Idaho
Idaho Senate Approves Measure To Ban Cannabis Legalization Initiatives
Idaho’s voters will decide on a constitutional amendment that would prohibit the legalization of … [+]
The Idaho Senate this week approved a joint resolution to deny voters the authority to legalize cannabis through a statewide ballot initiative. Tuesday’s passage of HJR 4 came one week after the Idaho House of Representatives approved the measure, which will ask voters in the 2026 election if the state’s constitution should be amended to prohibit ballot initiatives to legalize cannabis and other drugs.
Idaho’s voters will be asked to decide on the ballot question reading “Shall Section 26, Article III of the Constitution of the State of Idaho be amended to provide that only the Idaho Legislature shall have power and authority to legalize the growing, producing, manufacturing, transporting, selling, delivering, dispensing, administering, prescribing, distributing, possessing, or using of marijuana, narcotics, or other psychoactive substances?”
If a majority of voters in the 2026 election vote “yes” on the ballot question, the Idaho Constitution will be amended. If most voters decide against the proposal, Idaho’s voters will retain the authority to legalize cannabis and other drugs through a statewide ballot measure.
Republican state Sen. Scott Grow, a co-sponsor of HJR4, said that the constitutional amendment to block cannabis legalization initiatives is a way to be tough on marijuana. He also believes the amendment, if passed, can set Idaho apart from neighboring states that have legalized cannabis for recreational or medical use.
“Too many legislatures across this nation have sat back and just waited as initiative after initiative would come after them, until they finally overwhelm it and overwhelm the legislature,” Grow said, according to a report from the Idaho Capital Sun. “We are acting because that’s our responsibility.”
Grow also noted that the Idaho Constitution already states that, “The first concern of all good government is the virtue and sobriety of the people, and the purity of the home. The legislature should further all wise and well directed efforts for the promotion of temperance and morality.”
Opponents Of HJR4 Speak Out
Opponents of HJR4 say that the proposal indicates that lawmakers do not trust the voters of Idaho to weigh in on drug policy reform.
“The people have a right under the initiative and the referendum process to weigh in on these issues,” said Democratic state Sen. James Ruchti. “We have been clear in the Constitution that all political power is inherent in the people, and we have been clear that the people reserve to themselves the power to propose laws and enact the same at the polls independent of the Legislature. We should respect the people.”
In a report on HJR4, the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws (NORML) noted that in a recent survey, 70% of Idaho voters said that “the use of marijuana for medical purposes should be made legal.” The poll also found that nearly half (48%) of the state’s voters support legalizing marijuana for recreational use.
“State lawmakers are well aware that their ‘reefer madness’ views are out of step with most Idahoans,” NORML deputy director Paul Armentano said in a statement from the cannabis policy reform advocacy group. “That is why they are seeking to remove voters from the equation. Whether or not one personally supports or opposes cannabis legalization, these overtly undemocratic tactics ought to be a cause of deep concern.”
Weed Legalization Ballot Measure Already Filed For 2026
In November, the group KindIdaho filed a proposed ballot initiative to legalize cannabis possession and cultivation for personal use. If the measure qualifies for the ballot, voters will see both the legalization ballot question and HJR4 on the ballot for the 2026 election.
If passed by Idaho voters, the proposal would exempt adults aged 21 and older from state laws that prohibit the “possession, production, or cultivation of cannabis” under certain specified conditions.
Idaho activists hope to have a cannabis legalization initiative on the ballot for the 2026 election.
Marijuana could only be grown or possessed “for personal use and not for sale or resale” and consuming cannabis would be prohibited in a “public or open setting.” The proposal would not legalize marijuana sales or the commercial cultivation and distribution of cannabis.
Joseph Evans, a military veteran and a spokesman for KindIdaho, says that if it becomes part of the state constitution, “HJR4 would block citizens’ initiatives to legalize invaluable and irreplaceable medications in Idaho.”
“This is the fourth attempt in three years by the legislature to become the sole arbiters of medical value in the state,” Evans said after the House passed the resolution.
With HJR4 now approved by the Senate, KindIdaho will be forced “divide our efforts between our current initiative and campaigning against HJR4.”
“As a small grassroots non-profit, this would significantly hinder our mission of patient access, not only for cannabis but for other effective treatments as well,” Evans added.
PAYETTE — A Payette mom’s bond was revoked Tuesday after she was charged with suffocating her twin children earlier this month and is believed to pose a danger to the life of her newborn child.
The case, which has drawn national headlines, concerns Andrea Renee Shaw, a 23-year-old Payette mother who in May 2025 said her 18-month-old fraternal twins died the same day, after receiving routine childhood vaccinations. In January, Shaw joined as a plaintiff in a federal lawsuit filed by Children’s Health Defense, an anti-vaccine organization founded by Robert F. Kennedy Jr., with several other plaintiffs claiming vaccine injury or death.
Kennedy, who now serves as secretary of Health and Human Services, is no longer part of the group after taking on the cabinet position, as was reported by the Associated Press.
In Idaho, the twins’ deaths prompted a 14-month investigation by the Payette County Sheriff’s Department. On June 29, the investigation yielded a grand jury indictment of Shaw on two counts of first-degree murder by suffocation. If convicted, Shaw can be punished by up to life in prison or the death penalty, and the court would have the ability to order the penalties be served consecutively, or back to back.
Tuesday’s arraignment at the Payette County Courthouse was primarily attended by Shaw’s relatives and members of the media. Payette County Judge Kiley Stuchlik, who serves Idaho’s Third Judicial District, presided.
A key consideration for Stuchlik on Tuesday was a request from Joseph Filicetti, the legal counsel for Shaw, to have her bond reduced from $2 million to $100,000. Filicetti said this would allow for Shaw to care for a newborn girl, who, according to court documents, was born by caesarean section on June 25, four days prior to Shaw’s grand jury indictment.
State prosecutors objected to the motion for bond reduction, noting at hand was a potential death penalty case and asserting, unlike her husband, Shaw’s story repeatedly changed during questioning. Prosecuting Attorney Mike Duke said releasing Shaw would ultimately put the newborn’s safety at risk.
“That child is the most at risk. We do not think she should be allowed to be anywhere near any children, let alone her own children,” Duke said.
Stuchlik decided to revoke bond entirely, stating Shaw posed a “risk of safety” to the newborn child that was not known to Stuchlik or prosecutors when the $2 million bond was initially set.
Also for consideration Tuesday was a request to have grand jury transcripts of witness testimony provided to prosecutors and defense counsel to prepare their respective cases.
Idaho
Idaho is home to the nation's first DarkSky Reserve. Now it's home to the nations first DarkSky Certified Resort
IDAHO FALLS, Idaho (KIFI) – A controversy is brewing as the City of Idaho Falls reviews its alcohol ordinance.
The goal is to consolidate four existing ordinances for beer, wine and liquor into a single law and ensure compliance with state code.
However, at its meeting last Thursday, the Idaho Falls City Council unanimously voted to remove the proposed ordinance from its agenda, in order to receive and consider additional public comment.
The proposed ordinance would:
1. Require commercial establishments selling, dispensing or permitting consumption of alcohol – including beer, wine or liquor – to have an alcohol license, alcohol catering permit or a charitable event permit.
2. Business events with 20 or less employees consuming alcohol at the business would be allowed.
3. Require alcohol servers to complete training every three years.
4. Individuals who violate the law could be charged with a misdemeanor.
Idaho Falls City Council President Jim Francis said the changes were the culmination of months of collaboration between law enforcement, business owners and city attorneys.
“We wanted to provide a safe environment – the primary point here – for public gatherings,” Francis said. “We recognize that certain antiquated elements of the current code are overly restrictive and needed to be addressed. We wanted to make the code more accessible to the public. We needed to address over-pouring issues. We wanted to reduce penalties where possible for violations, particularly the first offenses, and yet make the code clear enough to be enforceable consistently by law enforcement.”
But City Council Member John Radford said the changes represent an overreach by city government.
“I believe it’s a bad policy. What problem are we solving in the name of trying to solve a non-problem?” Radford said. “We’re becoming big brother around alcohol in your private property. I’m concerned that landlords will be at risk of being charged with a misdemeanor if they knowingly, which I made sure that was in there, because that is what we’ve been talking about, allowed people to drink in our business. We will be outside the norm of Idaho cities. This is a big step, and I don’t think the public has weighed in on this.”
At a City Council Work Session on June 1, Idaho Falls Chief of Police Bryce Johnson cited an increase in alcohol-related crime – particularly downtown – as a reason for the changes.
“DUI is there, but this would include sexual assaults, assaults, batteries, disturbances, urination, public vandalism, shooting – all sorts of crimes,” Johnson said.
But business owners are concerned about the potential impact on commercial enterprises.
“The ordinance doesn’t address the real problem – which is people drinking … at one event and then showing up in a bar or restaurant already hammered and causing problems anyway,” ” said Terri Ireland, representing the Idaho Falls Downtown Merchants Association. “The industry is really well-regulated by state and local laws already.”
The City of Idaho Falls began the process of updating its alcohol ordinance in January 2026, seeking input from community stakeholders.
Multiple community members spoke out about the ordinance.
For more in-depth information, you can read the full 39-page proposed alcohol ordinance here.
-
Los Angeles, Ca1 hour agoSouthern California hits hottest day of its extreme heat warning
-
Detroit, MI2 hours agoSteve Yzerman out as Detroit Red Wings GM, moves to senior advisor role
-
San Francisco, CA2 hours agoSupervisors urge California to expand S.F. speed-camera program
-
Dallas, TX2 hours agoFive teens injured after crashing carjacked vehicle during Dallas police chase
-
Miami, FL2 hours agoTokyo-style Neapolitan pizza is coming to Miami, led by legendary pizzaiolo chef Bun
-
Boston, MA2 hours agoSEE THE GOOD: Roxbury center reminds young adults ‘You got this’ – Boston News, Weather, Sports | WHDH 7News
-
Denver, CO2 hours ago
Five Points affordable housing building honors Dr. Justina Ford | Rocky Mountain PBS
-
Seattle, WA2 hours agoSeattle weather: Hot and sunny day Wednesday, highs in the 80s
