Connect with us

California

TUCKER CARLSON: California’s leaders know nothing about energy

Published

on

TUCKER CARLSON: California’s leaders know nothing about energy


NEWNow you can take heed to Fox Information articles!

On April 24 of final yr, and you might have missed this, the state of California lastly achieved what the Inexperienced Motion has dreamt about for many years. It occurred. The State Power Authority in California was in a position to generate 95% of its whole energy from solely renewable sources. They mentioned it could not be accomplished. We mentioned it could not be accomplished, however simply months into the Joe Biden administration, California did it. 

“It sends chills down my backbone,” introduced Elliot Mainzer, who runs California’s greatest energy grid. “It is superb. We’re making an actual dent within the state’s carbon emissions.” April twenty fourth, 2021, women and gents, keep in mind that date. It is a second that may reside alongside Thomas Edison’s invention of the incandescent mild bulb, alongside Neil Armstrong’s stroll on the floor of the moon. It’s a day we noticed a glimpse of humanity’s future.  

That is what the information accounts informed us, however truly, there have been some caveats to this achievement. For starters, April is just not the time to check the ability grid. It is probably the most temperate months of the yr when electrical energy use is at its lowest. Nor was the grid in query statewide. It did not, for instance, provide energy to Los Angeles, which is by far the largest metropolis in California, and now that we’re being sincere, it wasn’t solely renewable. Because the L.A. Occasions conceded in a far decrease paragraph, regardless of its press launch about renewables, the state of California was truly, “additionally burning a bunch of pure fuel.”  

Advertisement

Now, in keeping with scientists, pure fuel qualifies as a fossil gasoline, and it isn’t technically renewable after which there was this superb however completely downplayed reality: the inexperienced vitality miracle that despatched chills down the spines of California energy executives, the occasion they described as “superb” lasted for a complete of (are you able to guess?) 4 seconds. Not days or hours, seconds, 4 seconds. That is what California politicians have been bragging about: 4 seconds of not truly renewable vitality, however the celebration obscured an inconvenient reality.  

MONTANA FILES LEGAL CHALLENGE AGAINST BIDEN ADMIN OVER PLANS TO TAKE LAND OUT OF PRODUCTION 

California Gov. Gavin Newsom speaks throughout a invoice signing ceremony. (Photograph by Justin Sullivan/Getty Photos)
(Justin Sullivan/Getty Photos)

Only a few months earlier, in mid-August, California’s inexperienced vitality grid had collapsed utterly. Half 1,000,000 residents misplaced energy in the course of a warmth wave. Grid operators warned it was about to get quite a bit worse. From late afternoon till night, they predicted, on the occasions individuals returned to their properties and have been hoping to make use of electrical energy, as some People do, the state could be quick 1000’s of megawatts and that meant thousands and thousands of Californians could be with none energy by any means and that will be a disaster, an plain one. So, to combat it, the state applied a technique the growing world has come to know, nicely: rolling blackouts. 

“It is nearly 3 p.m.,” the mayor of Los Angeles tweeted on September 6, 2020. “Time to show off main home equipment, set the thermostat to 78 levels, or use a fan as a substitute. Flip off extra lights and unplug any home equipment you are not utilizing. We’d like each Californian to assist preserve vitality,” besides, after all, for the mayor of Los Angeles who will get to be on Twitter every time he desires, however actually, the message was clear: We quit. We’re not pretending to offer a primary world way of life to our residents, probably the most closely taxed in America. We’re Tegucigalpa now. Please play alongside and for probably the most half, affected person Californians did play alongside, however the issue didn’t enhance. Actually, it acquired worse.  

Advertisement

The California Power Fee has simply issued a report predicting widespread energy outages within the state of California for the subsequent 5 years not less than and naturally, September will at all times be the worst month. Because the vice chair of the fee put it, “Securing vitality reliability is an incredible accountability. The accountability is changing into more and more tough to meet with the instruments we’ve got in hand.” 

Oh, cease whining. Maintain the ability on, however no, we do not have sufficient instruments. What occurred to all of the instruments? Effectively, these instruments would come with the well-known nuclear plant at San Onofre, however that plant was shuttered a decade in the past after 40 years of protests by inexperienced activists, supposedly on behalf of one thing known as the surroundings, one thing with which they’re personally unfamiliar, nevertheless it did not matter. The state shut it down. What occurred subsequent? What was the impact of shutting down San Onofre? 

ALASKA SUES FEDS OVER POLLUTED LANDS GOVERNOR SAYS DC ‘KNOWINGLY’ TRANSFERRED TO NATIVES 

Effectively, scientists estimate that closing San Onofre led to the discharge of 37 million metric tons of carbon dioxide into the environment. Now, in case you imagine that carbon dioxide is a pollutant they usually all do, that will qualify as a really unhealthy factor. Nevertheless it did not cease California from plowing ahead anyway and doing extra of the identical: polluting within the title of saving the surroundings. Now the state has introduced a plan to shut the San Luis Obispo Diablo Canyon nuclear plant. That plant provides vitality to thousands and thousands of different Californians. So on account of these and plenty of different closures of precise energy crops, the state of California now imports a 3rd of its vitality from elsewhere and that will appear to be an embarrassing show from what’s supposedly our richest state.  

So, say what you’ll about California politicians, like them or not, it is indeniable that on the query of vitality, they do not know what they’re doing and we all know this as a result of their monitor document of incompetence is prolonged and unbroken. They’re majestic of their ineptitude. So naturally, they need extra energy over energy. There’s simply a lot extra to destroy. This week, the state’s surgically enhanced governor, Gavin Newsom, introduced a brand new option to overburden California’s already collapsing vitality grid. He is acquired an concept. He desires to ban gasoline-powered engines and drive everybody to drive an electrical automobile, a automobile that must be plugged into shops that within the state of California not work. We’re not kidding, by the way in which. Watch this.  

Advertisement

NEWSON: We would be the first jurisdiction on the earth to require all new vehicles to be bought to be different gasoline vehicles. We’re going by means of one of many nice transformations in our historical past, vitality transformations, and the electrification is the structure for financial transformation.  

CAMBRIDGE OFFICIALS FIND ELEVATED LEVELS OF ‘FOREVER CHEMICALS’ IN WATER SUPPLY, MOVE TO SWITCH WATER SOURCE 

So, here is a man who’s by no means had a job, who could not repair a damaged lawnmower lecturing, you about vitality and structure and transformation. The identical man who’s presided over a state that may not energy your washer is telling you he’ll management what sort of automotive you drive. Now, simply assume broad for 1 second. If that man can inform you what sort of automotive you are allowed to drive, what cannot he inform you? Why cannot he inform you what sort of job you may have, what sort of meals you may eat, who you may sleep with? So, after all, the intuition behind all of that is totalitarian, which is to say whole management over you and banning the fuel engine is, amongst many different issues, an assault in your autonomy.  

Electrical automobiles will be, above all, managed by the individuals who management the grid and meaning the subsequent time that California’s vitality regulator decides to close off the ability, you may’t go anyplace. You may’t go away California. Now, a couple of stuff you may discover about this. First, they’re doing this as a result of they’re so involved about carbon emissions and burning fossil fuels provides to carbon emissions and is destroying the planet. If you happen to truly have been anxious about that, what’s the very first thing that you’d ban? Effectively, non-public jet journey clearly, non-public jet journey emits numerous carbon. In simply 60 minutes, a non-public jet emits extra carbon dioxide, in reality, than the common American family emits in three months in a single flight.  

So, non-public jet journey is answerable for extra greenhouse gases than the nation of Denmark. (They) pollute at a charge about 15 occasions increased than business planes. So, you’d assume since most individuals who fly non-public are prosperous by definition, and the worldwide warming cult is the preferred with the prosperous, that these similar individuals would have given up non-public jet journey as a result of it is simply such an apparent offense towards the local weather, however no, simply the other. Personal jet journey has change into extra well-liked for the reason that pandemic. Enterprise jet journey is up greater than 22% since 2019. Greater than 70% of all non-public jet flights happen in america. What are they doing? Effectively, they’re faring politicians like Gavin Newsom, who doesn’t fly business, and naturally, celebrities like Taylor Swift, famously. Her jet emitted 8,300 tons of carbon this yr thus far. Oh, attention-grabbing.  

Advertisement

ALASKA GOV. DUNLEAVY SLAMS BIDEN FOR ‘LACK OF OPPORTUNITY’ IN OIL PRODUCTION: ‘CANCEL CULTURE’ ON ENERGY 

So in case you’re seeking to scale back carbon emissions, you’d assume they’d fear rather less about your minivan and a bit of extra about their G4. Oh, however they are not anxious in any respect about their G4 and that is why Taylor Swift, Gavin Newsom and Nancy Pelosi and all the opposite individuals on the market lecturing about local weather won’t ever quit their non-public planes as a result of whenever you fly non-public, you are not solely immune from COVID, like you do not have to put on a masks on a personal airplane. Are you kidding? You poor or one thing? Shut up, however you are additionally immune from the immutable legal guidelines of local weather change.  

So, California has little interest in stopping people who find themselves making the principles like Gavin Newsom, from touring anyplace they need. They wish to management the way in which that you simply journey. Now that is California. So, you might be tempted to say, “Effectively, okay, California’s lovely, nevertheless it’s clearly run by lunatics who’re turning it right into a third-world nation. So possibly that is simply a part of their slate of concepts to wreck the prettiest place on the planet,” however no, it isn’t simply California. It isn’t simply occurring there.  

It is also occurring in additional affordable locations like Virginia. Legislation in Virginia at the moment requires gasoline engines, gasoline vehicles, to be phased out by 2035, which is fairly quickly. States of Massachusetts and Washington have comparable legal guidelines. So does New York, so does Oregon. In all, 15 states have supported California’s plan to drive zero-emission automobiles, none of which are literally zero-emission, they’re simply electrical and will due to this fact be managed by the vitality grid and the regulators who oversee it, and it isn’t simply 15 states, it is the federal authorities. In accordance with the Biden administration, everyone shall be required to drive an electrical automotive by 2035.  

CALIFORNIA’S CRAZY CAR BAN FORCES DRIVERS TO GO GREEN AND COULD DRIVE RATIONAL PEOPLE OUT OF STATE 

Advertisement
Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm speaks during a press briefing at the White House, Nov. 23, 2021, in Washington. (AP)

Power Secretary Jennifer Granholm speaks throughout a press briefing on the White Home, Nov. 23, 2021, in Washington. (AP)
(AP Photograph/Evan Vucci, File)

SECRETARY GRANHOLM: We clearly are all in on ensuring that we meet the president’s targets of attending to 100% clear electrical energy by 2035 and web zero carbon emissions by 2050 and, you already know, in case you drive an electrical automotive, this may not be affecting you clearly.  

SENATOR ED MARKEY: There is not any cause why you must pay $4 or $5 a gallon for gasoline when you may have an all-electric automobile.  

SENATOR DEBBIE STABENOW: After ready for a very long time to have sufficient chips on this nation to lastly get my electrical automobile, I acquired it and drove it from Michigan to right here this final weekend and glided by each single fuel station did not matter how excessive it was.  

PETE BUTTIGIEG: The extra ache we’re all experiencing from the excessive value of fuel, the extra profit there may be for many who can entry electrical automobiles.  

SCIENTISTS REVEAL SIMPLE NEW PROCESS THAT MAY HELP ELIMINATE TOXIC CHEMICALS FROM EVERYDAY ITEMS 

Advertisement

One other cascade of unemployable morons, each certainly one of whom has an extended monitor document of failure. Not certainly one of whom has ever accomplished something in the true world, all of whom providing you with an ethical lecture about how your automotive is destroying the planet after they’re flying non-public. How lengthy is the nation going to place up with this? There is not any cause to pay $4 or $5 for fuel, even electrical automobiles, says Ed Markey, who’s lived at public expense his total life and has no concept what something prices. A typical electrical automobile prices greater than 60 grand, however that is solely a part of the associated fee. Charging an electrical automobile in international locations which have numerous electrical automobiles, numerous them is now costlier than filling your tank with gasoline.  

As Swedish journalist Peter Imanuelsen put it, “Electrical energy costs in Norway are set to succeed in about $1 per kilowatt hour. At these costs, it will price $100 to completely cost one Tesla.” And but, everywhere in the world, international locations, politicians who could or could not have offers with the electrical automotive firms are forcing individuals to purchase merchandise they do not need, and drive is the phrase. This isn’t a metamorphosis that’s happening voluntarily as it will in a democracy the place individuals get to manipulate themselves and select the way in which they reside. No, that is being imposed by a small variety of individuals on prime once more, the ever the revolution aimed downward as at all times.  

A financial institution in Australia has introduced it is going to be ending loans for fuel automobiles. You simply cannot purchase one. You may’t finance it. The EU Parliament has simply voted to help a ban on the sale of recent gasoline and diesel vehicles starting in 2035 in all of Europe. Now Europe, as we informed you final night time, is a spot the place they’re turning off visitors lights as a result of they do not have sufficient vitality to maintain them on. So, how is that this going to work? Effectively, the actual fact it is occurring in any respect is superb. Take three steps again. Banning gasoline engines, which we have had for greater than 100 years, which have utterly outlined trendy society and that in case you’re a traditional individual on this nation and do not use the subway from the Higher West Aspect to Midtown every single day, however truly drive just like the overwhelming majority of People, that is the largest change in your lifetime. Have you ever been consulted on it? Has there been a debate about it? No.  

DAY SEVEN: WHITE HOUSE REFUSES TO EXPLAIN WHO WILL PAY FOR BIDEN’S $500B STUDENT LOAN HANDOUT 

All you hear is you should do that as a result of it is good for the surroundings, however that is a lie. It is measurably a lie. Electrical automobiles are horrible for the surroundings. Roger McGrath took the time to spell it out not too long ago in Chronicles journal. As he famous, supplying the supplies needed for the battery of an electrical automotive alone, simply the battery, requires, and we’re quoting “processing utilizing fossil fuels, after all, of not less than 50 tons of ores.” It takes numerous vitality to course of ore. 

Advertisement

A single battery for an electrical automotive wants not less than, “30 kilos of lithium, 60 kilos of cobalt, 130 kilos of nickel, 90 kilos of copper, 190 kilos of graphite and roughly 500 kilos of metal, aluminum, magnesium, plastic and different supplies,” all of that are derived from mining. The place’s that mining going to happen? In thirdworld international locations with no environmental rules by any means. How is that this good for the surroundings? Converse slowly so we are able to perceive.

And but, in California, below Gavin Newsom’s new order, each automobile would require these supplies.  Here is the issue. We do not have that a lot lithium or cobalt in america. So, the place are these parts going to return from, that are required for electrical automobiles? Effectively, lithium mines in China. Do you know the reply to that already? Most likely did and the Congo. Let’s go exploit Africa so we are able to really feel virtuous. As The New York Occasions reported final yr and we’re quoting, “Manufacturing of uncooked supplies like lithium, cobalt and nickel which can be important to (digital automobile) applied sciences are sometimes ruinous to land, water, wildlife and other people,” and by the way in which, land, water, wildlife and individuals are precisely the 4 issues that the environmental foyer has no curiosity in any respect in. They do not care concerning the land. They do not care concerning the water. They do not care concerning the wildlife they usually do not care concerning the individuals. It isn’t about that in any respect. 

BORDER PATROL CHIEF SAYS BORDER CRISIS A RESULT OF BIDEN’S ‘NO CONSEQUENCES’ POLICY FOR ILLEGAL MIGRANTS 

It is a faith. It is about making them really feel like good individuals and growing their management over you. Interval. By the way in which, none of this even addresses the nationwide safety implications of this. Simply as with photo voltaic panels and wind generators, the supplies required for electrical automobile batteries come from and you already know the reply, China. China processes 40% of the world’s uncooked lithium. China’s market share for lithium ion batteries is about 80%. That is in keeping with Bloomberg and even when we someway keep away from that downside by mining lithium volcanoes in, say, Nevada and polluting the surroundings there, then what? Effectively, then you have got lots of of thousands and thousands of People dependent upon vehicles that the federal government can flip off in a second which can be, by the way in which, operating software program that tracks your each motion. 

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP 

Advertisement

Now, in a excessive belief society the place everybody thinks the federal government is on their aspect, a society that hasn’t simply employed 87,000 armed IRS brokers to crush small enterprise and anybody who’s vote for them in a society like that, like possibly Sweden, 30 years in the past, that will be completely effective as a result of we belief that they are on our aspect, however in a rustic wherein the president of america is giving a speech two days from now declaring half the inhabitants a prison component, in all probability not a good suggestion to show your automobile over to these individuals. 

That is the vehicular equal of digital forex. Digital automobiles are a catastrophe for the vitality grid, a catastrophe for the surroundings and a catastrophe on your private autonomy. If this occurs, it should signify the one greatest change in the way in which you and your loved ones reside in generations and but nobody’s even speaking about it.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

California

California proposes its own EV buyer credit — which could cut out Elon Musk's Tesla

Published

on

California proposes its own EV buyer credit — which could cut out Elon Musk's Tesla


  • Gov. Gavin Newsom plans to revive California’s EV rebate if Trump ends the federal tax credit.
  • But Tesla, the largest maker of EVs, would be excluded under the proposal.
  • Elon Musk criticized Tesla’s potential exclusion from the rebate.

California Gov. Gavin Newsom is preparing to step in if President-elect Donald Trump fulfills his promise to axe the federal electric-vehicle tax credit — but one notable EV maker could be left out.

Newsom said Monday if the $7,500 federal tax credit is eliminated he would restart the state’s zero-emission vehicle rebate program, which was phased out in 2023.

“We will intervene if the Trump Administration eliminates the federal tax credit, doubling down on our commitment to clean air and green jobs in California,” Newsom said in a statement. “We’re not turning back on a clean transportation future — we’re going to make it more affordable for people to drive vehicles that don’t pollute.”

Advertisement

The rebates for EV buyers would come from the state’s Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund, which is funded by polluters of greenhouse gases under a cap-and-trade program, according to the governor’s office.

But Tesla’s vehicles could be excluded under the proposal’s market-share limitations, Bloomberg News first reported.

The governor’s office confirmed to Business Insider that the rebate program could include a market-share cap which could in turn exclude Tesla or other EV makers. The office did not share details about what market-share limit could be proposed and also noted the proposal would be subject to negotiations in the state legislature.

A market-share cap would exclude companies whose sales account for a certain amount of total electric vehicle sales. For instance, Tesla accounted for nearly 55% off all new electric vehicles registered in California in the first three quarters of 2024, according to a report from the California New Car Dealers Association. By comparison, the companies with the next highest EV market share in California were Hyundai and BMW with 5.6% and 5% respectively.

Advertisement

Tesla sales in California, the US’s largest EV market, have recently declined even as overall EV sales in the state have grown. Though the company still accounted for a majority of EV sales in California this year as of September, its market share fell year-over-year from 64% to 55%.

The governor’s office said the market-share cap would be aimed at promoting competition and innovation in the industry.

Elon Musk, who has expressed support for ending the federal tax credit, said in an X post it was “insane” for the California proposal exclude Tesla.

The federal electric vehicle tax credit, which was passed as part of the Biden administration’s Inflation Reduction Act in 2022, provides a $7,500 tax credit to some EV buyers.

Advertisement

Musk, who is working closely with the incoming Trump administration, has expressed support for ending the tax credit. He’s set to co-lead an advisory commission, the Department of Government Efficiency, which is aimed at slashing federal spending.

The Tesla CEO said on an earnings call in July that ending the federal tax credit might actually benefit the company.

“I think it would be devastating for our competitors and for Tesla slightly,” Musk said. “But long-term probably actually helps Tesla, would be my guess.”

Advertisement

BI’s Graham Rapier previously reported that ending the tax credit could help Tesla maintain its strong standing in the EV market by slowing its competitors growth.

Prior to the EV rebate proposal, Newsom has already positioned himself as a foil to the incoming Trump administration. Following Trump’s election win the governor called on California lawmakers to convene for a special session to discuss protecting the state from Trump’s second term.

“The freedoms we hold dear in California are under attack — and we won’t sit idle,” Newsom said in a statement at the time.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

California

California Gov. Gavin Newsom says state will provide rebates if Trump removes tax credit for electric vehicles

Published

on

California Gov. Gavin Newsom says state will provide rebates if Trump removes tax credit for electric vehicles


California Gov. Gavin Newsom said the state will provide rebates to residents if President-elect Donald Trump’s incoming administration does away with a federal tax credit for electric vehicles.

In a news release issued Monday, Newsom said he would restart the state’s Clean Vehicle Rebate Program, which provided financial incentives on more than 590,000 vehicles before it was phased out late 2023.

“We will intervene if the Trump Administration eliminates the federal tax credit, doubling down on our commitment to clean air and green jobs in California,” Newsom said. “We’re not turning back on a clean transportation future — we’re going to make it more affordable for people to drive vehicles that don’t pollute.”

The federal rebates on new and used electric vehicles were implemented in the Inflation Reduction Act that President Joe Biden signed into law in 2022. When Trump’s second term in office begins next year, he could work with Congress to change the rules around those rebates. Those potential changes could limit the federal rebates, including by reducing the amount of money available or limiting who is eligible.

Advertisement

Limiting federal subsidies on electric vehicle purchases would hurt many American automakers, including Ford, General Motors and the EV startup Rivian. Tesla, which also builds its automobiles in the United States, would take a smaller hit since that company currently sells more EVs and has a higher profit margin than any other EV manufacturer.

Newsom also announced earlier this month that he will convene a special session “to protect California values,” including fundamental civil rights and reproductive rights, that he said “are under attack by this incoming administration.”

“Whether it be our fundamental civil rights, reproductive freedom, or climate action — we refuse to turn back the clock and allow our values and laws to be attacked,” Newsom said on X on Nov. 7.

A spokesperson for Trump did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

This isn’t the first time California will be taking action against the Trump’s administration concerning clean transportation legislation.

Advertisement

In 2019, California and 22 other states sued his administration for revoking its ability to set standards for greenhouse gas emission and fuel economy standards for vehicles, The Associated Press reported.

California sued the Trump administration over 100 times during his first term, primarily on matters including gun control, health care, education and immigration, the Los Angeles Times reported.



Source link

Continue Reading

California

45 Years Later, California Murder Mystery Solved Through DNA Evidence

Published

on

45 Years Later, California Murder Mystery Solved Through DNA Evidence


A 45-year-old cold case of a 17-year-old girl brutally raped and murdered has been resolved, bringing closure to the family. On February 9, 1979, Esther Gonzalez walked from her parents’ home to her sister’s in Banning, California, roughly 137 km east of Los Angeles. She never arrived. The next day, her body was discovered in a snowpack near a highway in Riverside County, California. Authorities determined she had been raped and bludgeoned to death, leading to an investigation that spanned decades.

The lab was able to match the DNA to a man named Lewis Randolph “Randy” Williamson, who died in 2014. Williamson, a US Marine Corps veteran, called authorities on the fateful day to report finding Ms Gonzalez’s body. At the time, he claimed he could not identify whether the body was male or female. Described as “argumentative” by deputies, Williamson was asked to take a polygraph test, which he passed, clearing him of suspicion in the pre-DNA era. He had faced assault allegations in the past but was never convicted of any violent crimes, according to the Los Angeles Times.

Advertisement

Despite limited leads, the Riverside County cold case homicide team didn’t give up. A semen sample recovered from Ms Gonzalez’s body in 1979 was preserved but remained unmatched in the national Combined DNA Index System (CODIS) for decades.

In 2023, forensic technology finally caught up. The homicide team collaborated with a genetic lab in Texas that specialises in forensic genealogy. A sample of Williamson’s blood from his 2014 autopsy provided the DNA match needed to confirm him as the 17-year-old’s rapist and killer.

The Gonzalez family had mixed emotions—relief at finally having answers and sadness knowing Williamson would not face justice, as he died in Florida ten years ago. Ms Gonzalez, remembered by her family as a shy yet funny and mild-mannered young woman, was the fourth of seven children. Her oldest brother, Eddie Gonzalez, wrote on Facebook, “The Gonzalez family would like to thank the Riverside County Sheriff’s Department on a job well done. After 40 years, the Gonzalez family has closure.”

Advertisement

“We are very happy that we finally have closure,” Ms Gonzalez’s sister, Elizabeth, 64, shared with CNN. “We are happy about it but, since the guy has died, a little sad that he won’t spend any time for her murder.”




Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending