The Nuggets have made a habit of signing bench players with Colorado ties.

The latest homecoming they’ve arranged is for Alpha Diallo, who played a season of high school basketball at Denver West and is now signing a one-year, $1.4 million minimum contract with Denver in NBA free agency, a league source told The Denver Post on Sunday.

Diallo, 29, was named Defensive Player of the Year in the EuroLeague last season. This will be his first foray into the NBA after a five-year stint with AS Monaco. He recently committed to join Dubai Basketball on a multiyear deal, according to a report by the European media outlet BasketNews, but his contract included a clause granting his release if he left for the NBA by July 15.

The Nuggets have signed Diallo, Reggie Jackson (Palmer High School), David Roddy (Colorado State) and KJ Simpson (CU) to various deals in the last three years.

Born in New York, Diallo helped lead Denver West to the Colorado Class 4A Sweet 16 as a sophomore. He transferred to Lincoln High before his junior season, but he was ruled ineligible to compete for the entire school year due to what CHSAA deemed an implicit recruiting violation; Lincoln’s coach at the time had just coached Diallo in a summer tournament.

The eligibility fight with CHSAA eventually led Diallo to leave the state. He returned to the East Coast and played four years of college basketball at Providence, where he earned Second Team All-Big East honors twice.

The Colorado Court of Appeals this month reversed a discovery sanction against the Denver District Attorney’s Office after a judge found prosecutors violated a man’s rights two years ago when they turned over an exculpatory 911 recording just six days before his jury trial was set to begin.

Denver District Court Judge Eric Johnson dismissed all of the charges against the defendant to punish prosecutors for what he said was a larger pattern and practice of discovery violations by the Denver District Attorney’s Office, a sanction that has become significantly more common across the state in recent years as the Denver DA’s office and others have faced scrutiny over flawed practices.

The Court of Appeals left alone the judge’s discovery violation finding but rejected the sanction in a July 2 opinion, finding that Johnson did not give prosecutors a real chance to contest the judge’s finding of a broader pattern of such misconduct within the Denver District Attorney’s Office before he dismissed the attempted-murder case.

“Defense counsel never even mentioned a pattern and practice of violations before the court ruled from the bench,” the opinion reads. “Instead, the court raised the issue sua sponte (on its own) in its bench ruling. As a result, the prosecutor had no advance notice that the court believed that the District Attorney’s Office engaged in a pattern and practice of discovery violations or, based on that finding, that the court would impose the most severe possible discovery sanction.”

Judges must give prosecutors the opportunity to research and respond to allegations of a pattern of misconduct before imposing a sanction, the Court of Appeals panel found. They noted their ruling is the first time the issue has been considered in a reported case, that is, a published opinion that sets legal precedent.

The higher court sent the case back to Denver District Court for a new sanctions hearing on the discovery violation. They noted in their opinion that Johnson could once again dismiss the case as a sanction against prosecutors, as long as prosecutors have an opportunity to be heard first.

In the underlying case, which appears to be sealed and no longer public, defendant Ahmad Ahmed was charged with attempted murder and four counts of assault after authorities said he stabbed a person in front of a Family Dollar store in 2022. Two of the victim’s friends then threw rocks at Ahmed to drive him away, prosecutors contended. Ahmed later claimed he acted in self-defense.

Prosecutors did not share five 911 call recordings regarding the stabbing with defense attorneys until six days before Ahmed’s jury trial was scheduled to start in 2024. In one of those recordings, the 911 caller described Ahmed as the victim in the incident, not the assailant, and described the other people throwing rocks at Ahmed.

Ahmed’s defense attorneys immediately sought out the witness, who said he was willing to testify in the case but that he was traveling and would not be available for the jury trial scheduled six days later.

That prompted Ahmed’s defense team to object to the discovery violation in court, arguing that the 911 caller’s account was exculpatory and that prosecutors should have disclosed the recording to the defense team much earlier in the case, as required by Colorado’s rules of evidence. The defense asked Johnson to dismiss the case or issue other sanctions.