand. That is why I created this task force.”

Anthony’s official government X account shared posts about task force events, and staff from the state’s Office of Small Business Advocacy — under Anthony’s authority — sent out emails about the task force. Anthony’s chief of staff testified the task force was not a function of the office.

The ethics commission’s vote served to “admonish the lieutenant governor for his actions in violation of the ethics law,” its motion said.

Advertisement

The Reno Gazette Journal contacted Anthony and his attorney, the ethics commission and Lindsey Harmon, a reproductive rights advocate who made the initial ethics complaint, for comment. None immediately responded.

Stavros Anthony’s defense of his actions

Anthony’s attorneys argued in legal filings that he did not violate any state laws “because there are no statutes, rules, regulations, policies or other authority prohibiting Mr. Anthony from advocating on political issues, supporting political causes, or from forming the Task Force.”

They added he had no financial interest in the task force, and that elected officials should be allowed to advocate for political positions.

“Under such a standard as urged by the Director (Ross Armstrong of the ethics commission), a public officer, for example, speaking at an official function or writing in official correspondence, stating that he or she is passionate about such issues as veterans’ rights or health care could be found to have violated ethics laws,” his attorneys wrote in a filing.

Advertisement

Ethics director’s argument against Anthony

Armstrong responded in a filing that the case was not about being able to advocate for causes one believes in.

“It’s about the undisputed use of specifically allocated taxpayer funds through staff, time, property and equipment on his significant personal interest rather than the government interests of the Office of the Lieutenant Governor and the Office of Small Business Advocacy,” Armstrong wrote. “Doing so violates the Ethics Law.”

He noted that Anthony’s government staff used state email systems to set up and coordinate efforts of the task force, promoted it on their government X feeds, and created talking points, press releases and other materials supporting it.

Armstrong added Anthony “used influence over subordinates to benefit the Task Force.”

Advertisement

Mark Robison is the state politics reporter for the Reno Gazette Journal, with occasional forays into other topics. Email comments to mrobison@rgj.com or comment on Mark’s Greater Reno Facebook page.



Source link

Continue Reading

Nevada

Southern Nevada Tax Assistance offers free filing help for Latino families this tax season

Published

on

Southern Nevada Tax Assistance offers free filing help for Latino families this tax season


LAS VEGAS (FOX5) — Tax season is underway, but some Latino families in the Las Vegas area say they have questions and concerns before getting started — and trust is a central part of the conversation this year.

Organizers at Southern Nevada Tax Assistance say their goal is to help families file safely and correctly. But this year, they say they are seeing something different: hesitation.

Hesitation and distrust on the rise

Nonprofit organization Somos Votantes, which focuses on helping Latinos in the community, says it is hearing from more families who are unsure who they can trust when it comes to filing.

“That’s why Southern Nevada Tax Assistance — they’re a group of IRS-certified volunteers,” said Angel Lazcano.

Advertisement

Somos Votantes held a free filing event Wednesday to connect families with trusted, no-cost help. Volunteers said the stress of tax season is something many in the community have long felt.

“Personally, growing up, I’ve always heard how much, how stressful it is around this time of year, especially getting closer and closer to tax day,” one volunteer said.

Ghost preparers a recurring threat

That concern is not new. Connie Buckley, founder of Nevada Tax Assistance, said every year scammers known as ghost preparers target people who may not fully understand the filing process or whose first language may not be English.

“They create fraudulent tax returns. People don’t know what to expect on their taxes, so they don’t know that it’s wrong. And then two or three years later, the IRS sends them a letter that says something’s not right here,” Buckley said.

Fears about sharing personal information

For many Latino families, concerns this year go beyond scams, with some expressing fears about sharing personal information when filing.

Advertisement

Buckley addressed those concerns directly. “The recommendation always is — let me put it this way — when you get your tax forms from your employer, like the W-2s, the 1099s, those are also transmitted to the IRS. So the IRS knows that you made money and they are expecting to see your tax return to reconcile that,” she said.

Buckley also warned that choosing not to file can create larger problems. “If you owe taxes, there are a lot of penalties that they will assess against you, against what you owe. And now you’ve got yourself into an even bigger hole than you would have been in if you just filed your taxes when they were due,” she said.

Organizers say that no matter a person’s status, filing taxes remains important, and they want to make sure families can do it safely. Free tax filing help is available across the Las Vegas Valley for those who need it.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending