The 12-member Elk Administration Citizen Advisory Group was shaped by Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks Director Hank Worsech earlier this yr following a contentious season setting course of and debate over how you can handle some burgeoning elk populations and difficulties with public entry. The group, made up of a mixture of landowners or managers and public hunters, is charged with creating elk administration suggestions with a give attention to bettering relationships between public hunters, landowners and the division.

The group has met a number of occasions over the previous few months, advancing concepts with the help of a “sounding board.” FWP acquired 243 purposes to serve on the group, and people not chosen got the chance to function sounding board members. Worsech has mentioned advisory group members had been appointed based mostly on range of viewpoints reasonably than curiosity group illustration.

On Thursday, the group adopted its first 4 suggestions, starting from a couple of modifications to the sport injury looking program to what could be a monumental shift for a lot of elk hunters in requiring them to decide on both archery or rifles seasons.

FWP spokesman Greg Lemon mentioned that elk administration and looking is at present being tackled by a number of entities. Together with the elk administration advisory group, FWP is conducting public scoping conferences throughout the state on an replace to its elk administration plan. That features a possibility for the general public to weigh in on elk inhabitants aims, which have been a scorching button difficulty as wildlife managers sort out excessive elk numbers in some areas of the state the place non-public land entry is closely restricted. The Non-public Land/Public Wildlife Council has additionally been engaged on parameters for 454 entry agreements in addition to a brand new hunter ethics marketing campaign, he mentioned.

“These three issues are working independently of one another however the entire thought is to make use of these efforts to enhance elk administration in Montana,” Lemon mentioned, with the advisory group’s suggestions built-in into the extra efforts.

With hunters elevating issues about crowding and lack of recreation, the advisory group on Thursday debated at size the “select your weapon/season” proposal, realizing it might probably see some public pushback. Presently hunters could buy a normal elk license in addition to an archery stamp — archers should move a security course. That permits hunters among the longest looking seasons within the West to pursue elk in each the 6-week archery and 5-week normal season. Though many hunters solely hunt with archery tools or firearms, many additionally hunt with each, and a requirement to decide on may symbolize a big lack of alternative.

As well as, the advice requires shifts to some seasons. Archery season would start Sept. 1 and run for 5 weeks. Then for the two- or three-week break earlier than the beginning of the final rifle season in late October, a personal land hunt for cows could be allowed.

The intent of the proposal is to ease overcrowding and looking stress on public land bull elk, committee members mentioned.

Committee member Chuck Rein, a landowner and retired clothing store from Large Timber, mentioned that FWP would wish to carry public hearings if the proposal stands an opportunity of gaining hunter acceptance.

“It’s too huge of a change to not have hearings. If the general public rejects it, it’s by no means going to work,” he mentioned.

Debate on the proposal included issues of whether or not it might have the specified impact and if some unintended penalties may outcome.

Scott Van Dyken, the lone member to finally vote in opposition to the proposal, believed it might probably minimize down on the variety of archery hunters however do little to ease crowding through the normal season. Many who hunt with each a bow and rifle would select rifle on account of larger success charges, he mentioned.

“I don’t see this working to alleviate rifle stress,” he mentioned.

The group noticed some settlement on the necessity for FWP to assemble higher knowledge, together with polling hunters to see what number of would select every possibility.

The group additionally raised some issues that hunters would break up seasons between species, and what that will imply for deer populations. Particularly, archery hunters desirous to pursue bull elk through the rut may hunt through the archery season however then hunt mule deer through the rifle season, which may considerably enhance stress on deer.

The group additionally finalized a suggestion to reform elk shoulder seasons. The seasons had been carried out a number of years in the past in an effort to cut back elk populations in over-objective districts, discovering some blended outcomes.

The group really helpful shoulder seasons proceed however be used extra strategically. Proposals embody ready two weeks after the top of normal season to start shoulder seasons, including the shoulder season between archery and rifle season, and that shoulder seasons solely be used on non-public land — the fee authorised some public land shoulder seasons over the past season. Additionally, early shoulder seasons held in August would stop in favor of recreation injury hunts.

Committee member Race King, a ranch supervisor from Dillon, famous that Montana’s looking seasons are very lengthy and shoulder seasons have seen some issues from looking teams, however mentioned they’re an essential device to handle elk numbers in some locations.

“The intent is to reassess, not put off (shoulder seasons),” he mentioned.

The group additionally recommends modifications to the sport injury hunt program.

Presently, hunters who add their names to a roster are referred to as at random ought to a recreation injury hunt be authorised. With the intention to qualify for a injury hunt, landowners by legislation should enable some public entry.

The advice seeks to outline public entry as unpaid, together with by block administration, family and friends, and 454 agreements along with open public entry. The proposal additional requires permitting biologists or landowners to pick out a portion of hunters for a injury hunt and to strike hunters on account of “unhealthy conduct.”

Hunters can also be required to both reside inside 150 miles of the hunt or comply with attend the hunt inside 24 hours on the time of software. Hunters can also be charged a charge. Lastly, the advice proposes two sign-up durations for hunters to use for late or early injury hunts.

The group’s last suggestion requires promotion of native elk working teams. Biologists and presumably different FWP workers would attend working group conferences the place members would share info between landowners, hunters, outfitters and FWP, and work to handle issues or wanted regulatory modifications.

The elk working group will meet a minimum of twice extra this month because it vets further suggestions. Proposals at present on the desk embody a particular private-land-only cow elk license for districts over goal; higher collaboration between state and federal entities; bettering FWP communication to encourage higher hunter conduct; and a brand new block administration class giving landowners extra management over necessities for public entry. Whereas not a proper suggestion, the group additionally inspired FWP to handle administration, together with predation, in areas with under-objective elk populations.