Connect with us

Colorado

Colorado journalists show power of collaboration in UCHealth debt collection exposé

Published

on

Colorado journalists show power of collaboration in UCHealth debt collection exposé


University of Colorado Hospital. Photo by Jeffrey Beall (CC BY-SA 3.0)

In June, Colorado Gov. Jared Polis signed into law HB24-1380, Regulation of Debt-Related Services. The law marked a milestone in a five-year investigation by a group of reporters into the debt-collection practices of the University of Colorado Health System (UCHealth).

Starting in 2019, journalists from five news outlets collected data on the number of lawsuits UCHealth brought against patients who had unpaid medical bills, according to reporting from Chris Vanderveen, the director of special projects for television station 9News, and John Ingold, a health reporter and cofounder of the nonprofit news outlet, The Colorado Sun.

Dubbed “Diagnosis: Debt Colorado,” the reporting project stems from a partnership led by the Colorado News Collaborative (COLab) and KFF Health News and included contributions from The Colorado Sun, 9News, Colorado Newsline and The Sentinel. In a series stemming from KFF Health News’ reporting on medical debt in the United States, the reporters explored the causes, scale and effects of medical debt on Colorado’s residents.

Advertisement

UCHealth is the state’s largest hospital system, collecting more than $6 billion in patient care revenue annually, Ingold and Vanderveen reported on Feb. 19, “UCHealth sues thousands of patients every year. But you won’t find its name on the lawsuits.”

In its mission statement, UCHealth says, “We improve lives,” the reporters noted. But from 2019 through 2023, the health system and its debt collectors filed 15,710 lawsuits, UCHealth revealed in response to questions from Ingold and Vanderveen, the two reporters wrote in that Feb. 19 article. That’s an average of 3,142 lawsuits per year, or more than eight per day, they noted. Yet almost none of the lawsuits were filed in UCHealth’s name, they added.

In a broadcast on June 27, Vanderveen summarized the reporters’ findings. “As Colorado’s largest and most prominent medical provider insisted it was ‘not hiding anything,’ an exhaustive investigation discovered UCHealth, for years, used what amounted to a loophole in the state’s court system to keep private its aggressive bill collection practices,” Vanderveen wrote.

While journalists often cover hospitals’ confrontational billing and collection tactics, the investigative work of Vanderveen, Ingold and other journalists in this collaboration is significant because it shows how health reporters can uncover lawsuits when a hospital or health system conceals its legal actions against patients.

For their work, the collaborative efforts were particularly useful as were more traditional reporting strategies: soliciting patients’ hospital bills over multiple years, visiting courthouses when debt-collection cases were heard, and gathering the names of defendants and lawyers in those cases.

Advertisement

This spring, the investigation prompted the Colorado General Assembly to pass HB24-1380 to close a loophole that allowed UCHealth to sue thousands of patients under another business’ name, Vanderveen reported. Starting this fall, the law will force hospital systems to sue patients under their own names on debts the systems still own.

After the legislature passed HB24-1380, state Sen. Sonya Jaquez Lewis, praised the journalists’ work. “I really do think we owe you a little bit of thanks — maybe a lot of thanks and gratitude — for sure, because it pointed us in the right direction,” said Jaquez Lewis, a sponsor of the bill.

How the project unfolded

Early in 2020, UCHealth ended its years-long practice of suing patients under its own name, a change that was not disclosed to the state legislature or the public, Vanderveen reported. “The decision allowed UCHealth to continue to sue patients — roughly eight per day for years — with virtually no way to track its legal efforts,” the TV station explained. By allowing two of its third-party debt collectors to use their names as plaintiffs, “UCHealth turned a once-transparent process into a confusing and opaque mess for many of its patients,” the news station added.

When journalists asked about the issue, UCHealth’s administrators said the health system had sued more than 15,000 patients in five years, becoming one of the most aggressive litigants in Colorado, 9News explained.

Soliciting data from patients’ bills

Years before collaborating with other journalists to report on medical debt, Vanderveen asked 9News’ viewers to send in their medical bills. “Sometime between 2016 and 2018, we started a bill-solicitation program called, ‘Show Us Your Bills,’ and we got a lot of submissions,” he said in a phone interview. From those bills, Vanderveen built a database showing how often each hospital filed lawsuits, including the most aggressive litigants.

Advertisement

In 2020, COVID-19 forced all health care journalists to postpone their regular work, but later that year, Vanderveen became curious about how many hospitals filed debt-collection suits during the pandemic. His data showed a sudden drop in lawsuits from UCHealth.

Also in 2020, two Kaiser Health News journalists — senior correspondent Jay Hancock and data editor Elizabeth Lucas — were Pulitzer Prize finalists for reporting in 2019 on the predatory billing practices of the University of Virginia Health System. In an eight-part series, Hancock and Lucas exposed how UVA “relentlessly squeezed low-income patients — many into bankruptcy — forcing the nonprofit, state-run hospital to change its tactics,” the Pulitzer prize committee wrote, as AHCJ reported in a tip sheet published that same year.

Did UVA’s experience prompt UCHealth to change its tactics? Vanderveen wondered. “On the surface, it appeared as if UCHealth had a change of heart because no more lawsuits were filed under UCHealth’s name,” he explained. “It went from about hundreds per quarter to like two or three per quarter.” About that same time, he heard about Credit Service Co., a debt collector in Colorado Springs, that was a party to some UCHealth lawsuits against patients, he said. [See image from 9News.]

A trove of data in court filings

As Vanderveen’s data showed, UCHealth never stopped suing patients in early 2020. While it didn’t do so in a publicly traceable way, he could still find cases by searching court records for Credit Service Co. as a plaintiff, he said.

Visiting the courthouse was also useful, Ingold added. “Going to court is something I would highly recommend, because your local jurisdiction is probably hearing many debt-collection cases on the same days,” he said. “Plus, the lawyers who handle those cases are all the same people.” These courts had long dockets of cases that debt collectors filed, he noted. 

Advertisement

Inside Colorado’s courts, the reporters found defendants waiting to respond to debt-collection summonses. “Chris [Vanderveen] would walk up and down a row of people, and ask, ‘Who’s here for a UCHealth case,’ and ‘Who’s being sued by the Credit Service Company?” Ingold said. Several defendants raised their hands, he noted. At the same time, Ingold found people named in suits that other health care entities brought, leading to more stories.

In addition, the reporters called legal services groups, consumer assistance programs, law school clinics and any other organization helping consumers, especially those with low income, Ingold said. They would have at least some insight into who is suing over medical debt.

Another reporting strategy is to seek defendants who filed answers to complaints, meaning the case may go to a hearing or trial, Ingold advised. In those case files, reporters may find creditors’ names, he said. Also, defendants who challenge these cases may want to talk to reporters, he added.

The value of collaboration

One of the most important lessons learned was the teamwork that came from the collaborative nature of the project. At COLab, journalists no longer compete as they once did to be the first to break stories. Instead, COLab journalists from different newsrooms work on projects together to serve the public good, Ingold explained.

“What we produce for the news collaborative can be distributed to pretty much any newsroom in Colorado that wants it,” he added said. “My story about the lawsuits ran on our site, at www.ColoradoSun.com, and it ran on the websites of the other news collaborators. Also, it ended up in The Denver Post and a number of other places around the state.”

Advertisement

COLab makes efficient use of the limited staff left behind in many newsrooms when fewer news outlets can devote multiple staff to any one project, he commented. “Also, we can help all the participating newsrooms by providing content everybody can use,” he added.

In addition to working with multiple newsrooms in Colorado, COLab also worked with Noam N. Levey, a senior correspondent at KFF Health News, who has led KFF’s award-winning project, Diagnosis: Debt.

Levey introduced the Colorado reporters to the staff at the Urban Institute who have researched how medical debt and collections affect immigrants and people of color, said Tina Griego, COLab’s managing editor. Data from the Urban Institute led to this story, “Medical Debt Affects Much of America, but Colorado Immigrants Are Hit Especially Hard,” by Rae Ellen Bichell and Lindsey Toomer, of Colorado Newsline, Griego explained. Bichell is a Colorado correspondent for KFF Health News and Toomer covers politics and social justice for Colorado Newsline, which is part of the States Newsroom, a nonprofit covering state capitals.

Resources

  • “UCHealth sues thousands of patients every year but doesn’t use its own name to do it,” Colorado Sun and 9News, Feb. 16, 2024.
  • “Colorado hospital giant’s lawsuits fill county courtrooms with defendants and confusion,” 9News, March 1, 2024.
  • “Medical Debt Affects Much of America, but Colorado Immigrants Are Hit Especially Hard,” April 3, 2024.
  • “Hospitals suing patients over unpaid bills would have to put their names on lawsuits under new Colorado measure,” Colorado Sun, April 12, 2024.
  • “Loophole allowed UCHealth to sue thousands of patients under another business’ name,” 9News, June 27, 2024.



Source link

Colorado

Medina Alert issued after hit-and-run crash seriously injures motorist in Denver

Published

on

Medina Alert issued after hit-and-run crash seriously injures motorist in Denver


DENVER — Authorities issued a Medina Alert Sunday following a hit-and-run crash that seriously injured a motorist.

Police said the driver of a gold 2008 BMW X3 SUV struck another vehicle at the intersection of Sheridan Boulevard and W. 17th Avenue in Denver around 4:37 p.m. Saturday.

The crash left the driver of the victim vehicle with serious bodily injuries, according to the Colorado Bureau of Investigation.

CBI

Advertisement

The BMW driver fled following the crash, traveling northbound on Sheridan Boulevard, CBI said in a bulletin.

The gold BMW X3, with Colorado license plate ECB F17, sustained heavy damage on the driver’s side from the collision.

If seen, call 911 or the Denver Police Department at 720-913-2000.

This was the second hit-and-run crash and Medina Alert in Denver on Saturday.

Earlier Saturday, a pedestrian in a crosswalk was seriously injured after being struck by a 2010 white Toyota Corolla, Colorado license plate EDM U42, at the intersection of Federal Boulevard and W. Kentucky Avenue.

Advertisement

The driver of the Corolla left the scene—heading northbound on Federal Boulevard.

No arrests have been announced.

A Medina Alert honors the memory of Jose Medina, a 21-year-old valet driver who was killed by a hit-and-run driver in 2011.

A taxi driver witnessed the event, followed the driver, and gave the police the license plate number, leading to the capture and arrest of the suspect.

Advertisement

Coloradans making a difference | Denver7 featured videos


Denver7 is committed to making a difference in our community by standing up for what’s right, listening, lending a helping hand and following through on promises. See that work in action, in the videos above.





Source link

Continue Reading

Colorado

Denver shelter working to end homelessness for at risk youth, funding at risk

Published

on

Denver shelter working to end homelessness for at risk youth, funding at risk


Urban Peak is working to help Colorado youth have safe housing and support, and the organization says the community need is growing. They say 90% of the youth they assisted have been able to find safe housing and, even with funding cuts looming, it will continue to help those in need.



Source link

Continue Reading

Colorado

GUEST COLUMN: Principles for Guiding River Water Negotiations – Calexico Chronicle

Published

on

GUEST COLUMN: Principles for Guiding River Water Negotiations – Calexico Chronicle


Next week is the annual gathering of “water buffaloes” in Las Vegas. It’s the Colorado River Water Users Association convention. About 1700 people will attend, but probably around 100 of them are the key people—the government regulators, tribal leaders, and the directors and managers of the contracting agencies that receive Colorado River water.

Anyone who is paying attention knows that we are in critical times on the river. Temporary agreements on how to distribute water during times of shortage are expiring. Negotiators have been talking for several years but haven’t been able to agree on anything concrete.

I’m just an observer, but I’ve been observing fairly closely. Within the limits on how much information I can get as an outsider, I’d like to propose some principles or guidelines that I think are important for the negotiation process.

See also

Advertisement
  1. When Hoover Dam was proposed, the main debate was over whether the federal government or private concerns would operate it. Because the federal option prevailed, water is delivered free to contractors. Colorado River water contractors do not pay the actual cost of water being delivered to them. It is subsidized by the U.S. government. As a public resource, Colorado River water should not be seen as a commodity.
  2. The Lower Basin states of Arizona, California, and Nevada should accept that the Upper Basin states of Colorado, New Mexico, Utah, and Wyoming are at the mercy of Mother Nature for much of their annual water supply. While the 1922 Colorado River Compact allocates them 7.5 million acre-feet annually, in wet years, they have been able to use a maximum of 4.7 maf. During the long, ongoing drought, their annual use has been 3.5 maf. They shouldn’t have to make more cuts.
  3. However, neither should the Upper Basin states be able to develop their full allocation. It should be capped at a feasible number, perhaps 4.2 maf. As compensation, Upper Basin agencies and farmers can invest available federal funds in projects to use water more efficiently and to reuse it so that they can develop more water.
  4. Despite the drought, we know there will be some wet years. To compensate the Lower Basin states for taking all the cuts in dry years, the Upper Basin should release more water beyond the Compact commitments during wet years. This means that Lake Mead and Lower Basin reservoirs would benefit from wet years and Lake Powell would not. In short, the Lower Basin takes cuts in dry years; the Upper Basin takes cuts in wet years.
  5. Evaporation losses (water for the angels) can be better managed by keeping more of the Lower Basin’s water in Upper Basin reservoirs instead of in Lake Mead, where the warmer weather means higher evaporation losses. New agreements should include provisions to move that water in the Lower Basin account down to Lake Mead quickly. Timing is of the essence.
  6. In the Lower Basin states, shortages should be shared along the same lines as specified in the 2007 Interim Guidelines, with California being last to take cuts as Lake Mead water level drops.
  7. On the home front, IID policy makers should make a long-term plan to re-set water rates in accord with original water district policy. Because IID is a public, non-profit utility, water rates were set so that farmers paid only the cost to deliver water. Farmers currently pay $20 per acre foot, but the actual cost of delivering water is $60 per acre foot. That subsidy of $60 million comes from the water transfer revenues.
  8. The SDCWA transfer revenues now pay farmers $430 per acre-foot of conserved water, mostly for drip or sprinkler systems. Akin to a grant program, this very successful program generated almost 200,000 acre-feet of conserved water last year. Like any grant program, it should be regularly audited for effectiveness.
  9. Some of those transfer revenues should be invested in innovative cropping patterns, advanced technologies, and marketing to help the farming community adapt to a changing world. The IID should use its resources to help all farmers be more successful, not just a select group.
  10. Currently, federal subsidies pay farmers not to use water via the Deficit Irrigation Program. We can lobby for those subsidies to continue, but we should plan for when they dry up. Any arrangement that rewards farmers but penalizes farm services such as seed, fertilizer, pesticide, land leveling, equipment, and other work should be avoided.
  11. Though the IID has considerable funding from the QSA water transfers, it may need to consider issuing general obligation bonds as it did in its foundational days for larger water efficiency projects such as more local storage or a water treatment plant to re-use ag drain water.

Much progress has been made in using water more efficiently, especially in the Lower Basin states, but there’s a lot more water to be saved, and I believe collectively that we can do it.





Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending