BOULDER — To me, betting on Pat Shurmur to win the Big 12 sounds an awful lot like betting on Mr. Toad to win the Brickyard 400.

But America sure loves an impulse buy, so as of last week, per BetMGM, the school getting the most action in terms of winning the league wasn’t favorites such as Kansas State (+350) or Utah (+350). Oh, no. It was Deion Sanders and the Buffs (+3,000), with 30% of the bets on CU winning it all.

Have y’all lost your darn minds?

“We’re not waiting for Year 3 to win,” assistant head coach/running backs coach Gary “Flea” Harrell said Monday as the Buffs opened preseason camp. “We’re not waiting for midseason … it has to happen now. So (Sanders) has that ‘now’ approach. So every day he comes into work, his mentality, his thought process, his message, his philosophy is the same. He (doesn’t) deviate from it. That’s why he’s Deion Sanders.”

Hey, it’s your scratch. Just know that when it comes to Coach Prime, it feels as if only the computers can be neutral — and even your favorite AI is hedging its digital bets.

ESPN’s Football Power Index has the Buffs finishing 6-6. CU reaches six wins, usually the minimum for bowl eligibility, on 53.2% of the FPI’s simulations. TeamRanking.com’s CPUs are almost in complete agreement on the record (6-6) and odds of a bowl (53.5%).

Can the Buffs win nine or 10 games this fall with Shurmur, who crashed and burned as Broncos offensive coordinator, calling plays? Probably not. Unless these five things happen first.

1. Shedeur Sanders stays upright. (Duh.) And in one piece.

Can you order an entirely new offensive line the way you’d order a replacement air filter on Amazon? We’re about to find out.

For context, the top 12 teams in the final College Football Playoff rankings last fall gave up, on average, 1.61 sacks per game. CU surrendered 4.7. Cutting that number by even half — 2.5-ish, 2.4-ish sacks per game — would feel like a major victory in and of itself.

Heck, if the Buffs can manage that, forget giving Phil Loadholt a raise. Give that man a Nobel Prize.

2. Shedeur Sanders is the best QB in America. Hands down.

Deion says he is. Deion says a lot of things. Talk to Deion long enough, you’ll think that tailback Charlie Offerdahl — and we love Charlie, don’t get us wrong — is the next Christian McCaffrey.

What impressed the skeptics and scouts last fall was Shedeur’s actions on the field. Not his dad’s words.

We know the younger Sanders can win a one-possession game by himself, as long as there’s a sliver of time left on the clock. The next confidence test Shedeur fails will be his first. He’s got that Elway Quality already — the ability to drive the length of the field pretty much by himself in the clutch.

But can he stay healthy? Can he get rid of balls and give up on a play rather than hang on too long and get lit up? Can he sacrifice “hero ball” moments for the sake of the offense? Or for his well-being?

3. Travis Hunter plays in double-digit games.

The book on Hunter coming out of Jackson State was that he was coming to Boulder with almost the whole package, all neatly wrapped in a bow: NFL closing speed, NFL wheels, NFL instincts, NFL hands, NFL hops, NFL vision … and problems staying on the field. If you hit him hard enough, they whispered, he might be out weeks.

That’s pretty much what happened.

The nation’s former No. 1 recruit played in eight games in 2022 and nine last fall with the Buffs. Now conventional wisdom would say to limit his snaps the way you cap a star pitcher’s innings in order to try and keep Hunter fresh for November and December.

Couple of problems with that. One is that we already know what Deion thinks of “conventional wisdom,” unless he’s hearing said wisdom from a friend, mentor or former coach. Two, Hunter’s not playing in any bowl game that isn’t a playoff tilt anyway, given his NFL draft stock. So why stick a snap count on a player who’s shifting into draft mode after the first week of December? Because he’s your best player, that’s why.

4. Buffs are at least 3-1 after four weeks.

September is sneaky. A little birdie told me North Dakota State — with 27 seniors and 10 sixth-year returnees — has the heart, but not the horses to run with a Prime roster. Although when has that ever stopped the Bison before?

That said, the last time CU had a major talent advantage over an opponent was the Stanford game last October. We all know how that one ended up.

Assuming CU comes out blazing the way it did at TCU last fall, you’ve got to nail at least a split from two of the toughest, and certainly most emotionally raw, road games of the season: At Nebraska on Sept. 7; at CSU on Sept. 14. Sweep those and you’re ranked again. (Hiya, Nick Saban!) Split them and you’re still probably in pretty good shape — assuming No. 2 and No. 12 are as well.

The four roadies after Sept. 22 — at UCF, at Arizona, at Texas Tech and at Kansas in Kansas City — are all coin flips, so long as the stars are healthy (and aligned). While K-State (Oct. 12), Utah (Nov. 16) and Oklahoma State (Nov. 29) won’t be picnics, at least they’re at Folsom.

5. Pencil Pat has to open it up.

Memo to Shurmur: This ain’t Iowa ball, brother. The Buffs went 4-3 last season when throwing it at least 40 times; 0-5 when they didn’t. They were 3-2 with a 300-yard passer, 1-6 without one. Could Pencil Pat screw this wild ride up, even with two top 10 draft picks to play with? Don’t bet against it.

Originally Published: July 29, 2024 at 8:15 p.m.

The Denver Broncos quarterback battle is one of the more interesting, and wide-open, competitions throughout the NFL at the moment.

Sean Payton has been tasked with choosing the franchise’s next signal caller, after moving on from Russell Wilson. Three options are available for the Broncos — first rounder Bo Nix, incumbent Jarrett Stidham and former New York Jets quarterback Zach Wilson.

As part of his predictions for each quarterback battle in the NFL, ESPN’s Dan Graziano focused on the Broncos, and where Denver could look in 2024.

“Nix was the 12th overall pick in this year’s draft. A lot of people were surprised he went that early, but Broncos coach Sean Payton identified Nix early in the pre-draft process as the player he wanted for his system,” Graziano reported. “Stidham finished last season as the starter after the benching of Russell Wilson. And Zach Wilson is the 2021 No. 2 overall pick who never showed much with the Jets and got traded away for a sixth-round pick.

“You can place Zach Wilson as a clear No. 3 in this race right now, based on everything I’ve heard. He obviously has high-end talent and could theoretically show enough in camp to move up, but he never really did that in three years with the Jets and so far doesn’t seem to have impressed anyone very much in Denver.”

Evidently, Graziano believes it’s a two horse race between Nix and Stidham for the gig, as Wilson hasn’t exactly shown to be a threat since arriving with the AFC West franchise.

“That would put this between Stidham and Nix, and it seems like they’ll both get chances to show what they can do in camp,” Graziano reported. “Stidham knows the offense because of his experience in it last season, and there have been times this offseason when that experience and knowledge have shown through and he has looked smoother than Nix.

“But let’s be honest here: Nix is Payton’s guy. He will start eventually, and the Broncos hope for a very long time. This is not the kind of even competition we’re seeing in Pittsburgh and Las Vegas, because we know how it will turn out eventually, even if not by Week 1. Nix — who threw 45 touchdown passes and three interceptions at Oregon last season — would have to look completely overwhelmed in camp and preseason games to lose out to Stidham in this competition.”

In the end, Graziano believes Nix will be the one starting Week 1: “I don’t expect Nix to look overwhelmed, and I expect Payton to run his hand-picked QB of the future out there right away.”

Alas, Bo Nix isn’t your typical rookie quarterback, as he enters the NFL with immense experience as a starting quarterback in college, with the Oregon Ducks and Auburn Tigers. Under Sean Payton’s tutelage, he could be ready to roll Day 1, and it wouldn’t be a surprise to see Dan Graziano’s prediction come true.

Drivers navigating metro Denver last year spent an average of 37 hours stuck in traffic congestion — 16% more than in 2022, but 11% below pre-pandemic delays — and jams increasingly arise at midday rather than just during rush hours, according to a global transportation data firm’s latest analysis.

The average speed of vehicles moving toward downtown Denver remains around 14 mph, faster than the 11 mph in New York City and Chicago. But riding a bicycle where unimpeded routes are available can be faster. And when the Regional Transportation District’s public transit functions as it was designed to, riding a bus or train can be faster than driving a car.

The analysis was performed by the Seattle-based company INRIX. The numbers reflect a changed methodology, following the COVID-19 pandemic, that company officials say incorporates data from more commuting routes to more accurately reflect urban mobility.

The analysts compare data from 946 cities in 37 countries. In the United States, Denver ranked 22nd for traffic delays.

The increase here — up from 32 hours in 2022 and down from about 41 hours in 2019 — jibes with similar increases in large U.S. cities, where the average is 42 hours a year lost in traffic, costing the U.S. economy an estimated $70 billion.

Drivers since 2020 in metro Denver and other cities have faced markedly more traffic jamming during midday — between 10 a.m. and 4 p.m. — in addition to the traditional morning and evening rush hours, INRIX senior analyst Bob Pishue said in an interview — a trend attributed to the post-pandemic rise of hybrid working arrangements.

“Driving delays in Denver are still down compared with a few years ago and you may be better off for now. But traffic congestion, barring any massive economic recession, appears to be continuing to go up. That’s the general trend and it is what we expect in the near future,” Pishue said.

Metro Denver drivers devote nearly a work week a year to navigating traffic, and the INRIX analysis estimated the delays cost metro Denver $831 million a year and individual drivers $640.

Colorado Department of Transportation officials and regional planners for years have been wrestling with how to contain traffic, encouraging the expansion of public transit and building more high-density housing concentrated around bus and train hubs for workers so that residents can drive less. The highway widening at the core of metro Denver’s massive $1.6 billion T-REX project and the construction of arterials such as Peña Boulevard to enable follow-on new development no longer are seen as a solution.

Planners anticipate more heavy traffic down the road.

“The biggest driver of future congestion is going to be population growth. It is slowing, compared with the past 30 years, but we estimate roughly 1 million more people over the next 30 years,” Denver Regional Council of Governments mobility analytics program manager Robert Spotts said.

“The capacity of roadway systems is not going to be keeping up. Will people continue to have that same desire to travel as much, to go as many places, even in these congested conditions? Our models say they will. That will result in far more demands, compared with the capacity we have, and significantly more congestion.”

Hours spent stuck in traffic means less time to do other things.

“It means lost productive time, lower quality of life, excess carbon emissions from oil and gas, reduced air quality and increased frustrations,” Pishue said. “It also means delivery trucks and semi trucks sit in traffic longer, which increases the costs of goods sold. And there’s the health aspect — adding stress. Maybe you cannot catch your kid’s ballgame. Maybe you miss a work meeting. Maybe you can’t get to your doctor appointment on time.”

Drivers adapt. Some turn to book recordings, podcasts and language study. This has led to rising concerns about distracted driving, a factor in Colorado’s near-record traffic fatalities. Tempers also flare.

If the congestion increases, “driver frustrations will increase,” Pishue said. “That can lead to reckless behavior.”

Get more Colorado news by signing up for our Mile High Roundup email newsletter.