Connect with us

California

Will California Become A Refuge For Transgender Health Care?

Published

on

Will California Become A Refuge For Transgender Health Care?


When Kathie Moehlig’s 11-year-old son determined to transition in 2012, she says not one physician in San Diego was prepared to deal with him. “After I referred to as to make appointments, they saved telling me: ‘We don’t deal with children like that right here,’” Moehlig stated.

However she continued making calls, finally breaking by way of at Rady Youngsters’s Hospital. Her efforts drew consideration from different households of transgender children, a lot of whom started asking her for assist.

She determined she “couldn’t simply be a household good friend,” so eight years in the past she began TransFamily Help Companies, a nonprofit that provides a mess of companies to tons of of households of transgender people throughout the nation, together with help teams, help navigating the medical system, and — most lately — political advocacy.

Advertisement

Now, TransFamily Help Companies is a co-sponsor of Senate Invoice 107, which might defend from prosecution sufferers who journey to California for what supporters name gender-affirming care and medical doctors who present that care.

On Monday, the Meeting gave its ultimate approval to the invoice in a 60-19 vote. A Senate committee accredited it in the present day, and if the complete Senate agrees in a concurrence vote anticipated on Wednesday, the invoice heads to Gov. Gavin Newsom.

If signed, the invoice would make California a refuge for minors looking for gender-affirming care, just like how Meeting Invoice 1666, which Newsom signed into regulation in June, made the state a refuge for these looking for abortions.

“It is going to ship a really clear message that trans children and their households, in the event that they don’t really feel secure of their state, they’ll come right here and we’ll do every little thing in our energy to guard them from prosecution,” state Sen. Scott Wiener, a San Francisco Democrat and the invoice’s creator, informed CalMatters.

A nationwide wave

The invoice, maybe the very best profile of a number of LGBTQ-related proposals already on Newsom’s desk, responds to a latest wave of laws: Not less than 40 payments in 20 states would limit entry to gender-affirming medical take care of transgender youth. These proposals differ from an Idaho invoice to criminalize gender-affirming medical procedures to a Florida regulation banning their insurance coverage protection. In Texas, state social employees are reportedly rebelling — and even threatening to give up — somewhat than perform an order by Gov. Greg Abbott to research mother and father who permit transgender well being care.

Advertisement

Proponents of the invoice say it’s California’s duty to intervene.

“There are efforts all throughout the nation…to go after trans children and their households. California has a task to play in offering a secure, welcoming atmosphere for trans children and their households to get the care they want,” stated Samuel Garrett-Pate, managing director of exterior affairs for Equality California, which helps the invoice and says it’s the nation’s largest LGBTQ civil rights group.

SB 107 would:

  • Prohibit regulation enforcement participation and the arrest or extradition of a person for permitting an individual to obtain or present gender-affirming care when that care is authorized below California and federal regulation. 
  • Declare arrest warrants for people who allowed their little one to obtain gender affirming well being care the bottom regulation enforcement precedence.
  • Ban the enforcement of one other state’s regulation authorizing a state company to take away a toddler from their father or mother or guardian as a result of they allowed their little one to obtain gender-affirming care.
  • Bar compliance with subpoenas looking for medical info associated to gender-affirming care that interferes with an individual’s proper to permit a toddler to obtain that care.

“Because it stands, transgender youth and their mother and father in these states are below a relentless menace of being reported by anybody round them, whereas foregoing life-saving therapy,” stated Assemblymember Lori Wilson, a Suisun Metropolis Democrat and father or mother of a trans individual, in presenting the invoice on the Meeting ground on Monday. “In doing so, they’re concentrating on our most susceptible inhabitants — kids — in addition to their mother and father and medical doctors who help them.”

Nobody spoke towards the invoice on the Meeting ground. 

Advertisement

Foes elevate issues

By leaning into the nationwide debate round transgender points, the invoice has generated intense opposition.

Opponents say that kids usually misunderstand their gender id and are prone to remorse their determination to get irreversible therapies resembling hormone alternative remedy and gender-affirming surgical procedure.

“A whole lot of children don’t fairly comprehend the implications of taking puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones and even a number of the surgical procedures; don’t comprehend the long-term nature and the damaging impact it might have on their on their our bodies once they have been minors,” stated Greg Burt, a spokesperson for the California Household Council.

Burt cited testimony from Chloe Cole earlier than the Meeting Public Security Committee on June 28.

“SB 107 is circumventing states’ legal guidelines and which have wanted safeguards in place so my story’s not repeated. Youngsters can not consent,” stated Cole, a 17-year-old from the Central Valley, who medically transitioned from age 13 to fifteen with puberty blockers, male hormones and a mastectomy.

Advertisement

Given this, Burt stated the spiritual nonprofit “could be towards any type of medicine or surgical procedures to attempt to match an individual’s physique to their emotions beneath the age of 18,” no matter parental consent.

“We don’t let mother and father sterilize their children, even when mother and father consent to it, and we predict that is in the identical class,” Burt stated. “You possibly can’t hurt your little one completely, even should you consider the hurt is in some way justified.”

Opponents additionally spotlight a clause within the invoice that they are saying may take custody rights away from an out-of-state father or mother who disagrees with the opposite on their little one’s gender-affirming care.

Erin Friday, a San Francisco lawyer and father or mother of a kid who as soon as needed to transition, stated that the clause “pits mother and father towards mother and father” by permitting an out-of-state father or mother to refile for full medical custody of their little one in California and eclipse the consent of the non-affirming father or mother.

“It makes it simpler for the one father or mother who desires to hurt their little one to hurt their little one, and it’s an enticement for youths to run away. There’s no two methods about it,” she stated.

Advertisement

Wiener’s workplace disputes that that is the invoice’s intent.

“The purpose of the invoice is to not take away children from their mother and father’ custody — not when mother and father come right here with their children to stop states like Texas from eradicating them from their custody,” he stated.

Serving to households, one after the other

Because the political debate rages on, Moehlig and her employees of 10 proceed their work, serving to households throughout America determine the perfect physician and methods to get insurance coverage protection, and offering help teams for individuals from elementary faculty to age 30. She says her group has assisted 3,000 households in its lifetime.

That work convinces her of the significance of the invoice. She stated it’s “ludicrous” for politicians to say that they know higher than the mother and father of transgender kids and their medical doctors about what medical care and therapy is greatest.

Advertisement

As of now, each regulation that criminalizes gender-affirming care in different states has been delayed by authorized challenges. Moehlig, nonetheless, stated it’s solely a matter of time earlier than certainly one of these payments turns into regulation.

And she or he’s already seeing the affect: She stated she has a number of shoppers who’ve moved to California due to the legal guidelines in different states. One in all her shoppers in Texas stated his physician canceled his female-to-male prime surgical procedure as a result of they have been not comfy treating transgender youth.

“I feel that defending the rights of those mother and father to make these medical selections and get this therapy for these children with out having to fret about any of the ramifications of prosecutions is tremendous necessary,” Moehlig stated.

What questions do you could have about Southern California?

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

California

California proposes its own EV buyer credit — which could cut out Elon Musk's Tesla

Published

on

California proposes its own EV buyer credit — which could cut out Elon Musk's Tesla


  • Gov. Gavin Newsom plans to revive California’s EV rebate if Trump ends the federal tax credit.
  • But Tesla, the largest maker of EVs, would be excluded under the proposal.
  • Elon Musk criticized Tesla’s potential exclusion from the rebate.

California Gov. Gavin Newsom is preparing to step in if President-elect Donald Trump fulfills his promise to axe the federal electric-vehicle tax credit — but one notable EV maker could be left out.

Newsom said Monday if the $7,500 federal tax credit is eliminated he would restart the state’s zero-emission vehicle rebate program, which was phased out in 2023.

“We will intervene if the Trump Administration eliminates the federal tax credit, doubling down on our commitment to clean air and green jobs in California,” Newsom said in a statement. “We’re not turning back on a clean transportation future — we’re going to make it more affordable for people to drive vehicles that don’t pollute.”

Advertisement

The rebates for EV buyers would come from the state’s Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund, which is funded by polluters of greenhouse gases under a cap-and-trade program, according to the governor’s office.

But Tesla’s vehicles could be excluded under the proposal’s market-share limitations, Bloomberg News first reported.

The governor’s office confirmed to Business Insider that the rebate program could include a market-share cap which could in turn exclude Tesla or other EV makers. The office did not share details about what market-share limit could be proposed and also noted the proposal would be subject to negotiations in the state legislature.

A market-share cap would exclude companies whose sales account for a certain amount of total electric vehicle sales. For instance, Tesla accounted for nearly 55% off all new electric vehicles registered in California in the first three quarters of 2024, according to a report from the California New Car Dealers Association. By comparison, the companies with the next highest EV market share in California were Hyundai and BMW with 5.6% and 5% respectively.

Advertisement

Tesla sales in California, the US’s largest EV market, have recently declined even as overall EV sales in the state have grown. Though the company still accounted for a majority of EV sales in California this year as of September, its market share fell year-over-year from 64% to 55%.

The governor’s office said the market-share cap would be aimed at promoting competition and innovation in the industry.

Elon Musk, who has expressed support for ending the federal tax credit, said in an X post it was “insane” for the California proposal exclude Tesla.

The federal electric vehicle tax credit, which was passed as part of the Biden administration’s Inflation Reduction Act in 2022, provides a $7,500 tax credit to some EV buyers.

Advertisement

Musk, who is working closely with the incoming Trump administration, has expressed support for ending the tax credit. He’s set to co-lead an advisory commission, the Department of Government Efficiency, which is aimed at slashing federal spending.

The Tesla CEO said on an earnings call in July that ending the federal tax credit might actually benefit the company.

“I think it would be devastating for our competitors and for Tesla slightly,” Musk said. “But long-term probably actually helps Tesla, would be my guess.”

Advertisement

BI’s Graham Rapier previously reported that ending the tax credit could help Tesla maintain its strong standing in the EV market by slowing its competitors growth.

Prior to the EV rebate proposal, Newsom has already positioned himself as a foil to the incoming Trump administration. Following Trump’s election win the governor called on California lawmakers to convene for a special session to discuss protecting the state from Trump’s second term.

“The freedoms we hold dear in California are under attack — and we won’t sit idle,” Newsom said in a statement at the time.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

California

California Gov. Gavin Newsom says state will provide rebates if Trump removes tax credit for electric vehicles

Published

on

California Gov. Gavin Newsom says state will provide rebates if Trump removes tax credit for electric vehicles


California Gov. Gavin Newsom said the state will provide rebates to residents if President-elect Donald Trump’s incoming administration does away with a federal tax credit for electric vehicles.

In a news release issued Monday, Newsom said he would restart the state’s Clean Vehicle Rebate Program, which provided financial incentives on more than 590,000 vehicles before it was phased out late 2023.

“We will intervene if the Trump Administration eliminates the federal tax credit, doubling down on our commitment to clean air and green jobs in California,” Newsom said. “We’re not turning back on a clean transportation future — we’re going to make it more affordable for people to drive vehicles that don’t pollute.”

The federal rebates on new and used electric vehicles were implemented in the Inflation Reduction Act that President Joe Biden signed into law in 2022. When Trump’s second term in office begins next year, he could work with Congress to change the rules around those rebates. Those potential changes could limit the federal rebates, including by reducing the amount of money available or limiting who is eligible.

Advertisement

Limiting federal subsidies on electric vehicle purchases would hurt many American automakers, including Ford, General Motors and the EV startup Rivian. Tesla, which also builds its automobiles in the United States, would take a smaller hit since that company currently sells more EVs and has a higher profit margin than any other EV manufacturer.

Newsom also announced earlier this month that he will convene a special session “to protect California values,” including fundamental civil rights and reproductive rights, that he said “are under attack by this incoming administration.”

“Whether it be our fundamental civil rights, reproductive freedom, or climate action — we refuse to turn back the clock and allow our values and laws to be attacked,” Newsom said on X on Nov. 7.

A spokesperson for Trump did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

This isn’t the first time California will be taking action against the Trump’s administration concerning clean transportation legislation.

Advertisement

In 2019, California and 22 other states sued his administration for revoking its ability to set standards for greenhouse gas emission and fuel economy standards for vehicles, The Associated Press reported.

California sued the Trump administration over 100 times during his first term, primarily on matters including gun control, health care, education and immigration, the Los Angeles Times reported.



Source link

Continue Reading

California

45 Years Later, California Murder Mystery Solved Through DNA Evidence

Published

on

45 Years Later, California Murder Mystery Solved Through DNA Evidence


A 45-year-old cold case of a 17-year-old girl brutally raped and murdered has been resolved, bringing closure to the family. On February 9, 1979, Esther Gonzalez walked from her parents’ home to her sister’s in Banning, California, roughly 137 km east of Los Angeles. She never arrived. The next day, her body was discovered in a snowpack near a highway in Riverside County, California. Authorities determined she had been raped and bludgeoned to death, leading to an investigation that spanned decades.

The lab was able to match the DNA to a man named Lewis Randolph “Randy” Williamson, who died in 2014. Williamson, a US Marine Corps veteran, called authorities on the fateful day to report finding Ms Gonzalez’s body. At the time, he claimed he could not identify whether the body was male or female. Described as “argumentative” by deputies, Williamson was asked to take a polygraph test, which he passed, clearing him of suspicion in the pre-DNA era. He had faced assault allegations in the past but was never convicted of any violent crimes, according to the Los Angeles Times.

Advertisement

Despite limited leads, the Riverside County cold case homicide team didn’t give up. A semen sample recovered from Ms Gonzalez’s body in 1979 was preserved but remained unmatched in the national Combined DNA Index System (CODIS) for decades.

In 2023, forensic technology finally caught up. The homicide team collaborated with a genetic lab in Texas that specialises in forensic genealogy. A sample of Williamson’s blood from his 2014 autopsy provided the DNA match needed to confirm him as the 17-year-old’s rapist and killer.

The Gonzalez family had mixed emotions—relief at finally having answers and sadness knowing Williamson would not face justice, as he died in Florida ten years ago. Ms Gonzalez, remembered by her family as a shy yet funny and mild-mannered young woman, was the fourth of seven children. Her oldest brother, Eddie Gonzalez, wrote on Facebook, “The Gonzalez family would like to thank the Riverside County Sheriff’s Department on a job well done. After 40 years, the Gonzalez family has closure.”

Advertisement

“We are very happy that we finally have closure,” Ms Gonzalez’s sister, Elizabeth, 64, shared with CNN. “We are happy about it but, since the guy has died, a little sad that he won’t spend any time for her murder.”




Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending