Montana
Full year of birth control up for Montana Senate consideration
Elinor Smith
HELENA (UM Legislative Information Service) — As of proper now, Montanans can solely get a number of months of contraception at a time. Rep. Alice Buckley, D-Bozeman, says she is aware of precisely how irritating it may be to attend in lengthy strains each few months for a prescription she wants.
She’s sponsoring Home Invoice 302, which might change that — permitting Montanans to get a full yr’s provide of contraception at a time.
Buckley advised the Senate Enterprise, Labor and Financial Affairs Committee Wednesday that HB 302 wouldn’t get in the way in which of a physician’s relationship with their affected person and would nonetheless enable individuals to get their prescriptions month-by-month.
“If a affected person is attempting out a brand new model or struggling to seek out the proper contraception answer, this would not be the proper match. It will be the proper match, although, for ladies who know what works for them and who depend on contraceptives for their very own well being. And this laws could be an enormous boon. Lastly, this invoice saves time. It will be enjoyable and laborious to quantify the period of time I and the individuals I do know have spent ready in line to get prescriptions refilled. And that simply provides nervousness of needing to fill a prescription earlier than it runs out,” Buckley mentioned.
The invoice would cowl all types of contraception that should be refilled month-to-month, just like the capsule or the patch. So, if somebody is anxious they’ll lose their medical insurance or they hate going to the pharmacy, they’ll refill their contraception prescription for a full yr.
Buckley mentioned she designed the invoice to interrupt down limitations to contraceptive entry. She additionally mentioned she needed to verify individuals can keep away from unplanned or undesirable pregnancies and be capable of deal with medical circumstances like endometriosis persistently.
There have been 5 proponents of the invoice representing healthcare professionals, pharmacists and girls who could be affected by the invoice. Stephanie McDowell spoke as a proponent of the invoice and browse written testimony from Dr. Kristie Bodnar, an OBGYN who couldn’t make it to the listening to. Bodnar wrote that she’s caring for a younger girl who lives in rural Montana, about 45 miles away from a pharmacy. When her automobile broke down, she couldn’t get her prescription so she skipped a number of drugs and she or he’s now pregnant.
“Sadly, this isn’t an unusual story right here in Montana. Whereas contraception drugs vastly scale back the possibility of getting an unplanned being pregnant, they aren’t good. And lacking, skipping or gaps between drugs vastly reduces the capsule’s effectiveness. Whereas my affected person could have made the troublesome resolution to proceed her being pregnant, not all sufferers can have the identical response to an unplanned being pregnant. I’m pretty sure that Jess wouldn’t have been on this predicament had she had entry to a full-year provide of contraception drugs,” McDowell mentioned, studying Bodnar’s assertion.
There was just one opponent of the invoice. John Doran is the Vice President of Exterior Affairs at Blue Cross Blue Protect of Montana. He solely opposed the invoice as a result of he says it wants two amendments to operate appropriately if it passes.
One to make it so insurance coverage corporations don’t have to provide again pay for drugs somebody took earlier than they have been a policyholder and the second to make sure the contraception can really be paid for by insurance coverage.
“So once more, we advocate that you simply do placed on these amendments. And it’s a actually, actually good invoice, and with these amendments we come right into a place of full help,” Doran mentioned.
The invoice handed the Home on a 74-25 vote. On Wednesday, Republican Senator Jason Small from Busby requested if he might sponsor the invoice as soon as it reaches the total Senate. The committee didn’t take instant motion on the invoice.
Montana
Montana group welcomes South Dakotans seeking abortion, reproductive care
A Montana-based abortion rights group is reaching out to neighboring states announcing abortion and contraception are legal and available there.
South Dakota has a near total abortion ban, which extends to pregnancies caused by rape or incest. Health care professionals say the state’s current abortion exception is unclear.
“Minnesota and Colorado are being so inundated with volume from other states that they might have wait times,” said Nicole Smith, executive director of Montanans for Choice.
Smith said the number of South Dakota women travelling to Montana is quite small. That’s why the group is raising awareness that the state is an option to procure the procedure, which includes a billboard campaign that welcomes those seeking the procedure.
“In Montana, we can see people same day that they get here, pretty much,” Smith said. “We just want folks to know that we do have a lot of availability and if they don’t want to wait and they can get into Montana—we can probably see them pretty quickly.”
Since September last year, 280 South Dakotans travelled to Minnesota for an abortion and 170 travelled to Colorado for the procedure. That’s according to the Guttmacher Institute, a sexual and reproductive health group.
The closest abortion facilities to South Dakota in Montana are located in Billings. Smith says clinics also offer abortion medication through telemedicine.
Smith said Montana’s constitution has strong health care privacy rights.
“We have almost unfettered access to abortion in Montana,” Smith added. “There’s no mandatory waiting periods. There’s no mandatory counselling. We have telehealth for medication abortion. We’re very grateful that our constitution has protected those rights—that doctors and providers are able to give best practice medicine to us without politicians interfering in that way.”
South Dakota voters are set to vote on whether to enshrine abortion access in the state constitution this November. Constitutional Amendment G grants South Dakota women access to abortion in the first two trimesters of pregnancy. It allows the state to restrict the procedure in the third trimester, with exceptions for health and life of the mother.
Planned Parenthood North Central States believe the measure will not “adequately reinstate” abortion access in the state. Abortion opponents call the measure extreme.
Montana
Sheehy, PERC and the future of public lands conservation in Montana
A great recent article by Chris D’Angelo reports on the connection between Tim Sheehy, the Republican challenging Jon Tester for his senate seat, and PERC, the Bozeman-based Property and Environment Research Center that promotes what it calls “free market environmentalism.”
While Montanans might wonder about Sheehy’s background and policy positions given the shifting sands in his explanations, the fact that he was on the board of PERC is not in question — despite his failure to disclose that fact as required by Senate rules which his campaign says is an “omission” that’s being “amended.”
For those who have long been in the conservation, environmental, and public lands policy arena, PERC is a very well-known entity. As noted on its IRS 990 non-profit reporting form, the center is “dedicated to advancing conservation through markets, incentives, property rights and partnerships” which “applies economic thinking to environmental problems.”
But to put it somewhat more simply, PERC believes that private land ownership results in better conservation of those lands under the theory — and it is a disputable theory — that if you own the land and resources, you take better care of it due to its investment value. This has long been their across the board approach to land, water, endangered species and resource extraction.
If one wanted to dispute that theory, it certainly wouldn’t be difficult to do, particularly in Montana where checking the list of Superfund sites left behind by private industries and owners bears indisputable evidence of the myth that private ownership means better conservation of those resources.
In fact, the theory falls on its face since, when “using economic thinking” the all-too-often result is to exploit the resources to maximize profit as quickly as possible. And again, this example is applicable across a wide spectrum of resources. In Montana, that can mean anything from degrading rangeland by putting more livestock on it than it can sustain to, as in Plum Creek’s sad history, leaving behind stumpfields filled with noxious weeds on their vast private — once public — land holdings.
None of this is particularly a mystery, yet PERC has sucked down enormous amounts of funding from anti-conservation sources for more than four decades as it tries mightily to put lipstick on the pig of the all-too-obvious results of runaway private lands resource extraction.
Running one of the most high-stakes senate campaigns in the nation, however, produces a lot of tap-dancing around the truth in an effort to convince voters that you’re for whatever position will garner the most votes come Election Day.
In that regard, both Sheehy and PERC are scuttling sideways in their positions. Given the overwhelming support for “keeping public lands in public hands” in Montana, PERC now claims it “firmly believes that public lands should stay in public hands. We do not advocate for nor support privatization or divestiture.”
Funny that, given its previous and very long-held position that private ownership of lands and waters is the key to conservation. Likewise, Sheehy’s position, “that “public lands must stay in public hands” is completely the opposite from the one he held only a year ago, and parrots PERC not only in its verbiage, but in its realization of which way public sentiment and the electoral winds are blowing.
Since what’s at stake is nothing less than the future of public lands in the Big Sky State, it behooves us to demand specific policy positions in writing from all candidates for public office — including the race for Montana’s Senate seat.
Montana
Couple walking across the U.S. reach Montana
WHITE SULPHUR SPRINGS — A couple from Missouri have a goal to walk through every state in the lower 48.
Paige and Torin – known by their social media handle “Walking America Couple” – are in leg three of a five-leg, cross-country journey.
They’ve already traversed through 21 states, and on Thursday, their journey brought them to just outside White Sulphur Springs.
“Even out here in the more rural open space, we still make a lot of friends on the side of the road. People often stop and ask what we’re doing, or stop to see if we need water or food,” says Paige.
Each leg takes the couple roughly six months to one year, though they take short breaks in-between. They’re also completing the entire journey with their dog Jak.
“I think he loves the adventure more than we do,” Paige adds.
Through rain, shine, snow, and severe weather warnings, the couple have not been deterred, their purpose and mission propelling them.
“We would like to set the example that you can find contentment under almost any circumstance,” says Torin. “I started out the journey an incredibly cynical person, and it was through these repeated interactions of kindness with people that I had otherwise written off in the past, that my perspective began to change dramatically,” he adds.
Now, their journey is helping to spread the same happiness they’ve discovered to those they encounter on their journeys.
“We hope to be the example that we’re, as humans, all more malleable than we think,” says Paige.
For more information, click here to visit their website.
-
News1 week ago
Read the Ruling by the Virginia Court of Appeals
-
News1 week ago
Tracking a Single Day at the National Domestic Violence Hotline
-
Fitness1 week ago
What's the Least Amount of Exercise I Can Get Away With?
-
News1 week ago
Supreme Court upholds law barring domestic abusers from owning guns in major Second Amendment ruling | CNN Politics
-
Politics1 week ago
Trump classified docs judge to weigh alleged 'unlawful' appointment of Special Counsel Jack Smith
-
Politics1 week ago
Newsom seeks to restrict students' cellphone use in schools: 'Harming the mental health of our youth'
-
Politics1 week ago
Supreme Court upholds federal gun ban for those under domestic violence restraining orders
-
Politics1 week ago
Trump VP hopeful proves he can tap into billionaire GOP donors