Denver, CO
Denver police sergeant arrested for domestic violence assault
Denver police sergeant Stephanie Neblock was arrested on suspicion of domestic violence assault in Douglas County on Monday, the Denver Police Department said Tuesday in a press release.
Neblock, who joined DPD in 2006 and was most recently assigned to the Division of Administration, has been placed in an “off-line assignment” and “will remain in that role while the case makes its way through the judicial process,” according to the release.
DPD did not release any other details about the Nov. 11 incident, which is under investigation by the Douglas County Sheriff’s Office. The department says its administrative review of Neblock’s case will begin once her criminal charges are adjudicated.
Neblock has been released on a $3,000 bail and this is her first arrest, according to online court records.
Denver, CO
Denver considers kicking out Flock — but keeping license plate cameras
Denver is considering ending its relationship with Flock, a controversial company that maintains a network of license-plate reading cameras in the city, but Mayor Mike Johnston’s office plans to continue using that technology.
“We are currently fielding bids for license plate reader services,” Jon Ewing, a spokesman for the mayor’s office, said Monday. “The chosen provider will be weighed on several factors and will be required to comply with an exhaustive list of expectations regarding data retention, information sharing, and access limitations.”
The city’s current contract with Flock ends on March 31. The mayor’s office plans to submit a new contract to the City Council “in the coming weeks,” he said.
Atlanta-based Flock has faced national scrutiny for its artificial intelligence-powered system, with many critics arguing that the company has built a nationwide mass-surveillance network ripe for abuse. In Colorado, where Johnston and police chiefs have cited the cameras’ assistance in nabbing criminals, the technology has also led to wrongful accusations of crimes.
Some are also concerned the cameras may be aiding in President Donald Trump’s mass-deportation campaign. Data collected in Denver by Flock was used in immigration-related national searches more than 1,400 times between June 2024 and April 2025, according to Colorado Newsline. Trump returned to office in January 2025.
Hundreds of people have complained to the city about its relationship with the company. Community feedback is one of the reasons the city is now considering a new provider for the technology, Ewing said.
The council unanimously rejected a two-year contract with Flock last May, partly because the mayor’s office requested they do so after hearing backlash from council members and the public. Johnston’s administration then twice extended the contract without council approval, most recently in October.
Under that extension, Johnston’s administration added new requirements to Flock’s contract that were intended to protect sensitive data.
Johnston has said the technology has been a “game changer” for combating crime, leading to hundreds of arrests and recovered stolen vehicles.
The 111 Flock cameras operating in Denver were installed at 70 intersections in 2024 as part of an eight-month pilot program.
The continuing extensions have caused considerable tension between the mayor’s office and the council. Several members have lambasted Johnston’s office over the cameras.
“Flock Safety’s cavalier treatment of our data should have disqualified them from continuing to operate on our streets long ago,” Councilwoman Sarah Parady, one of the most vocal critics of Flock, said Monday. “Moving forward, this experience should be a wake-up call for all of us in city leadership to be far more rigorous about when we collect data in the first place and how we protect it.”
She said she was working with council colleagues and the mayor’s task force on “legislative guardrails,” adding: “I hope the mayor will approach other surveillance companies with far less credulity than has been the case so far.”
The cameras operate by snapping photos of every car that passes through the intersections where they are based. The system then cross-references the license plates with national and local law enforcement databases.
If a plate matches one listed in the system as associated with a car that’s been reported stolen or involved with a crime, the Denver Police Department is notified — with a pinpoint of where the photo was taken — within about 15 seconds.
The photos are stored for 30 days unless they are flagged as part of an investigation.
Stay up-to-date with Colorado Politics by signing up for our weekly newsletter, The Spot.
Denver, CO
What Did the Denver Nuggets Learn From the All-Star Weekend?
Getty
For the first times since 2010, the Denver Nuggets had two representatives participating in the NBA All-Star Game – or Games – in three-time MVP Nikola Jokic and star guard Jamal Murray, who was making his first ASG appearance. They dynamic duo – who’ve formed one of the NBA’s best tandems over the past decade – both started for the World Team in the debut of the three-team, round-robin format.
Between 2011 and 2019, Denver did not have a single player make the All-Star team. Until this season, Jokic had been the organization’s lone representative for the past seven seasons.
The New Format Pumped up the Competitive Juices
The notoriously non-competitive NBA All-Star game was anything but this time, with the participants playing hard on both ends of the court. Team Stars ended up besting Team Stripes for the championship after each USA squad had edged the favored World Team by a single bucket in the first two 12-minute contests.
Both Murray and Jokic went scoreless in the first game against the USA’s Stars team. Joker only played five minutes and missed his only shot. Murray, meanwhile, played a lot of minutes in place of injured starter and fellow Canadian Shai Gilgeous-Alexander. Murray was a frustrating 0-6 from the floor in the first game, but bounced back with a pair of three pointers and eight points in the second game, another last second loss, this one to Team Stripes.
Jokic didn’t play in the second game, opting to rest his knee after missing 16 games in December and January. It’s fair to wonder if the results of the round robin mini-tournament would have been different if he, plus the Los Angeles Lakers Luka Dončić – who also started and played just five minutes while nursing a sore hamstring and Milwaukee’s former MVP Giannis Antetokounmpo, out with a calf strain – had been full go.
Can a Healthy Nuggets Squad Remain in a Top Three Playoff Position?
Regardless, the question for Denver Nuggets fans is now simple: How will the All-Star experience translate into the resumption of the NBA regular season? Denver opens the final stanza of the season in Los Angeles against the red-hot Clippers next Thursday. Joker will be Joker, regardless. Perhaps Murray can build off his positive performance in the second game when he puts a Nuggets jersey back on?
Both All-Stars will get some much deserved rest before the resumption of the schedule, which has 25 games left for Denver. The Nuggets will need both stars to be healthy if Denver is going to hold onto a top three seed in the competitive Western Conference.
The All-Star weekend showed Nuggets fans a couple of other things as well. First, the San Antonio Spurs, who lead Denver by 3 1/2 games for second place in the Western Conference standings, are going to be a problem. Spurs center Victor Wembanyama had 33 points in the two 12-minute All-Star contests and was the most dominant force on the court at both ends. His young San Antonio teammate De’Aron Fox hit the game winning three-pointer for the Stripes team against the Stars in Game two.
The other thing is that the Nuggets rivalry with the Minnesota Timberwolves isn’t dead. After the end of the mini-tournament, T-Wolves Most Valuable Player Anthony Edwards of Team Stripes called out Jokic and Dončić for their lack of participation in the games. No doubt Joker will remember that comment when the two teams meet again on March 1st in Denver.
Mark Knudson Mark is a former MLB pitcher for the Houston Astros, Milwaukee Brewers and Colorado Rockies. He’s the only person ever to play high school, college and professional baseball in Colorado. Mark earned a BA in Technical Journalism from Colorado State University and has worked in radio, television and print sports media since 1994. He’s the co-author of “Pitching to the Corners” with former teammate Don August and the author of “Just Imagine,” a historical fiction novel about The Beatles.
Mark is currently a feature writer and columnist for Mile High Sports in Denver and recently joined the team at Heavy.com. Mark is also a high school baseball coach in the Denver area. More about Mark Knudson
More Heavy on Nuggets
Loading more stories
Denver, CO
A Colorado court sends poor people to jail without access to lawyers, advocates say. It doesn’t record the proceedings.
Jennifer Jones was sitting in Montrose Municipal Court in early January when she noticed something that didn’t seem right.
She witnessed a man in his 60s with multiple trespassing and camping charges receive a 10-day jail sentence. This individual, though, did not have an attorney — a right afforded under the Constitution to anyone facing jail time.
If Jones, a volunteer court-watcher, hadn’t been observing proceedings that day, nobody outside of the people involved with the case would have known what happened.
That’s because Montrose Municipal Court is not a “court of record” — meaning it keeps no written, audio or visual recording of court proceedings. The public, civil rights organizations and members of the media cannot watch court hearings virtually, or access video after the fact, and cannot request any transcripts or audio of the day’s docket.
It’s not clear how many municipal courts in Colorado are not courts of record. But court watchers say they believe Montrose to be the only court in the state that sentences people to jail and isn’t a court of record.
It’s examples like these that spurred Colorado lawmakers this month to introduce a bill that would bar municipal courts that are not courts of record from sending people to jail. House Bill 26-1134, titled “Fairness and Transparency in Municipal Court,” also clarifies that municipal court defendants have a right to counsel and that in-custody proceedings must be livestreamed for the public to view.
The legislation marks a second stab at codifying protections for municipal defendants after Gov. Jared Polis vetoed a similar bill last year. The governor, though, took issue with the part of the bill that sought to address sentencing disparities between municipal and state courts. A Colorado Supreme Court ruling settled that issue in December, leading bill sponsors this year to focus on the transparency elements from last year’s legislation.
“Justice dies in the dark,” said Rebecca Wallace, policy director for the Colorado Freedom Fund, an organization that helps people pay bail. “Montrose Municipal Court needs a light on it — this bill provides some of that light.”
If municipal courts have the same power to put people in jail as state courts, they must provide the same due process protections, said Rep. Javier Mabrey, a Denver Democrat and one of the bill’s sponsors.
Access to counsel is already a right for municipal defendants facing jail time — but that doesn’t mean it always happens.
In October 2024, The Denver Post reported that poor and unhoused individuals in custody in Grand Junction Municipal Court were frequently appearing in court without attorneys. This came to light because the Colorado Freedom Fund obtained hours of recordings of court proceedings. If Grand Junction hadn’t been a court of record, that would not have been possible.
Alida Soileau, a defense attorney who practices in Montrose, said she’s never heard the municipal court say that someone’s case qualifies for court-appointed counsel. She said she’s witnessed one occasion in which a defendant facing jail did not have an attorney.
“It’s the wild west,” she said in an interview.
Without recordings or transcripts, Wallace said it’s impossible for watchdog organizations like hers — or members of the media — to confirm such accounts and investigate further.
Chris Dowsey, Montrose’s city attorney, said the municipal court directs people to a written advisement on the right to an attorney when a case involves a possible jail sentence, and follows that up with an oral advisement.
“For each case, the judge confirms that the defendant has received one of those advisements of rights,” he said in a statement. “If they have not received such an advisement, the judge would give another oral advisement to that individual.”
Montrose city officials say they’re working on becoming a court of record.
Municipal Judge Thomas LeClaire told the City Council during a January meeting that he recommended the court make the change. Councilmembers supported the idea, saying the pending state legislation made it a good time to get ahead of the curve. Officials estimated it could happen as soon as this spring.
Montrose Municipal Court needs only minimal investment to make itself a court of record, including some staff time and equipment modifications, Dowsey said in a statement.
As to why the city waited so long to make this happen?
“At the time, there was no business reason to do so, there was no mandate to do so, and there was no push by the state legislature or the courts to do so,” Dowsey said.
The Post, over the past two years, has detailed numerous examples of municipal courts around the state not following the law. The reporting showcased how Colorado’s more than 200 municipal courts operate with little oversight and scrutiny, since they run independently from the state judicial department.
The newspaper found a judge who improperly threatened to call immigration authorities on a defendant in his courtroom and a court that illegally used contempt of court to dramatically inflate jail sentences for poor and unhoused individuals.
Meanwhile, municipal courts around the state are adjusting to a new normal after the Colorado Supreme Court ruled in December that cities cannot punish lawbreakers beyond what state statute would allow for the same offenses. This decision has led city councils to adopt new ordinances, judges to adjust their advisements for defendants and prosecutors and defense attorneys to negotiate plea deals under new guidelines.
The Supreme Court’s ruling came after The Post detailed how municipal courts had become the state’s most punitive forums for minor crimes, with people convicted of low-level offenses facing exponentially more jail time in city courts than they would if convicted of the same offense in state court.
Sign up to get crime news sent straight to your inbox each day.
-
Alabama1 week agoGeneva’s Kiera Howell, 16, auditions for ‘American Idol’ season 24
-
Illinois1 week ago2026 IHSA Illinois Wrestling State Finals Schedule And Brackets – FloWrestling
-
Technology1 week agoApple might let you use ChatGPT from CarPlay
-
Culture7 days agoTry This Quiz on Passionate Lines From Popular Literature
-
News1 week ago
Hate them or not, Patriots fans want the glory back in Super Bowl LX
-
Technology1 week agoWe found 20 Verge-approved gifts on sale ahead of Valentine’s Day
-
Politics1 week agoVirginia Dems take tax hikes into overtime, target fantasy football leagues
-
Politics1 week agoWest Virginia worked with ICE — 650 arrests later, officials say Minnesota-style ‘chaos’ is a choice