Montana
Montana launches rural health overhaul backed by $233 million federal investment
BOZEMAN, Mont. — Montana health leaders are racing to roll out a sweeping overhaul of rural health care, backed by a historic $233 million federal investment, after more than 600 people gathered Thursday for the first Rural Health Transformation Program Stakeholder Advisory Committee meeting at Montana State University in Bozeman.
The advisory committee, created to guide the state’s new Rural Health Transformation Program, met to review goals and gather public feedback on how to stabilize and modernize care in frontier and rural communities. No funding decisions were made at the meeting, which was open to the public, though some portions were closed.
In December 2025, Gov. Greg Gianforte and Department of Public Health and Human Services Director Charlie Brereton announced Montana had secured about $233 million in first-year funding from the Trump administration through the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ Rural Health Transformation Program, or RHTP. The state is slated to receive up to $1.2 billion over the five-year life of the program, the fourth-largest award among all 50 states.
“I think it’s a historic opportunity for the state,” Brereton said.
Brereton noted that only Texas, Alaska and California received larger first-year allocations.
Under federal rules, states must submit revised budgets aligned with their announced awards by Jan. 30, forcing Montana to quickly prioritize “high-impact programs with the capacity to absorb additional funding,” DPHHS officials said.
Montana originally submitted a $200 million budget but received $233 million, requiring a supplemental plan to detail how the extra $33 million will be used. Brereton said DPHHS is building an internal RHTP unit of about 20 state positions to manage implementation and oversight.
For the first $233.5 million dollars in funding, Montana must submit its initial federal progress report by August 2026 and then file annual and quarterly reports through 2030.
“That is a tight timeline to start spending these funds,” Brereton said.
The money flows from a $50 billion national RHTP fund created under President Donald Trump’s Working Families Tax Cuts legislation, which runs through 2030 and is designed to help states stabilize and restructure rural health systems. Congress established the program in H.R. 1, a 2025 law that set aside $10 billion a year for five years.
KFF Health News has reported that every state is guaranteed at least $100 million a year from the fund, with additional dollars distributed based on rural population, facilities and a technical score for each state’s proposal. Awards range from $147 million for New Jersey to $281 million for Texas in the first year.
Brereton emphasized that RHTP dollars will be subject to standard state of Montana procurement rules. Meaning DPHHS cannot simply pick and choose winners or sole-source most contracts.
Competitive grant applications through platforms such as Submittable, which many organizations used during the COVID-19 pandemic.
The state expects its first round of RHTP-related procurements to open in the second quarter of federal fiscal year 2026, roughly March 2026, with updates posted at ruralhealth.mt.gov and on the state’s eMACS procurement system.
DPHHS also plans regular updates to the Legislature through standing and interim committees, as well as frequent reports to CMS on spending, outcomes and progress toward program goals.
Montana’s approved rural health transformation plan is built around five core initiatives: workforce development, sustainable access, innovative care models, community health and prevention, and technology innovation.
DPHHS leaders said the plan is all in part due to public engagement before the state applied to CMS. The department conducted weeks of outreach to hospitals, more than 20 rural health stakeholders, all eight tribal nations and Urban Indian Organizations, and other agencies, drawing on a 900-person webinar and more than 300 formal responses to a request for information.
KFF Health News reporting describes the national program as an effort to give states space to be creative in how they fix systemic gaps in rural health care. Federal officials will begin reviewing states’ progress this summer and will announce 2027 funding levels by the end of October, based on performance and compliance.
Roughly $20 million of Montana’s first-year allocation will go toward a comprehensive workforce strategy led by the Department of Labor & Industry, which is partnering with DPHHS under the first initiative.
“I have always been proud to be from Montana, and I’ve long known that Montana punches above its weight class, but this is an incredible opportunity,” Labor & Industry Commissioner Sarah Swanson told the audience.
The workforce initiative has three sub-initiatives:
- About $15 million for recruiting and retaining rural health care workers, including a statewide talent-attraction campaign, scholarships and tuition assistance, and a major expansion of registered apprenticeship from entry-level roles to registered nurses.
- Just under $4 million to expand clinical training capacity, adding residency slots, exploring new rural residencies, and building rural training tracks for physicians, advanced clinicians and dental providers.
- About $1.1 million for retention and upskilling, including relocation support, wellness programs, community integration for new clinicians, and advanced training delivered virtually so rural workers don’t have to leave their communities.
Swanson said the state intends to train and upskill 700 Medicaid expansion enrollees into health care jobs, build a pipeline through middle and high school programs such as HOSA, and support the development of up to 400 new rural preceptors within a year.
All workforce investments will carry a five-year service commitment to work in Montana’s health care system and cannot be used for construction or to replace existing funding.
The initiative will be measured against eight key metrics, including year-over-year 5% growth for five years in the number of nurse practitioners, physicians, registered nurses, dental hygienists, EMTs and physician assistants. That translates into annual statewide targets such as about 23 new nurse practitioners, 27 physicians, 258 registered nurses, 24 dental hygienists, 34 EMTs and 21 physician assistants. Two additional measures, rural turnover rates and clinician burnout, are still being sorted out.
Swanson tied the work to “406 Jobs,” a Gianforte executive order issued last August that aims to align education and workforce systems and insists that solutions be industry driven and community led, especially in rural and tribal communities. She said the RHTP effort must be shaped by hospitals, physicians and local leaders from places like Fort Peck and Livingston.
Under the program’s innovative care models initiative, Montana plans to shift more rural providers from fee-for-service to value-based care, expand emergency medical services, and broaden the role of community pharmacies.
“This will look at transitioning more rural health care providers to value-based care models which focus on reimbursing for the quality of the care provided as opposed to simply the number of services,” said Rebecca de Camara, Medicaid and Health Services executive director.
De Camara said the state has already been revamping primary care case management and evaluating options for dual-eligible residents who have both Medicare and Medicaid, including whether the PACE model would fit Montana.
De Camara said officials are also looking at authorizing Treat-in-Place, allowing EMS providers to deliver reimbursable on-site care when appropriate, rather than requiring transport to qualify for payment. That would require changes to Medicaid billing codes and significant upgrades to ambulances and related equipment.
Currently, EMS providers receive no Medicaid reimbursement when they respond to a call but do not transport a patient, a situation she described as financially unsustainable. Building on an ongoing legislative interim study of the EMS system, the state will examine how to expand community paramedicine, modernize dispatch and retrofit or replace ambulances.
Another priority is expanding rural pharmacy services by allowing pharmacists to work at the top of their license, including prescribing some medications, providing basic primary care and managing chronic diseases. The state plans to create pharmacist point-of-care testing sites, draft a Medicaid state plan amendment to allow reimbursement, and use these changes to ease pressure on clinics and emergency departments.
Metrics for this initiative include:
- Holding average monthly costs for dual-eligible members at about $305 per person.
- Increasing use of EMS treat-and-no-transport billing codes while reducing avoidable emergency department transports for high utilizers.
- Raising the share of pharmacists who prescribe for Medicaid enrollees.
- Shifting a greater share of Medicaid spending from inpatient to outpatient care, building on broader hospital transformation work.
Other pieces of Montana’s RHTP plan focus on community health and infrastructure, including behavioral health services, child and family care, and local nutrition and prevention projects.
Amanda Harrow, a DPHHS project manager, said the state will support the expansion of crisis safe spaces. These are alternatives to hospitalization for people in behavioral health crises.
Through Certified Community Behavioral Health Clinics, and fund minor renovations and repairs for rural and tribal facilities. The initiative will invest in community spaces that support healthy lifestyles by funding one-time projects like food system action plans, farmers markets that also benefit local producers and school nutrition efforts designed by local communities.
By the time of its first CMS report, the state aims to:
- Finalize subrecipient grants and oversight models for school-based care, mobile health vans and tribal programs.
- Expand Montana State University’s “Care for Your Own” nursing program, which supports American Indian students and has strong retention and graduation rates.
- Evaluate community pediatric programs for long-term sustainability.
- Initiate procurement for rural infrastructure projects, including safe-space build-outs and minor facility repairs.
- Launch community nutrition and health grants by late 2026 or early 2027 after stakeholder convenings.
Harrow said the state will track progress with a broad suite of metrics, including:
- Increasing the number of crisis safe spaces statewide to 11 by the end of the five-year grant.
- Improving preventive health measures such as well-child visits in the first 30 months of life across rural counties, A1C control for residents with diabetes, and blood pressure control among those with hypertension.
- Monitoring body mass index data and behavioral health emergency department admissions per 1,000 residents, with an eye toward reducing hospitalizations as safe spaces expand.
- Lowering suicide rates and cutting by 10% the share of students reporting mental health-related risk behaviors.
- Boosting the number of certain behavioral health providers to about 200 over the life of the program.
KFF Health News has noted that total RHTP awards vary widely on a per-rural-resident basis and that states governed by Republicans tended to score higher on the discretionary technical portion of the funding formula, although federal officials have denied politics played any role. Analysts and researchers are watching closely to see how states deploy the money, and whether they adopt administration-backed policies such as broader fitness testing, SNAP food restrictions or changes to certificate-of-need laws.
In Montana, state leaders say their focus is squarely on rural realities from long travel distances and workforce shortages to strained behavioral health systems and limited training capacity.
During the gathering on Thursday, attendees asked what happens in five years when this unique funding is gone. Brereton said when they designed the plan with one use funds in mind.
“Sustainability was absolutely top of mind for DPHHS so that we’re not establishing or creating cliffs everywhere we turn,” he said. “Our plan is centered on one time only investments that get provider organizations, communities and others to the place that they need to be in order to continue services into the future.”
Providers, local officials and residents are encouraged stay engaged via ruralhealth.mt.gov and attend stakeholder meetings as the transformation effort unfolds.
Montana
Montana AG letter alleges Helena violates law banning ‘sanctuary cities’
HELENA — On Monday, Montana Attorney General Austin Knudsen sent a letter to the City of Helena claiming the municipality is not in compliance with the state’s law banning “sanctuary cities.” The letter comes just under a month after the State of Montana launched an investigation into a city resolution on Helena Police policy and Helena’s involvement in federal immigration enforcement.
In the letter, Knudsen laid out the ways he believes the city’s resolution violated state law. The attorney general gave Helena 15 days to respond or reverse the policy. If the city does not comply, his office will pursue legal action.
“Helena’s resolution appears to contain blatant violations of this law,” wrote Knudsen.
MTN News
On January 26, 2026, the City of Helena adopted a resolution clarifying when and how the Helena Police Department will cooperate with federal immigration officials. The vote was 4 to 1. The Helena commission seats and the mayor are elected in non-partisan races.
In the letter, Knudsen alleges the resolution established “a broad sanctuary city policy” that seeks to protect every illegal immigrant, regardless of whether the individual had committed a serious crime or not. The state further claims the resolution gives illegal immigrants “special privileges” in plea deals and establishes a “free-for-all policy” where a police officer can request the unmasking of Department of Homeland Security and ICE officers.
Knudsen has requested that the City of Helena, in their response, specifically describe in detail how the resolution complies with Montana law, provide emails and correspondence from city staff and the commission regarding the resolution.
Helena City manager Alana Lake told MTN in a statement: “The City of Helena is aware of the issues being raised by the Attorney General’s Office and is reviewing the matter. While we cannot discuss the details of a potential legal issue, the City is committed to transparency and compliance with the law. The City takes these matters seriously and will continue to cooperate with the appropriate authorities while remaining focused on serving our community.”
MTN News
Passed in 2021, Montana House Bill 200 prohibits a state agency or local government from implementing any policy that prevents employees or departments from communicating with federal agencies regarding immigration or citizenship status for lawful purposes. It also states governments must comply with immigration detainer requests if they are lawfully made.
HB 200 was backed by Republicans and passed with only Republican votes. Gov. Greg Gianforte signed the legislation into law on March 31, 2021.
Passage of the resolution by the Helena City Commission has drawn ire from conservative voices in Montana politics and on the national level.
MTN News
The resolution said the commission supported the Helena Police Department avoiding “committing its resources to federal action for which it has no authority,” such as entering into an agreement with the federal government to directly enforce immigration laws. Under federal law, immigration enforcement is conducted by federal agencies under the Department of Homeland Security. However, under the Immigration and Nationality Act, state and local governments can voluntarily enter into 287 (g) agreements with the federal government that allow them to enforce immigration laws.
The commission further supported HPD’s policy not to stop, detain, or arrest a person solely on suspected violations of immigration law, including assisting other agencies in an arrest based solely on immigration law.
DEEPER LOOK: Helena has seen a growing debate over ICE and local police involvement
In the resolution, the commission also supported an HPD officer, using their own discretion, requesting the identification and unmasking of a Department of Homeland Security Officer if the HPD officer “feels it will not be interfering with the actions of federal officers exercising their jurisdiction.”
“This adversarial relationship by local law enforcement toward federal officers itself undermines public safety and forces immigration officers to fear for their safety when they are simply carrying out their lawful duties,” wrote Knudsen.
The resolution further supports the City of Helena’s policy not to consider immigration consequences in a plea agreement with a defendant.
Mack Carmack, MTN News
The commission also supports the City of Helena not disclosing any sensitive information about any person – including immigration status, sexual orientation, or social security number – except as required by law.
“This is a restriction that directly conflicts with Montana’s prohibition on sanctuary jurisdictions, specifically ‘sending to, receiving from, exchanging with, or maintaining for a federal, state, or local government entity information regarding a person’s citizenship or immigration status for a lawful purpose,’” the attorney general wrote.
If a government is found to be violating Montana’s law banning “sanctuary cities”, the state could fine them $10,000 every five days, prevent them from receiving new grants from the state, and have their projects with the state re-prioritized. A government in violation can avoid penalties by becoming compliant with the law within 14 days of being notified of the violation.
Read the full letter from the Montana Attorney General to the City of Helena:
Montana
Dispatches from the Wild: Montana’s wild inheritance at risk | Explore Big Sky
Steve Pearce and the future of the BLM
By Benjamin Alva Polley EBS COLUMNIST
If you care about hunting elk in crisp October air, floating a clear-running river for cutthroat trout, or simply taking your kids camping beneath a sky unspoiled by drill rigs, you should be outraged that Steve Pearce was ever considered to run the Bureau of Land Management.
The BLM is the largest landlord in the West. It oversees nearly 245 million acres of public land—millions of those acres in and around Montana’s most cherished places. This land is the backbone of our elk and mule deer herds, our sage grouse leks, our pronghorn migration routes and our blue-ribbon trout streams. It’s also the stage on which Montana’s hunting, fishing and outdoor recreation economy plays out.
Putting someone with Steve Pearce’s environmental record in charge of that land is like handing your cabin keys to the arsonist who’s always hated it. In the four months since Pearce was first nominated, it emerged that, if confirmed, he and his wife would divest from more than 1,000 oil and gas leases in Oklahoma to address potential conflicts of interest. While some senators strongly support his “active forest management” approach, he still faces opposition from groups alarmed by his record on public land transfers. On March 4, the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee voted 11-9 to advance his nomination, despite concerns from conservation groups.
Pearce’s track record is no mystery. He has consistently sided with extractive industries at the expense of wildlife, habitat and public access. He has supported opening more public lands to oil and gas drilling, weakening bedrock environmental safeguards and undermining science-based management. His votes and public statements have signaled again and again that he sees wild country as an obstacle to be overcome, not a legacy to be stewarded.
For Montana, that posture is an existential threat. Our big-game herds rely on intact winter range and unfragmented migration corridors across BLM lands. Aggressive drilling, poorly planned roads and relaxed reclamation standards shred those habitats. Once you carve up a landscape with pads, pipelines and traffic, you don’t get solitude—or mature bull elk—back with the stroke of a pen.
Anglers should be just as alarmed. Headwater streams and riparian corridors on BLM ground are the life support system for native bull trout, cutthroat and wild trout. A BLM director hostile to environmental safeguards is far more likely to greenlight development that increases sediment, degrades water quality and depletes the cold, clean flows our rivers depend on.
If Pearce takes office, outdoor recreation—and the rural economies built around it—will not be spared. In Montana, hunting, fishing and outdoor recreation pump billions of dollars into local businesses, guiding operations, gear shops and main-street cafes. People travel here precisely because of the open space, healthy herds and functioning ecosystems that BLM lands help sustain. When those landscapes are sacrificed to short-term profit, we don’t just lose scenery; we lose jobs, identity and a way of life.
This is not a partisan issue, especially in Montana. Public lands are one of the few things we truly share: ranchers who graze allotments, tribal communities with cultural ties to these places, hunters and anglers who’ve long defended habitat, and families who just want a place to pitch a tent. A BLM director should be a careful, science-driven steward accountable to all Americans—not a politician with a history of dismissing environmental protections as red tape.
Montanans know what’s at stake. We’ve fought bad ideas before—land transfers, giveaway leases, rollbacks to bedrock conservation laws—and we’ve won when we stood together. Steve Pearce’s nomination should have been dead on arrival. The fact that he was even on the list tells us how vigilant we must remain.
Our outrage must translate into action: calling elected officials, packing public hearings, writing letters and voting as if our public lands are on the line. Truly, they are. The BLM needs a director who sees these landscapes the way Montanans do: as sacred ground, not a balance sheet.
Anything less is a betrayal of the wild inheritance we’re supposed to pass on.
Benjamin Alva Polley is a place-based storyteller. His words have been published in Rolling Stone, Esquire, Field & Stream, The Guardian, Men’s Journal, Outside, Popular Science, Sierra, and WWF, among other notable outlets, and are available on his website.
Montana
Californians caught using ‘Montana Loophole’ to dodge supercar sales tax — and Beverly Hills is the worst
California has launched a huge crackdown on criminals buying and registering supercars outside of the state to avoid eye-popping sales tax.
Fourteen people have been charged after $20 million worth of vehicles were sourced to the Big Sky State in what authorities are calling the “Montana Loophole.”
The cars include a $1.8 million McLaren Elva, a Porsche 918 Spyder and a $1.26 million Ferrari F12TDF, the attorney general’s office said.
In the Golden State base rate sales tax is 7.25%. For a Lamborghini or Ferrari that can reach up to $250,000 or higher, that can mean a tax bill over $18,000. In Montana it is zero.
The gang, from Alameda, Marin, Santa Clara and Sacramento, allegedly dodged more than $1.8 million in taxes since 2018.
They are accused of filing false records showing the supercars were bought in Montana but then drove and kept them in California.
The DMV has launched nearly 100 criminal investigations into similar schemes across California since 2023 and recovered $2.3 million. It says the schemes are costing over $10 million per year.
It says there are 601 fraudulently registered cars involved and the DMV and California Department of Tax and Fee Administration have reviewing all car sales made in Montana.
California AG Rob Bonta said: “When bad actors abuse legal loopholes and submit fraudulent documents to evade their obligations, the California Department of Justice will not stand idly by.
“Every dollar of unpaid taxes is a dollar taken from California’s roads, schools and the vital services our communities rely on.”
The AG’s office said Beverly Hills was the city with the most suspicious car sales, with 416 cases on its radar from the luxury enclave.
It also released a series of text messages from defendants in Marin County and Walnut Creek, which said: “Don’t want the state of California to know anything about this car.”
Another asked: “Before you deliver it to him can you please remove the dealer plate.” One more asked if those with Montana plates had issues, the reply was: “Not yet.”
Another defendant added: “70k saved — I can’t believe the registration lasts for five years — that’s crazy. Stupid California. Paid 3k to own a 600k car for 5 years — lol in Cali that’s like 75k for 5 years. Hella dumb.”
California DMV Director Steve Gordon said: “We encourage all Californians to do the right thing and register their vehicle here if they are operating it in California.”
-
Wisconsin1 week agoSetting sail on iceboats across a frozen lake in Wisconsin
-
Massachusetts1 week agoMassachusetts man awaits word from family in Iran after attacks
-
Pennsylvania6 days agoPa. man found guilty of raping teen girl who he took to Mexico
-
Florida1 week agoFlorida man rescued after being stuck in shoulder-deep mud for days
-
Detroit, MI5 days agoU.S. Postal Service could run out of money within a year
-
Miami, FL6 days agoCity of Miami celebrates reopening of Flagler Street as part of beautification project
-
Sports6 days agoKeith Olbermann under fire for calling Lou Holtz a ‘scumbag’ after legendary coach’s death
-
Virginia7 days agoGiants will hold 2026 training camp in West Virginia