Idaho
House election bill echoes Idaho voter citizenship laws
A bill requiring voters to provide proof of citizenship just passed the U.S. House of Representatives and is advancing to the Senate.
Last Thursday, the House passed the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act, or SAVE Act. The legislation requires voters to provide proof of citizenship, including REAL ID driver’s licenses, to participate in elections. Standard driver’s licenses would no longer be accepted.
Last week, Idaho Secretary of State Phil McGrane spoke on election security at the federal House Election Subcommittee in Washington. Before the hearing, McGrane told Boise State Public Radio what he planned to discuss.
“A really hot topic is just citizenship validation. In order for us to be able to do that, we can’t just do it as Idaho alone. We need our partners in the other states, as well as the federal government, to be able to do that,” McGrane said.
This includes implementation of the state’s 2024 Only Citizens Can Vote Act executive order, which requires all Idaho voters’ citizenship status to be reviewed each election cycle.
The order was followed by a constitutional amendment Idaho voters approved in fall that explicitly says only U.S. citizens can vote, even though existing laws already ban noncitizens from casting ballots.
At the hearing, McGrane said all 1.1 million Idaho voter registrations were audited by the state this last election. He said it the state is “easily determining citizenship for the overwhelming majority, but then really dialing it in to a case by case basis to narrow it down to 34 individuals who were non-citizens on Idaho’s voter rolls.”
That’s about .003% of the voting population in last year’s election.
Idaho checks the voter registry to purge inactive voters every two years.
The committee asked McGrane why Idaho recently banned student IDs for voter identification. He said it didn’t change voter turnout, and that Idaho is looking into requiring REAL ID Star Cards for voting.
“We have the real ID taking effect. We all see this when we travel. All of us experience it. This is something that we can do.”
Idaho’s REAL ID Star Card program takes effect on May 7.
A 2024 study by the University of Maryland finds roughly 21 million registered voters don’t have easy access to proof of citizenship. That’s 9% of the country’s voting population.
PAYETTE — A Payette mom’s bond was revoked Tuesday after she was charged with suffocating her twin children earlier this month and is believed to pose a danger to the life of her newborn child.
The case, which has drawn national headlines, concerns Andrea Renee Shaw, a 23-year-old Payette mother who in May 2025 said her 18-month-old fraternal twins died the same day, after receiving routine childhood vaccinations. In January, Shaw joined as a plaintiff in a federal lawsuit filed by Children’s Health Defense, an anti-vaccine organization founded by Robert F. Kennedy Jr., with several other plaintiffs claiming vaccine injury or death.
Kennedy, who now serves as secretary of Health and Human Services, is no longer part of the group after taking on the cabinet position, as was reported by the Associated Press.
In Idaho, the twins’ deaths prompted a 14-month investigation by the Payette County Sheriff’s Department. On June 29, the investigation yielded a grand jury indictment of Shaw on two counts of first-degree murder by suffocation. If convicted, Shaw can be punished by up to life in prison or the death penalty, and the court would have the ability to order the penalties be served consecutively, or back to back.
Tuesday’s arraignment at the Payette County Courthouse was primarily attended by Shaw’s relatives and members of the media. Payette County Judge Kiley Stuchlik, who serves Idaho’s Third Judicial District, presided.
A key consideration for Stuchlik on Tuesday was a request from Joseph Filicetti, the legal counsel for Shaw, to have her bond reduced from $2 million to $100,000. Filicetti said this would allow for Shaw to care for a newborn girl, who, according to court documents, was born by caesarean section on June 25, four days prior to Shaw’s grand jury indictment.
State prosecutors objected to the motion for bond reduction, noting at hand was a potential death penalty case and asserting, unlike her husband, Shaw’s story repeatedly changed during questioning. Prosecuting Attorney Mike Duke said releasing Shaw would ultimately put the newborn’s safety at risk.
“That child is the most at risk. We do not think she should be allowed to be anywhere near any children, let alone her own children,” Duke said.
Stuchlik decided to revoke bond entirely, stating Shaw posed a “risk of safety” to the newborn child that was not known to Stuchlik or prosecutors when the $2 million bond was initially set.
Also for consideration Tuesday was a request to have grand jury transcripts of witness testimony provided to prosecutors and defense counsel to prepare their respective cases.
Idaho
Idaho is home to the nation's first DarkSky Reserve. Now it's home to the nations first DarkSky Certified Resort
IDAHO FALLS, Idaho (KIFI) – A controversy is brewing as the City of Idaho Falls reviews its alcohol ordinance.
The goal is to consolidate four existing ordinances for beer, wine and liquor into a single law and ensure compliance with state code.
However, at its meeting last Thursday, the Idaho Falls City Council unanimously voted to remove the proposed ordinance from its agenda, in order to receive and consider additional public comment.
The proposed ordinance would:
1. Require commercial establishments selling, dispensing or permitting consumption of alcohol – including beer, wine or liquor – to have an alcohol license, alcohol catering permit or a charitable event permit.
2. Business events with 20 or less employees consuming alcohol at the business would be allowed.
3. Require alcohol servers to complete training every three years.
4. Individuals who violate the law could be charged with a misdemeanor.
Idaho Falls City Council President Jim Francis said the changes were the culmination of months of collaboration between law enforcement, business owners and city attorneys.
“We wanted to provide a safe environment – the primary point here – for public gatherings,” Francis said. “We recognize that certain antiquated elements of the current code are overly restrictive and needed to be addressed. We wanted to make the code more accessible to the public. We needed to address over-pouring issues. We wanted to reduce penalties where possible for violations, particularly the first offenses, and yet make the code clear enough to be enforceable consistently by law enforcement.”
But City Council Member John Radford said the changes represent an overreach by city government.
“I believe it’s a bad policy. What problem are we solving in the name of trying to solve a non-problem?” Radford said. “We’re becoming big brother around alcohol in your private property. I’m concerned that landlords will be at risk of being charged with a misdemeanor if they knowingly, which I made sure that was in there, because that is what we’ve been talking about, allowed people to drink in our business. We will be outside the norm of Idaho cities. This is a big step, and I don’t think the public has weighed in on this.”
At a City Council Work Session on June 1, Idaho Falls Chief of Police Bryce Johnson cited an increase in alcohol-related crime – particularly downtown – as a reason for the changes.
“DUI is there, but this would include sexual assaults, assaults, batteries, disturbances, urination, public vandalism, shooting – all sorts of crimes,” Johnson said.
But business owners are concerned about the potential impact on commercial enterprises.
“The ordinance doesn’t address the real problem – which is people drinking … at one event and then showing up in a bar or restaurant already hammered and causing problems anyway,” ” said Terri Ireland, representing the Idaho Falls Downtown Merchants Association. “The industry is really well-regulated by state and local laws already.”
The City of Idaho Falls began the process of updating its alcohol ordinance in January 2026, seeking input from community stakeholders.
Multiple community members spoke out about the ordinance.
For more in-depth information, you can read the full 39-page proposed alcohol ordinance here.
-
Miami, FL2 minutes agoTokyo-style Neapolitan pizza is coming to Miami, led by legendary pizzaiolo chef Bun
-
Boston, MA8 minutes agoSEE THE GOOD: Roxbury center reminds young adults ‘You got this’ – Boston News, Weather, Sports | WHDH 7News
-
Denver, CO14 minutes ago
Five Points affordable housing building honors Dr. Justina Ford | Rocky Mountain PBS
-
Seattle, WA20 minutes agoSeattle weather: Hot and sunny day Wednesday, highs in the 80s
-
San Diego, CA26 minutes agoGibraltar ushers in a new era as British territory’s border fence with Spain is removed
-
Milwaukee, WI32 minutes agoCity funding awarded for redevelopment at 2618 N. Milwaukee
-
Atlanta, GA38 minutes agoAtlanta hosts its final FIFA World Cup match as tournament’s impact continues to grow
-
Minneapolis, MN44 minutes agoWalking All the Streets of Western Northeast Park
