Connect with us

California

Turkey vultures in California are testing positive for rat poison  – High Country News

Published

on

Turkey vultures in California are testing positive for rat poison  – High Country News


In humankind’s ongoing war against rats, rodents are far from the only casualties.

Over the last few years, a common class of chemicals known as anticoagulant rodenticides has come under fire for its heavy toll on wildlife. Despite statewide restrictions on these pesticides in California, a recent study found that as many as 13% of turkey vultures in the Los Angeles area tested positive for the chemicals. Given the birds’ unique ecological perch as nature’s carnivorous cleanup crew, the results reveal just how thoroughly anticoagulant rodenticides pervade the ecosystem. They are a reminder of how human actions can have vast environmental consequences, often compounded by climate change — and, in this case, for fundamentally limited returns.

Anticoagulant rodenticides work by causing their victims to bleed to death, often internally. Afflicted animals show signs of anemia and often bleed from their nostrils, mouth and anus before they die. Animal cruelty aside, these substances are problematic because they can persist in carcasses and the environment for up to a year. This means that a poisoned rat can in turn poison its predator, and that predator’s predator as well, long after the first fatal nibble. The upshot is vast collateral damage: raptors, foxes, coyotes, bobcats and mountain lions — all of which help keep rodent populations in check — have been sickened or killed by these toxins. Occasionally, pets fall victim, too.

A healthy fledgling turkey vulture. Credit: Courtesy of Todd Backman
The same fledgling turkey vulture after it was found sickened by rat poison and collapsed in the patio of a El Cerrito, California, home. Credit: Courtesy of Patricia Jones

“I consider them to be like our modern-day DDT, due to the fact that they have infiltrated the entire food web,” said Lisa Owens Viani, the director of Raptors are the Solution, a nonprofit that champions wild predators rather than rodenticides as a pest-control solution.

Thanks to the advocacy efforts of groups like Owens Viani’s, in 2020, California signed into law a ban on the most harmful anticoagulant rodenticides by the general public and pest control companies. In 2023 and again in 2024, the state passed additional legislation that added older versions of these rodenticides to that ban.

Advertisement

“I consider them to be like our modern-day DDT, due to the fact that they have infiltrated the entire food web.”

Immediately after the first ban was passed, raptor deaths by poison dropped nearly 15%, according to data from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife, though the numbers have fluctuated in subsequent years. But the new study, in which tested turkey vultures for the chemicals after the initial bill was enacted, showed that anticoagulant rodenticides still pervade the environment.

According to study author Miguel D. Saggese, an avian and wildlife researcher at Western University of Health Sciences in Pomona, California, the results “provide further evidence that there is still a problem out there for non-target species.”

SCAVENGERS LIKE TURKEY VULTURES, with their diverse carrion diet, are good sentinels of rodenticides’ footprint across an entire ecosystem. Still, the results might be an underestimate. The new study examined blood samples from live-captured vultures, so the results provide only a snapshot of the birds’ most recent encounters with the chemicals. Liver necropsies, which are more telling of chronic exposure, tend to register higher contamination rates — one 2022 study found that 93% of turkey vultures in Northern California and southern Oregon had anticoagulant rodenticides in their bodies — though necropsy results can skew toward animals that have already perished from the poisons.

Turkey vultures are not a threatened species, but their exposure sounds an alarm for their more vulnerable neighbors. Spotted owls, bald eagles and the iconic California condor are already at risk of extinction, and anticoagulant rodenticides are likely a contributing factor. In the past, monitoring efforts have detected the toxins among these birds of prey. The prevalence among turkey vultures indicates that the chemicals need to be eliminated from the environment to ensure the health of wildlife in the West, whether or not the animals are endangered.

A bleeding great horned owl from the Morro Coast at Audubon’s Sweet Springs Preserve the day before its death from pesticides. Credit: Courtesy of David Lamkin
A poisoned red-tail hawk that was bleeding right until its death. Credit: Courtesy of WildCare

California is the only state with legislation restricting anticoagulant rodenticides. But even the Golden State’s bills have gaping concessions: The agriculture industry and food producers are exempt from the bans, as are public health agencies. And some people still set out illegal rat bait boxes anyway, regardless of what the law says.

Still, there’s another compelling reason to renounce anticoagulant rodenticides: They’re not all that effective at reining in rats. Experts say that a more durable solution is to not give rodents a reason to come by in the first place — by sealing off food sources and fortifying trash bins. Not only do the relatively slow-acting poisons falter against the prolific reproduction of rodents, they also kill off the rats’ natural predators, which are humanity’s most valuable allies against rodent infestations. Ultimately, the chemicals we employ to control rat populations end up helping rat populations slide out of control. “None of it makes any sense,” Owens Viani said. “I just feel like it’s kind of a scam that’s been perpetrated to the public.”

Advertisement

“I just feel like it’s kind of a scam that’s been perpetrated to the public.”

And climate change is making things worse for pesticides-strained raptors. “Climate change is the very MOTHERSHIP of ecological stressors,” wrote Allen Fish, a raptor biologist and former director of the Golden Gate Raptor Observatory, in an email. Already-weakened species may lack the wherewithal to deal with dwindling food sources and shrinking habitats. Meanwhile, warming temperatures allow rats to remain active during mild winters, eating and mating instead of laying low underground, and society’s typical response — doling out even more rodenticides — only increases secondary poisoning events.

Anticoagulant rodenticides may well prove the last straw for some species’ survival. “It’s an ongoing environmental catastrophe that’s happening right before our eyes,” Owens Viani said.

Spread the word. News organizations can pick-up quality news, essays and feature stories for free.

Creative Commons License

Republish our articles for free, online or in print, under a Creative Commons license.

Advertisement



Source link

California

California may take weeks to finalize primary results. ‘This is normal’

Published

on

California may take weeks to finalize primary results. ‘This is normal’


play

Although results from California’s primary election began rolling in on Tuesday, June 2, it could take days or even weeks before the final counts are certified. 

“This is normal … We have a process that by law ensures both voting rights and the integrity of elections, so I would call on all Californians to be patient,” Secretary of State Shirley N. Weber said in a June 2 news release.

Advertisement

The Golden State’s lengthy vote-counting process has “become a national narrative about California elections,” according to Thad Kousser, a professor of political science at the University of California, San Diego.

“In California, it takes a long time to certify votes, to verify the signatures, to then count the ballots; all of that process takes a while,” Kousser said in an interview last week. “It may take a while for us to learn who the top candidates who emerge are.”

Here are some factors behind California’s lengthy vote-counting process. 

Mail-in ballots come with added verification step 

With each mail-in ballot cast, elections officials must compare the signature on a returned vote-by-mail envelope to the voter’s signature on their voter registration card. Various factors go into determining whether the signatures match, including the slant of the signature, whether it is printed or written in cursive, and the size, proportions, or scale. 

Vote-by-mail ballots were Californians’ preferred voting method in both the 2024 primary and general elections, with drop-off locations — such as ballot drop boxes and voting centers — the most popular way to return mail-in ballots. 

Advertisement

During California’s 2024 primary, more than 7.7 million votes were cast statewide, and 90 percent of those were mail-in ballots. This means election officials had to verify the signatures on more than 6.8 million ballots before they could be counted. For the November 2024 general election, 80% of cast ballots, or about 13 million, were vote-by-mail. 

Reviewing conditional voter and provisional ballots 

California also allows for same-day voter registration, also known as conditional voter registration. Voters who need to register, or re-register, within 14 days of an election can do so at their county elections office, polling place, or vote center. These ballots will be processed and counted after the county elections office has completed the voter registration process. 

In addition to conditional voter ballots, there are provisional ballots that must be verified before they are counted. Voters cast provisional ballots for a wide array of reasons, including if their name does not appear at a polling place or if they’ve made a mistake on their ballot. After a voter casts a provisional ballot, it will not be counted until election officials have confirmed that the voter is registered to vote in that county and has not already voted in that election. 

Vote-by-mail ballots can be sent on Election Day 

Though state officials recommend voters mail their ballots sooner rather than later, state law allows vote-by-mail ballots postmarked by Election Day to be counted if they arrive within a specified window afterward, thereby extending the tallying process. 

Advertisement

For the primary, ballots needed to be postmarked on or before June 2 and received by county elections office no later than June 10.  

California is, well, big 

California is the most populous state in the nation. And, as of May 18, a record total of 23,155,447 Californians were registered to vote. 

While not all registered voters are expected to have voted, county election officials estimate that more than 5 million ballots were cast statewide. 

When to expect final results 

Under state law, county elections officials are required to report the results for most ballots by June 15, or 13 days after the election, according to Weber. However, some ballots can take counties up to 30 days to count every ballot and then conduct a post-election audit. 

State law requires county elections officials to report final official results to state officials July 3. State officials then have until July 10 to certify the results of the election.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

California

California’s race for governor and other key primaries remain unsettled as vote count continues

Published

on

California’s race for governor and other key primaries remain unsettled as vote count continues


California’s crowded, protracted gubernatorial primary is going to take a little more time to settle.

The race remained too early to call Wednesday morning with 50% of the expected vote counted, according to NBC News’ Decision Desk. Three main candidates — former Fox News host Steve Hilton, a Republican, and two Democrats, former Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra and billionaire activist Tom Steyer — are competing for two spots in the general election, with the candidate in fourth place, Republican Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco, running well behind.

Hilton had 27% support in the all-party primary with about half of votes still left to count, while Becerra had 26% and Steyer had 20%. Bianco was the only other candidate in double digits, at 11%.

In California, all candidates run on the same primary ballot in the primary and the top two vote-getters, regardless of party, move on to the general election.

It’s difficult to say when it will be clear which two candidates advance to the November general election, however, due to the state’s protracted vote counting.

And with millions of ballots left to count, other key races in California remain uncalled as well, including the second runoff spot to face Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass one on one in November, several House races that could help determine the majority next year, and more.

Advertisement

In the governor’s race, all three candidates rallied supporters around the state as the evening drew on.

“We’re not there yet, but it’s looking good,” Hilton told allies. “It looks very much as if Californians really will have the chance to vote for change in November and take our state in a new direction, a fresh start for our state, which is long overdue.”

But while Hilton was narrowly in first place when he spoke, Democratic candidates were capturing the majority of the votes.

Becerra looked back at his own “underdog story,” from his immigrant relatives to his bid for governor, which took some time to catch fire.

“Almost immediately, he’s counted out, an afterthought, overlooked by many, outspent by a ton, even called along the way to drop out and save us the trouble,” Becerra recounted to his supporters. “Well, guess what? The underdog stayed in the fight. Like my parents, I never gave up.”

Steyer struck a hopeful note in his election night speech despite a deficit in the vote count.

Advertisement

“It might take some time to figure out where this is going, we’re going to wait till every ballot is counted, we’re going to give democracy a time to work, and we know we finished really strong,” Steyer said.

Major battleground districts

GOP Rep. David Valadao’s district has been one of Democrats’ top targets for years, but two Democrats are locked in a close race for the second spot in the November general election against the incumbent.

School board member Randy Villegas, who won support from national progressives, has a slight lead over state legislator Jasmeet Bains, 30% to 26%, with less than half of the expected vote tallied in the 22nd District. Valadao is comfortably in first place.

And in Northern California’s 6th District, Rep. Kevin Kiley — who was elected as a Republican and switched to become an independent this election cycle, as he runs in another newly redrawn district — is bunched up in a tight race that includes Democrat Richard Pan, a former state legislator, and Republican Michael Stansfield. Currently, Stansfield is running ahead of Pan; they spent much of Tuesday night and Wednesday morning trading the lead, which could have significant general election implications.

Meanwhile, outside California, Democrats think they might be able to challenge for one of Montana’s red-tinted congressional districts this fall, after Rep. Ryan Zinke decided to retire. But less than 2 percentage points separate Democrats Sam Forstag and Ryan Busse with more than 85% of the expected vote tallied in their primary in Montana’s 1st District.

Advertisement

Read more about Tuesday’s House primaries here.

A safe seat battle to watch

Plenty of other House districts in California — and a few elsewhere — still have unsettled primaries, but one attracted particular attention due to how nasty the campaign got.

In Southern California, where two Republican incumbents are facing off in one district due to redistricting, Rep. Ken Calvert has advanced to the general election, but Rep. Young Kim is still battling for the second spot. She leads Democrat Esther Kim-Varet in the race for second, 22% to 16%, with about half of the vote in.

Who will face Bass in Los Angeles?

While Bass is projected to advance to a November runoff in Los Angeles, it’s not yet clear whether she’ll face Republican Spencer Pratt or Democrat Nithya Raman.

Bass has about 37% of the vote to 29% for Pratt and 21% for Raman so far, with approximately half of the expected vote tallied.

Advertisement

Speaking to supporters on election night, Raman, a member of the Los Angeles City Council, said that “tonight may not give us a final answer on this race.”

“Many thousands of votes will be counted in the days ahead, and we may not get an answer we like, but regardless of what happens next, nobody, nobody can take away what all of us have built together,” she continued.

Pratt, meanwhile, was looking ahead to a potential matchup with Bass when he spoke to reporters.

“Now I have five months to get deep into every community that hasn’t heard my message to make them safe,” said Pratt, a former reality TV star. “So I’m actually very excited, because I felt very rushed. It’s a big city, and I was not able to talk to as many people as I look forward to talking to.”

Bass also projected optimism, telling her backers, “We got a lot more to go, but so far it’s looking good.”

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

California

Midterm primaries 2026 live: results and reaction after six states including California and Iowa cast ballots

Published

on

Midterm primaries 2026 live: results and reaction after six states including California and Iowa cast ballots


Lucy Campbell

Millions of voters across the country are heading to the polls today in crucial primaries in a slew of key gubernatorial, Senate and House races.

Advertisement

Here’s a quick rundown of what we’re watching:

California
Voters are casting ballots on who should lead the nation’s most populous state (and the world’s fourth largest economy), where there is no clear leader among candidates vying to advance in the race to succeed term-limited Democratic governor Gavin Newsom. The race for Los Angeles mayor is also on the ballot, along with a series of high-stakes US House contests in the state’s newly redrawn congressional districts – which are set to play an outsized and potentially decisive role in the battle for power in Washington in November’s midterm elections. My colleague Lauren Gambino has more:

Iowa
Per my colleague Chris Stein, with Trump’s approval ratings deep underwater, gas prices high and historical political trends favoring the party out of power, Democrats this year are considering a comeback in Iowa, putting the state at the center of their campaigns to win back control of both the US House and the Senate. That effort for a “once-in-a-generation” breakthrough in the GOP-dominated state is being led by pro-hunting Democrat Rob Sand, who is running for governor. Chris wrote about him below. Democrats also believe they have a shot at winning three of the state’s US House seats and a competitive chance at securing a US Senate seat, where the GOP frontrunner recently called Trump’s war on Iran a “political liability”.

New Jersey
One of this year’s most closely watched House midterms will take place in the battleground district currently represented by now-infamous Republican Tom Kean Jr, who has drawn public scrutiny and concern after missing more than 100 House votes due to an undisclosed illness. Voters are deciding which Democrat will run against him in November – and the seat is a must-win for the party. The frontrunner, veteran army trauma surgeon and political newcomer Adam Hamawy, has secured endorsements from the likes of Bernie Sanders, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Ilhan Omar. My colleague Joseph Gedeon has more:

New Mexico
Contests in the state include primaries for congressional seats, a US Senate seat and a long list of statewide offices, but the governor’s race is the main event. Deb Haaland, who was Joe Biden’s interior secretary, is running for the Democratic nomination, which could put her on a historic path for Native American leaders.

Advertisement

Montana
In Montana, a five-way Democratic fight is under way for the retiring Republican senator’s seat. Independent Seth Bodnar, former president of the University of Montana, is outraising them all at the moment but they’re refusing to step aside, Politico reports this morning.

South Dakota
The race is on for state governor, Sioux Falls mayor, a US Senate and House seat, a Republican primary for local lawmakers. The incumbent GOP governor Larry Rhoden faces three primary challengers in his first run for a full term. He stepped up into the role from the lieutenant governorship when the former governor, the since-ousted Kristi Noem, left to lead the Department of Homeland Security.

The Associated Press contributed reporting

Share

Key events

Advertisement

Joseph Gedeon

On the day Donald Trump endorsed him as a tireless advocate for New Jersey’s seventh district, the representative Tom Kean Jr was, as he has been since early March, nowhere to be found.

Kean, a New Jersey Republican, was last seen when he cast a House floor vote on 5 March, and he is running unopposed in Tuesday’s Republican primary. The Democratic race in his district, meanwhile, has attracted multiple candidates and ample fundraising.

In late April, his office said he was dealing with a “personal medical issue” and would be back “very soon”. He told the New Jersey Globe last month he expected to return within “the next couple of weeks”. In the meantime, Kean’s social media accounts have continued posting regularly, with staff attending ribbon-cuttings and graduation ceremonies on his behalf.

Advertisement
Share



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending