Connect with us

Colorado

Colorado’s unaffiliated voters on the rise as parties decline | WADHAMS

Published

on

Colorado’s unaffiliated voters on the rise as parties decline | WADHAMS







Advertisement

Dick Wadhams



“Unaffiliated voters claim the majority.”

It wasn’t that many years ago when this March 5, 2024 headline in the Colorado Springs Gazette would have been unthinkable. Unaffiliated voters are now in the majority in El Paso County.

For decades, El Paso County was the massive Republican bulwark that fueled statewide election victories. El Paso County offset heavily Democratic Denver County, allowing Republican candidates to take the fight to the Jefferson County and Arapahoe County suburbs and other competitive counties while running up the score on the eastern plains and the Western Slope.

During this time, the state was accurately described as a third-third-third with Republicans, Democrats and unaffiliated voters having roughly equal shares of the electorate.

Advertisement

Stay up to speed: Sign up for daily opinion in your inbox Monday-Friday

But the influx of 800,000 new residents in the last 14 years dramatically changed the overall Colorado electorate. Statewide, unaffiliated voters now number 1.8 million, or 48%. Democrats are at 1.2 million, or 27%, and Republicans at 900,000 are at 24%.

El Paso County was not immune to this sea change. Unaffiliated voters are now a majority at 50.3%, with Republicans at 30.28% and Democrats at 17.51%.

Despite this stark reality of unaffiliated power, the Colorado Republican Party actually went into U.S. District Court to try to prevent unaffiliated voters from voting in one of the two major party primaries under Proposition 108, which was strongly passed by voters in 2016.

Under a new chairman elected in 2023, Dave Williams, the state party announced it would raise $200,000 to challenge Proposition 108 in federal court.  It hired John Eastman, the lawyer who devised the scheme to try to deny Joe Biden the presidency by having Vice President Mike Pence reject the results of the Electoral College on Jan. 6, 2021. 

Advertisement

Eastman is fighting disbarment in California and is under indictment in Georgia for his alleged efforts to overturn the 2020 presidential election. Eastman was also suspended in 2021 from his duties as the director of the Benson Center for the Study of Western Civilization at the University of Colorado for his role in the events of Jan. 6.

The case brought by Eastman and his legal sidekick, stolen-election conspiracist Randy Corporon, to steal the votes of unaffiliated voters was soundly rejected by U.S. District Court Judge Philip Brimmer.

As the number of unaffiliated voters continues to increase while registered Democrats and Republicans continue to decline, both parties seem to be in a race to the bottom.

Democrats are increasingly under the influence of Democratic Socialists who are far to the left of traditional liberals and have donned the mantle of antisemitism while parroting the violent chants of pro-Hamas terrorists.

The Denver City Council and the Fort Collins City Council have had their proceedings interrupted and forcibly adjourned by these leftists calling for a “ceasefire” in Gaza, which is a ruse to destroy Israel. 

Advertisement

There are increasing numbers of these far-left activists being elected to the state legislature and city councils. Democratic leaders seem intimidated and increasingly deferential to their extremism.

The best national Democrats can do is again nominate the failed, doddering, immensely unpopular President Joe Biden who was first elected to the Senate in 1972.

Meanwhile, Republicans are once again nominating a defeated former president, Donald Trump, who was silent for hours while rioters who counted themselves as his supporters ransacked the United States Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, while chanting “Hang Mike Pence.”  Trump relentlessly contends the 2020 presidential race was stolen from him despite none of the crackpot conspiracy theories promoted by his loyalists having any credibility.

The Colorado Republican Party is being led by a cabal of political grifters intent on expunging any Republican who does not worship at their altar of political purity.  They see Republican campaign contributions as their personal political piggy bank to unethically influence Republican primary elections in violation of state party bylaws. Dave Williams refuses to resign as state chairman despite being a candidate for Congress.

Democrats are careening toward the left-wing cliff while being empowered by a politically impotent Republican Party.

Advertisement

The current political process in Colorado seems unable to restore the kind of political balance that defined Colorado politics for 40 years. Colorado voters are voting with their feet by rejecting both parties and registering as unaffiliated.

It is time to consider restoring some ideological and political balance in Colorado by reforming the current playgrounds of the political extremes. The caucus-assembly process was once a haven for thriving neighborhood debates leading to the nomination of candidates at every level; it is now dominated by a few thousand activists on the extremes of both parties.

Though allowing unaffiliated voters to choose to vote in one of the major party primaries has been a welcome and effective reform for the past six years, perhaps it is time for unaffiliated voters, who will soon be a clear majority, to have access to both parties in an open primary election.

Colorado voters deserve to have a political nominating process that will restore political balance, not promote the political fringes.

Dick Wadhams is a former Colorado Republican state chairman who worked for U.S. Sen. Bill Armstrong for nine years before managing campaigns for U.S. Sens. Hank Brown and Wayne Allard, and Gov. Bill Owens.

Advertisement



Source link

Colorado

Outraged over incentives for data centers that are no good for Colorado (Letters)

Published

on

Outraged over incentives for data centers that are no good for Colorado (Letters)


Data centers: What good are they for Colorado?

Re: “Dueling policies for data centers,” March 1 news story

The Denver Post article about two competing bills in the legislature regarding new data centers in Colorado seems to start with the presumption that we want the data centers.

Why do we want them and who wants them? Is it the politicians wanting bragging rights about our state becoming another Silicon Valley? Perhaps they want more businesses so they can collect more taxes from the new residents. Alternatively, they just want more power in Washington by increasing our population. Has anyone stopped to ask why we want to attract more people to our state?

Colorado is in a fight with other Western states to obtain more water for our growing population. Our wildlife is being crowded out by the increased urbanization. The roads are so crowded that it is not uncommon to come to a complete stop on our interchanges during rush hour. We have a serious housing shortage. The air is being polluted by the increased number of cars. These are all the result of a growing population. Did anyone stop to ask why we want more people?

Advertisement

During my 53 years living in Colorado, I have never heard anyone (other than politicians) say, “We need more people.” On the contrary, the conversation is more often about how we are becoming overcrowded. I would like the politicians to explain why we need more businesses and more people in our state. It should not be a presumption that more is better! Are our elected representatives truly reflecting the wishes of their constituents?

Doug Hurst, Parker

Anger and disbelief were our reactions when we read about House Bill 1030, which is under consideration at the statehouse. This outrageous corporate welfare bill would provide some of the world’s wealthiest corporations with massive state tax reductions to build monstrous resource-thirsty data centers. Analysts projected a $92.5 million tax loss in just three years if a bunch of these data centers are built. Just one 160-megawatt facility would gobble up as much power as 176,000 homes once completed. Consider for comparison that the entire DIA airport uses around 45 megawatts of power!

As the state legislature grapples with bone-deep budget cuts, we cannot afford to exempt data centers from paying their own way nor allow their unregulated construction. Taxpayer-funded corporate handouts would entail massive hits to tax revenue that should be used for our schools, roads, infrastructure, and valid state needs. What essential services will potentially be cut or axed to cover the lost revenue to the state from this corporate giveaway?

These data centers also demand massive amounts of our water. A CoreSite data center in Denver alone will use approximately 805,000 gallons of water per day to air-condition its computers. That is the same as the average daily indoor water use of 16,100 Denver homes.

Advertisement

I pray our state legislature will condemn HB-1030 to the corporate welfare hell where it belongs in. Instead, they should support Senate Bill 102 that will hopefully properly regulate these tax-eating, water-wasting, and electricity-gobbling monstrosities.

Terry Talbot, Grand Junction



Source link

Continue Reading

Colorado

Skier killed in avalanche in Colorado’s Boss Basin, first ski death of the season

Published

on

Skier killed in avalanche in Colorado’s Boss Basin, first ski death of the season


Early Sunday morning, Colorado rescue crews found the body of a missing skier who was killed in a recent avalanche.

The skier was reported missing in the Boss Basin area in the upper portion of Resolution Creek on March 7.

Advertisement

Colorado Avalanche Information Center


Summit County Rescue Group, Vail Mountain Rescue and the Summit and Eagle County Sheriff’s Offices began searching the area and discovered the site of the avalanche. They noticed that nearby ski and snowmobile tracks led up to where it occurred.

The Colorado Avalanche Information Center says Flight for Life helped with the search. They found the body of the missing skier in the avalanche debris on Sunday, around sunrise.

boss-basin-fatal-avalanche-1-slide-from-caic-on-fb.jpg

Advertisement

Colorado Avalanche Information Center


CAIC staff said the avalanche started near the treeline on a northeast-facing slope and was about two feet deep. The slope angles ranged from 33 to 36 degrees.

According to CAIC data, this is the first person killed in an avalanche during the 2025-2026 ski season.

colorado-avalanche-danger-march-8-2026.png

Colorado Avalanche Information Center

Advertisement


Avalanche danger in some parts of the high country is considerable, particularly on north- and east-facing slopes and on large open slopes just below ridgelines.

The CAIC Forecast for Sunday says:

“The avalanche danger will stay at CONSIDERABLE (3of5) on Sunday for the places that picked up the most snow in this last storm (Elk and Sawatch Ranges). Areas that received less than 8 inches will go back to MODERATE danger, but this may vary significantly from drainage to drainage and with elevation. Assume a higher danger if you find a foot or more of new snow. Across the region, wind-drifted slopes will remain the most dangerous regardless of the danger. In the shallower areas (Elks and Sawatch), we’re more concerned about avalanches in motion breaking deeper, failing in buried facet layers.

On Sunday, as the sun pops out, remember that a strong spring sun can make sunny slopes unstable rather quickly. Keep an eye out for roller balls as an indication of a forthcoming shed cycle of loose avalanches.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Colorado

Arizona men’s basketball shakes off poor start to win at Colorado in regular season finale

Published

on

Arizona men’s basketball shakes off poor start to win at Colorado in regular season finale


Will this be the team that gets Arizona back to the Final Four for the first time in 25 years, and maybe go further? Who knows. But one thing is for certain, no Wildcats squad has had a better regular season than this one.

Second-ranked Arizona rallied from down 11 late in the first half to win 89-79 at Colorado on Saturday night, putting the finishing touches on its first Big 12 title. The 29 victories are the most in school history during the regular season, breaking a mark done four previous times including in 2021-22 in Tommy Lloyd’s first year running the program.

Brayden Burries had a career-high 31 points, 22 coming in the second half, while Koa Peat scored 19 of his 25 in the first half. The freshmen combined to make 21 of 31 shots and Burries added an 11-of-12 performance at the foul line, and Burries added seven rebounds, five steals and an assist.

Tobe Awaka, Ivan Kharchenkov and Motiejus Krivas each had 10 for Arizona, which shot 70.4 percent in the second half and 55.9 percent for the game. The Wildcats had a 54-26 edge on points in the paint and finished plus-5 on the boards after being down four at the half.

Advertisement

Jaden Bradley went scoreless for the first time this season, missing all three of his shots, but he made up for it with six of the UA’s 22 assists.

Colorado (17-14) got 28 points from Isaiah Johnson, who set the school freshman season scoring record. The Buffaloes shot 40.6 percent and made 7 of 22 from 3 but only hit one triple after halftime.

The UA trailed 38-36 at halftime, only the fourth time this season it has been down after 20 minutes, after being down 11 late in the first half. A Burries 3 tied it at 44, thenKharchenkov gave the Wildcats their first lead at 48-46 with 16:59 remaining.

Arizona got the lead up to five before Colorado fought back. Six straight by Bangot Dak put the Buffaloes ahead 54-52 but then Dak picked up his fourth foul and had to sit.

That began a 4-minute stretch with 10 lead changes before Arizona got a stop and Burries drained a 3 on the other end to put the UA up 66-62 with 9:17 left. The Wildcats made six straight shots, including back-to-back baskets inside byAwaka to make it 73-64 with 7:15 remaining.

Advertisement

A 3 from Kharchenkov put Arizona up 10 with 5:48 to go. The Buffaloes got within six before Peat dunked through a zone defense, and a Burries layup again got the lead to double digits.

Peat had 12 of Arizona’s first 14 points in the first seven minutes, but none put the Wildcats in the lead. The Buffaloes never trailed in the first half, jumping out to an 8-point edge with 8:08 left before halftime and extending that to 36-25 with 4:21 to go in the half, both on 3s by Johnson.

Colorado hit six 3-pointers in the first half, three by Johnson, while Arizona was 0 for 6 from deep

A 9-0 run, capped by a 3-point play by Burries, got the UA within two in the final minute, setting the stage for the second half.

Arizona now gets a few days off before heading to the Big 12 Tournament in Kansas City. As the No. 1 seed it has a double bye into Thursday’s quarterfinals, where it will face either No. 8 UCF, No. 9 Cincinnati or No. 16 Utah. They beat those teams this season by seven, 26 and 19 points, respectively.

Advertisement

2026 Big 12 Tournament schedule

No. 12 ASU (16-15) vs. No. 13 Baylor (16-15), 9:30 a.m. (ESPN+)

No. 9 Cincinnati (17-14) vs. No. 16 Utah (10-21), 12 p.m. (ESPN+)

No. 10 BYU (21-10) vs. No. 15 Kansas State (12-19), 4 p.m. (ESPN+)

No. 11 Colorado (17-14) vs. No. 14 Oklahoma State (18-13), 6:30 p.m. (ESPN+)

Advertisement

ASU/Baylor winner vs. No. 5 Iowa State (25-6), 9:30 a.m. (ESPN/ESPN2)

Cincinnati/Utah winner vs. No. 8 UCF (20-10), 12 p.m. (ESPNU)

BYU/Kansas State winner vs. No. 7 West Virginia (18-13), 4 p.m. (ESPNU)

Colorado/Oklahoma State winner vs. No. 6 TCU (21-10), 6:30 p.m. (ESPN2/ESPNU)

ASU/Baylor-Iowa State winner vs. No. 4 Texas Tech (22-9), 9:30 a.m. (ESPN/ESPN2)

Advertisement

Cincinnati/Utah-UCF winner vs. No. 1 Arizona (29-2), 12 p.m. (ESPN/ESPN2)

BYU/Kansas State-West Virginia winner vs. No. 2 Houston (26-5), 4 p.m. (ESPN/ESPN2)

Colorado/Oklahoma State-TCU winner vs. No. 3 Kansas (22-9), 6:30 p.m. (ESPN/ESPN2)

Quarterfinal 1 winner vs. Quarterfinal 2 winner, 4 p.m. (ESPN/ESPN2)

Quarterfinal 3 winner vs. Quarterfinal 4 winner, 6:30 p.m. (ESPN/ESPN2)

Advertisement

Semifinal winners, 3 p.m. (ESPN)



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending