Connect with us

West

High school coach fired after pushing to change state trans athlete law: 'Vilified' for standing up for girls

Published

on

Join Fox News for access to this content

Plus special access to select articles and other premium content with your account – free of charge.

By entering your email and pushing continue, you are agreeing to Fox News’ Terms of Use and Privacy Policy, which includes our Notice of Financial Incentive.

Please enter a valid email address.

Having trouble? Click here.

An Oregon high school track and field coach says his First Amendment rights were violated when a local school district terminated his contract for sending letters to state officials, advocating for a change in laws concerning transgender athletes.

John Parks had been the head track and field coach at Lake Oswego High School outside of Portland from Jan. 2023 until backlash ensued after he penned letters to Peter Weber, the Executive Director of the Oregon Student Activities Association (OSAA), and State Sen. Rob Wagner in May, seeking changes to current policies allowing transgender students to compete under the gender they identify as, local outlet KATU reported.

Advertisement

His actions allegedly violated district policy. An investigation began after the district reportedly received a formal complaint alleging Parks had made a transgender student athlete from a different school feel “unwelcome and discriminated against” at events throughout the spring, something Parks denied, The Oregonian reported.

The investigation ended with Parks’ termination.

OREGON TRACK AND FIELD COACH SAYS SCHOOL DISTRICT FIRED HIM AFTER HE ADVOCATED FOR TRANSGENDER LAW CHANGES

Former Lake Oswego High School Coach John Parks is challenging his termination after he was released for pushing for a change to Oregon’s transgender athlete policies. (Getty Images)

Parks told Fox News Digital on Monday he feels he was “vilified” for standing up for girls’ right to compete fairly.

Advertisement

“It’s kind of like a slap in the face to say, ‘I’ve fought for you, I’ve got girls scholarships to some of the best schools in the country – guys as well – and you’re tossing me aside because you’re saying I wrote a letter that you, after the fact, are saying was inappropriate hate and harassment because I was advocating for a change, for an opportunity to protect girls from this,’” he said of the school district.

“Everybody agrees, except for just a few officials and people that just don’t understand the issue,” he added.

According to KATU, Parks wrote to Wagner, calling for competition rules to be “aligned with what the rest of the world competes under,” particularly appearing to reference hormone testing by professional organizations like the International Olympic Committee.

The Oregonian noted that OSAA’s policies are “created through the guidelines that are set by the Oregon Department of Education and the federal government” and are made by its executive board, which consists of representatives from schools across the Beaver State.

FORMER HIGH SCHOOL TRACK AND FIELD COACH JOHN PARKS TALKS FIRING AMID PUSH FOR TRANSGENDER ATHLETE LAW CHANGE

Advertisement
John Parks on the "Gaines for Girls Podcast"

John Parks recently joined Riley Gaines to talk about the termination on OutKick’s “Gaines for Girls Podcast.” (OutKick)

Aside from insisting that he aimed to protect girls’ right to fair sports competitions, he argued that his ability to express his opinions to officials should be protected by the First Amendment. He also emphasized that he wants what’s best for everyone involved – including transgender competitors.

“I’m fully supportive of transgender rights and every other aspect,” he said.

In his letter to the OSAA, he called for creating an open division to be more inclusive, give transgender athletes a space to compete where they feel more welcomed and strive for victory without being met with hostility from spectators.

“We can create an open division for the transgender athletes, and I really think what that’s going to do is actually encourage more transgender kids to participate, because they won’t be feeling like, ‘If I go out, I’m going to face the hostility of being booed if I’m competing to my best of my abilities, and it’s an outlet for me to socialize with the other kids on my team… and get this opportunity to be out there without the hostility of having to face female athletes.’ Many transgender athletes recognize they have an advantage and they don’t want to take part because of that,” he told Fox News Digital.

“I think [establishing an open division would] be a very healthy thing,” he said.

Advertisement

Parks coached transgender athletes on his own team and told The Oregonian that he “support[s] them like all other athletes.”

TRANSGENDER HIGH SCHOOL RUNNER IN OREGON HEARS BOOS FROM CROWD AFTER WINNING GIRLS’ 200-METER STATE TITLE

Oregon Fox News graphic

Transgender students are currently allowed to compete under the gender with which they identify. (Fox News)

He also said he had witnessed transgender athletes being booed for winning, adding that it doesn’t need to happen again.

When reached for comment on the termination, Mary Kay Larson, director of communications at Lake Oswego School District, declined to comment in a previous statement, saying, “We do not discuss personnel matters.” 

Parks is appealing his termination and told Fox News Digital that the appeal had to be submitted by Wednesday.

Advertisement

“My attorneys are working with me on that,” he said.

Despite the controversy, Parks said he has been relieved to see so many members of the community coming together to support him.

“It’s been empowering to have all my athletes support me, parents support me, and they don’t even know what’s going on fully, but they know that they didn’t witness anything inappropriate, and I know that it’s an issue that they care deeply about and enough that they even set up a GoFundMe, so that’s been empowering. That kind of support.”

Fox News’ Chantz Martin contributed to this report.

Advertisement

Read the full article from Here

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Montana

Montana tribes seek to join court case over EPA water rights rule

Published

on

Montana tribes seek to join court case over EPA water rights rule


The Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes joined six other tribes in defense of a new federal rule protecting their water rights in court.

The rule requires states to consider tribes’ fishing, hunting and gathering rights while crafting water regulations.

Twelve states sued the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency over the rule, which was finalized earlier this year.

Montana is not part of the lawsuit. Those states argue the federal government oversteps its power under the Clean Water Act and would severely limit their ability to craft water standards.

Advertisement

Seven tribes have filed a motion to intervene in the case. They say the rule is key to protecting “reserved rights,” which gives tribes the ability to hunt, fish and gather on lands they ceded to the federal government through treaties.

The tribes say the rule is within the EPA’s authority as it ensures treaties are adhered to.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Nevada

Debates don’t tend to have a lasting impact. Could last week’s be different?

Published

on

Debates don’t tend to have a lasting impact. Could last week’s be different?


While last week’s debate prompted further concerns about President Joe Biden’s cognitive fitness among pundits and some national Democrats, both Nevada Democrats and Republicans are shying away from the topic on the campaign trail.

Debates and campaign events usually have only temporary effects, according to Dan Lee, a political science professor at UNLV. Polls might change, but the effects dissipate over a couple of weeks, he said. Bigger predictors of election outcomes are partisanship and the state of the economy, he said.

But last week’s debate is different, Lee said. It was not like Biden gave a bad answer; rather, it brought up questions about his ability to be president, he said.

“Debates tend not to have lasting effects, but because this debate was more, you know, highlighting his perceived shortcomings in terms of his cognitive capabilities, that’s kind of something that could stick and what Democrats are worried about,” Lee said.

Advertisement

Voters have long expressed their concerns about both presidential candidates’ ages and ambivalence over the rematch. The debate heightened those concerns. A recent CBS News poll, for instance, found that 72 percent of 1,130 registered voters surveyed — including many Democrats — do not think Biden has the mental and cognitive health to serve as president. The poll had a margin of error of plus or minus 4.2 percentage points.

Texas Rep. Lloyd Doggett became the first Democratic lawmaker to publicly call on Biden to withdraw from the 2024 election. He cited multiple polls showing Biden running substantially behind Democratic senators in key states.

“I had hoped that the debate would provide some momentum to change that,” he said in a statement Tuesday. “It did not. Instead of reassuring voters, the President failed to effectively defend his many accomplishments and expose Trump’s many lies.”

Nevada campaigning to shy away from cognitive concerns

Nevada Democrats, however, are sticking with the president — though Sen. Jacky Rosen and other candidates have been maintaining a distance from the president, who has not polled well in Nevada — and the Nevada Republican Party does not plan to focus on Biden’s health as a top campaign strategy.

Advertisement

The state’s Democrats have been focusing on the actions the Biden administration has taken, from investing in affordable housing and infrastructure and trying to lower health care costs.

Democratic Rep. Dina Titus, who has campaigned for Biden and was named to his re-election advisory board, stands by the president.

“I’ve known him, I’ve supported him, I’ve worked with him for a long time,” Titus said. “And do I wish he’d have been stronger? Of course. Do I wish he’d have called out the lies better? Yes. Do I wish he’d focused on all the good things the Democrats have done under his leadership? Yes. But you’ve got to remember, you can’t just focus on the superficial.”

Instead, you have to focus on the substance, she said.

“You play the hand you’re dealt, and that’s what we’re going to do,” she said. Democrats’ goal is to show Nevadans who Biden really is and what he’s accomplished.

Advertisement

A spokesperson for Sen. Jacky Rosen’s campaign painted the election as a choice between an administration “focused on lowering costs, growing the middle class, and restoring reproductive freedom” and “Trump’s MAGA agenda,” while distancing her from the president.

“Senator Rosen is focused on her own reelection campaign and continuing her track record as one of the most bipartisan, independent, and effective Senators,” the spokesperson said in a statement.

‘Feel sorry’

Nevada GOP Chairman Michael McDonald told the Review-Journal he felt sorry for Biden.

“I know he had a bad night, but I think it’s deeper than that,” he said Monday. “I feel sorry for his family. It’s a major concern of who is running the country right now.”

Advertisement

That said, the Republican Party won’t focus on those cognitive concerns at a state level, said McDonald, who took on the role as senior campaign adviser for the Trump campaign.

Rather, McDonald said, the party will push on Trump’s record of helping working people and will highlight his plans and outlook for the future.

“We’re going to show the difference between the two,” he said.

Contact Jessica Hill at jehill@reviewjournal.com. Follow @jess_hillyeah on X.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

New Mexico

Controversial nuclear waste storage proposal faces strong opposition in New Mexico

Published

on

Controversial nuclear waste storage proposal faces strong opposition in New Mexico


WEST TEXAS, Texas (KOSA) – A controversial nuclear waste storage proposal is facing significant opposition in the Permian Basin, particularly in New Mexico.

Background and Legal Battle:

The federal government is prohibited by law from engaging in temporary storage of nuclear waste without a permanent disposal plan. However, private companies like Holtec International have found a loophole that allows them to take on this responsibility. Holtec and the NRC have appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court to reinstate their storage license despite regional opposition.

Holtec’s Chief Communications Officer stated:

“The Fifth Circuit’s ruling that the NRC was not authorized to license and regulate nuclear fuel storage is like saying OSHA is unqualified for worker safety, the FAA for aviation safety, and the EPA for environmental safety. We urge the Supreme Court to overturn the Fifth Circuit’s legally unsound position.”

Advertisement

Local Opposition:

This move has sparked outrage and concern among residents and stakeholders in the Permian Basin, who argue that their voices and way of life are being ignored. Monica Perales, counsel for the Permian Basin Coalition, said, “This federal agency, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, is acting like a rogue agency. They’re interpreting the law and deciding it’s within their power to issue a license to allow private companies to consolidate all of America’s spent nuclear fuel and store it in the Permian Basin.”

Environmental and Health Risks:

The Permian Basin Coalition, made up of ranchers, oil and gas operators, and local landowners, has taken their fight to the Supreme Court in hopes of stopping Holtec’s plan. They argue that allowing private companies to store nuclear waste indefinitely without a permanent disposal solution is illegal and poses significant environmental and health risks.

The coalition has raised over 100 contentions against the site, citing seismic risks, constant oil and gas activity in the region, corrosive dust and salt that can lead to corrosion at cracks in the stainless steel canisters, and the potential for dangerous releases of radioactive material. Monica Perales noted, “As these canisters travel on the rail line across the country, all destined for the Permian Basin, they are going ‘bumpity bump’ and developing cracks. Cracks that can’t be fixed, cracks that will corrode, and cracks that will eventually lead to release. Maybe not in my lifetime, maybe not in my son’s lifetime, but eventually, because this remains deadly for hundreds of thousands of years.”

The NRC has acknowledged that it has not solved the problem of chloride-induced stress corrosion cracking in the canisters but has still pushed forward with the licensing process. Holtec and the NRC argue that the storage is temporary, but opponents point out that there is no defined end date for the storage and no permanent disposal site available.

Future Implications:

The Supreme Court’s decision could have far-reaching implications for nuclear waste storage policies and the safety of communities across the country. CBS7 will continue to follow this story closely and bring you updates as they become available.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending