Connect with us

Idaho

Two Idaho Falls mayoral candidates want your vote; here is their take on the issues – East Idaho News

Published

on

Two Idaho Falls mayoral candidates want your vote; here is their take on the issues – East Idaho News


IDAHO FALLS — With less than a week to go before a runoff election, two candidates are still in the race to become Idaho Falls’ new mayor.

Thousands of votes were cast on Nov. 4, but Jeff Alldridge and Lisa Burtenshaw did not obtain a 50% majority, resulting in a runoff election being declared.

Looking at the numbers, Alldridge secured the most votes with 47.17% or 5,599 votes, with Burtenshaw trailing behind with 46.65% or 5,537 votes. The third candidate, Christian Ashcraft, received 6.18%, or 733 votes, and will not be on the ballot for the runoff.

RELATED | Here’s who is donating to Jeff Alldridge and Lisa Burtenshaw in the Idaho Falls mayoral runoff

Advertisement

Idaho Falls is one of two cities hosting runoff elections in eastern Idaho, with Pocatello holding theirs to elect a new mayor between Greg Cates and Mark Dahlquist.

RELATED | Idaho Falls and Pocatello, here’s what you’ll see on your ballots in the runoff elections

EastIdahoNews.com created new questions and sent them to Alldridge and Burtenshaw to gain a deeper understanding of each candidate’s platform. Their responses, listed below, were required to be 250 words or less, and were only edited for minor punctuation, grammar and length.

The runoff election is scheduled for Dec. 2. To find a voting location near you, visit VoteIdaho.gov.

RELATED | Who will be the next mayor of Idaho Falls? These three candidates are hoping to secure your vote

Advertisement

QUESTIONS

How will you persuade local voters to choose your name on the ballot during the upcoming runoff election? Why should someone vote for you?

Alldridge: I built this campaign on truth and real issues, not personal attacks.

I’ve shared a clear vision for Idaho Falls, been honest about where city leadership has fallen short, and offered solutions that put current residents and families first. Candidates should debate ideas, not rely on slander or innuendo to sway voters.

On November 4, I received the most votes, showing the citizens are ready for a new direction. My support came from regular citizens and local voters. The other campaign is backed by establishment figures and officials who can’t even vote in this mayoral race. That contrast matters.

I’m running to represent the people who live here, pay taxes here, raise their families here, and want a mayor who listens, adjusts when needed, and works to make Idaho Falls stronger for everyone.

Burtenshaw: Idaho Falls deserves a mayor who is experienced and ready for the job on Day 1. It’s time for the city to get back to doing what it does best, providing essential services and getting out of the way so that businesses can prosper. This city has been and will always be my home. I want to protect the quality of life we all cherish here. I will work hard to keep our neighborhoods safe, maintain reliable city services, and protect the heart of Idaho Falls, even as we grow. My mechanical engineering degree and critical thinking skills are very valuable for understanding infrastructure, planning, and long-term city development issues. I have a comprehensive knowledge of public finance and experience in large organizational structures.

Advertisement

I’ve built businesses here, raised a family here, and volunteered in nearly every corner of this city. I’m honored to make my case to the citizens of Idaho Falls. With every conversation I’ve had during this campaign, I’ve left convinced that we can do better as a City. My goal is to establish strong relationships between residents and the city so you can have confidence we’re working for you on the priorities that matter to the community.

Our community wants common sense, transparency, and accountability, and that’s the kind of leadership I’ll bring to the Mayor’s office.

Do you support the Idaho Falls Airport’s new 20-year Master Plan to expand onto nearby private property? Why or why not?

Alldridge: No. The sanctity of the neighborhoods around the airport matters far more than adding another terminal or expanding runways onto nearby private property. The city should never have threatened to take the adjacent soccer park without full transparency or letting homeowners in on the discussion from the start. Until the airport fully uses land it already leases and serves passengers effectively, I will not support further expansion.

Burtenshaw: The airport is a tremendous asset for our region. I helped grow the airport to provide more travel options for our community. I fully support the continued growth of this airport. With 5 airlines operating in Idaho Falls and 12 non-stop destinations, the airport is Idaho’s second busiest. The 20-year master plan does not disrupt the soccer complex, and provides a blueprint for a new control tower, more hangars, a second taxiway and air cargo buildings. Due to the proximity of the private land, including it as a “future land acquisition” allows for the potential purchase using federal dollars if the land becomes available. It does not obligate the Idaho Falls Airport or the property owner.

Growth should be guided by facts, public input, and respect for property rights. The airport can continue to grow responsibly through smart land use planning, infrastructure improvements, and strategic partnerships that balance regional economic opportunity with local impacts.

Advertisement

What are your thoughts on the citywide installation of water meters?

Alldridge: I am opposed to metering residential water.

Burtenshaw: Water metering is as complicated as it is controversial. The city has gradually been installing water meters for commercial property over the past 20 years. Due to our current infrastructure limitations, city-wide residential water metering is not feasible. The water landscape in Idaho is evolving, and to comply with state law, all new construction since 2007 has included meter pits. The city is proactively installing these pits (not the meters themselves) as part of a long-term plan. Should the state mandate full metering in the near future, our focus will be on implementing the change with an emphasis on water conservation and maintaining affordability. Idaho Falls is in a region where new groundwater rights are unavailable. The city is becoming better stewards of our current water rights by using surface water (canals) for irrigation. Pinecrest Golf Course, Sunnyside park and Community park have already been converted to surface water irrigation, saving millions of gallons of potable water each year. The city will continue to look for ways to conserve and protect our water.

As Idaho Falls grows, traffic, commuting, and parking in the downtown area are quickly becoming more difficult. What kinds of solutions would you propose to ease these transportation issues?

Alldridge: Idaho Falls isn’t growing as rapidly as we’re led to believe. New developments are happening faster than our actual population growth. Meanwhile, the growth we do have is straining our current roads and infrastructure.

When we build mostly apartments, we bring more people who eventually want single-family homes. This drives up demand and prices for locals.
Downtown access is already tight. When the city tried to fast-track paid parking downtown, residents and small-business owners pushed back hard. That tells you something. We should be making parking easier, not harder.

The city should consider public-private partnerships to expand free, convenient parking and better signal timing. The solution is making sure growth and our transportation system stay in sync.

Advertisement

Burtenshaw: For many years, during the 1990’s and early 2000’s, downtown was often described as “deserted.” I am glad to see the downtown become vibrant with more local shops and new restaurants, but this revitalization is creating traffic and parking issues. Bonneville County is the largest downtown employer, providing essential county services and operating the courthouse, DMV, and elections offices. The city, county, merchants, IFDDC, and landlords must work collaboratively to address employee parking and parking alternatives for a wide variety of downtown businesses.

Downtown needs to remain accessible and welcoming for residents, visitors, and businesses alike. Possible options include expanding shared parking, improving pedestrian crossings, and dedicated parking for employees.

Do you believe that Idaho Falls would benefit from more options for public transportation? If so, what kinds and who should pay for it?

Alldridge: Yes. For Idaho Falls, small and flexible public transit makes more sense than big buses on fixed routes. Point-to-point micro-transit can serve people more directly.

Public transportation will never fully pay for itself through fares, and that’s okay. It’s a public good, especially for seniors, people with accessibility needs, and residents with mobility challenges. Because it won’t be self-sufficient, we need to be honest that it must come from our local budget and not rely on the assumption that federal dollars will cover ongoing costs.

We should design transit so it can scale up or down based on real demand and what our revenues can support. We need to improve mobility for people who need it most, in a way the city can maintain over time.

Advertisement

Burtenshaw: Reliable transportation options strengthen our workforce, improve access to education and healthcare, and support economic growth. I am a strong supporter of the current GIFT program, which already provides valuable service to Idaho Falls residents. It’s a great example of a practical, right-sized transit solution that fits our community.

Looking ahead, we need to increase GIFT service to our metropolitan area. Idaho Falls and Ammon are not divided by daily life because we share employers, schools, shopping areas, and neighborhoods. Our transportation planning should reflect that reality. My established regional and statewide networks can help facilitate GIFT’s reach to improve efficiency and accessibility for everyone.

Funding should continue to come from a mix of local, state, and federal sources, along with creative grant opportunities. The focus for public transportation in Idaho Falls should remain on services that meet real needs without creating an unsustainable burden on taxpayers.

According to Zillow, the average house price in Idaho Falls is $468,436, while the average annual income is $50,907. What will you do to help locals work and live in Idaho Falls more affordably?

Alldridge: The numbers vary by source. According to the city’s 2026 Adopted Annual Budget, the median household income in Idaho Falls is $63,000 and the median home value is $420,000. At today’s interest rates, a family putting 20 percent down would need to earn roughly $109,000 a year to afford that home. That shows how far out of reach ownership has become for many working families.

The city can’t fix interest rates, but we can influence what gets built and where. We should encourage community-minded developers to build homes people can actually buy. Ownership gives families stability, helps build equity, and strengthens neighborhoods. More rentals will not solve our affordability problem.

Advertisement

We also need to grow good-paying jobs in Idaho Falls. We have talented people connected to the Idaho National Laboratory and some of the most affordable electricity in the country through Idaho Falls Power. Groups like REDI and the Idaho Innovation Center already work to attract and grow businesses. The city should be an active partner helping local entrepreneurs access programs like America’s Seed Fund through SBIR and STTR, which bring federal support to new tech and research ideas. We have what we need to become a real tech-and-innovation hub. We can become another Silicon Slopes. That would help local incomes better match today’s housing costs.

Burtenshaw: Housing affordability is a national issue and is one of Idaho Falls’ biggest challenges.

The city can lead on this issue by reducing red tape, making development predictable, and responsibly using impact fees to ensure that infrastructure keeps up with growth. As mayor, I’ll focus on promoting a mix of housing options that fit individuals and families. That mix includes entry-level homes and quality options in every price range. I can help address the other side of affordability by working to attract and retain businesses in our local economy that pay good wages and offer stable employment. I support the next generation of nuclear reactors being developed at the INL, and its alignment with workforce development at the College of Eastern Idaho. We can continue to expand our footprint as a regional hub for healthcare, and champion the long-standing companies that contribute to the stable job market. A healthy job market and balanced housing supply are the foundation for long-term affordability.

If elected, how will you govern differently from the previous administration?

Alldridge: I would not be a continuation of the current leadership. I would govern differently in three ways: by improving communication, rebuilding trust and engagement with residents, and strengthening the culture inside city government.

First, communication has to change. City Council meetings are too restrictive because residents can’t speak to agenda items. Under my leadership, agendas will be posted two weeks in advance on every city channel, and public comment will be allowed before votes. After each meeting, the city will share a short update on what was decided and what comes next. Livestreams should be easy to find on the city website and on YouTube.

Advertisement

Second, we need better ways for residents to engage. Formal council meetings can feel intimidating and don’t always invite real conversation. I will hold regular, informal Q&As and open discussions where people can ask questions and understand the reasoning behind decisions. When people understand the why, trust grows. The citizens are the best consultants the city will ever have.

Third, the culture inside city government needs attention. Employees do their best inside a system that often works against them. Departments are stuck in silos. I want employees to have more autonomy to solve problems, work across departments, and raise concerns without fear of reprisal.

That’s the kind of new leadership I plan to bring to Idaho Falls.

Burtenshaw: My candidacy is driven by genuine change and a shift from top-down decision making. In my administration, communication, accountability, and partnership with the people of Idaho Falls will have priority. I’ll work to make what we do at City Hall more accessible with regular communication, better information tools, and useful community updates on major projects and spending. My opponent and I agree that listening to the citizens needs to increase, where we differ is the fact that listening alone is not helpful unless you have the experience and skills to solve their concerns.

I am solutions oriented and understand that problems are best identified and resolved in a collaborative work environment. We need to break down internal barriers and focus on excellent customer service for every resident and business.

Advertisement

What role can the city government play in partnering with grocery stores, local farms, or food distribution networks to help make food prices in Idaho Falls more stable and affordable?

Alldridge: The city’s role is not to set grocery prices. What the city can do is help people’s food budgets stretch further by supporting a healthy economy where wages rise and cost pressures go down.

That means growing jobs that pay decent wages so people aren’t choosing between housing costs and groceries. It also means partnering with nonprofits like Community Food Basket that help families when they need support.

Burtenshaw: City government can’t and shouldn’t control food prices, but we can play a role in supporting and protecting our agricultural economy. Idaho Falls can work with Bonneville County and the City of Ammon to implement growth management policies that protect agricultural land. We can support local farmers through our relationship with the Greater Idaho Falls Chamber Agricultural Advocacy group. Together we can advocate for state policies that keep Eastern Idaho a thriving agricultural region.

The city also has several community gardens. As the mayor, I will continue to support and promote farmers markets and explore partnerships that make it easier for small producers to connect with Idaho Falls consumers.

=htmlentities(get_the_title())?>%0D%0A%0D%0A=get_permalink()?>%0D%0A%0D%0A=htmlentities(‘For more stories like this one, be sure to visit https://www.eastidahonews.com/ for all of the latest news, community events and more.’)?>&subject=Check%20out%20this%20story%20from%20EastIdahoNews” class=”fa-stack jDialog”>

Advertisement





Source link

Idaho

‘Unrelenting’: Statehouse reporters recap 2026 legislative session in Idaho Falls – East Idaho News

Published

on

‘Unrelenting’: Statehouse reporters recap 2026 legislative session in Idaho Falls – East Idaho News


IDAHO FALLS — Two prominent Idaho Statehouse reporters say this past legislative session was “unrelenting,” chaotic, largely driven by budget cuts, and they see the Legislature getting more powerful.

Kevin Richert and Clark Corbin recapped this past legislative session at a forum on the ISU Idaho Falls Campus on Thursday.

Richert is a senior reporter at Idaho Education News, with more than 30 years of experience covering education policy and politics. Corbin is a senior reporter at the Idaho Capital Sun who has covered every Idaho legislative session, gavel to gavel, since 2011.

The event was hosted by the City Club of Idaho Falls, which “exists to sponsor and promote civil dialogue and discourse on all matters of public interest” and strives to be “nonpartisan and nonsectarian,” according to its website.

Advertisement

Budget cuts

Both Richert and Corbin said this session was driven by budget cuts. Corbin said this was due to a lack of revenue stemming from past income tax and the adoption of new federal tax cuts.

“Cuts for almost every state agency and state department dominated the legislative session,” Corbin said. “We’re talking about 4% budget cuts for most state agencies and departments in the current fiscal year, and we’re talking about an additional 5% budget cuts for almost all state agencies and departments starting next year — fiscal year ’27 — and continuing permanently.”

RELATED | Gov. Little signs so-called ‘crappy bill’ to cut state budget

Richert said he thought higher education was taking the brunt of budget cuts. “It’s not a question of whether tuition fees are going to go up at the universities; it’s a question of how much,” he said.

When asked what the future would hold, Corbin said the budget cuts aren’t likely to go away, and their effects will be felt over time.

Advertisement

“There could always be a change of leadership in the House, but they do expect the budget crunch to continue in the next year’s legislative session,” Corbin said.

‘Radiator capping’

Richert said he has one word to describe this year’s legislative session: “unrelenting.”

One thing that made it feel that way was that some bills were recycled over and over, he said. For example, Richert said the Legislature saw five different versions of a bill that proposed cuts to the Idaho Digital Learning Alliance.

“We had multiple bills that came from the dead,” he said.

The journalists said this is partly due to a tactic called “radiator capping.” The term means to replace the entire car — the bill’s text, in political terms — while only keeping the radiator cap: the bill number. By rewriting a bill on the House or Senate floor while maintaining its number, failed bills can effectively bypass the committee process.

Advertisement

“Those are the changes they tried to make on immigration bills, on union bills this year,” Corbin said. “It made it extremely difficult for the public to have any idea what was going on, to have any opportunity to participate in the legislative process and share their opinions.

A more powerful, more chaotic Legislature

Richert said Idaho’s annual legislative sessions are trending longer, commonly going into the early part of April, and producing a record number of bills.

“There are rumblings that this Legislature, as a body, is wanting to expand its reach over more and have even more power over the other branches of government to the point of — are we trending towards more of a full-time professional legislature?” Richert said. “We’re a long way from there.”

“The legislative branch of government, particularly the Idaho House of Representatives, is the most powerful I’ve seen it in 16 years of covering state government,” Corbin said.

He added that this year’s legislative session was unlike any he’s experienced.

Advertisement

“The overall temperature in the building was bad,” Corbin said. “It was divisive. It was chaotic. People were not hiding their feelings of disgust for each other. These traditional ideas of decorum and respect very much fell by the wayside.”

Richert said Gov. Brad Little vetoed very few bills that came across his desk, and the ones he did weren’t high-profile.

RELATED | Idaho Gov. Brad Little issues 5 vetoes. Here are the bills affected

“I think the governor behaved like he was very concerned about the supermajority-controlled Legislature, and I think that that Legislature, in turn, asserted itself and took control of the agenda this year,” Corbin said.

Are legislators representing Idaho?

Corbin said some bills this year also focused on the LGBTQ+ community, such as a bathroom restriction for transgender individuals, and a bill that banned the City of Boise from waving a Pride flag.

Advertisement

RELATED | Idaho governor signs bill to criminalize trans people using bathrooms that align with their identity

RELATED | Boise removes LGBTQ+ pride flag as Idaho governor signs bill to fine city for its display

When asked if these were what Idahoans wanted, Corbin said it doesn’t necessarily appear so to him, based on his review of Boise State University’s annual public policy survey.

“For years and years, I’ve heard concerns about affordability of housing, access to housing, managing the growth of the state of Idaho, having quality public schools available for our young people — that also generates a workforce pipeline for some of our businesses,” Corbin said. “I’ve heard about paying for wildfires. I’ve heard about having good roads, supporting access to public lands, public recreation, those are the concerns I hear from Idahoans.”

“But the Legislature spent a significant amount of time over the last two, three, four years placing additional restrictions on LGBTQ communities, placing restrictions on what teachers can and cannot teach in their classrooms, what school boards can and cannot do,” Corbin continued. “They talked about requiring a moment of silence every day to begin the public school day, where children could pray or read the Bible.”

Advertisement

RELATED | Gov. Brad Little signs public school ‘moment of silence’ bill into law

Corbin said it may be his own opinion, but perhaps it is easier to “make a bunch of noise about what’s going wrong and (distract) people with social issues” rather than focus on harder issues that Idaho faces.

“I think what you saw on the policy space is a reflection of the fact that you had legislators thinking about reelection, and legislators with time on their hands — and that’s not always a good combination,” Richert said.

Accountability

When asked how people can keep legislators accountable, Corbin said it can be done by following the state Legislature through trusted news sources, going to community events and voting.

“This is a great year to practice accountability, because all 105 state legislators and all statewide elected officials are up for election this year,” he said.

Advertisement

=htmlentities(get_the_title())?>%0D%0A%0D%0A=get_permalink()?>%0D%0A%0D%0A=htmlentities(‘For more stories like this one, be sure to visit https://www.eastidahonews.com/ for all of the latest news, community events and more.’)?>&subject=Check%20out%20this%20story%20from%20EastIdahoNews” class=”fa-stack jDialog”>





Source link

Continue Reading

Idaho

Idaho Lottery results: See winning numbers for Powerball, Pick 3 on April 18, 2026

Published

on


The results are in for the Idaho Lottery’s draw games on Saturday, April 18, 2026.

Here’s a look at winning numbers for each game on April 18.

Winning Powerball numbers from April 18 drawing

24-25-39-46-61, Powerball: 01, Power Play: 5

Check Powerball payouts and previous drawings here.

Advertisement

Winning Pick 3 numbers from April 18 drawing

Day: 9-5-1

Night: 0-2-4

Check Pick 3 payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning Pick 4 numbers from April 18 drawing

Day: 4-6-0-4

Night: 9-9-8-2

Advertisement

Check Pick 4 payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning Lotto America numbers from April 18 drawing

18-21-22-32-42, Star Ball: 10, ASB: 03

Check Lotto America payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning Idaho Cash numbers from April 18 drawing

08-19-22-31-44

Check Idaho Cash payouts and previous drawings here.

Advertisement

Winning Millionaire for Life numbers from April 18 drawing

17-19-47-48-55, Bonus: 04

Check Millionaire for Life payouts and previous drawings here.

Feeling lucky? Explore the latest lottery news & results

When are the Idaho Lottery drawings held ?

  • Powerball: 8:59 p.m. MT Monday, Wednesday and Saturday.
  • Mega Millions: 9 p.m. MT on Tuesday and Friday.
  • Pick 3: 1:59 p.m. (Day) and 7:59 p.m. (Night) MT daily.
  • Pick 4: 1:59 p.m. (Day) and 7:59 p.m. (Night) MT daily.
  • Lucky For Life: 8:35 p.m. MT Monday and Thursday.
  • Lotto America: 9 p.m. MT on Monday, Wednesday and Saturday.
  • 5 Star Draw: 8 p.m. MT on Tuesday and Friday.
  • Idaho Cash: 8 p.m. MT daily.
  • Millionaire for Life: 9:15 p.m. MT daily.

This results page was generated automatically using information from TinBu and a template written and reviewed by a USA Today editor. You can send feedback using this form.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Idaho

League of Women Voters of Idaho partners to host candidate forums ahead of 2026 primary elections

Published

on

League of Women Voters of Idaho partners to host candidate forums ahead of 2026 primary elections


The rotunda as seen on March 16, 2026, at the Idaho State Capitol Building in Boise. (Photo by Pat Sutphin for the Idaho Capital Sun)

Ahead of the 2026 primary elections, the League of Women Voters of Idaho is teaming up with several local groups to hold candidate forums and voter education events in the hopes of boosting voter turnout.

The groups invited all candidates for public office in Ada and Canyon County’s commissions, and in legislative district 11, which is in Canyon County.

Advertisement

The groups that are hosting include Mormon Women for Ethical Government, the Caldwell Chamber of Commerce, the American Association of University Women’s Boise branch and the College of Idaho’s Masters of Applied Public Policy Program.

Here’s when and where the forums are:

  • Ada County Commissioner District 2: 7-8:30 p.m. April 24 at Meridian City Hall, located at 33 E. Broadway Ave. in Meridian.
  • Ada County Commissioner District 1: 7-8:30 p.m. April 28 at Valley View Elementary School, located at 3555 N Milwaukee St. in Boise.
  • Legislative District 11: 6:30-8:30 p.m. April 30 at Caldwell City Hall, located at 205 S. 6th Ave. in Caldwell.
  • Canyon County Commissioner: 6-8 p.m. May 7 at Caldwell City Hall, 205 S. 6th Ave. in Caldwell.

Learn more about candidates at the League of Women Voters’ online voter guide, VOTE411.ORG

SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending