Connect with us

Nevada

Got a Nevada signature verification form in the mail? Here are 3 things to know.

Published

on

Got a Nevada signature verification form in the mail? Here are 3 things to know.


Confused voters are flooding Washoe County with questions about voter signature verification cards the Nevada Secretary of State’s office sent out last week.

“These cards are not a scam,” said Washoe County spokesperson Bethany Drysdale in an email Monday, adding: “We are receiving a lot of phone calls.”

Are Nevada signature verification cards mandatory to fill out?

The cards are not mandatory to return.

“Completing and submitting the form is optional and will not affect your ability to vote in the upcoming election,” the Secretary of State’s office said in a news release.

Advertisement

Why were Nevada signature verification cards sent out?

Nevada law requires election officials to use your signature to verify your identity when voting.

The card’s intention was to give registered voters the opportunity to update their signature on file because signatures can evolve over time.

“This is an effort to get ahead of possible delays caused by mismatched signatures,” Drysdale said. “They will ensure that we have accurate signatures on file.”

If the signature on a mail-in ballot does not match the one on file, it gets flagged and election officials reach out to the voter by mail – or by phone if a number was provided – in order to confirm the actual registered voter submitted the ballot. If the signature can’t be confirmed by the Saturday after the election, the ballot is not counted.

Advertisement

More than 800 ballots required additional signature verification – called curing – in June’s primary.

Signatures can also be flagged for not matching when voting in person at a vote center.

Why does Nevada’s signature verification mailer want personal details?

If you send back the postcard with your current signature, it asks you to provide additional information to identify it’s really you: your date of birth or the last four digits of either your driver’s license or Social Security number.

“The letter asks for information to confirm the identity of the individual responding if there are any questions on the updated signature,” the Secretary of State’s office said.

Advertisement

If you don’t feel comfortable providing the added information on the return postcard, you can submit your signature update in person at your registrar of voters or county clerk’s office.

In Washoe County, that’s in Room 135 at 1001 E. Ninth St., Building A in Reno.

Mark Robison is the state politics reporter for the Reno Gazette Journal, with occasional forays into other topics. Email comments to mrobison@rgj.com or comment on Mark’s Greater Reno Facebook page.



Source link

Advertisement

Nevada

IN RESPONSE: Cortez Masto lands bill would keep the proceeds in Nevada

Published

on

IN RESPONSE: Cortez Masto lands bill would keep the proceeds in Nevada


A recent Review-Journal letter to the editor mischaracterized Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto’s Southern Nevada Economic Development and Conservation Act, also known as the Clark County Lands bill. As the former executive director of the Nevada Conservation League, I wholeheartedly support this legislation, so I wanted to set the record straight.

Sen. Cortez Masto has been working on this bill for years in partnership with state and local governments, conservation groups like the NCL and local area tribes. It’s true that the Clark County lands bill would open 25,000 acres to help Las Vegas grow responsibly, while setting aside 2 million acres for conservation. It would also help create more affordable housing throughout the valley while ensuring our treasured public spaces can be preserved for generations to come.

What is not correct is that the money from these land sales would go to the federal government’s coffers. In fact, the opposite is true.

The 1998 Southern Nevada Public Lands Management Act is a landmark bill that identified specific public land for future sale and created a special account ensuring all land sale revenues would come back to Nevada. In accordance with that law 5 percent of revenue from land transfers goes to the state of Nevada for general education purposes, 10 percent goes to the Southern Nevada Water Authority for needed water infrastructure and 85 percent supports conservation and environmental mitigation projects in Southern Nevada. This legislation has provided billions to Clark County and will continue to benefit generations of Southern Nevadans. Sen. Cortez Masto’s lands bill builds upon the act’s success.

Advertisement

So here’s the good news: All of the money generated from land made available for sale under Sen. Cortez Masto’s bill would be sent to the special account created by the 1998 law. Rather than going to an unaccountable federal government, the proceeds would continue to help kids in Vegas get a better education, bolster outdoor recreation and modernize Southern Nevada’s infrastructure.

I know how important it is that money generated from the sale of public land in Nevada stay in the hands of Nevadans, and so does the senator. That’s why she opposed a Republican effort last year to sell off 200,000 acres of land in Clark County and other areas of the country that would have sent those dollars directly to Washington.

Public land management in Nevada should benefit Nevadans. We should protect sacred cultural sites and beloved recreation spaces, responsibly transfer land for affordable housing when needed and ensure our state has the resources it needs to grow sustainably. I will continue working with Sen. Cortez Masto to advocate for legislation, such as the Clark County lands bill, that puts the needs of Nevadans first.

Paul Selberg writes from Las Vegas.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Nevada

Las Vegas High beats Coronado in 5A baseball — PHOTOS

Published

on

Las Vegas High beats Coronado in 5A baseball — PHOTOS