Connect with us

Idaho

Incumbent Dustin Manwaring battling political newcomer Mary Shea for Idaho House Seat 29A – East Idaho News

Published

on

Incumbent Dustin Manwaring battling political newcomer Mary Shea for Idaho House Seat 29A – East Idaho News


POCATELLO — Incumbent Dustin Manwaring will probably be challenged by fellow lawyer Mary Shea as he pursues his third time period within the Idaho Home Seat 29A.

Republican Manwaring stuffed Seat 29 of the Idaho Home of Representatives from 2016 to 2018, then once more from 2020 by way of 2022. Shea, the Democrat candidate, is a civil rights and household legislation lawyer and former teacher at Idaho State College.

You’ll find extra details about Manwaring and his marketing campaign on his web site — right here.

You’ll find extra details about Shea and her marketing campaign on her web site — right here.

Advertisement

The 2022 normal election will probably be Nov. 8.

EastIdahoNews.com despatched each candidates the identical eight questions. Candidates have been required to maintain every reply to 250 phrases or fewer. Each candidates’ solutions are listed under.

Inform us about your self — embody details about your loved ones, profession, schooling, volunteer work and any prior expertise in public workplace.

MANWARING: I used to be raised in Blackfoot and graduated from Blackfoot Excessive Faculty. I earned a Bachelor of Science from the College of Utah and a Juris Physician from Drake College Faculty of Regulation.

I follow legislation in Pocatello, helping shoppers primarily in enterprise and property planning. I’m the Vice President of Lillian Vallely Faculty, Inc., a personal 501(c)(3) serving Native American kids.

I’ve been married to my spouse, Whitney, for 5 years and we now have two kids. We’re energetic in our church and group.

Advertisement

I beforehand served within the Idaho Home of Representatives from 2016-2018 and was reelected in 2020. I at present serve on the Home Income and Taxation, Sources and Conservation, and Transportation and Protection committees.

SHEA: I’m a mom of three younger adults (18, 20, and 22). I’m a “second mother” to my nephew following the loss of life of my sister six years in the past.

I’m a civil rights and household legislation lawyer with greater than 30 years’ expertise, and I’m revealed in Idaho in these follow areas. I taught and led the Paralegal Research Program at Idaho State College from 2010-2017 on a full time foundation, whereas additionally juggling a legislation follow. I’m now a full-time accomplice at Merrill and Merrill.

As certainly one of a handful of Little one Welfare Regulation Specialists in Idaho, I donate skilled time to the Bannock County juvenile court docket system. I’ve served within the Mates of the Marshall Public Library, as President of the Portneuf Well being Care Basis, and I used to be a member of Zonta.

I’m a three-time CASA lawyer of the yr.

Advertisement

These days, I’ve been centered on service inside the Bar. I’ve led the native Bar and the native Household Regulation Part within the govt committees. I led Idaho Authorized Help Companies as Board President by way of the recession for 5 years, 2008-2013, when these providers have been in excessive demand and sources have been scarce.

I’m nonetheless a Board member of ILAS, I’m a former member of the Entry to Justice Committee, and I’m a present member of the Idaho Supreme Court docket Professional Bono Fee, working to seek out methods to attach low-income shoppers to authorized professionals in Idaho.

What are your proudest accomplishments in your private life or profession?

MANWARING: Having the ability to get hold of a post-secondary schooling and return to Idaho to launch my profession and begin my very own enterprise. This yr marks the twelfth anniversary of my legislation follow, and it brings nice satisfaction occupied with all of the relationships constructed and those who I’ve been capable of serve throughout my two phrases as a citizen legislator.

This yr, I’m proud to have sponsored and efficiently carried vital laws regarding cybersecurity, public data, designations of authority on the Idaho state tax fee, selling domestication and growth of the Idaho semiconductor business, and defending rights in digital property like cryptocurrency.

SHEA: My proudest accomplishment in life will all the time be elevating my three youngsters to be good and type males, and supporting my nephew following the sudden lack of his mom, my sister. My nephew is now a double main graduate of ISU and he’s making use of to legislation faculty, and I’m very happy with how he has navigated a painful chapter of his life with grace and dedication. He’s additionally a great and type younger man.

Advertisement

I’m happy with my document of service to the group, significantly focusing my time and expertise on underserved populations in Idaho. Profession-wise, I all the time really feel fulfilled when my shoppers get a great consequence, like right this moment, after I was capable of protect parental rights for certainly one of my younger shoppers.

Why are you a member of the Republican / Democrat / Impartial / Different get together? Briefly clarify your political platform.

MANWARING: The Republican Social gathering is the get together of Lincoln and Reagan. I consider our get together stands for liberty, equality, and household values. I consider the power of our nation lies with our religion in God, the person, and the household, and that every particular person’s dignity, freedom, capacity, and duty have to be honored.

I consider the US is in contrast to another nation on earth, the US Structure is the best and most impressed doc to control a nation and is the very best guarantor of freedom in historical past. I consider in equal rights, equal justice, and equal alternative for all. I consider human life begins at conception and is protected by unalienable rights endowed by our Creator.

I strategy choices through the use of unbiased commentary and analysis, contribute concepts by way of vital pondering, and act by main by way of relationships and energy constructed on belief.

My platform contains defending household values and non secular liberty, preserving our surroundings and Idaho lands and water sources, and selling enterprise alternative and subsequent era applied sciences whereas defending private privateness and particular person property rights.

Advertisement

SHEA: I made a decision to run as a Democrat this yr as a result of I consider that in Idaho we have to pull our authorities again to the place I feel most of our voters are — to the center. If we solely enable the combat to be between the appropriate and the far proper, the folks gained’t ever be absolutely or precisely represented. Idahoans usually are far much less excessive than the vocal minority would have it appear.

I’m additionally working as a Democrat as a result of I’m involved that the get together in energy has too typically allowed ideology to get in the way in which of serving the very best pursuits of the folks of this nice state. It has led to a number of violations of our civil rights. The Idaho legislature has been hyper centered on what I name “nontroversies” — tradition wars and divisive points that don’t even occur in Idaho.

I labored for a GOP administration in Virginia within the 1990’s. They might by no means have handed laws simply to make some extent, realizing that it could be invalidated by federal courts and so they must pay not solely their very own authorized prices but in addition the authorized prices of the opposite facet. Actually hundreds of thousands of taxpayer {dollars} have been wasted in Idaho this manner. I feel solely a Democrat proper now can cease this pattern, as a result of I can’t be pressured by the Idaho Freedom Basis. I don’t want their cash, and I hope to show on November 8, I don’t want their votes to win an election.

What are the best challenges going through Idahoans?

MANWARING: Whereas Idaho is blessed with a lot to reward, we even have our challenges. As we proceed to develop at a quick tempo, we’re challenged with investing sufficient sources in schooling, infrastructure, increasing broadband entry, and preserving our pure sources and agriculture alternatives for future generations. We will get by way of these challenges and others with cautious planning and prudent, conservative resolution making. We should not compromise or use a pandemic as an excuse for failure to teach our youngsters or to ascertain and keep a normal, uniform, and thorough system of public, free frequent faculties because the Idaho Structure requires.

SHEA: The best challenges statewide and in my group embody an unaffordable price of residing created by a storm of occasions: the fast rise of housing values and growing property taxes; inflation; larger rates of interest and gasoline costs; and wages that haven’t saved up.

Advertisement

After I first moved to Idaho, though wages have been depressed, housing prices have been additionally depressed, so the price of residing remained reasonably priced. That’s not true. We now have a looming housing disaster in Pocatello, as we’re second solely to Boise when it comes to low stock and excessive rents.

I’m additionally very involved about youth psychological well being — Idaho has a teen suicide charge that’s double the nationwide common. We now have misplaced three youngsters in Pocatello simply since August.

I’m involved in regards to the vilification of our public faculties and educators, and threats to defund public schooling. Idaho already provides a variety of faculty alternative by way of constitution faculties and a just about unregulated homeschool program. Homeschoolers already get curriculum and know-how assist by way of the State of Idaho. Till we’re sure we’re assembly our constitutional mandate to fund public schooling, we should always not experiment with public funds.

Lastly, I’m involved that our abortion set off legal guidelines don’t replicate what most individuals in Idaho need, they don’t seem to be truthful nor morally simply, and they’ll result in a variety of hurt and far larger maternal and toddler mortality.

How will you finest symbolize the views of your constituents – even these with differing political opinions?

MANWARING: I strategy coverage choices by three core ideas. I ask whether or not the coverage or strategy protects Idaho households, promotes small enterprise, and whether or not authorities have to be concerned to resolve the issue. I additionally attempt to perceive the monetary and different impacts together with to our Idaho water and different pure sources.

Advertisement

My constituents are various in my legislative district. I search to symbolize all views utilizing the very best obtainable information and analysis and make choices which are in the very best pursuits of Pocatello and Idaho.

SHEA: I’m fortunate to have been mentored by some wonderful politicians in Idaho — Mark Nye and James Ruchti. I’ve additionally obtained some nice recommendation from Diane Bilyeu and Donna Boe.

James Ruchti, Nate Roberts and I’ve been knocking on doorways in Pocatello because the main season in 2022. We now have attended as many group occasions as we now have been capable of, together with Farmer’s Markets on Saturdays. We now have met with educators on the Pocatello Schooling Affiliation picnic and at different occasions. We now have visited with college students and college at ISU. We now have talked to the medical group. We now have talked to librarians.

We’re not simply speaking to Democrats; we’re speaking to everybody, as a result of we actually wish to perceive what people are involved about. We wish to perceive how we may help them, and the way anticipated laws may impression them. One of the best skillset I’ve as a lawyer is realizing methods to pay attention earlier than I reply. I can not clear up issues until I actually perceive them. Too typically recently in Idaho, the legislative department has acted with out speaking to the stakeholders to actually perceive how the wording of their payments may result in unintended penalties. Our authorities must moralize and choose us much less, and hearken to us extra.

What position do lobbying entities play within the decision-making of Idaho legislators?

MANWARING: The variety of lobbyists in Idaho is small and for probably the most half they perceive the one foreign money they’ve is belief. Lobbyists are sometimes good at serving to collect and supply info on various topics and the very best ones can converse straightforwardly about all sides of a difficulty.

Advertisement

Lobbyists have a job to do for his or her shoppers and usually simply wish to know the place a legislator stands on the topic. Typically the stress is quite a bit, however it’s best to maintain in perspective that it’s not private, and lobbying is a enterprise like the rest. This helps me be certain that I’m not ever unduly influenced and making choices primarily based on what’s finest for my constituents.

SHEA: As a first-time candidate and somebody who has not served within the legislature, all I do know is what folks I belief have shared with me. Lobbyists are current in Idaho simply as they’re in all places else, and they’re actually influential, however I don’t assume they’ve an outsized affect on what truly occurs in Boise.

For example, the $6 million greenback federal grant for early teaching programs had heavy and practically common foyer assist in Idaho in 2021, but it surely was defeated nonetheless by the Idaho Freedom Basis forces. I’m involved that the IFF has extra affect on Idaho politics than it ought to, and I feel their tax exempt standing is suspect. They behave extra like a foyer or a PAC than a “assume tank.”

I’m involved in regards to the stress ways they promote on members of the GOP who don’t vote they manner they need them to vote. Typically, I feel lobbies may be very useful in educating legislators in regards to the execs and cons of specific payments, however legislators should be good shoppers and bear in mind to crosscheck the data they obtain with all the opposite stakeholders, in addition to with their constituents.

How are you going to encourage compromise, debate and a bipartisan strategy to introducing new laws in Idaho?

MANWARING: I’ve labored for 2 phrases as the one elected Republican in my district by specializing in doing what is true and never what’s politically handy. I search compromise if the result’s for the higher good and don’t consider this implies you could surrender your beliefs, values, or opinions.

Advertisement

This yr and final yr I sponsored bipartisan laws with my democratic seat mate. After we selected our ground seats, we select to take a seat subsequent to one another. We go to typically and talk about how coverage will impression our district and regardless that we don’t all the time agree, more often than not we’re aligned on the problems to finest symbolize a vote for Pocatello.

I consider all new laws ought to have early bipartisan assist and even in a state the place Republicans have a supermajority within the legislature, there’s a higher probability of final success if laws is vetted and supported by members of each events and extra persons are concerned and collaborating within the strategy of drafting and understanding one another’s motives early on.

SHEA: As a trial lawyer, I understand how to debate even robust points pretty, inside the bounds of ethics and the principles, and with out making issues private. It’s a ability set I’ve practiced recurrently for over thirty years.

I consider there are good folks and good concepts all over, no matter get together affiliation or identification. I understand how to seek out the frequent floor.

As somebody who has served in a number of management roles in numerous organizations that concerned legal professionals and different vital stakeholders, I understand how to make everybody really feel heard and methods to elicit collaboration and inventive problem-solving earlier than choices are made.

Advertisement

I do know the worth of relationships, and I work onerous to maintain them constructive, productive, {and professional}, even when circumstances are onerous. I do know that my get together won’t have sufficient votes to do something with out cooperation with the GOP. I plan to construct relationships in order that we will discover actual options to the true issues, in the very best pursuits of all of our constituents.

What components of Idaho authorities may benefit from extra state funding? What a part of Idaho authorities may very well be improved with monetary cutbacks?

MANWARING: Whereas we now have invested a whole lot of hundreds of thousands of {dollars} into schooling during the last a number of years together with $410 million extra ongoing funds designated this yr for schooling, there may be nonetheless extra we will do to supply wonderful schooling and elevated pupil achievement and a ready workforce.

Each greenback invested in early childhood improvement, together with studying, math, and science, will return nice dividends for Idaho. Each baby ought to have broadband entry, tailor-made mentoring from cradle to profession, and inherit a state that’s cleaner, safer, and crammed with extra alternative to stay in and lift the subsequent era of Idaho households.

We should always make investments extra in bodily and psychological well being, and substance abuse packages. Sustainable administration and assist for the development and improvement of vitality sources, like nuclear and hydro, will assist us meet the rising wants of Idaho.

We should additionally proceed to work on felony justice reform and lowering the prices of imprisonment, together with lowering rules and obstacles in order that well being care and childcare is accessible and reasonably priced.

Advertisement

SHEA: Idaho must prioritize psychological well being, significantly for our youth. I wish to get on that group to verify cash is spent properly.

Idaho must work immediately with native governments to prioritize good progress and to stabilize price of residing considerations by issues like lowering property tax burdens. We would do that by paying off bonds and levies, and by paying extra of the state’s justifiable share of funding for legislation enforcement and the judicial department.

I’d like to see Idaho begin listening to authorized recommendation in regards to the likelihoods of shedding costly court docket battles. We now have wasted actually hundreds of thousands of taxpayer {dollars} this manner over time. A few years in the past, Idaho handed a invoice to stop adults from altering their gender on their start certificates, regardless that a federal court docket informed Idaho in 2018 they might not try this. Idaho must be far more accountable with the folks’s cash. I additionally assume we now have low tax burdens in Idaho for the rich and for companies, and we don’t want to provide them anymore tax breaks anytime quickly. If anybody wants extra of a break, it’s the low revenue households in Idaho.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Idaho

Idaho Supreme Court rules on Thomas Creech’s last state appeal to avoid death penalty – East Idaho News

Published

on

Idaho Supreme Court rules on Thomas Creech’s last state appeal to avoid death penalty – East Idaho News


BOISE (Idaho Statesman) — Idaho’s high court dismissed a final state appeal from Thomas Creech on Wednesday, leaving the federal courts to decide whether Idaho can try again to execute its longest-serving death row prisoner after a failed attempt earlier this year.

The Idaho Supreme Court unanimously rejected Creech’s arguments that a second execution attempt would represent cruel and unusual punishment under the Eighth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. In February, the execution team was unable after nearly an hour to find a vein in Creech’s body suitable for an IV to lethally inject him, and prison leaders called off the execution.

Creech became the first-ever prisoner to survive an execution in Idaho and just the sixth in U.S. history to survive one by lethal injection, according to the Washington, D.C.-based Death Penalty Information Center.

Creech alleged in his appeal that another lethal injection attempt, this time possibly with a stepped-up method known as a central line IV, which uses a catheter through a jugular in the neck, or vein in the upper thigh or chest, would violate his constitutional rights. A lower state court ruled against the claim last month.

Advertisement

“The application does not support, with any likelihood, the conclusion that the pain other inmates purportedly suffered in other states establishes an ‘objectively intolerable’ risk of pain for Creech, as required under the Eighth Amendment,” Idaho Chief Justice G. Richard Bevan wrote for the court.

Idaho’s five justices also ruled against Creech in a similar appeal earlier this month.

The court’s ruling Wednesday sided with Idaho Attorney General Raúl Labrador’s office and was determined on legal briefs alone. No oral arguments were scheduled in the appeal.

Justice Colleen Zahn recused herself from Creech’s appeal and was replaced by Senior Justice Roger Burdick, who retired from the court in 2021. Zahn cited her decadelong tenure in the Attorney General’s Office before her appointment to the Supreme Court bench, state courts spokesperson Nate Poppino previously told the Idaho Statesman.

The State Appellate Public Defender’s Office, which represented Creech in the case, did not immediately respond to a request for comment from the Idaho Statesman. The Attorney General’s Office declined to comment Wednesday after the ruling.

Advertisement

The Federal Defender Services of Idaho, which represents Creech in three other active appeals in federal court, did not immediately respond to a request for comment, including over its own federal appeal with the same legal arguments as the case just dismissed by the Idaho Supreme Court.

Creech was set to be executed earlier this month after he was served with a death warrant from Ada County Prosecuting Attorney Jan Bennetts’ office. A federal judge issued a stay and hit pause on the scheduled execution timeline before Idaho could follow through on the state’s first execution in more than a dozen years.

Creech, 74, has been incarcerated for 50 years on five murder convictions, including three victims in Idaho. His standing death sentence stems from the May 1981 beating death of fellow prisoner David D. Jensen, 23, for which Creech pleaded guilty. Before that, Creech was convicted of the November 1974 shooting deaths of two men in Valley County in Idaho, and later the shooting death of a man in Oregon and another man’s death by strangulation in California.

Arizona judge to decide federal appeals

Presiding over Creech’s three pending federal lawsuits is visiting U.S. District Judge G. Murray Snow from the District of Arizona. He stepped in after U.S. District Judge Amanda Brailsford for the District of Idaho was forced to recuse herself from one of Creech’s cases over her decadeslong friendship with Bennetts.

Snow, an appointee of former President George W. Bush, is no stranger to death penalty cases. He has handled several in Arizona, which, like Idaho, maintains capital punishment — though Arizona’s Democratic governor issued a pause on all executions last year.

Advertisement

In a 2016 case, Snow ruled that witnesses to an execution must be allowed to see the entirety of the execution. That includes when a prisoner is brought into the execution chamber and strapped down to a gurney, as well as when chemicals are administered during a lethal injection.

Idaho’s prison system recently revamped its execution chamber to add an “execution preparation room” and cameras with closed-circuit live video and audio feeds to meet similar legal requirements for witnesses. The renovation, associated with possible use of a central line IV, cost the state $314,000.

In another Arizona case in 2017, Snow ruled that prison officials did not have to reveal their suppliers of lethal injection drugs or the credentials of anyone who participates in an execution. The identities of suppliers and members of the execution team are protected pieces of information under Arizona law.

Snow rationalized in his decision that some suppliers may not sell the drugs to the state if they were not granted anonymity, the Associated Press reported. Lethal injection drugs have in recent years become difficult to buy for corrections systems across the U.S., because of mounting public pressure and drug manufacturers prohibiting sales to prisons for use in executions.

Faced with its own challenges obtaining lethal injection drugs, Idaho approved a similar law in 2022 that shields any potential identifying information about drug suppliers, as well as the identities of execution participants, from public disclosure. The next year, Idaho prison officials paid $50,000 to acquire lethal injection drugs for the first time in several years, but withheld from where, citing the new law. The going retail price for the drugs is about $16,000, a doctor of pharmacy declared in court records.

Advertisement
Thomas Creech, left, is Idaho’s longest-service death row prisoner, including after a failed execution by lethal injection in February 2024. He married his wife, LeAnn Creech, in 1998 while incarcerated. | Courtesy Federal Defender Services of Idaho

Idaho prison officials later bought a second round of lethal injection drugs for $100,000, but those expired, court records showed. That led to another $50,000 purchase, according to an invoice obtained by the Statesman through a public records request, in the weeks leading up to Creech’s scheduled execution.

Already, Snow has issued rulings in favor of Creech, including the stay of execution in one case. He also granted a doctor who specializes in assessing trauma the ability to evaluate Creech. Labrador’s office opposed the evaluation while Creech’s death warrant was active.

=htmlentities(get_the_title())?>%0D%0A%0D%0A=get_permalink()?>%0D%0A%0D%0A=htmlentities(‘For more stories like this one, be sure to visit https://www.eastidahonews.com/ for all of the latest news, community events and more.’)?>&subject=Check%20out%20this%20story%20from%20EastIdahoNews” class=”fa-stack jDialog”>





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Idaho

For a year, Idaho pregnant moms’ deaths weren’t analyzed by this panel. But new report is coming.

Published

on

For a year, Idaho pregnant moms’ deaths weren’t analyzed by this panel. But new report is coming.


Reassembled Maternal Mortality Review Committee will review 2023 data in next report, due Jan. 31

Newly reassembled after Idaho lawmakers let it disband, a group of Idaho medical experts is preparing a report about pregnant moms who died in 2023.

The Idaho Maternal Mortality Review Committee met Thursday for the first time since being disbanded in 2023.

The committee’s next report is due to the Idaho Legislature by Jan. 31, as required in the new Idaho law that re-established the group.

The review committee’s purpose has been to identify, review and analyze maternal deaths in Idaho — and offer recommendations to address those deaths.

Advertisement

The committee’s last report, using data from 2021, found Idaho’s maternal mortality rate nearly doubled in recent years — and most of those deaths were preventable.

The committee was previously housed in the Idaho Department of Health and Welfare. But the new law that reinstated it placed the committee under the Idaho Board of Medicine, which licenses doctors.

The committee is working to first address maternal death cases in 2023, and will then look into 2022 cases, Idaho Board of Medicine General Counsel Russell Spencer told the Sun in an interview.

That’s “because the Legislature would like the most up to date” information available, Idaho Board of Medicine spokesperson Bob McLaughlin told the Sun in an interview.

Idaho has several laws banning abortion. In the 2024 legislative session, Idaho lawmakers didn’t amend those laws, despite pleas from doctors for a maternal health exception.

Advertisement

How Idaho’s Maternal Mortality Review Committee works

The review committee, under the Department of Health and Welfare, analyzed de-identified medical records, health statistics, autopsy reports and other records related to maternal deaths.

The committee’s work “was not intended to imply blame or substitute for institutional or professional peer review,” according to a Health and Welfare website. “Rather, the review process sought to learn from and prevent future maternal deaths.”

The reinstated committee, under the Board of Medicine, will still analyze de-identified cases. The cases “will not be used for disciplinary actions by the Board of Medicine,” the board’s website says.

An advisory body to the Board of Medicine, the review committee is meant to “identify, review, and analyze maternal deaths and determine if the pregnancy was incidental to, or a contributing factor in, the mother’s death,” the Board of Medicine’s website says.

The board’s website says the committee report “will provide insights into maternal death trends and risk factors in Idaho year over year.”

Advertisement

Next Idaho maternal mortality report to include 2023 data

The review committee hasn’t yet fully reviewed or published findings from Idaho maternal deaths in 2022 and 2023.

In 2023, 13 Idaho maternal death cases were identified for review, and 15 cases were identified in 2022, Spencer told the Sun.

But he said the actual number of maternal death cases to be reviewed could be reduced, for instance, if the person wasn’t pregnant or if the death occurred outside of the year the committee was analyzing.

Spencer told the Sun the committee has already reviewed seven of the 13 maternal death cases identified in 2023.

The committee will also work to ensure that each case is “correctly associated with maternal mortality,” he said.

Advertisement

“If so, then it will go in front of the committee, and the committee and the committee will determine whether it was related to the pregnancy or if it was incidental to the pregnancy,” Spencer said.

The committee plans to meet three times this year, including last week’s meeting, he said.

The committee will likely review 2022 data in the first half of 2025, while it awaits the 2024 data, McLaughlin told the Sun in an email.

“It usually takes a full calendar year to receive relevant documents, input data, and have committee meetings,” he said. “We are doing everything in our power to review 2022’s data as soon as possible, along with the cases from 2023 and the expected cases for 2024 coming to us in 2025.”

How Idaho lawmakers reinstated the committee

In summer 2023, Idaho became the only U.S. state without a maternal mortality review committee, after state lawmakers let the committee disband by not renewing it.

Advertisement

In 2024, the Idaho Legislature reinstated the maternal mortality review committee through a new bill, House Bill 399, that widely passed both legislative chambers before Gov. Brad Little signed it into law.

Work to revive the review committee started soon after Little signed the new bill into law on March 18, McLaughlin told the Sun in an email before the meeting.

The Idaho Board of Medicine hired a coordinator for the review committee, who started Aug. 5, and worked to ensure the committee had access to data to conduct the work, such as receiving information to start case review from the Idaho Department of Health and Welfare’s Bureau of Vital Statistics and working with the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention “to execute a data sharing agreement and memorandum of understanding” for its database, McLaughlin told the Sun.

Idaho Medical Association CEO Susie Keller said in a statement that the association was grateful to the Legislature for reinstating “this important health care resource for women and families.”

The medical association “commends the Idaho Board of Medicine for meeting the challenges of re-establishing” the review committee, Keller added.

Advertisement

Who’s on the committee now?

The reinstated Idaho Maternal Mortality Review Committee includes a mix of health care professionals, including doctors, midwives, a nurse and a paramedic.

The members are:

  • Dr. Andrew Spencer, a maternal-fetal medicine (MFM) specialist
  • Faith Krull, a certified nurse midwife
  • Jeremy Schabot, deputy director of training and safety at Ada County Paramedics
  • Dr. John Eck, a family physician in Boise
  • Joshua Hall, the Nez Perce County coroner
  • Dr. Julie Meltzer, who specializes in OB/GYN care
  • Krysta Freed, a licensed midwife
  • Linda Lopez
  • Dr. Magni Hamso, the medical director for Idaho Medicaid
  • Dr. Spencer Paulson, a pathologist
  • Tasha Hussman, a registered nurse

On Thursday, the committee named Eck as chair and Spencer as vice chair, on voice votes without any opposition.

The committee then entered executive session — where the public is not allowed to attend — to review cases.

The previous iteration of Idaho’s Maternal Mortality Review Committee conducted most of its work in executive session, similar to other states, McLaughlin told the Sun in an email.

“To do its work, the (Maternal Mortality Review Committee) must review records of hospital care, psychiatric care, and other medical records, all exempt from disclosure” under Idaho law, McLaughlin said. “We also want to encourage open and free discussion among the members of the committee, which an executive session helps to promote.”

Advertisement

Two past committee members re-applied, but weren’t selected

Four of the review committee’s current members had served on the Idaho Maternal Mortality Review Committee when it concluded its final report in 2023, including Hamso, Meltzer, Freed and Krull.

But two doctors who had previously served on the committee applied and were not selected. Both of those doctors — Dr. Stacy Seyb and Dr. Caitlin Gustafson — have been involved in lawsuits against the state of Idaho or state government agencies related to Idaho’s abortion bans.

Upon request, the Idaho Board of Medicine provided the list of committee applicants to the Idaho Capital Sun. But McLaughlin said the Idaho Public Records Act did not allow the state medical licensing agency to “provide a more specific answer” about reasons applicants weren’t selected.

The head of the Idaho Academy of Family Physicians, in a statement, said the organization was “deeply invested” in the review committee’s work.

“The IAFP is deeply invested in the continued work of the (Maternal Mortality Review Committee) in its new iteration and hopes to see the high-quality data analysis and reports that were provided by previous (review committees). This work is crucial to supporting maternal health and well-being in Idaho,” organization executive director Liz Woodruff said in a statement.

Advertisement

Russ Barron, administrator of the Board of Medicine’s parent agency called the Division of Occupational and Professional Licenses, made the appointments “in consultation” with the Board of Medicine, McLaughlin told the Sun.

Committee members were selected based on their education, training and clinical expertise, the Board of Medicine’s website says.

Asked why some past review committee members weren’t selected to serve on the new committee, Spencer told the Sun, “there’s nothing wrong with anybody who wasn’t on.”

Spencer said he couldn’t discuss reasons why specific people weren’t selected.

“We’re very, very grateful for everybody who’s ever served on this committee. We had enough interest in the committee that we were able to fill the different slots with people who hadn’t served before and provide new perspectives,” he told the Sun.

Advertisement

This article was written by Kyle Pfannenstiel of the Idaho Capital Sun.





Source link

Continue Reading

Idaho

More steelhead bound for the Boise River

Published

on

More steelhead bound for the Boise River


More steelhead are headed for the Boise River the day before Thanksgiving.  

Approximately 110 additional steelhead will be released into the Boise River on Wednesday, Nov. 27. The Fish and Game fish stocking trucks will be releasing fish at the usual locations: 

  • Glenwood Bridge
  • Americana Bridge
  • Below the Broadway Avenue Bridge behind Boise State University
  • West Parkcenter Bridge
  • Barber Park

The fish are trapped at Hells Canyon Dam on the Snake River and will be released in equal numbers (~22 fish) at these five stocking locations. 

Boise River steelhead limits are 2 fish per day, 6 in possession and 20 for the fall season. Though required in other steelhead waters, barbless hooks are not required for Boise River steelhead angling.

In addition to a valid fishing license, anglers looking to fish for one of the hatchery steelhead need a steelhead permit. Permits can be purchased at any Fish and Game office or numerous vendors across the state.

Advertisement

All steelhead stocked in the Boise River will lack an adipose fin (the small fin normally found immediately behind the dorsal fin). Boise River anglers catching a rainbow trout longer than 20 inches that lacks an adipose fin should consider the fish a steelhead. Any steelhead caught by an angler not holding a steelhead permit must immediately be returned to the water, and it is illegal to target steelhead without a steelhead permit.

For more information regarding the Boise River steelhead release, contact the Fish and Game Southwest Regional Office in Nampa or call (208) 465-8465. Check the department’s website to learn more.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending