Connect with us

Montana

Montana's Transplant Debate: Are Newcomers Really Ruining Our State?

Published

on

Montana's Transplant Debate: Are Newcomers Really Ruining Our State?


We hear a lot about how transplants are ruining the great state of Montana.

Over the last few years, thousands of people have moved to The Treasure State and for many Montanans, that’s been a hard pill to swallow. If you were to spend any time on social media sites that are Montana-related, chances are you will most certainly read lots of comments from disgruntled “locals”.

Of course, the strange part of that is that only about half of the state’s residents are actually from here and while it’s true, many have moved to Montana recently, according to new data, just as many people are moving away.

In my opinion, it’s not the transplants that are the problem, it’s the fact that we live in this environment of “if you don’t agree with me and my belief system, then you’re wrong, and screw you”.

Advertisement
Credit: Canva
Credit: Canva

Over the next several months we will be indoctrinated with political ads on TV, Radio, and Social Media and if history repeats itself, the majority of those ads won’t talk about the accomplishments of the candidate running, but everything wrong with the candidate that is going against them.

Somewhere along the way, many Montanans have simply refused to listen to anyone who has a different opinion than them.

Credit: Canva
Credit: Canva

Instead of focusing on things that benefit everyone and the state, we instead focus on who is “liberal” and who is “conservative”.  While many Montanans are under the impression that liberalism is new to the state, the truth is, that two of the biggest cities in Montana have leaned liberal for decades. Both Bozeman and Missoula are “college towns” and like most college towns across the United States, tend to be a little more left.

On the other hand, Montana is filled with small towns and like most small towns across the country, tends to lean a little more conservative.  In other words, it’s kind of always been this way, and this isn’t anything new. The difference is that we have multiple platforms to share our opinions and viewpoints and while technology is a wonderful thing, it has also caused quite a riff in our society and how we treat each other.

Credit: Canva
Credit: Canva

Like many Montanans, I’m conservative on some issues and a little more liberal on others. I find myself somewhere in the category of “I don’t care what you do, just leave me alone.”

Advertisement

The truth is, this country and this state are big enough to have all kinds of opinions and just because someone doesn’t share mine, certainly doesn’t make them better or worse than me. Until we can compromise and meet somewhere in the middle, Montana will continue to suffer, no matter how many “transplants” move here.

Californians: What To Know When Moving to Montana

If you’re moving to Montana from California, here are a few things that might make you rethink your decision.

Gallery Credit: Jesse James

10 Helpful Montana Weather Terms You Need to Know

Weather in Montana can be unpredictable. Here are 10 weather terms that you need to know.

Gallery Credit: Jesse James

Advertisement

Fame and Fortune: These Are the Richest Celebrities in the World

Stacker compiled a list of the world’s richest celebrities using data collected from Celebrity Net Worth’s rankings by current net worth.

Gallery Credit: Stacker





Source link

Montana

Your guide to local sports events, plus what’s on TV for June 19

Published

on

Your guide to local sports events, plus what’s on TV for June 19





Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Montana

Newly released documents shed light on Montana PSC dispute

Published

on

Newly released documents shed light on Montana PSC dispute


MISSOULA — Four out of five members of Montana’s Public Service Commission were in a federal courtroom in Missoula Thursday morning, as the PSC’s former president challenges the disciplinary action taken against him earlier this year. Now, newly released documents are shedding more light on to what led up to this point.

(Watch the video for a closer look at the case.)

New documents shed light Montana PSC dispute

Advertisement

Commissioner Brad Molnar has sued President Jeff Welborn, Vice President Jennifer Fielder and Commissioner Annie Bukacek – the three PSC members who voted in May to require him to work remotely, after an investigation into complaints about his workplace conduct. Molnar has claimed he is being unfairly punished for constitutionally protected speech, and he asked Senior U.S District Judge Donald Molloy to allow him to return to the PSC offices.

Matthew Monforton, Molnar’s attorney, told the judge that barring Molnar from the building was limiting his ability to do his job.

“He has not been officially kicked out of office, but his voice has clearly been diminished,” said Monforton.

But Natasha Jones, an attorney representing the other three commissioners, said the findings were about behavior, not just speech, and that the PSC’s action was a reasonable response.

Advertisement

“These are serious concerns about a pattern of conduct that has made employees quit,” she said.

Jonathon Ambarian

Montana Public Service Commissioner Brad Molnar (right) speaks with his attorney Matthew Monforton (left) outside the Russell Smith Federal Courthouse in Missoula, June 18, 2026.

On Tuesday, Molloy ordered the release of redacted versions of two full investigative reports into Molnar’s conduct – more than 100 pages of documents. Monforton had moved for the full reports to be made public, and Molloy ruled attorneys for the other PSC members hadn’t shown a compelling reason to keep the documents under seal as long as the names of people involved in the investigation were obscured.

While the names remained redacted in the investigation reports, the attorneys for Welborn, Fielder and Bukacek also filed additional documents – including a public declaration from Bukacek and from former PSC executive director Alana Lake, providing information about their allegations against Molnar.

The two reports, from an outside investigator, cover Molnar’s alleged actions over two periods: the first from February to August 2025, and the second from August to October 2025. The investigation began after the first formal complaint, filed by Bukacek in May 2025 – though the reports say employees had been bringing up concerns about Molnar’s behavior informally for several months prior.

Advertisement

Bukacek’s complaint claimed Molnar had repeatedly made what she called “sexualized and demeaning comments.” The examples she cited included saying the PSC should replace “Taco Tuesdays” with “Topless Tuesdays,” reminiscing about watching girls in bikinis as a teenager, and commenting about the beauty of women in areas of China who didn’t get “old and wrinkly.”

In her declaration, Bukacek also claimed Molnar had “maliciously disseminated false information” about her and “engaged in behavior that was dismissive, derisive and otherwise abusive.”

“My primary concern now is not for my safety nor my feelings, but for the rest of the staff who may not have the temperament to speak up or may feel too intimidated to speak up given concerns over job security,” Bukacek said in her declaration.

Molnar Docs

MTN News

On June 16, 2026, a federal judge ordered that two full investigative reports into Montana Public Service Commissioner Brad Molnar be unsealed, as long as the names of people involved in the case remain redacted.

The investigators determined Molnar had violated the PSC’s code of conduct by making comments of a sexual nature, and that it appeared his behavior had continued for some time after he was warned about it. They also found he had behaved unprofessionally and in a belittling manner toward Bukacek, though they said Bukacek herself had at times used “language that could be considered inappropriate” in emails to staff or other commissioners. Bukacek told MTN she “readily self corrected” any behaviors that were brought to her attention.

Advertisement

The investigation also found a violation in connection with a complaint from a PSC staff member, who said he “felt bullied” by Molnar when the commissioner sent an email complaining about his team not being “people with competence.”

However, much of the first report and the entire second report was focused on conduct after the initial complaints, when Molnar was accused of retaliating against people who participated in the investigation. Lake said in her declaration that she saw “an immediate and significant change in his behavior toward staff involved in the process.” She claimed he said he would use an attorney and private investigator to go after people who filed complaints, and she accused him of publicly criticizing her in interviews and removing her job responsibilities because of her handling of the investigation.

Lake said Molnar’s actions led to “declining morale within the agency,” undermined staff members’ ability to do their jobs and damaged her reputation. She said that led her to resign as executive director.

“I believe no employee should be forced to choose between reporting misconduct and protecting their career, reputation, or personal well-being,” she said in her declaration.

Lake has since become Helena city manager.

Advertisement
Missoula Federal Courthouse

Jonathon Ambarian

Four out of five members of the Montana Public Service Commission were at the Russell Smith Federal Courthouse in Missoula June 18, 2026, for a hearing on Commissioner Brad Molnar’s lawsuit challenging disciplinary action taken against him.

The report said there was evidence to show Molnar had retaliated, including by “making disparaging statements about investigation participants” including Lake, by sending an email warning he could file complaints of his own against people involved, and by taking other actions investigators said could dissuade employees from reporting behavior in the future.

Monforton said during Thursday’s hearing that the initial comments Bukacek complained about were jokes Molnar had admitted were inappropriate, that he regretted saying them, and that he hasn’t made any similar comments in about a year. But he argued the vast majority of the findings against Molnar were about retaliation – and that those were primarily based on speech that the other commissioners don’t have the right to interfere with.

Monforton said it’s unreasonable to punish Molnar for what he said in the July news conference where he announced he was under investigation, in interviews with the media or in commission meetings. He said Molnar’s conduct doesn’t rise to the level of actual retaliation.

“This is an elected official, engaging in speech in his forum,” Monforton said.

Advertisement

He said Molnar may have made harsh comments toward staff, but that he had the right to raise objections about the way the agency does business.

Montana Public Service Commission

Jonathon Ambarian

Monforton also argued the retaliation claims no longer justify keeping Molnar out of the office, since Welborn, Fielder and Bukacek voted to remove him as president in October and he no longer has the authority he’s accused of misusing. He said there haven’t been further complaints about his behavior since that time.

“We’re not asking for the moon and stars, we’re asking for the status quo as it existed for the last seven months,” he said.

Jones said there is enough evidence to show Molnar would have been punished regardless of whether any protected speech was excluded.

Advertisement

“This is not about a couple of jokes,” she said.

Jones said Molnar made maliciously false statements about people like Lake, and that type of statement isn’t covered by free speech protections.

She also said Molnar’s exclusion from the PSC offices is temporary, and that the PSC will reconsider whether to let him return if he apologizes for his actions, accepts the agency’s code of conduct and undergoes training.

Molloy indicated he saw indications that there was “acrimony” on both sides of the situation, and said he was skeptical it would be resolved easily.

“It would be nice if instead of juvenile behavior, there was professional behavior,” he said.

Advertisement

However, the judge said there was an avenue for Molnar to pursue if he wanted to reach a resolution.

Molloy took no immediate action Thursday. He told the parties he would rule as quickly as he could.





Source link

Continue Reading

Montana

Cancer Support Community Montana names new executive director to lead statewide expansion

Published

on

Cancer Support Community Montana names new executive director to lead statewide expansion


Carrie Gilbertson has been executive director of Cancer Support Community Montana for just under two months, stepping into the role in April with more than 15 years of nonprofit experience and a lifetime of Montana roots.

The organization provides psychosocial and mental health support to anyone affected by cancer — not just those with a diagnosis, but also family members and others walking alongside them.

WATCH: Meet the new leader of Cancer Support Community Montana 🎗️

Advertisement

Cancer Support Community Montana names new executive director

“This mission of providing psycho-social supports and mental health supports for anyone impacted by cancer, not just that person who has the diagnosis, but also family members, anyone who is walking alongside someone as they experience that often scary diagnosis, that’s just something that’s important to me,” Gilbertson said.

Gilbertson’s role extends beyond the Bozeman office. Cancer Support Community Montana’s Missoula location is already up and running, and a Helena location is expected to be operating soon. Each presents its own set of challenges.

“Each hospital is different. They might have different resources. Their social workers might be connecting to things in a different way. So understanding what those hospitals need, what different participants need in each community, is going to be different just because the communities are different, resources are different,” Gilbertson said.

Advertisement

The Bozeman office has been operating for more than 20 years, providing a foundation that supports the organization’s broader statewide efforts.

“I think this is a crew that looks at what does this community need what do our participants need what are some of the changing landscapes in cancer care what things are the gaps that we see that we can maybe just jump right in and you know let’s see if we can provide that for people so that’s something I really love about this crew that I work with and just this mission that there is some flexibility in being able to adjust and adapt as we learn more,” Gilbertson said.

Those adaptations show up in unexpected ways. The organization converts its parking lot into a pickleball court every Friday morning.

“I didn’t know there was a pickleball court. I pulled in actually with my daughter pulled in and she was is that pickleball court and I was like oh, it kind of looks like it is so yeah that’s fun, every Friday morning we clear out the parking lot and put up the net and I haven’t played yet I’ve been watching just to kind of see how that game works but they take it pretty seriously,” Gilbertson said.

This story was reported on-air by a journalist and has been converted to this platform with the assistance of AI. Our editorial team verifies all reporting on all platforms for fairness and accuracy.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending