Connect with us

California

US bombs Iran: California leaders react

Published

on

US bombs Iran: California leaders react


The United States bombed three Iranian nuclear sites on Saturday, President Donald Trump announced, with several California leaders criticizing the President over whether he had the authority to call for t

US bombs Iran nuclear sites as Trump joins Israel’s push to cripple program

Advertisement

US bombs Iran

What we know:

The President called the attacks a “spectacular” success that “completely and fully obliterated” Iran’s nuclear enrichment facilities.

Advertisement

Israel-Iran conflict

The backstory:

Israel launched attacks on Iran on June 13, saying that they had bombed the country to try and limit their nuclear capabilities. Iran retaliated, and the two countries have been trading missile attacks for days. 

Advertisement

Trump had debated whether the U.S. would join Israel in their air assault of Iran. Earlier this week, Trump said that he would make a decision within the next two weeks. On Saturday, he apparently made his decision.

California leaders react to Iran bombings

What they’re saying:

Advertisement

California Gov. Gavin Newsom on Saturday said that the state’s Threat Assessment Center “is actively monitoring for any potential impacts in California,” and that there were no credible threats. Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass announced on X that in response to the attacks, the Los Angeles Police Department is “stepping up patrols near places of worship, community gathering spaces and other sensitive sites.”

In the wake of the attacks, many other California leaders are speaking out against the President, saying that the bombings were unconstitutional, as Congress has the sole authority to declare war. Others praised the President’s decision.

Here’s what they’re saying:

Advertisement

Rep. Nanette Barragán (D – Los Angeles): “Trump did not have the authority to bomb Iran’s nuclear sites without Congressional approval. He should have pursued diplomacy, not escalation. Now we face serious risk of retaliation.”

Rep. Ken Calvert (R – Corona): “Like President Trump, I have consistently said Iran cannot be allowed to obtain a nuclear weapon. I support his decision to use the force and precision of the U.S. military in coordination with our ally Israel to uphold this redline with tonight’s targeted strike.”

Advertisement

Rep. Judy Chu (D – Monterey Park): “President Trump just illegally bombed Iran with no authorization from Congress. This is unacceptable and unconstitutional, and risks dragging the U.S. into another endless war.”

Rep. Gil Cisneros (D – Covina): “We need a diplomatic solution, not an escalation of tensions. Our nation does not want another endless war.”

Rep. Vince Fong (R – Bakersfield): “President Trump’s decisive action to eliminate the nuclear capabilities posed by the Iranian regime was a necessary one to prevent a real and catastrophic threat. Iran can NEVER be allowed to have a nuclear weapon. We’re grateful for the bravery of the U.S. Air Force and all our military personnel. May God protect them and all Americans in harm’s way as we continue the necessary work to preserve peace and stability.”

Advertisement

Rep. Jimmy Gomez (D – Los Angeles): “Trump’s unilateral decision to strike these facilities may lead the U.S. into a war with Iran — without Congressional authorization. Under our Constitution, the power to declare war rests with Congress. Period. He chose to launch this strike on his own, knowing full well it could provoke retaliation and put American lives at risk. Now, the American people and Congress are left to deal with the fallout of a reckless decision we had no role in. President Trump has broken his promises of peace, undermined our allies, and once again shown that he lacks the credibility and steady leadership this moment demands. The Islamic Republic of Iran is an oppressive and dangerous regime that supports terrorism, targets Americans, and silences its own people. It should never be allowed to obtain a nuclear weapon — plain and simple. That would be a direct threat to peace and security around the world. However, we must not forget the Iranian people are not our adversaries. They deserve compassion, dignity, and the same human rights we fight for everywhere.”

SUGGESTED: Read full remarks of what Trump said about bombing Iran

Advertisement

Rep. Sydney Kamlager-Dove (D – Los Angeles): “These strikes were unconstitutional and all involved should be subpoenaed and appear before Congress and the courts.”

Rep. Young Kim (R – Anaheim): “The military’s targeted actions tonight against Iranian nuclear sites are necessary to deter Tehran’s nuclear ambitions and save lives. I thank our military for their service in this critical operation to restore peace through strength and am glad they are safely on the way home.”

Rep. Mike Levin (D – San Juan Capistrano): “We cannot allow any president to entangle the United States in another deadly and open-ended war without constitutional authority. Iran must never obtain a nuclear weapon. Our national security and the safety of our allies demand strength, resolve, and clear strategy. But strength in a democracy begins with the Constitution. Had the president come to Congress, a majority may very well have authorized a strike. But that is not what has happened.”

Advertisement

Rep. Luz Rivas (D – Los Angeles): “Tonight, I’m thinking of the safety of our troops, our nation, and the world. Donald Trump’s erratic action is unauthorized and unconstitutional. It is my hope that this does not increase escalations and engage our country into a prolonged military conflict and war in the Middle East. Congress needs answers in a classified briefing as to why this action was taken, the potential threats as a result of this action, and the adverse effects to follow. Let us be clear – this is once again Trump putting his ego before our troops, Americans, and peace.”

Rep. Norma Torres (D – Pomona): “Donald Trump illegally attacked a foreign country, putting American lives at risk — our troops, our families, our communities. He bypassed Congress & the Constitution. Now, the American people will be forced to pay the price for his recklessness. This is not leadership.”

Advertisement

The Source: Information in this story is from President Donald Trump’s address to the nation on June 21, 2025, X posts from California Gov. Gavin Newsom and Karen Bass; statements from Rep. Jimmy Gomez, Rep. Mike Levin and Rep. Vince Fong emailed to FOX 11; X posts made by Rep. Nanette Barragán, Rep. Ken Calvert, Rep. Judy Chu, Rep. Gil Cisneros, Rep. Vince Fong, Rep. Jimmy Gomez, Rep. Sydney Kamlager-Dove, Rep. Young Kim, Rep. Mike Levin, Rep. Luz Rivas and Rep. Norma Torres; and previous FOX 11 reports.

PoliticsCaliforniaMilitaryWorld



Source link

Advertisement

California

California lawmaker introduces bill to protect wildlife from euthanasia, create coexistence program

Published

on

California lawmaker introduces bill to protect wildlife from euthanasia, create coexistence program


A Southern California state senator has proposed a new law that would prevent euthanasia in the state’s wildlife just a month after a mother bear was put down for swiping at a woman in Monrovia, feet away from where her two cubs were located. 

The legislation, SB 1135, which was introduced by Sen. Catherine Blakespear (D-Encinitas), calls for the establishment of a state program that promotes the coexistence with wildlife and codifies a wolf-livestock coexistence and compensation program. The move comes two years after funding for a similar wildlife coexistence program expired. 

“We can and must responsibly support people and wild animals to exist in a California where we are all under growing pressures and cumulative threats like extreme heat, frequent drought and intense wildfires that animals respond to by moving in search of resources to survive,” Sen. Blakespear said in a statement. “That means investing in science-based, situation-specific, proactive strategies to minimize negative interactions and prevent escalation to conflicts that pose risks for people and animals. SB 1135 proposes a program to better protect people, wildlife and communities.”

Blondie, the mother bear that was euthanized in March after it swiped at a woman in Monrovia.

Advertisement

Neighbor Photo


The proposed coexistence program, which would be allocated nearly $50 million through the state’s 2026-27 budget, would build on the previous version, which deployed trained regional human-wildlife conflict staff around the state. The absence was noted by CDFW leaders during a state Assembly meeting in January, according to Blakespear. 

“Over the last five years, wildlife incident reports logged by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) increased by 31 percent and calls, emails and field contacts rose by 58 percent,” Blakespear’s proposal says. 

She noted the recent headline across the state, including “Blondie,” the Monrovia mother bear who was captured and put down by wildlife officials in March after it swiped at a woman near the home it was living under with its two cubs

Advertisement

The home in question belongs to Richard Franco. He, along with many other Monrovia residents, has documented his encounters with bears over the years, even setting up a system of trail cameras to track the bears’ movements. 

“Getting to know her, you could see what a devoted mother she was,” Franco said. “She was always building a nest.”

Read more: Orphaned bear cubs taken to San Diego for care after mom is euthanized for attacking people

screenshot-2026-03-15-214018.png

One of the two bear cubs captured by California Department of Fish and Wildlife officials in Monrovia on Sunday, March 15, 2026.

CBS LA

Advertisement


Franco and many of his neighbors were angered upon learning that CDFW officials had euthanized Blondie after her capture, which they credited to the fact that she had swiped at the woman days earlier and another person in 2025.

“Forcing them out, and then euthanizing the mom was just traumatic for us,” said one Monrovia couple. “It was just tragic, and there was no need for it; it was completely unnecessary.”

Situations like this are what caught Blakespear’s attention, leading to her proposal last week. 

“It is really my desire to make sure that wild places stay wild, and not be having to resort to lethal measures like killing bears or killing wolves,” Blakespear said, while speaking with CBS LA. “We need to have a program that is up and going so we can be educating people.”

The program calls for focus on public education, maintaining a statewide incident reporting system and deploying devices like barriers, noise and light machines and other technology that would deter predators from places where they shouldn’t be. 

Advertisement

SB 1135 passed on a 5-1 vote and will now be considered by the Senate Appropriations Committee. 



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

California

480 ducks find homes after an emergency rescue operation in Riverside County

Published

on

480 ducks find homes after an emergency rescue operation in Riverside County


Only a week after animal services officials in Riverside County discovered 480 ducks living in crowded, outdoor cages, all of the ducks have been adopted, the result of a what authorities are describing as a massive “teamwork and coordination” effort.

The Riverside County Department of Animal Services found the ducks Tuesday after investigating overcrowding conditions at a property in unincorporated Riverside County, according to the agency. The birds were taken to the San Jacinto Valley Animal Campus, where officials urgently called on the public and rescue organizations to help place them beginning Wednesday.

According to a social media update from the San Jacinto Valley Animal Campus, all 480 ducks have been rescued or adopted, marking one of the largest single intake-and-placement efforts for the department in over a decade.

“This large-scale operation required extensive teamwork and coordination across our department,” Riverside County officials said in the social media update.

Advertisement

Animal service officials were not available to explain who had adopted the animals and whether they were adopted as pets or food. But Daniel Markichevich told KABC that he and his fiancée Savannah Burgardt visited the San Jacinto shelter on Wednesday and planned on adopting 20 ducks for their San Jacinto property.

“We have a 3.5-acre farm, so they will just go right into the area and enjoy, and we’ll get out there and look at them, eat their eggs and have a whole full life for them,” said Markichevich, who recently completed construction on a pond in their backyard.

An animal sanctuary in Vacaville, dubbed the Funky Chicken Rescue, took in eight of the ducks, according to a social media post.

Officials said the original owner of the ducks had intended to create a sanctuary for the animals but animal control officers ultimately determined that conditions required intervention, citing improper husbandry and concerns about the number of birds being housed.

Before taking in the ducks, the animal services agency coordinated with the California Department of Food and Agriculture to test a sample of the ducks for zoonotic diseases, according to the county. All results came back negative but early assessments indicated the birds had not received adequate care, according to authorities.

Advertisement

“Overcrowding can contribute to stress and decreased immune function,” Itzel Vizcarra, chief veterinarian for the county animal services agency, said in a statement. “Inadequate nutrition, particularly vitamin A deficiency, can impair the lining of the digestive tract, predisposing birds to inflammation and secondary illness.”

The swift placement effort was supported in part by community donations, including more than 70 bags of waterfowl feed provided by a local business, according to the San Jacinto Valley Animal Campus.

While the ducks now have new homes, officials said the investigation into overcrowding conditions at the original property is ongoing.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

California

California couple charged with murder in death of toddler skip court

Published

on

California couple charged with murder in death of toddler skip court


A Bay Area couple charged in the murder of a 2-year-old girl who reportedly overdosed on fentanyl earlier this year failed to appear in court last week to face the charges.

The tragic incident occurred just after 5 a.m. on Feb. 12, according to the San Francisco County District Attorney’s Office.

Officers with the San Francisco Police Department responded to an apartment in the 3800 block of 18th Street, near Mission Dolores Park, after receiving a 911 call reporting that a child was not breathing.

“Medics arrived at the location and pronounced the two-year-old child deceased,” the DA’s office said in a news release. “Medics observed signs of rigor mortis and lividity, indicating the child had been dead for several hours.”

Advertisement
A woman and her boyfriend in San Francisco have been charged with second-degree murder in the fatal overdose death of a 2-year-old girl on Feb. 12, 2026. (Google Maps)

Responding officers noted that Michelle Price, 38, the girl’s mother, was slurring her speech and had “an emotionless demeanor,” according to court documents. Investigators also observed drug paraphernalia in the apartment, including three pipes, lighters and torches, a used Narcan container, white powder ultimately identified as fentanyl, bottles of spoiled milk and stained sheets on the bed.

Price was arrested for child endangerment.

Her boyfriend, Steve Ramirez, 43, allegedly attempted to flee the apartment on a bicycle, leading police on a chase during which an officer was injured. At the time of his arrest, Ramirez was reportedly in possession of a pipe inside a bag on his bike. Two additional pipes with burnt residue were also found nearby, investigators said.

Blood samples taken from Price and Ramirez at the time of their arrests showed high levels of methamphetamine and fentanyl in their systems, according to the DA’s office.

An autopsy performed by the San Francisco Medical Examiner’s Office revealed no obvious signs of physical injury to the toddler. However, toxicology testing showed lethal levels of fentanyl, as well as naloxone, commonly known as Narcan, in the child’s bloodstream.

Advertisement

“The cause of death was determined to be acute fentanyl poisoning,” the release stated.

Price was initially charged with felony child endangerment, possession of fentanyl and possession of drug paraphernalia. Ramirez faced the same charges, along with an additional count of resisting, obstructing and delaying a peace officer.

Over the objections of prosecutors, both Price and Ramirez were allowed to remain out of custody ahead of their arraignments.

The overdose-reversal drug Narcan was reportedly found to have been used on a 2-year-old girl in San Francisco who died from a fentanyl overdose prior to police arriving at the apartment.(AP Photo/Matt Rourke, File)

On April 15, San Francisco District Attorney Brooke Jenkins announced an amended complaint charging the couple with second-degree murder, marking the first time such charges have been brought in a fatal fentanyl overdose case in the county.

“There wasn’t really anywhere safe for this child to be inside of this home,” Jenkins said during a press conference announcing the charges. “This is a moment in time where people have to realize that we take these situations very seriously and where, I believe, parents who knowingly possess fentanyl, who understand its lethality and the danger it poses, allow their children to be exposed to it, this is something that can come with respect to accountability if a child dies.”

At the April 16 arraignment, where both defendants failed to appear, Price’s attorney told the court she may have experienced transportation issues. An attorney representing Ramirez said he did not know his client’s whereabouts, according to KTLA’s Bay Area sister station KRON.

Advertisement

While both attorneys said the couple was mourning the loss of the child and struggling with addiction, Ramirez’s lawyer accused the district attorney’s office of turning the case into a media circus, claiming the publicity caused his client to panic.

The judge subsequently issued bench warrants for both Price and Ramirez. It remains unclear whether either has since been taken into custody.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending