Connect with us

West

Expelled California high school students awarded $1 million in lawsuit after accusation they used 'blackface'

Published

on

Expelled California high school students awarded  million in lawsuit after accusation they used 'blackface'

A California jury has awarded $1 million to two former students in their case against a private high school in the Bay Area that forced them to withdraw after a photo of the teens wearing acne masks was interpreted as blackface.

The Santa Clara County jury sided with the former students on two of the five claims made in the lawsuit, awarding them $500,000 each and $70,000 tuition reimbursements to the boys four years after they were swept up in a racial controversy that led to them being forced to withdraw from Saint Francis High School in Mountain View, Calif.

“Our primary goal was to clear (our clients’) names,” the plaintiffs’ attorney, Krista Baughman, told the San Francisco Chronicle after the jury’s decision on Monday. “It was quite clear the jury believed these were innocent face masks. They are young kids, their internet trail is going to haunt them for the next 60 years. Now they don’t have to worry about that.”

A California jury has awarded $1 million to two former students in their case against a private high school in the Bay Area that forced them to withdraw after a photo of the teens wearing acne masks was interpreted as blackface. (iStock)

In 2020, the former students, identified in court records as H.H. and A.H., and their parents initially filed a lawsuit against the private school for $20 million after old photos from 2017 went viral and led to accusation against the boys of doing blackface. In the photo, the two plaintiffs, who were 14 at the time, and a third boy who did not attend St. Francis are posing in front of a mirror wearing green face masks, which the lawsuit said were acne medications. 

Advertisement

After the photo reemerged online in June 2020, amid the racial reckoning that followed George Floyd’s death in police custody, other St. Francis students and parents speculated that the boys were making a racially charged joke and pressured the school to take action against them.

YOUNG CHIEFS FAN AND DAD RESPOND TO ‘BLACKFACE’ ACCUSATIONS: ‘NEVER MEANT TO DISRESPECT ANY NATIVE AMERICANS’

The plaintiffs argued that as a result of public pressure, the school gave the two boys an ultimatum to either voluntarily withdraw or be expelled, the Chronicle reported.

“Defendants took it upon themselves to use the innocent and wholly unrelated photograph of the boys to make the malicious and utterly false accusation that the boys had been engaging in ‘blackface,’ and to recklessly assert that the photograph was ‘another example’ of racism at SFHS,” the suit states.

“The boys did not use the facemasks or take the photograph with any ill-intent, bias or prejudice, let alone in connection with any racist sentiments or epithets,” it continues.

Advertisement

The jury found the school guilty of two of the five claims made in the lawsuit, including failing to do a proper investigation and breach of an oral contract. (iStock)

The jury found the school guilty of two of the five claims made in the lawsuit, including failing to do a proper investigation and breach of an oral contract.

CLICK HERE FOR MORE COVERAGE OF MEDIA AND CULTURE

“We appreciate the jury’s verdict rejecting the plaintiffs’ two primary claims of defamation and breach of contract and thank them for their thoughtful analysis. The jury rightly found we did not breach our handbook, did not violate the students’ free speech rights, and did not defame the students,” a spokesperson from the school told Fox News Digital in an emailed statement. ” However, we respectfully disagree with the jury’s conclusion as to the lesser claim regarding the fairness of our disciplinary review process and are exploring legal options, including appeal as there is no legal precedent applying that claim to a high school.” 

“We are grateful for the strong support of our community throughout this case,” the statement continued. “We look forward to putting this matter behind us so we can return to focusing solely on educating our vibrant student body and living the Catholic values of the Holy Cross tradition, which are rooted in hope, respect, integrity and family.”

Advertisement

Read the full article from Here

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

New Mexico

New Mexico (NMAA) High School Boys Basketball State Championship Brackets, Schedules – March 7, 2026

Published

on

New Mexico (NMAA) High School Boys Basketball State Championship Brackets, Schedules – March 7, 2026


The 2026 New Mexico high school boys basketball state championships begin on Saturday, March 7, with 40 games in the first round of action.

High School on SI has brackets for every classification in the New Mexico high school basketball state brackets. The championship games begin on March 14 at the University of New Mexico – The Pit.

New Mexico (NMAA) High School Basketball State Championship Brackets, Schedule – March 7

Advertisement

No. 1 Volcano Vista vs. No. 16 Santa Fe – 03/07, 6:00 PM MT

No. 8 Las Cruces vs. No. 9 Albuquerque – 03/07, 4:00 PM MT

No. 5 Hobbs vs. No. 12 Organ Mountain – 03/07, 6:00 PM MT

No. 4 La Cueva vs. No. 13 Atrisco Heritage Academy – 03/07, 6:00 PM MT

Advertisement

No. 3 Rio Rancho vs. No. 14 Mayfield – 03/07, 4:00 PM MT

Advertisement

No. 6 Sandia vs. No. 11 Farmington – 03/07, 5:00 PM MT

No. 7 Centennial vs. No. 10 Carlsbad – 03/07, 5:00 PM MT

No. 2 Cleveland vs. No. 15 Alamogordo – 03/07, 5:00 PM MT


Advertisement

No. 1 Highland vs. No. 16 Grants – 03/07, 6:00 PM MT

No. 8 Belen vs. No. 9 Portales – 03/07, 5:00 PM MT

No. 5 Taos vs. No. 12 St. Pius X – 03/07, 6:00 PM MT

No. 4 Del Norte vs. No. 13 Valencia – 03/07, 7:00 PM MT

Advertisement

No. 3 Hope Christian vs. No. 14 Pojoaque Valley – 03/07, 6:00 PM MT

Advertisement

No. 6 Albuquerque Academy vs. No. 11 Goddard – 03/07, 5:00 PM MT

No. 7 Gallup vs. No. 10 Silver – 03/07, 5:00 PM MT

No. 2 Artesia vs. No. 15 Bloomfield – 03/07, 6:00 PM MT


Advertisement

No. 1 St. Michael’s vs. No. 16 Wingate – 03/07, 4:00 PM MT

No. 8 Tohatchi vs. No. 9 New Mexico Military Institute – 03/07, 3:00 PM MT

No. 5 Santa Fe Indian vs. No. 12 Sandia Prep – 03/07, 4:00 PM MT

No. 4 Navajo Prep vs. No. 13 Hot Springs – 03/07, 3:00 PM MT

Advertisement

No. 3 Cobre vs. No. 14 Ruidoso – 03/07, 4:00 PM MT

Advertisement

No. 6 Bosque vs. No. 11 Cottonwood Classical Prep – 03/07, 6:00 PM MT

No. 7 East Mountain vs. No. 10 Robertson – 03/07, 6:00 PM MT

No. 2 Tularosa vs. No. 15 West Las Vegas – 03/07, 6:00 PM MT


Advertisement

No. 1 Texico vs. No. 16 Clayton – 03/07, 5:00 PM MT

No. 8 Tucumcari vs. No. 9 Mora – 03/07, 5:00 PM MT

No. 5 Mesilla Valley Christian School vs. No. 12 Dulce – 03/07, 4:00 PM MT

No. 4 Santa Rosa vs. No. 13 Eunice – 03/07, 4:00 PM MT

Advertisement

No. 3 Mesa Vista vs. No. 14 Hozho Charter Academy – 03/07, 5:00 PM MT

Advertisement

No. 6 Rehoboth Christian vs. No. 11 Oak Grove Classical – 03/07, 5:00 PM MT

No. 7 Escalante vs. No. 10 Menaul – 03/07, 5:00 PM MT

No. 2 Pecos vs. No. 15 Mescalero Apache – 03/07, 6:00 PM MT


Advertisement

No. 1 Logan vs. No. 16 Quemado – 03/07, 4:00 PM MT

No. 8 Cliff vs. No. 9 To’hajiilee – 03/07, 5:00 PM MT

No. 5 Alamo Navajo vs. No. 12 Grady – 03/07, 5:00 PM MT

No. 4 Melrose vs. No. 13 Elida – 03/07, 5:00 PM MT

Advertisement

No. 3 Cimarron vs. No. 14 Pine Hill – 03/07, 5:00 PM MT

Advertisement

No. 6 Roy/Mosquero vs. No. 11 Mountainair – 03/07, 6:00 PM MT

No. 7 Magdalena vs. No. 10 Springer – 03/07, 3:00 PM MT

No. 2 Fort Sumner/House vs. No. 15 Gateway Christian – 03/07, 6:00 PM MT




Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Oregon

Keizer city councilor fined $500 by Oregon ethics commission

Published

on

Keizer city councilor fined 0 by Oregon ethics commission


play

The Oregon Government Ethics Commission voted March 6 to fine Keizer City Councilor Soraida Cross $500 after an investigator found she tried to use her position to avoid a criminal citation.

In a stipulated final order signed by Cross, an OGEC investigator detailed a May 14, 2025, incident in which Cross attempted to call Marion County Sheriff Nick Hunter on his personal cellphone when police responded to a domestic dispute at the home Cross shared with her ex-husband.

Advertisement

During the incident, first reported by Keizertimes, a woman accused Cross of pushing her off a barstool.

Salem Police responded to the 911 call in Keizer to avoid a possible conflict of interest. Video footage obtained by Keizertimes shows Cross telling the officer she is a city councilor, played golf with Keizer Police Chief Andrew Copeland and is friends with Hunter.

The body camera footage was later shared on social media by Marion County Democrats.

Paige Barton, chair for Marion County Democrats, filed a complaint against Cross with the ethics commission.

Advertisement

When Cross told the officer she was a councilor, she attempted to “use her official position to avoid the financial detriment associated with a criminal citation,” according to the order.

The order said Cross “used confidential information in an attempt to obtain a personal gain” when she called Hunter on his personal cellphone to involve him in the Salem Police investigation.

“The personal phone number of Mr. Hunter is not publicly available information, such that any member of the public may contact him when dealing with law enforcement matters,” the order said.

The criminal citation for harassment was forwarded to the Polk County District Attorney’s Office due to a possible conflict of interest. The office declined to prosecute.

Advertisement

Cross told OGEC that she did not willingly or intentionally violate Oregon ethics law.

“She further asserts that she is a victim of domestic violence and that the police were called to her home on May 14, 2025, by her ex-husband as a form of retaliation and that was not the only time,” officials said in the order. “Ms. Cross further contends that on the evening of May 14th, she needed to call her friends, which is why she contacted Marion County Sheriff Nick Hunter whom she called for advice out of fear and there was no malicious intent.”

Commission investigator Daniel Pacheco said in a preliminary investigation that Cross appeared to try to use her position to avoid financial detriment, such as legal fees associated with a criminal charge.

The commission voted 5-0 in October to find a substantial objective basis for believing Cross violated Oregon law. A more in-depth investigation ensued.

In the order, OGEC officials said the results of the investigation pointed to a preponderance of evidence that Cross violated Oregon ethics law.

Advertisement

Cross signed the stipulated final order on Feb. 17, waiving her right to a contested hearing and judicial review. She will pay a $500 civil penalty to settle the matter.

The commission approved accepting the final order in a 6-0 vote with one abstention.

For questions, comments and news tips, email reporter Whitney Woodworth at wmwoodworth@statesmanjournal.com, call 503-910-6616 or follow on X at @wmwoodworth





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Utah

The calculus of charity: 20,000-pound LDS donation equals 15,000 meals for 9,000 people

Published

on

The calculus of charity: 20,000-pound LDS donation equals 15,000 meals for 9,000 people


Southern Utah shipment is part of the faith’s yearlong celebration of the Declaration of Independence.

(Mark Eddington | The Salt Lake Tribune) Movers load part of a donation of 20,000 pounds of food to Switchpoint’s St. George food pantry by The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints on Thursday, March 5, 2026.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending