Colorado
Lauren Boebert’s switch-up throws massive political wrench into Colorado’s two largest congressional districts
Lauren Boebert’s current congressional district shares a border with the one she wants to represent next year. But she’d have to drive nearly 300 miles from her home to reach it.
That distance underscores the surprised reactions prompted by her decision last week to abandon the 3rd Congressional District, where she narrowly avoided a reelection defeat in 2022. The controversial right-wing Western Slope firebrand’s announcement of a switch for the November election to the 4th Congressional District, on the state’s Eastern Plains — seeking to represent an even more politically conservative district than the one she sits in today — is not getting the kind of welcome she might have hoped for.
“It looks like she’s so in love with the D.C. swamp that she will do whatever it takes to stay there,” her old friend Greg Brophy, a farmer and former Republican state lawmaker from Wray in northeastern Colorado, told The Denver Post. “Sometimes your friends do things that disappoint you.”
In just minutes, the second-term congresswoman’s Dec. 27 announcement upended the dynamics in two of the state’s eight congressional races. It also prompted speculation about her own fate, given the 4th District’s deeper red hue: Can Boebert increase her chances of returning to Congress in 2025 by throwing her hat into that already crowded race?
U.S. Rep. Ken Buck, a fellow Republican who’s held the seat for five terms, has announced he won’t run for reelection this year. Candidacy rules don’t require hopefuls for congressional seats to live in the district they want to represent, though they must reside in the same state. Boebert has said she plans to move to the 4th District this year.
So far, views on Boebert’s chances — and her bombshell decision — are mixed, even among Republicans.
Colorado GOP chair Dave Williams last week chastised her for “jeopardizing our ability to retain Congressional District 3 as well as our slim majority in the U.S. House of Representatives.” RINO Watch Colorado, an organization that targets GOP candidates that it says have betrayed their conservative bona fides, followed up with a scathing denunciation of Boebert’s move, characterizing it as a surrender to “the enemy” and an egregious example of carpetbagging.
“Her self-serving bid to hold on to power guarantees CD3 will now go to a Democrat or a uni-party Republican In Name Only,” the group posted on its website.
The 3rd District includes most of western Colorado and many southern counties. The 4th District covers the state’s rural eastern third, along with a chunk of Douglas County, a Republican stronghold for decades in south metro Denver. The two districts are Colorado’s most expansive.
They border each other in southeastern Colorado along the Pueblo, Crowley and Las Animas county lines — far away from Boebert’s longtime home in Garfield County. Her statement last week noted that she “spent years living on the Front Range” and played up the two districts’ common rural interests.
For her part, Boebert argued her switch would make it more likely that Republicans, who now have a seven-seat edge, could “protect our House majority” by holding onto both Colorado’s 3rd and 4th districts. She said in her statement that the 4th District “is hungry for an unapologetic defender of freedom with a proven track record of standing strong for conservative principles.”
Sandra Hagen Solin, a Loveland-based Republican political and policy strategist, called Boebert’s decision “both savvy and desperate.”
“Her desire to maintain some semblance of power and enjoyment of a prominent media profile motivated her to seek an alternative path in the face of a very likely defeat in CD3,” Solin said. “CD4, with its significant Republican advantage and Congressman Buck’s departure, presented the perfect opportunity for her.”
An analysis produced for Colorado’s redistricting commission of the results of eight elections between 2016 and 2020 found an average 9.3-percentage-point advantage for Republican candidates over Democrats in the 3rd District. The Republican advantage in the 4th District averaged 26.6 percentage points.
Boebert will bring her positives and considerable negatives to the new district, said Colorado State University political science professor Kyle Saunders. But she remains a force to be reckoned with.
“There are other (Republican) candidates she must defeat for the nomination, but with her cash on hand and her name recognition, she has to be the favorite as of today,” Saunders said.
“Downsides” for Democrat Adam Frisch in CD3
The candidate with the most to lose in Boebert’s district shuffle, political watchers say, is Democrat Adam Frisch.
The former Aspen city councilman’s campaign to represent the 3rd Congressional District has largely cast him as an alternative to the chaotic “angertainment” he claims Boebert has stirred up.
Frisch came within a half percentage point of unseating the congresswoman in the 2022 election and has raised more than three times the money Boebert has in this cycle. There are two other Democrats in the race.
“Rep. Boebert’s exit from the 3rd District likely provides more downsides to Adam Frisch than upsides,” said Justin Gollob, a political science professor at Colorado Mesa University. “It is important to remember that the 3rd is a Republican district that became competitive in no small part because of Lauren Boebert.”
The congresswoman’s controversial conduct, including public statements that have generated headlines, culminated last fall in her humiliating removal from a performance of the musical “Beetlejuice” in Denver after fellow patrons complained she was acting inappropriately. Her antics inside the Buell Theatre, which included surveillance video footage of her groping her date and vaping, prompted several Republicans — both inside and outside her district — to abandon her reelection effort and back GOP challenger Jeff Hurd.
Frisch, Gollob said, has “spent a lot of time messaging (and fundraising) that he is the candidate who can beat Lauren Boebert, and it will be interesting to see how the Frisch campaign adjusts to this new reality.”
Hagen Solin predicts his fundraising will slow significantly — while Hurd’s goes in the other direction.
Hurd, a Grand Junction attorney who raised more than $400,000 during his first six weeks in the race and now leads the GOP field in the money game, didn’t mention Boebert in reacting to her district switch.
“We have the support of elected and previously elected Republicans all over the state and district, and I will fight every day to ensure this seat stays in Republican hands,” he said.
Four other Republicans are in the race, including former state Rep. Ron Hanks, a Donald Trump devotee who announced his candidacy last week. Russ Andrews, a financial adviser who is second in fundraising among Republican candidates, wished Boebert well and immediately turned his focus on Hurd.
“Now more than ever it is important to unite behind a candidate who will represent our district’s priorities and values, not someone who will turn his back because his endorsers have guided him to do so,” Andrews said in a news release.
Frisch’s campaign said its focus “will remain the same” — namely “defending rural Colorado’s way of life and offering common sense solutions to the problems facing the families” of the district.

“A bigger gunfight on the Eastern Plains”
Boebert’s path in the 4th Congressional District has plenty of potential hurdles and obstructions.
With no fewer than nine Republican candidates now in the mix for the June primary, Democratic political strategist Andrew Boian predicted the district would be “enormously tough” for Boebert to win. The latest entrant is House Minority Leader Mike Lynch, a Wellington Republican who planned to announce his candidacy Wednesday.
“This is viewed by many as a desperate move and one that most likely proves ultimately fatal for her political career,” Boian said. “With the Iowa caucuses (in the presidential race) just a few weeks away, the time to have made this jump passed months ago.”
But Steven Peck, the Douglas County GOP chair, called Boebert’s move “undeniably intriguing.”
The large field will offer “competing ideas and visions for both our community and the future of America,” he said. “I am looking forward to hearing a robust policy debate around the best ways to solve these problems and move beyond the headlines.”
Brophy, the former state lawmaker from Wray, said Boebert may be able to rely on her famous name to win a plurality in the GOP primary — “unless the people who want a more serious conservative leader decide to rally around one of the others and bring real resources.”
Candidate Richard Holtorf, a Republican who represents seven plains counties in the state House, looked down on Boebert’s chances. A third-generation cattle rancher who lives about 20 miles north of Akron, he said Boebert is kidding herself if she thinks she can lay claim to eastern Colorado simply by laying down stakes.
“She doesn’t even know all the counties in the district,” he said. “She doesn’t know the district. She’s just trying to keep that job in D.C.”
The Eastern Plains is a wholly different beast from the Western Slope, Holtorf said, almost entirely agricultural and ranching-based, and devoid of the ritzy ski resorts and outdoor tourism that characterize the 3rd District.
“She’s running from a fight on the Western Slope,” he said, “and she’s running into a bigger gunfight on the Eastern Plains.”
Stay up-to-date with Colorado Politics by signing up for our weekly newsletter, The Spot.
Colorado
After community efforts, Colorado county votes to preserve historic baseball fields in sale
On Tuesday, the Boulder County Commissioners voted to move forward with a development plan for their former North Broadway complex in the Colorado city of Boulder that would preserve the historic nearby baseball park at Iris Fields. County commissioners voted 2-1 to enter into a contract with The Academy Management Group for $26 million that aims to preserve the fields and possibly introduce new affordable senior housing to the area.
The lot came up for sale after the county decided to downsize much of their human services staff to another building, saying that many of those employees now work remotely. The county estimates the move will save the county $12.5 over the next five years. However, the sale of their buildings also meant the possibility of losing Iris Fields.
North Boulder Little League players have run the bases of Iris Fields for almost 70 years, and as the league’s Vice President, Thomas Click has spent endless hours coaching them.
“This is a little slice of americana, you know, this is, this is a classroom of life here,” Click said.
So earlier this year, when the county put this land up for sale and the fields’ days looked numbered, Click took a swing.
“A handful of us stood up and just said, ‘No, we’re not going to let that happen,’” Click said, “Our petition, we’ve got 5,000 signatures on it, and there are hundreds of comments on there of people just bearing their souls and talking about what the fields really meant to them.”
Eventually the league found a developer that wanted to help called the The Academy Management Group and submit their own bid. But they still needed Boulder County Commissioners like Ashley Stolzmann to approve it.
“We certainly heard from the neighborhood right around the property, but also … heard from people with different perspectives on the type of housing or not housing that should go on this site,” Stolzmann said.
And on Tuesday, the fields’ future came to a vote.
“Everyone sat quietly all through the hearing, and was like, on their best, you know, best church-like behavior. And then once the vote was taken, the crowd just erupted in tears,” Stolzmann said.
In a 2-1 vote, the fields now seem to be “safe.”
“To see everybody come together … that’s a super powerful thing, and hopefully it laid some framework for the way things can be going forward,” Click said.
And Click is already looking forward to seeing all his players for years to come.
When asked what the league’s plans are for opening day next year Click said, “Oh, man, we’re going big. We’re going really big. I’ll make sure of it.”
As with any major sale, there are still some details that still need to be worked out, including a 90 days due diligence period, but this vote lays the groundwork for the fields preservation and the possible addition of senior housing in the future.
The county expects to move out of their North Complex offices sometime next year.
Colorado
Opinion: Colorado caregivers fight for basic rights as billionaires lobby for AI
I have spent the last seven months learning to be a volunteer lobbyist — registering with the Colorado General Assembly, showing up with research, hoping someone will listen.
I became a lobbyist because I became a caregiver. In Colorado, you can be fired or denied workplace flexibility simply because you’re caring for an aging parent, a child with disabilities or a seriously ill spouse. There’s no law protecting you.
Meanwhile, big tech and AI interests have poured significant resources into federal lobbying, shaping regulations for rapidly evolving technologies like artificial intelligence. By contrast, people provide $600 billion in unpaid care annually, with broader national studies valuing unpaid care at over $1 trillion each year. Yet caregivers have virtually no voice in our state capitol.
This isn’t just unfair. It’s economically irrational.
AARP Colorado reports that one in five adult Coloradans — over 1 million people — are employed family caregivers: We’re the accountant leaving at 3 p.m. for Mom’s dialysis. The nurse needing Tuesday mornings for her son’s physical therapy. The engineer working remotely to care for his husband with ALS.
We’re not asking for special treatment. We’re asking not to be punished for keeping our families alive.
National caregiver studies show family caregivers face average lifetime wage losses of $295,000, with 36% reporting moderate to high financial strain. Many quit jobs entirely, losing income, health insurance and retirement precisely when they need stability most.
But here’s what businesses miss: This isn’t just a family problem. It’s an employer problem.
Companies hemorrhage experienced workers because they won’t provide basic flexibility. Replacing an employee costs 50% to 200% of their annual salary. Applied to Colorado’s caregiver workforce, this translates to hundreds of millions in employer losses annually. Supporting caregivers through reasonable accommodations could save employers tens of millions each year in reduced turnover.
That’s why I’m developing the Colorado Caregiver Accommodations and Rights Enhancement, or CARE, Act with legislators for the 2026 session.
The bill would do three things:
First, it would add family caregiver status as a protected class under Colorado’s Anti‑Discrimination Act. Workers couldn’t be fired simply for caring for a parent with dementia or a child with cerebral palsy. Surveys show 42% of Colorado caregivers quit or cut hours due to these demands, and wrongful termination tied to family responsibilities is documented in state and local law.
Second, it would require employers to provide reasonable accommodations — flexible schedules, telework for remote-capable positions, brief phone access for care coordination — unless doing so creates genuine hardship. Many good employers already do this. We’re ensuring everyone has access.
Third, it would create streamlined pathways for family members to become certified paid caregivers through existing Medicaid programs. Right now, families often can’t provide paid care for relatives, forcing them into institutional settings that cost taxpayers far more. This fixes that — at zero cost to the state budget.
The projected impact? Supporting caregivers through reasonable accommodations reduces costly turnover and protects small businesses through mandatory mediation.
I shouldn’t need to become a lobbyist to advocate for basic dignity. But when big tech pours millions into shaping policy for hypothetical AI risks while real people lose jobs caring for family members, grassroots advocacy isn’t optional — it’s survival.
I founded CASI because caregivers don’t have PACs or super PACs. We have stories, data, lived experience and moral authority. In a democracy, that should be enough.
But it’s not always enough. That’s why we need legislators willing to champion working families, not just corporate donors. That’s why we need Coloradans to tell their representatives: “I’m a caregiver” or “This matters.”
Because here’s the truth: We were all cared for at birth. Many of us will need care in aging. Most of us will provide care at some point. Care isn’t a niche issue — it’s the universal human experience.
I’m working to introduce the CARE Act in the 2026 session, pending final sponsor commitments. Meetings with legislators are ongoing to review the proposal.
If we secure sponsors, caregivers will testify about denied promotions and lost wages. Business owners will share how supporting caregivers improved retention. Policy experts will present data showing this isn’t charity — it’s infrastructure for an aging state.
Then legislators will vote. That vote will answer whether Colorado values family caregivers or only listens to those who can afford massive lobbying budgets.
I’m betting on Colorado. I’m betting on legislators taking time to understand this issue. I’m betting on employers who recognize that flexibility is a competitive advantage. I’m betting on everyday Coloradans who understand that supporting caregivers strengthens families, businesses and communities.
But I’m not leaving it to chance. I’m organizing, mobilizing and lobbying. Contact your legislator and say: “I’m a caregiver,” “I know a caregiver,” or “Support the CARE Act when it’s filed.”
Because if big tech can spend millions shaping the future of machines, surely we can invest in the people caring for humans.
Mark Fukae, of Brighton, is the founder of CASI, a Colorado caregiver advocacy organization, and serves as Director of Advocacy for Professionals Who Care, a national nonprofit supporting family caregivers.
The Colorado Sun is a nonpartisan news organization, and the opinions of columnists and editorial writers do not reflect the opinions of the newsroom. Read our ethics policy for more on The Sun’s opinion policy. Learn how to submit a column. Reach the opinion editor at opinion@coloradosun.com.
Follow Colorado Sun Opinion on Facebook.
Colorado
Point spread, betting odds for Boise State vs. Colorado State
Despite scoring seven points apiece in its last two games, Boise State will enter Saturday’s home finale against Colorado State as a massive favorite.
The Broncos (6-4, 4-2 Mountain West) are favored by 16.5 points over the Rams (2-8, 1-5). As of Monday mornings, Boise State is -880 on the moneyline while Colorado State is +580.
The over/under is set at 45.5 points.
Kickoff between the Broncos and Rams is scheduled for 5 p.m. Mountain time on Saturday. The game will air live nationally on FS1.
Boise State is coming off consecutive poor offensive performances in losses to Fresno State (30-7) and MWC-leading San Diego State (17-7). The Broncos have scored exactly seven points in all four losses this season.
After the San Diego State game, Boise State head coach Spencer Danielson reaffirmed his support of first-year offensive coordinator Nate Potter.
“I have absolute confidence in Nate Potter,” Danielson said. “Absolute confidence in him, absolute confidence in our offensive staff. But obviously it’s not good enough right now, I’m not running from that … but I don’t lose the trust in our coaches. We’ve got to look at it, though.
“We’ve got to see what are we missing, what are we teaching, why are we not able to create more explosive plays? And we weren’t, and I have to see why we didn’t see some of those things and what maybe scared us away from them.”
The Broncos were down three offensive starters against the Aztecs: quarterback Maddux Madsen, leading receiver Chris Marshall and left guard Jason Steele. The status of all three is unknown heading into Saturday’s matchup with Colorado State.
The Rams fired head coach Jay Norvell last month following a home loss to Hawaii. Colorado State will enter Albertsons Stadium on a four-game losing streak.
FanDuel has listed early betting lines for the other five Week 13 MWC games: Hawaii at UNLV (-3.5), Nevada at Wyoming (-6.5), New Mexico (-2.5) at Air Force, Utah State at Fresno State (-2.5) and San Jose State at San Diego State (-10.5).
Spread: Boise State -16.5
Moneyline: Boise State -880, Colorado State +580
Over/under: 45.5 points
Records against the spread: Boise State 5-3-2, Colorado State 4-6
Game time: 5 p.m. Mountain time | Saturday, Nov. 22
Location: Albertsons Stadium | Boise, Idaho
Live stream: Watch Boise State vs. Colorado State live on fuboTV (Start your free trial)
TV channel: FS1
Odds are courtesy of FanDuel Sportsbook. Game odds refresh periodically and are subject to change. If you or someone you know has a gambling problem and wants help, call 1-800-GAMBLER.
-
Vermont1 week agoNorthern Lights to dazzle skies across these US states tonight – from Washington to Vermont to Maine | Today News
-
New Jersey1 week agoPolice investigate car collision, shooting in Orange, New Jersey
-
West Virginia1 week ago
Search for coal miner trapped in flooded West Virginia mine continues for third day
-
Business7 days agoDeveloper plans to add a hotel and hundreds of residences to L.A. Live
-
Business2 days ago
Fire survivors can use this new portal to rebuild faster and save money
-
World1 week ago
The deadly car explosion in New Delhi is being investigated under an anti-terrorism law
-
Washington, D.C1 week agoBarack Obama surprises veterans on honor flight to DC ahead of Veterans Day
-
Culture1 week agoTest Yourself on the Settings Mentioned in These Novels About Road Trips
