Hawaii
Should Flight Attendants Be Allowed Do This In First Class On Hawaii Flights?
For those of us who fly to and from Hawaii regularly, the journey is often still a celebration in the sky, despite all the challenges of modern-day air travel. But on a recent First Class flight, what we witnessed raised serious questions about airline policies and safety: a visibly inebriated flight attendant being served multiple drinks while “deadheading.”
The person was not in uniform but was part of the crew. They were seated up front and, throughout the flight, had many conversations with other crew members who came to talk story with them. We noticed they were feeling the alcohol while continuing to receive more from the working crew—who appeared entirely unfazed.
This wasn’t the first time we’d encountered this, and while not frequent, each time—to our recollection—it happened on the same airline over a couple of decades’ time. That led us to take note when others started writing about this and to dig into the rules behind a situation that may surprise many Hawaii travelers.
Airline fine print behind flight attendant drinking.
In airline terms, “deadheading” refers to crew members flying as passengers, often to reposition for a future assignment. They aren’t working the flight, are typically not wearing an airline uniform, but are still technically considered to be on duty.
One major U.S. carrier with a big focus on Hawaii flights, United Airlines, permits these off-duty flight attendants to drink onboard under specific conditions: they must be out of uniform, not scheduled to work another flight that day, and only drink after the aircraft door is closed. Most other airlines have phased it out due to concerns about safety and public perception.
In other words, this isn’t a policy loophole—it’s deliberate. And now, it’s getting media attention.
What makes Hawaii flights different?
Hawaii flights are longer than most domestic flights and are unquestionably more isolated, with limited diversion options and stricter overwater safety protocols. Airlines consider every crew member onboard, whether working or not, part of the larger safety equation.
If something goes wrong over the Pacific, no matter the nature, having a visibly impaired crew member onboard—regardless of whether they’re scheduled to work—could be a concern. These are not short hops where help is always nearby. Preparedness becomes a greater issue when passengers are up to six hours from the mainland.
That’s why this particular policy might feel different when applied to Hawaii routes. It’s not just about perception—it’s about readiness when needed most.
Why this matters now.
Recent headlines about flight attendants and alcohol use—such as failed breathalyzer tests and crew removals—highlight the growing scrutiny on airline safety and conduct. Policies like this can seem increasingly outdated in an era of heightened awareness.
The rationale for allowing drinking may appear more reasonable on Hawaii flights, where flight time is long and reassignments are unlikely. However, the flip side is that the consequences of an impaired crew member could be more serious, especially if an issue arises with no one else available to step in.
A bigger debate over alcohol, behavior, and trust in the skies.
Alcohol and air travel have long sparked debate among our readers. In a recent Beat of Hawaii article, dozens of comments poured in with frustration, personal observations, and concrete suggestions.
One commenter, JA, pointed out that most passengers don’t realize it’s illegal to fly while intoxicated and proposed visible signage to deter it. Meanwhile, others advocated for simple, enforceable solutions—like limiting onboard alcohol or reviving face-to-face check-ins to catch visibly impaired travelers.
Mike C, proposed tracking drinks by boarding pass and time stamp to limit pre-flight alcohol consumption. At the same time, Don K pushed back against impractical solutions, saying, “Breathalyzers before boarding? Maybe the single dumbest thing I’ve read in a while.”
A shared concern unites all these comments: passengers want safe, predictable flights—and they’re increasingly skeptical about anything that could compromise that. So when passengers see flight attendants, even off-duty ones, being served alcohol, the reaction may be as much about trust as it is airline policy.
What travelers have told us.
After sharing our experience, we heard from other travelers who’d seen similar behavior. One visitor told us, “I didn’t realize they were crew until they started talking about work mid-flight. They were on their third glass of wine. It just felt wrong.”
Another BOH reader told us, “If I showed up tipsy to my job, I’d be fired. Why should someone being paid to fly be drinking at all?”
Others pushed back. “They’re done for the day. If they’re off the clock and following the rules, they should be allowed to enjoy the flight like anyone else.”
This split perspective makes the issue so compelling—and why we decided to share it.
Airline loophole or a smart perk?
Supporters of the policy say it’s a matter of fairness. A deadheading flight attendant, out of uniform and done with work for that day, is still a passenger. Why shouldn’t they be treated like one in all regards?
Critics argue that air travel’s unpredictability—from medical emergencies to diversions or unexpected staffing needs—makes any level of impairment unacceptable. On Hawaii routes, where flights are longer and assistance options are limited, the risks can be amplified.
As a passenger, would you be comfortable knowing a potentially inebriated crew member is onboard and might be asked to assist in an emergency?
A quiet airline policy, now being exposed.
This policy has existed quietly for some time. Honestly, we didn’t know about it ourselves, and we suspect most passengers don’t either. With renewed attention this week, it’s suddenly under a brighter spotlight.
In our case, what was most concerning wasn’t just the drinking—it was how intoxicated the crew member became, and how casually the working staff continued to serve them. It suggested to us that this wasn’t unusual.
That leaves us wondering: How common is this, and how do travelers feel about it—especially on long, remote flights like those to and from Hawaii?
What do you think?
Have you seen this happen on your Hawaii flight? Should off-duty crew be treated like passengers, or held to a higher standard?
As passengers, we trust that everyone onboard—crew included—is prepared for the unexpected. Policies like this challenge that trust and raise an important question: where should the line be drawn, especially on high-stakes routes like Hawaii?
We’d love to hear your thoughts. Let us know in the comments.
Get Breaking Hawaii Travel News
Hawaii
Famed Beach Is Disappearing. Should Hawaii Save It?
Hawaii’s Kaanapali Beach is a famed tourist destination with a problem: The beach itself is gradually disappearing. Now a major debate is underway in Maui about how, or whether, to save it, reports SFGate. Photos from the late 1980s show a much wider beach, one that has narrowed to a sliver in some places. In short, it “still looks spectacular, but there is less of it,” is how the Beat of Hawaii puts it. And it’s not always so spectacular: “Exposed rock and drainage pipes are sometimes seen jutting out from the sand, while orange plastic fencing blocks access to erosion-impacted areas,” per SFGATE. A long-planned state-backed effort to pump offshore sand back onto the beach cleared environmental review, but the state’s land board pulled its funding in 2023 after residents blasted the price tag and raised alarms over marine impacts.
Now hotel and condo owners are reviving the project themselves. Through a new nonprofit, they’re pitching a “nature-based” plan to rebuild the beach to roughly its 1988 width, restore dunes, and plant natives, with applications headed to the state in coming months. Supporters frame it as a way to keep Kaanapali usable and accessible. Opponents like community advocate Kai Nishiki say the real fix is “managed retreat”—moving buildings inland and letting the shoreline migrate naturally. In her view, the real issue is that hotels and condos were built decades ago on dunes too close to the shorefront, without much thought to the long-term ecological impact.
“The problem is the structures, not the beach,” Nishiki tells SFGATE. “The beach is completely fine and healthy if we would just support the coastal ecosystem and support the landward migration of our beaches.” Beachfront owners disagree, and their renewed proposal will trigger another state review and public hearing. In the meantime, “Kaanapali remains a quintessentially beautiful and worthwhile destination, but visitors arriving this year should come with adjusted expectations,” per the Beat of Hawaii.
Hawaii
University of Hawaii study finds San Andreas Fault stress at 1,000-year high | Honolulu Star-Advertiser
LOS ANGELES >> Stress on the San Andreas Fault system has reached a 1,000-year high, according to new research from the University of Hawaii.
Higher stress on a fault means the pressure that causes earthquakes is building.
“Our results show that stress levels on multiple fault segments are now at or above the highest values seen in the past millennium and that the region may be capable of a large through-going rupture involving both fault systems,” said lead author Liliane Burkhard, research affiliate in the Hawai‘i Institute of Geophysics and Planetology at the UH-Manoa School of Ocean and Earth Science and Technology and a scientist at the University of Bern, Switzerland.
“We also found that Cajon Pass may act as an ‘earthquake gate:’ sometimes blocking large ruptures from crossing between the faults, and sometimes allowing them to pass through and involve both systems in a single event,” Burkhard said in a UH news release.
Multi-fault ruptures, where earthquakes continue from one fault to another, have occurred in multiple recent earthquakes, including the 2011 Tohoku, Japan, earthquake and became a part of the U.S. Geological Survey’s earthquake forecasting model in 2015.
This type of quake would be possible if the Cajon Pass, which is between the San Bernardino and San Gabriel mountains in Southern California, allows an earthquake to pass through it, meaning rather than affecting the area along one fault line, a quake could continue along a second fault and affect a larger area.
Don’t miss out on what’s happening!
Stay in touch with breaking news, as it happens, conveniently in your email inbox. It’s FREE!
But Kate Scharer, a co-author of the study and a seismologist with the U.S. Geological Survey in Pasadena, said there’s no reason for California residents to be significantly more concerned than they were before hearing about the study.
While the stress has reached a milestone, the pressure was already high and the fault has been overdue for a large earthquake for some time, according to the study.
It has been over 100 years since a major tectonic rupture has affected the greater Los Angeles area, which means stress on the tectonic plates has been building, according to the study.
The 1857 Fort Tejon earthquake was the most recent “big one” to affect Southern California, while the San Jacinto Fault saw moderate earthquakes in 1918, 1968 and 1987, according to the study. A long period without seismic activity “raised concern that the next slip event in this region could be both large and complex,” the study says.
As more time passes, an earthquake becomes more likely because built-up energy needs to be released.
“We know for the southern San Andreas and the San Jacinto fault that they were just a little bit over the average (time between earthquakes) from looking at the geologic record,” Scharer said.
Those two faults are at highest risk for an earthquake because they are the fastest moving, she said.
The study looked at a geologic record of earthquake activity across the past 1,000 years, giving a new perspective on the total stress the San Andreas and San Jacinto fault systems are under. Tectonic plates are always moving and accumulating stress, save for those few seconds where an earthquake is happening.
When an earthquake releases built-up stress from hundreds to thousands of years of an interseismic period, energy is felt in the form of an earthquake, Scharer said.
Earthquake forecast models from the U.S. Geological Survey are “a reminder that damaging earthquakes are inevitable for California,” and the new study highlights just how much stress the fault systems are under as Californians prepare for the “big one,” according to the USGS.
The study’s importance is with the calculations of stress the researchers did. After a geologic record, which looks at prehistoric earthquakes and is assembled by digging trenches across faults and looking at layers that have been offset in the past, is created, the researchers were able to determine that the stress on the San Andreas fault is at a 1,000-year high.
The stress level could influence if the Cajon Pass facilitates an earthquake spreading from one fault to another, or if it stops an earthquake from doing so. When the stress levels on both faults are similar, both faults appear to rupture jointly, according to the study.
Using a physics-based computer model, the researchers found that that the stress that would normally be released in large earthquakes has continued to accumulate and is at unprecedented levels.
The Cajon Pass, the study suggests, could facilitate a joint rupture of both the San Andreas and San Jacinto faults simultaneously, which could be “significantly more damaging than a single-fault event,” affecting densely populated areas including Los Angeles, San Bernardino, Riverside and the Coachella Valley, according to the UH news release.
“This is not a prediction of when an earthquake will happen,” Burkhard said. “However, studies like this are important contributions to national and global earthquake hazard research in that we are using rigorous, quantitative science to better understand the risk facing millions of people. What we can say is that the system is critically stressed, and that physics-based models like this one give us a clearer picture of the range of scenarios we should be prepared for. That information matters for hazard assessments, infrastructure planning, and emergency preparedness.”
Honolulu Star-Advertiser staff contributed to this report.
Hawaii
Police recover 19 gaming machines, $7K in Kakaako gambling bust
HONOLULU (HawaiiNewsNow) – The Honolulu Police Department shut down an illegal gambling operation in Kakaako.
On Thursday, officers with the Narcotics/Vice Gambling detail, along with the District 1 Crime Reduction Unit, Forfeiture Detail and Specialized Services Division, executed a search on a property on Kawaiahao Street.
HPD said they recovered 19 gaming machines and more than $7,000 in cash.
The department said they remain committed to addressing illegal gambling operations.
“The June 25, 2026, operation is the 19th illegal gambling search warrant executed so far in 2026 and the third in the month of June,” said HPD Maj. Jerome Pacarro. “Enforcing the law against these illegal operations helps prevent related criminal activity from taking root and strengthens the safety of our communities.”
To report illegal gambling, call the Narcotics/Vice 24-hour hotline at (808) 723-3933 or use the online form here.
Copyright 2026 Hawaii News Now. All rights reserved.
-
Movie Reviews5 minutes agoHollywood Pariah Kevin Spacey Opens in a Straight to Video Movie with 25 Producers, 1 Review, No Theaters, No Press – Showbiz411
-
World17 minutes ago
Rescue Workers and Aid Arrive in Venezuela, Official Says
-
Lifestyle55 minutes agoThis mindset shift can help you get better at using up your leftovers
-
Technology1 hour agoTMD’s keyless bike lock is a $280 solution to a $60 problem
-
World1 hour agoAmerican rescue teams pull infant alive from rubble in Venezuela days after devastating twin earthquakes
-
Politics1 hour agoTrump scores another endorsement win with Louisiana Senate runoff victory
-
Health1 hour agoNew blood test detects 90% of aggressive prostate cancer cases, beating current screenings
-
Sports1 hour ago2026 World Cup Round of 16 Odds: Which Teams Will Make It?