Connect with us

Colorado

Colorado’s unaffiliated voters on the rise as parties decline | WADHAMS

Published

on

Colorado’s unaffiliated voters on the rise as parties decline | WADHAMS







Advertisement

Dick Wadhams



“Unaffiliated voters claim the majority.”

It wasn’t that many years ago when this March 5, 2024 headline in the Colorado Springs Gazette would have been unthinkable. Unaffiliated voters are now in the majority in El Paso County.

For decades, El Paso County was the massive Republican bulwark that fueled statewide election victories. El Paso County offset heavily Democratic Denver County, allowing Republican candidates to take the fight to the Jefferson County and Arapahoe County suburbs and other competitive counties while running up the score on the eastern plains and the Western Slope.

During this time, the state was accurately described as a third-third-third with Republicans, Democrats and unaffiliated voters having roughly equal shares of the electorate.

Advertisement

Stay up to speed: Sign up for daily opinion in your inbox Monday-Friday

But the influx of 800,000 new residents in the last 14 years dramatically changed the overall Colorado electorate. Statewide, unaffiliated voters now number 1.8 million, or 48%. Democrats are at 1.2 million, or 27%, and Republicans at 900,000 are at 24%.

El Paso County was not immune to this sea change. Unaffiliated voters are now a majority at 50.3%, with Republicans at 30.28% and Democrats at 17.51%.

Despite this stark reality of unaffiliated power, the Colorado Republican Party actually went into U.S. District Court to try to prevent unaffiliated voters from voting in one of the two major party primaries under Proposition 108, which was strongly passed by voters in 2016.

Under a new chairman elected in 2023, Dave Williams, the state party announced it would raise $200,000 to challenge Proposition 108 in federal court.  It hired John Eastman, the lawyer who devised the scheme to try to deny Joe Biden the presidency by having Vice President Mike Pence reject the results of the Electoral College on Jan. 6, 2021. 

Advertisement

Eastman is fighting disbarment in California and is under indictment in Georgia for his alleged efforts to overturn the 2020 presidential election. Eastman was also suspended in 2021 from his duties as the director of the Benson Center for the Study of Western Civilization at the University of Colorado for his role in the events of Jan. 6.

The case brought by Eastman and his legal sidekick, stolen-election conspiracist Randy Corporon, to steal the votes of unaffiliated voters was soundly rejected by U.S. District Court Judge Philip Brimmer.

As the number of unaffiliated voters continues to increase while registered Democrats and Republicans continue to decline, both parties seem to be in a race to the bottom.

Democrats are increasingly under the influence of Democratic Socialists who are far to the left of traditional liberals and have donned the mantle of antisemitism while parroting the violent chants of pro-Hamas terrorists.

The Denver City Council and the Fort Collins City Council have had their proceedings interrupted and forcibly adjourned by these leftists calling for a “ceasefire” in Gaza, which is a ruse to destroy Israel. 

Advertisement

There are increasing numbers of these far-left activists being elected to the state legislature and city councils. Democratic leaders seem intimidated and increasingly deferential to their extremism.

The best national Democrats can do is again nominate the failed, doddering, immensely unpopular President Joe Biden who was first elected to the Senate in 1972.

Meanwhile, Republicans are once again nominating a defeated former president, Donald Trump, who was silent for hours while rioters who counted themselves as his supporters ransacked the United States Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, while chanting “Hang Mike Pence.”  Trump relentlessly contends the 2020 presidential race was stolen from him despite none of the crackpot conspiracy theories promoted by his loyalists having any credibility.

The Colorado Republican Party is being led by a cabal of political grifters intent on expunging any Republican who does not worship at their altar of political purity.  They see Republican campaign contributions as their personal political piggy bank to unethically influence Republican primary elections in violation of state party bylaws. Dave Williams refuses to resign as state chairman despite being a candidate for Congress.

Democrats are careening toward the left-wing cliff while being empowered by a politically impotent Republican Party.

Advertisement

The current political process in Colorado seems unable to restore the kind of political balance that defined Colorado politics for 40 years. Colorado voters are voting with their feet by rejecting both parties and registering as unaffiliated.

It is time to consider restoring some ideological and political balance in Colorado by reforming the current playgrounds of the political extremes. The caucus-assembly process was once a haven for thriving neighborhood debates leading to the nomination of candidates at every level; it is now dominated by a few thousand activists on the extremes of both parties.

Though allowing unaffiliated voters to choose to vote in one of the major party primaries has been a welcome and effective reform for the past six years, perhaps it is time for unaffiliated voters, who will soon be a clear majority, to have access to both parties in an open primary election.

Colorado voters deserve to have a political nominating process that will restore political balance, not promote the political fringes.

Dick Wadhams is a former Colorado Republican state chairman who worked for U.S. Sen. Bill Armstrong for nine years before managing campaigns for U.S. Sens. Hank Brown and Wayne Allard, and Gov. Bill Owens.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Colorado

Trump signs travel ban on 12 countries after Colorado attack

Published

on

Trump signs travel ban on 12 countries after Colorado attack


US President Donald Trump participates in a Summer Soiree on the South Lawn of the White House in Washington, DC, on June 4, 2025. Agence France-Presse

WASHINGTON — US President Donald Trump signed a new travel ban Wednesday targeting 12 countries, saying it was spurred by an attack on a Jewish protest in Colorado that authorities blamed on a man they said was in the country illegally.

The ban, which strongly resembles a similar measure taken in his first presidency, targets nationals of Afghanistan, Burma, Chad, Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen.

Advertisement
Article continues after this advertisement

It will go into effect on June 9, the White House said.

READ: ‘Antipathy’ to US: Tourists turning away from Trump’s America

Trump also imposed a partial ban on travelers from seven countries: Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela, the White House said.

“The recent terror attack in Boulder, Colorado has underscored the extreme dangers posed to our country by the entry of foreign nationals who are not properly vetted,” Trump said in a video message from the Oval Office posted on X.

Advertisement

“We don’t want them.”

Article continues after this advertisement

Trump compared the new measures to the “powerful” ban he imposed on a number of mainly Muslim countries in his first term, which he said had stopped the United States suffering attacks that happened in Europe.

READ: What we know about the suspect and victims in Boulder, Colorado, attack

Article continues after this advertisement
Advertisement

“We will not let what happened in Europe happen in America,” Trump said.

“We cannot have open migration from any country where we cannot safely and reliably vet and screen. That is why today I am signing a new executive order placing travel restrictions on countries including Yemen, Somalia, Haiti, Libya, and numerous others.”

Rumors of a new Trump travel ban had circulated following the attack in Colorado, with his administration vowing to pursue “terrorists” living in the US on visas.

Suspect Mohammed Sabry Soliman is alleged to have thrown fire bombs and sprayed burning gasoline at a group of people who had gathered on Sunday in support of Israeli hostages held by Hamas.

US Homeland Security officials said Soliman was in the country illegally, having overstayed a tourist visa, but that he had applied for asylum in September 2022.

Advertisement

“President Trump is fulfilling his promise to protect Americans from dangerous foreign actors that want to come to our country and cause us harm,” White House Deputy Press Secretary Abigail Jackson said on X.

“These commonsense restrictions are country-specific and include places that lack proper vetting, exhibit high visa overstay rates, or fail to share identity and threat information.”



Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.


Your subscription has been successful.
Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Colorado

‘Incredibly special moment’: Colorado Springs firefighters help deliver baby

Published

on

‘Incredibly special moment’: Colorado Springs firefighters help deliver baby


COLORADO SPRINGS, Colo. (KKTV) – It’s a girl!

Colorado Springs firefighters helped deliver a baby on the southwest side of the city on Wednesday afternoon, according to the Colorado Springs Fire Department.

CSFD shared the sweet moment in a post to social media about an hour after baby girl’s arrival. Officials said crews were dispatched to an “imminent delivery” in the Cheyenne Mountain area Wednesday afternoon, and Engine 4 crews and AMR both worked to help mom deliver the baby at around 2:20 p.m.

“We are thrilled we got to be there for the incredibly special moment,” the post reads. “It’s not every day we get to deliver a baby!”

Advertisement

CSFD said mom and baby are both doing great!

According to CSFD, last year, the department delivered 44 babies.

Advertisement

Colorado

Castle Rock approves controversial Pine Canyon development, annexes Colorado land into town

Published

on

Castle Rock approves controversial Pine Canyon development, annexes Colorado land into town


Hundreds of homes will be coming to Castle Rock as part of a controversial development called Pine Canyon Ranch. Up until now, the proposed Pine Canyon development was in unincorporated Douglas County but was surrounded by the town of Castle Rock. For decades, it has been a cattle ranch belonging to the Scott and now Walker family.

CBS

Advertisement


The land is located on both the east and west sides of Interstate 25. To the east, it is north of Scott Boulevard, south of Black Feather Trail, west of Founders Parkway and east of Front Street. West of I-25, the property is east of Prairie Hawk Drive, south of Highway 85 and bisected by Liggett Road.

At a Tuesday night meeting, the Castle Rock Town Council voted to annex the land into the town of Castle Rock and approve its development plan and zoning.

This has been a controversial development, with neighbors saying they worry about its impact on traffic and town resources. But the public was notably absent from Tuesday night’s meeting, as originally there was no public comment scheduled.

meeting.jpg

CBS

Advertisement


After the vote, landowner Kurt Walker spoke to CBS Colorado on camera for the first time.

“What’s the next step for you guys now?” CBS Colorado’s Olivia Young asked Kurt Walker, Pine Canyon project manager and sixth-generation landowner.

“Take a breath!” Walker replied.

It’s the yes Walker and his family have been waiting 20 years for.

“It’s been a very, very long lead-up, multiple decades. We’re excited and relieved to have this chapter closed,” Walker said.

Advertisement

Most recently, Walker sought approval for the development through Douglas County, which drew outcry from neighbors and the town of Castle Rock itself, citing concerns that the development would develop solely off nonrenewable groundwater and would tax town resources without supporting them.

Ultimately, county commissioners directed the applicant to meet with the town of Castle Rock, and after months of moving through the town’s process, the land Walker’s family has ranched for the last 150 years will soon be officially a part of Castle Rock. It has also been greenlit for development.

“As of today, we get to be part of the fabric of the town itself and we are darn excited about integrating into the town,” Walker said.

The proposed Pine Canyon Ranch will include 800 single-family homes, 1,000 multifamily homes, open space and commercial space, which could include a hotel and spa. Many community members have said it’s too much.

“I’m worried about the traffic on Founders,” said Laura Cavey, Castle Rock mayor pro tem. “I would love to see a little less density and some real focus on the traffic.”

Advertisement

“Nobody wants a hotel there. Everybody I talk to thinks it’s a bad idea,” said Castle Rock Town Councilmember Mark Davis.

Echoing those concerns, three town councilors voted against the development plan.

“I cannot vote yes,” said Castle Rock Town Councilmember Tim Deitz. “We have one shot to do this right. Basically, I don’t like the fact that we would piece-meal it.”

council.jpg

CBS

Advertisement


But with four councilmembers voting yes, the development plan and zoning regulations passed. The annexation passed unanimously, and a final motion to approve annexation, a vested property rights agreement, and vesting site development plans passed 6-1. The only no vote was Councilmember Deitz, who said at times he felt the town was being “held hostage” in this process.

“They’re giving us all of our groundwater and we’ll be able to keep our sanitation process safe going forward,” said Kevin Bracken, Castle Rock town councilmember.

Bracken voted yes on the development plan, saying he was not willing to risk having the development move through the county. He and other councilmembers said it would be a “bait and switch” to reject the proposal now.

“We’ve worked really hard and done our due diligence to make sure it’s done in the town of Castle Rock,” said Jason Gray, Castle Rock mayor. “There are some things we don’t love about this. At the same time, we do love that it’s in the town of Castle Rock and not the county.”

Walker, pledging to listen to those concerns, as development begins: “We very much appreciate those comments and we look forward to working to do exactly what was said, which was work together to find the solution that works for the entire community,” Walker said.

Advertisement

While the project has been greenlit, the approval won’t be formally official for 30 days. A town spokesperson said:

“The annexation and zoning for Pine Canyon was approved by Town Council. There is a 30-day referendum period that starts now. Following that, the applicant will provide all of their signed mylars and agreements to the town for recording. Every project is different on when final documents are signed and submitted to the town. This typically ranges from one to six months from when the annexation and zoning was approved. The annexation and zoning are effective once all final documents are signed and recorded with the Douglas County Clerk and Recorder’s Office.”

This approval is just the first step of a long development process. Next, site development plans will be submitted for approval. The developers say they will look at doing an updated traffic study as part of this process.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending