By Amy Alonzo — Dwarfed by drought, the warming climate and other, more immediate environmental threats, earthquakes aren’t at the forefront of most Nevadans’ minds.
But through the mid-20th century, Nevada was known as an earthquake state. While the state has experienced few sizable quakes since then, recent temblors have caught the attention of those who monitor earthquakes.
On Dec. 5, waves of water in the cave that houses rare Devil’s Hole pupfish in Death Valley National Park sloshed nearly 2 feet high after a 7.0 magnitude earthquake struck off the coast of California.
Just four days later, a 5.8 magnitude quake struck on an unnamed fault between Yerington and Silver Springs, shaking Northern Nevada and sending objects flying in some buildings.
Advertisement
A map showing Nevada’s jurisdictional dams. Green are low hazard, blue are significant hazard and red are high hazard. (Nevada Division of Water Resources/Courtesy)
Neither of the earthquakes resulted in any substantial damage — the California earthquake was too far offshore, while the Nevada quake had its epicenter in a remote area — but they are reminders that seismic activity could result in significant damage to the state’s aging infrastructure. It’s why state officials are proactively shoring up some of Nevada’s oldest earthen dams that, if shaken to the point of breaking, could cause water supply contamination for tens of thousands of people and deadly floods.
Earthquake magnitude is measured on a scale of 1 to 10, with damage starting to be visible around magnitude 5; by magnitude 6, buildings could see structural damage requiring repairs. Nevada experiences about one magnitude 6 earthquake per year, said Christie Rowe, director of the Nevada Seismological Laboratory at the University of Nevada, Reno, but almost always in a remote portion of the state.
If a magnitude 6 or greater earthquake were to occur in Las Vegas, Reno or another densely populated portion of the state, “there’s going to be a lot [of] impact,” Rowe said.
In the case of the recent earthquakes with epicenters in Yerington and off California’s coast, urban areas such as Reno were “pretty lucky,” Rowe said. “If either one had happened in a city, it would have been bad news.”
Inspections around the epicenter of the Lyon County earthquake revealed cracks in irrigation ditches and collapses on the banks of the Walker River but no damage to roads or bridges.
Advertisement
The quake was also a reminder to officials of the state’s seismic history and the need to beef up some of the hundreds of dams across Nevada, most constructed in the days before statewide engineering standards and made of dirt and other natural materials.
Damage from earthquakes is “definitely a concern,” said Keith Conrad, chief of dam safety at Nevada’s Division of Water Resources.
The state recently received federal funds to upgrade the dam at Marlette Lake, one of the oldest dams in the state. Marlette Lake perches on the rim between the Lake Tahoe Basin and Carson City, a popular mountain biking and hiking destination renowned for its fall colors and views down to Lake Tahoe. Its reservoir, restrained by an earthen dam estimated to be more than 150 years old, serves as the water source for multiple Northern Nevada counties and cities.
The state purchased the lake and its surrounding land in 1963, but now its aging infrastructure, combined with its location in an area of high seismic activity, makes it a “high hazard dam.” Annual inspections of the dam indicate a “high probability” of a breach if an earthquake of 6.5 magnitude or greater were to occur. If it breached, it could easily flood State Route 28, which runs between the dam and Lake Tahoe, and, with a sewage pipe running beneath the highway, damage to the highway could release sewage and debris into Lake Tahoe.
The seismic retrofit being done at Marlette should cover a lot of vulnerabilities that could affect the lake, caused by earthquakes or other events, Rowe said.
Advertisement
“If they know that dam is vulnerable, I’m really glad they’re doing preventative work,” she said. “It’s going to be way less expensive than if the dam failed.”
High hazard dams and federal emergency declarations
In 1915, the state experienced its largest earthquake, a 7.3 shaker near Winnemucca.
But there has been little high-magnitude shaking in urban areas since 1960, the exception being a magnitude 6 earthquake in the Wells area in 2008. But earthquake faults are still being discovered across the state (the Yerington-area quake occurred near no known faults) and there is still serious potential for earthquakes, especially in western Nevada.
In Lake Tahoe, there are multiple major fault lines that run beneath the lake, Rowe said, and the area is considered at high risk for earthquakes. While the state has been relatively free of any large quakes during the last few decades, Nevada has had the third most frequent number of large earthquakes in the last 150 years.
Advertisement
Lake Tahoe was created by seismic activity — earthquake faulting caused a portion of the mountains to drop, creating a giant bowl, and volcanic deposits dammed the bowl on its north side.
About 5,000 years ago, Lake Tahoe’s west shore experienced an earthquake large enough to produce a tsunami — and a tsunami-producing fault in the basin is overdue for an earthquake, scientists said more than a decade ago at an annual meeting of the American Geophysical Union.
Earthquakes occur every 3,000 to 4,000 years along the West Tahoe Fault that runs from beneath the lake up to the Echo Summit area. That fault last saw a major quake 4,500 years ago. The Incline Fault, located in the northeast portion of the lake, saw a quake of roughly magnitude 7 about 575 years ago.
During earthquakes, concern first focuses on injury and loss of life, said Rowe. But after that, effects to basic services and communications are of utmost concern, she said.
“The resilience of a community relies on the resilience of the water supply and the food supply,” she said. “It can take days or weeks to restore those kinds of services.”
Advertisement
It’s that focus on infrastructure that prompted the state to apply for a $10 million federal grant to upgrade Marlette Lake Dam to reduce the risk of a dam breach during an earthquake. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) agreed the dam, listed as “high hazard,” warrants the work and issued the funding.
Nevada’s Division of Water Resources, the department Conrad staffs, oversees about 660 dams across the state; additional dams, such as those operated by the Bureau of Reclamation, Army Corps of Engineers and Bureau of Indian Affairs, do not fall under the division’s purview.
Few are concrete or rock masonry dams — most are earth embankment dams. Many of them are part of stormwater detention basins in Las Vegas or are small, privately owned structures used for irrigation in rural portions of the state (nearly half of the state’s dams are privately owned) but some are larger and in areas that could have substantial downstream effects if they failed, such as the dam at Marlette Lake.
The dams are categorized into “low,” “significant” and “high” hazard by how catastrophic their failure would be on downstream residents and infrastructure. While failure of low hazard dams are unlikely to have any substantial economic effects or cause death, failure of significant hazard dams are likely to cause substantial economic effects; failure of a high hazard dam is likely to lead to death.
Nearly a quarter of state-monitored dams, primarily in the Reno/Tahoe and Las Vegas areas, are considered “high hazard.” (The designation does not reflect the safety or condition of the dam.)
Advertisement
Nevada didn’t start regulating dams until 1955; “anything prior to that, we don’t know a whole lot about these dams, and chances are they were never engineered,” Conrad said. When it comes to Marlette Lake’s dam, built nearly a century before the state started regulating dams, “Who knows what techniques they used to build it. There’s a big old question mark on that portion of the dam.”
But the general state of dams within Nevada is pretty poor, Conrad said.
A 2018 report from the American Society of Civil Engineers ranked Nevada’s dams with a lowly grade of “D+” or “Poor: At Risk.”
A separate report issued by the National Inventory of Dams in 2023 echoed the 2018 findings, with the condition of the bulk of the dams included in the report listed as “fair” or “poor.”
“It’s hard to say exactly what the likelihood of failure is,” Conrad said.
Advertisement
In 2003, the state began drafting emergency action plans for all high and significant hazard-rated dams in the state.
“We are kind of ahead of the curve” compared with some other states, Conrad said.
Those plans have been activated occasionally, Conrad said, such as earlier this year at Angel Lake near Wells when cracks were found in the roughly 150-year-old dam. The seeping cracks created sinkholes on top of the dam, complicating repairs.
There has never been a federal emergency declaration in Nevada because of a dam failure in the state, but Nevada has seen multiple dam failures throughout the years.
The earliest documented dam failure in Nevada occurred in 1876, when an irrigation dam across the Humboldt River 22 miles east of Battle Mountain failed, releasing a large volume of water through the canyon and flooding several downstream ranches.
Advertisement
In 1955, an intense December storm dropped between 10 inches and 13 inches of rain in Northern Nevada, causing flooding along the Walker, Carson and Truckee rivers. Derby Dam on the Truckee River failed, and Hobart Dam outside Carson City failed and released water that severely damaged U.S. Route 395. Nearly $4 million in damages (roughly $44.2 million in 2022 dollars) was incurred and one person died.
Hobart Reservoir, also part of the Marlette Lake Water System, is next on the state’s list of dams to be repaired with federal funds, Conrad said.
— This story is used with permission of The Nevada Independent. Go here for updates to this and other Nevada Independent stories.
RENO, Nev. (KOLO) – Country music artist Caleb Montgomery will be performing at the State Fair of Nevada.
Montogomery will be headlining the Opening Night Concert on June 11 at the Nevada State Fairgrounds in Reno.
“We are excited to welcome families and communities from across Nevada back to the official State Fair of Nevada,” said Nevada Department of Agriculture Director J.J. Goicoechea. “After 16 years, a Nevada tradition is finally returning, something many families have waited years to experience again.”
The fair will run from June 11 to June 13, and opening day tickets will be $15 for adults and $12 for kids aged 12 and younger.
Advertisement
Other featured programming includes:
Nevada Junior Livestock Show and Sale
University of Nevada, Reno Extension’s 4-H State Expo
NEVADA CITY, Calif. June 2, 2026 – Polls closed at 8:00 pm today. We will post local election results here as soon as they are released.
Advertisement
June 2, 2026 at 11:54 PM Third and final update, the next results update will be on Friday.
June 2, 2026 at 10:10 PM Second update being published now. The voter counts on the Cumulative Reports are based on the 15 Day Report of Registration and may differ from the Ballot Statistics count.
June 2, 2026 at 8:15 PM First updates
Advertisement
Advertisement
Federal contests – Nevada County results
CA Secretary of State · June 2, 2026 Primary · Unofficial
U.S. House, District 3
Advertisement
Loading…
Source: api.sos.ca.gov · Auto-refreshes every 2 min
‘
);}).join(”);
}
Advertisement
function sosFetchus_rep_district_3(manual){
if(manual)skeleton();
fetch(‘https://api.sos.ca.gov/returns/’+slug+’?_=’+Date.now())
.then(function(r){if(!r.ok)throw new Error(‘HTTP ‘+r.status);return r.json();})
.then(function(d){
if(d.raceTitle)titleEl.textContent=d.raceTitle;
metaEl.innerHTML=’‘+(d.Reporting||”)+(d.ReportingTime?’ · ‘+d.ReportingTime:”);
tsEl.textContent=”Updated “+new Date().toLocaleTimeString([],{hour:’2-digit’,minute:’2-digit’});
var cands=(d.candidates||[]).map(function(c){return{name:c.Name,party:c.Party,votes:parseInt((c.Votes||’0′).replace(/,/g,”)),pct:parseFloat(c.Percent||0),inc:c.incumbent};}).sort(function(a,b){return b.pct-a.pct;});
var top2set=new Set(cands.slice(0,2).map(function(c){return c.name;}));
var total=cands.reduce(function(s,c){return s+c.votes;},0);
CA Secretary of State · June 2, 2026 Primary · Unofficial
Insurance Commissioner
Loading…
Advertisement
Source: api.sos.ca.gov · Auto-refreshes every 2 min
‘
);}).join(”);
}
function sosFetchinsurance_commissioner(manual){
if(manual)skeleton();
fetch(‘https://api.sos.ca.gov/returns/’+slug+’?_=’+Date.now())
.then(function(r){if(!r.ok)throw new Error(‘HTTP ‘+r.status);return r.json();})
.then(function(d){
if(d.raceTitle)titleEl.textContent=d.raceTitle;
metaEl.innerHTML=’‘+(d.Reporting||”)+(d.ReportingTime?’ · ‘+d.ReportingTime:”);
tsEl.textContent=”Updated “+new Date().toLocaleTimeString([],{hour:’2-digit’,minute:’2-digit’});
Advertisement
var cands=(d.candidates||[]).map(function(c){return{name:c.Name,party:c.Party,votes:parseInt((c.Votes||’0′).replace(/,/g,”)),pct:parseFloat(c.Percent||0),inc:c.incumbent};}).sort(function(a,b){return b.pct-a.pct;});
var top2set=new Set(cands.slice(0,2).map(function(c){return c.name;}));
var total=cands.reduce(function(s,c){return s+c.votes;},0);
CA Secretary of State · June 2, 2026 Primary · Unofficial
Attorney General
Advertisement
Loading…
Source: api.sos.ca.gov · Auto-refreshes every 2 min
‘
);}).join(”);
}
Advertisement
function sosFetchattorney_general(manual){
if(manual)skeleton();
fetch(‘https://api.sos.ca.gov/returns/’+slug+’?_=’+Date.now())
.then(function(r){if(!r.ok)throw new Error(‘HTTP ‘+r.status);return r.json();})
.then(function(d){
if(d.raceTitle)titleEl.textContent=d.raceTitle;
metaEl.innerHTML=’‘+(d.Reporting||”)+(d.ReportingTime?’ · ‘+d.ReportingTime:”);
tsEl.textContent=”Updated “+new Date().toLocaleTimeString([],{hour:’2-digit’,minute:’2-digit’});
var cands=(d.candidates||[]).map(function(c){return{name:c.Name,party:c.Party,votes:parseInt((c.Votes||’0′).replace(/,/g,”)),pct:parseFloat(c.Percent||0),inc:c.incumbent};}).sort(function(a,b){return b.pct-a.pct;});
var top2set=new Set(cands.slice(0,2).map(function(c){return c.name;}));
var total=cands.reduce(function(s,c){return s+c.votes;},0);
A Carson City judge has granted the Nevada Gaming Control Board’s motion for a preliminary injunction blocking the operation of a third prediction market in the state.
First Judicial District Court Judge Jason Woodbury on Friday granted the Control Board’s motion and state officials believe a formal written order is forthcoming.
“We are very pleased with Judge Woodbury’s ruling and will continue to vigorously enforce Nevada law to safeguard gaming in our state,” Gaming Control Board Chairman Mike Dreitzer said in a release issued by the board Monday.
The injunction blocks QCX LLC, doing business as New York cryptocurrency-based Polymarket US, from providing its services in Nevada.
Advertisement
The Control Board has had similar successes with preliminary injunctions against New York-based KalshiEx LLC, doing business as Kalshi, and internet-centered Coinbase.
The board has taken decisive action in recent months to halt the operations of prediction markets in the state and has successfully restricted the operation of all unlicensed prediction markets that had been known to be operating in the state.
The board started its efforts in March 2025 against prediction markets, which are not licensed by the state but have written event contracts on sports and election outcomes and entertainment propositions.
Regulators consider the offering of sports-event contracts, along with certain other event contracts, to constitute wagering activity under Nevada law. They’ve said that they could operate in the state if were licensed, a process that often takes at least a year to complete.
Prediction markets believe they are authorized to conduct business in Nevada and every other U.S. state because they are regulated by the federal Commodity Futures Trading Commission, currently chaired by Michael Selig.
Advertisement
Because of its assertion that it has exclusive jurisdiction, it also has claimed that its oversight outweighs state gaming laws, which has resulted in pushback and lawsuits from a number of states that regulate casino gambling and sports betting.
Several states have pending litigation in place against prediction markets, but Nevada has seemingly found the silver bullet by taking their cases to state courts instead of federal courts.
Nevada’s public policy, as expressed by the Legislature, is that the gaming industry is vitally important to the economy of the state and the general welfare of the inhabitants and therefore “must be licensed, controlled, and assisted to protect the public health, safety, morals, good order, and general welfare of the inhabitants of the state.”
Contact Richard N. Velotta at rvelotta@reviewjournal.com or 702-477-3893. Follow @RickVelotta on X.
