Connect with us

California

SpaceX accuses California board of bias against Musk in decisions over rocket launches

Published

on

SpaceX accuses California board of bias against Musk in decisions over rocket launches



SpaceX accused the California Coastal Commission of political bias after the board cited Elon Musk in denying a request to increase launches at Vandenberg Space Force Base.

Elon Musk’s SpaceX is suing a California commission and accusing members of political bias after the commission rejected the company’s request to allow for more rocket launches from a California air base.

The lawsuit was filed Tuesday in U.S. District Court in the Central District of California against the California Coastal Commission, which is tasked with planning and regulating the usage of land and water on the California coast.

Vandenberg Space Force Base in Santa Barbara, California, has been host to SpaceX Falcon 9 launches since 2013 and the company requested to increase launches to up to 50 a year from the current 36 allowed by the state.

Advertisement

In a recent meeting, the commission voted 6 to 4 to deny the request from SpaceX to increase the amount of launches. During the vote, commissioners quoted environmental concerns as part of their refusal to approve the request from SpaceX.

Following the meeting, Musk’s company filed a lawsuit that asked the court to prohibit the commission from regulating the company’s rocket launches, according to court documents.

SpaceX says it has been ‘punished’ for free speech

One of the arguments leveled by SpaceX’s attorneys claims that the decision from the commission is in retaliation for some comments from Musk – the company’s leader and largest stakeholder.

“But the Commission’s unconstitutional overreach does not stop at punishing SpaceX for constitutionally protected speech, beliefs, and practices that has no relevance to the proposed launches’ effects on coastal resources—the actual issue pending before the Commission,” the lawsuit said.

Advertisement

SpaceX’s lawyers also accused Commissioner Caryl Hart of bias, with the lawsuit quoting comments the commissioner made in a recent meeting.

“The concern is with SpaceX increasing its launches, not with the other companies increasing their launches . . . we’re dealing with a company . . . the head of which has aggressively injected himself into the Presidential race and made it clear what his point of view is,” the lawsuit said.

The lawsuit also quoted other members of the commission, namely Commissioner Gretchen Newsom, Commissioner Mike Wilson and Commissioner Dr. Justin Cummings calling their claims “irrelevant, biased concerns about Mr. Musk’s politics.”

SpaceX’s lawyers argued that these comments were politically biased against the company and the decision to deny their request for increased launches.

Musk has been increasingly involved with the right

In recent months, Musk has become a vocal supporter of conservative candidates and causes, voicing his support for former President Donald Trump’s campaign and even donating at least $75 million to the America PAC, which Musk helped found.

Advertisement

He also made an appearance at a recent Trump rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, the site of one of the assassination attempts against Trump. 

“The true test of someone’s character is how they behave under fire. We had one president who could not climb a flight of stairs and another who is fist pumping after getting shot,” Musk said during his speech, chanting, “Fight, fight, fight.”

Fernando Cervantes Jr. is a trending news reporter for USA TODAY. Reach him at fernando.cervantes@gannett.com and follow him on X @fern_cerv_.



Source link

Advertisement

California

2 Northern California universities made U.S. News ‘Best Global’ list

Published

on

2 Northern California universities made U.S. News ‘Best Global’ list


play

To the surprise of perhaps no Californians, several California universities appeared in the top rankings of the world’s best universities in the latest U.S. News and World Report rankings released on June 16.

Of the more than 2,250 worldwide research institutions that U.S. News & World Report evaluated for this list, six California universities ranked in the top 50 globally, with an even split among Northern and Southern California institutions.

Advertisement

The 2026 list includes universities from more than 100 countries, with the following countries receiving the most schools in the overall rankings:

  • China: 409
  • United States: 275
  • India: 123
  • United Kingdom: 93
  • Japan: 86

Did your California alma mater appear among the top global universities?

U.S. News and World Report methodology

When determining a university’s placement on the list, U.S. News & World Report considered factors more relevant to research-oriented institutions than to undergraduate-focused metrics like bachelor’s degree graduation rates.

It focused on aspects like academic institutions’ research and reputation, number of publications, the quality of publications and citations. It considers other factors, including location, campus culture, the strength of particular programs, and cost, which are also very important.

Advertisement

“For students seeking universities with strong academic excellence and global recognition, the Best Global Universities rankings offer an essential comparative resource,” said LaMont Jones, Ed.D., managing editor for Education at U.S. News.

“Our methodology focuses on a school’s research mission and scholarly impact, helping students identify institutions that are truly at the forefront of global knowledge creation.”

Out of the top 10 global universities, two California institutions made the list:

  1. Harvard University
  2. Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)
  3. Stanford University
  4. University of Oxford
  5. University of Cambridge
  6. Tsinghua University
  7. University of California Berkeley
  8. Yale University
  9. University College London
  10. Columbia University

How did California colleges rank in U.S. News and World Report’s Best Global Universities 2026 list?

Outside of the top 10 universities, California saw a handful of other institutions rank highly on U.S. News & World Report list.

Notably, the University of California – Los Angeles just missed the top 10 list, ultimately ranking as the 11th-best global university and the second-best public institution on the list. It was beaten out as the best public institution by its academic counterpart, the University of California, Berkeley, which was ranked the 7th-best global university.

Advertisement

Additionally, a number of University of California schools made the top of the list, ultimately reaffirming the quality of the institutions’ public campuses across the state.

“Research from the University of California is vital to work that benefits all Americans, from breakthroughs in the treatment of Parkinson’s to the science behind previously unimagined successes in fighting cancer and the development of quantum computers that will enable the critical advances of the 21st century,” the University of California said in a press release about its rankings.

Here’s the list of California universities that made the top 100 list:

  • 3. Stanford University
  • 7. University of California Berkeley
  • 11. University of California – Los Angeles
  • 22. University of California – San Francisco
  • 23. (Tied) California Institute of Technology
  • 23. (Tied) University of California – San Diego
  • 74. University of Southern California
  • 95. University of California – Davis
  • 99. University of California – Irvine
  • 100. University of California – Santa Barbara

Noe Padilla is a Northern California Reporter for USA Today. Contact him at npadilla@usatodayco.com, follow him on X @1NoePadilla or on Bluesky @noepadilla.bsky.socialSign up for the TODAY Californian newsletter or follow us on Facebook at TODAY Californian.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

California

Is California’s ‘Big One’ coming soon? Maps show growing danger.

Published

on

Is California’s ‘Big One’ coming soon? Maps show growing danger.


The most significant seismic event in California’s history – an earthquake of 7.9 magnitude – occurred in 1857 and ruptured about 225 miles on the San Andreas Fault. That earthquake, dubbed the last “Big One,” killed two people and produced shaking that lasted between one and three minutes.

Since then, California has exploded in population and been has been rattled by many major earthquakes. But Californians have also grown familiar with the existential dread of another “Big One” looming.

Researchers have long warned there will be another massive earthquake in Southern California. They just don’t know when.

A recent study says warning signs continue to grow in 2026. The San Andreas and San Jacinto fault systems have reached the highest stress levels seen in the past 1,000 years, according to a study conducted at the University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa.

Advertisement

The San Andreas fault runs throughout the state, passing through San Francisco and San Bernardino, while the San Jacinto fault is in Southern California and runs through Riverside, San Diego and Imperial Counties.

Unable to view our graphics? Click here to see them.

Why the San Andreas Fault is so risky

Faults rupture on the San Andreas Fault approximately every 150 years, according to UCLA professor Jonathan Stewart, who studies earthquake engineering.

But it’s been over 300 years since the last “large rupture” occurred south of the 1857 Fort Tejon earthquake, Stewart said. “As far we know it didn’t produce a large rupture since around 1690. To the present that’s a lot more than 150 years, so there’s a lot of build-up. That doesn’t mean it’s going to happen immediately, it just means there is more stress built-up.”

Advertisement

When the earthquake happens, it is likely to cause a lot of damage. One major concern is the state’s water systems.

“An earthquake like this would rupture most, if not all of the major aqueducts bringing water into Southern California,” Stewart said. “Most people will not be in a collapsed structure after this earthquake, but everybody’s going to be affected by water problems.”

Study highlights longstanding risk

To investigate the probability of an earthquake occurring, researchers built a physics-based simulation and fed it the earthquake history from the region. By doing so, they were able to estimate how much stress has built up along the southern San Andreas and San Jacinto fault systems.

The results suggest that catastrophe may be near.

Advertisement

“Right now, with stress at historically high levels across the region and more than 160 years elapsed since the last major rupture, the system is in a critically loaded state,” lead author Liliane Burkhard said.

Most importantly, the Cajon Pass, at the junction of the San Andreas and San Jacinto faults, could facilitate a joint rupture of the two faults. This scenario, according to the study, would probably be “significantly more damaging” than a single-fault event.

How is earthquake safety considered?

Seismic hazard assessments are critical for the safety of the millions of residents in California’s densely-populated and earthquake-prone areas.

Seismic Hazard maps show the relative hazard associated with earthquakes using information on past faults, the behavior of seismic waves and the near-surface conditions of specific locations, according to the U.S. Geological Survey.

Larger values indicate a stronger level of earthquake shaking. A peak ground velocity of 269 cm/sec would correspond to extreme shaking and heavy damage. For reference, the largest ground velocity recorded in Taiwan’s 1999 Chi-Chi earthquake reached 318 cm/sec and had a magnitude of 6.7.

Advertisement

That earthquake killed more than 2,000 people and incurred approximately $14 billion in damage.

How do the fault lines rupture?

The San Andreas and San Jacinto faults are strike-slip faults, which typically cause horizontal displacement. Both faults comprise the geologic boundary between the Pacific Plate and the North American Plate.

If a major earthquake occurs on the San Andreas fault, it is likely to produce surface rupture, which occurs when a fault breaks through to the surface. Most earthquakes, however, do not produce surface rupture, according to USGS.

In a major rupture, strong shaking could cause severe damage near the fault and in areas built on soft or water-saturated soils, which can amplify shaking. Rupture can directly offset roads, buildings, and other structures that span the fault trace.

Although the study helps explain the risk associated with the California fault lines, Burkhard emphasized that it shouldn’t serve as a forecast.

Advertisement

“This is not a prediction of when an earthquake will happen,” Burkhard said. “However, studies like this are important contributions to national and global earthquake hazard research in that we are using rigorous, quantitative science to better understand the risk facing millions of people.”

Contributing: Brandi D. Addison, USA TODAY NETWORK



Source link

Continue Reading

California

California lawmakers seek $32M to combat invasive pest found on grapevines sold at Costco

Published

on

California lawmakers seek M to combat invasive pest found on grapevines sold at Costco


California lawmakers are now asking the federal government for more than $32 million in emergency funding to stop the spread of an invasive insect that was recently discovered on grapevines sold at Costco stores across the state.

The request comes about a month after Fresno County agricultural officials discovered grapevine plants infested with the glassy-winged sharpshooter, a pest capable of spreading Pierce’s Disease, a deadly infection that can kill grapevines.

In a letter sent to U.S. Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins, Sens. Adam Schiff and Alex Padilla joined Reps. Mike Thompson, David Valadao and other members of California’s congressional delegation in requesting $32.2 million in emergency funding to contain and eradicate the pest.

[RELATED] Fresno County grapevine plants shipped to Costco were infested with bugs

Advertisement

Lawmakers say the infected nursery stock was identified Mat 19 by the California Department of Food and Agriculture and the Fresno County Agricultural Commissioner’s Office.

The plants had been distributed to Costco stores in more than two dozen California counties before being sold to customers.

Officials believe some of the infested plants have since been transported to homes in at least 38 counties across the state.

The movement of infested nursery stock into and near key grape-producing regions, including areas critical to California’s winegrape and fresh table grape production, significantly elevates the urgency of this response.

The glassy-winged sharpshooter feeds on grapevines and spreads Pierce’s Disease, an incurable bacterial infection that can destroy vineyards by preventing vines from transporting water.

Lawmakers warned that the pest poses a serious threat to California’s wine and table grape industries.

Advertisement

According to the Wine Institute, California’s wine industry supports 1.1 million jobs nationwide and generates an economic impact of more than $170 billion.

California also produces 99% of the nation’s table grapes, with an annual crop value estimated at $2.59 billion.

If the pest spreads unchecked, the California Department of Food and Agriculture estimates losses associated with Pierce’s Disease and the glassy-winged sharpshooter could exceed $104 million annually.

The requested funding would support emergency response efforts, including tracing the movement of infested plants, surveying affected areas and expanding trapping programs.

Additional funding would also be used for long-term monitoring and eradication efforts over the next several years.

Advertisement

The lawmakers are asking the U.S. Department of Agriculture to immediately release the funding through the Commodity Credit Corporation, arguing that the outbreak meets the federal definition of an agricultural emergency.

Growers have already contributed more than $62 million toward research and mitigation efforts over the past 25 years through industry assessments, according to the letter.

Federal officials have not yet announced whether the funding request will be approved.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending