Connect with us

California

Privacy Battle Over Connected Cars Takes An Interesting Turn In California

Published

on

Privacy Battle Over Connected Cars Takes An Interesting Turn In California


So goes California, and so sometimes goes the nation. And the North American automotive trade together with it.

That is probably the case with California and its battle over knowledge.

Advertisement

There isn’t a query the automotive producers need knowledge from lots of of sensors for a mess of causes starting from guarantee discount, restore prognostics, machine studying of safety-related methods and, sure, promoting income. As the previous CEO of Ford, Mark Fields, introduced to the world in 2016, “As our automobiles turn into a part of the Web of issues and as shoppers give permission to us to gather that knowledge, we’ll additionally turn into an data firm. Our differentiator might be how we use that knowledge to fulfill our prospects in ways in which they by no means thought attainable of their lives.” In truth, it is projected by 2023 that worldwide gross sales of linked automobiles will surpass 76 million items (70% globally, 90% in the USA) with a linked automobile market income of $192 billion and a Cumulative Annual Development Fee (CAGR) of 18.1% till minimally 2028. Massive cash.

A fraction of that goldmine comes from insurance coverage corporations trying to handle danger and maximize income. Knowledge in the proper fingers may allow highly effective behavioral reward applications for safer drivers akin to Tina Fey telling State Farm’s Mayhem, “Hey! My focus is on the highway, and that is saving me money with DriveWise. Who’s the dummy now?” The implied message: higher drivers by way of action-reward applications that will make B.F. Skinner proud, scale back accident claims and assist all of society.

However within the fallacious fingers, that knowledge can create insurance policies that discriminate in opposition to particular demographics. “There are all kinds of ramifications for us as people: from undesirable advertising to the private liberties and constitutional rights round unreasonable search and seizure, but additionally on our insurance coverage charges,” states Jamie Courtroom, President of Client Watchdog. “Insurance coverage corporations do not disclose their telematics mannequin, so we do not know what knowledge they’re utilizing. When they’re utilizing a score issue, it must be related to a ‘danger of loss’. In truth, Tesla

TSLA
points its personal insurance coverage however does not inform you need knowledge they’re utilizing. And most insurance coverage corporations fee by zip code as a result of they wish to cost poor folks extra as a result of they’re riskier resulting from defaulting on funds, getting in accidents, and so on. Now we’re coming again to digital surrogates for the beforehand enacted ban on utilizing avenue deal with: geofencing and movies that may chronicle what sort of home you reside in, the place you park and probably even what’s your pores and skin colour. Individuals have to understand that it is simpler for corporations to make use of that knowledge greater than you suppose.”

And so Prop 24 was born in 2020: the California Privateness Rights Act (CPRA), which might preclude automakers and insurance coverage corporations from using exact geolocation with out the permission of the buyer (e.g., “decide in” or minimally “decide out” if undesirable). This Act, which is ready to take impact in 2023, was particularly designed to thwart use instances delineated within the March 2022 Client Watchdog report entitled, “Related Vehicles and the Risk to Your Privateness,” resembling logging the neighborhoods wherein you drive, whether or not you’ve got been fired, for those who’ve just lately divorced, and so on. “Customers ought to have the proper to say no to being tracked of their automobiles” stated the report’s writer, Justin Kloczko. “California’s new privateness legislation provides the perfect hope for limits on automotive surveillance if the California Privateness Safety Company fulfills its mandate to present shoppers an decide out proper. Simply since you subscribe to [Global Positioning System functionality] doesn’t imply carmakers and insurance coverage corporations ought to have a clean test to make use of or promote your knowledge for no matter they need.”

Advertisement

The Fascinating Flip

It isn’t braking information that politicians generally speak out of either side of their mouths. Prior to now 5 years, although, we now have seen unprecedented bravado from politicians blatantly ignoring legal guidelines or constituents’ rights.

Enter California Senator, Ricardo Lara. In what seems initially as public assist for the rights of automobile house owners to keep away from surveillance by insurance coverage corporations, Lara got here out publicly in January on social media denouncing Musk and others saying, “Push all you need, however we cannot bend on defending client knowledge, privateness and truthful charges.”

Nevertheless, a 2019 recording surfaced just a few months later the place Lara at a podium said assist for digital surveillance of driving habits by insurance coverage corporations. When confronted by a questioner within the viewers about whether or not such insurance policies violated the California Client Privateness Act, Lara rapidly started doublespeak, joking about Common Council’s presence and stating, ‘it is one thing we’re speaking about, making an attempt to determine, you already know, the particular nuances.”

Will the legislation proceed forth as written and be unperturbed by waffling politicians? Will the automotive producers enact one, opt-in technique in 2023 for the continent given California’s latest legislation? Or will producers throw cash by way of lobbyists and legal professionals to affect laws or the courts? Will insurance coverage corporations present transparency about which knowledge is getting used to find out charges? All good questions.

“Sadly, the auto and insurance coverage industries are in search of exceptions from that legislation,” bemoans Courtroom. “And that is going to be a battle that takes place over the following eight months that basically goes to find out, I feel, the destiny not solely of privateness protections in California however, by translation, in America.”

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

California

Park Fire roughly doubles in size, becomes one of the biggest in California history

Published

on

Park Fire roughly doubles in size, becomes one of the biggest in California history



The blaze has nearly doubled in size since Friday morning. It’s burning about 90 miles north of Sacramento.

play

A fire that allegedly started when a man pushed a flaming car into a gully in a Northern California park on Wednesday has quickly ballooned into the West’s largest fire burning right now and one of the largest in state history.

Advertisement

The Park Fire, about 90 miles north of Sacramento, has now burned over 307,000 acres as of Saturday morning, according to Cal Fire. It’s currently the eighth-largest fire in California history, has no containment, and is even producing its own clouds.

The blaze has roughly doubled in size since Friday morning when it engulfed an area the size of Chicago.

Prosecutors allege the fire started when Ronnie Stout sent his mother’s car ablaze 60 feet down an embankment near Alligator Hole in Chico’s Upper Bidwell Park. That gave the fire its match to spread northward across the Sierra Nevada foothills.

Triple-digit temperatures, low humidity and gusty winds contributed to the Park Fire’s rapid growth, officials say. The Park Fire on Saturday has burned an area roughly the size of the city of Los Angeles. So far, the Park Fire has damaged 134 structures, Cal Fire’s latest incident report showed.

Advertisement

Cooler temperatures, with highs in the upper 80s, and more humidity are expected Saturday, according to the National Weather Service’s Sacramento office. On Friday afternoon, officials hoped these conditions would give some 2,500 firefighters the needed respite to reduce the fire’s spread from Butte County into Tehama County, where the majority of the fire is now occurring, as it burns grass, brush, timber and dead vegetation.

Evacuation orders and warnings continued through Friday night, the Butte County Sheriff’s Office announced. This included warnings for Magalia in the foothills east of Chico, located just next to Paradise, the California town burned by the 2018 Camp Fire that destroyed 14,000 homes and killed 85 people. The Camp Fire, caused by faulty Pacific Gas & Electric power lines, maxed out at 153,336 acres, half the size of the current Park Fire. 

There are nearing 100 large wildfires across 10 western states and Alaska that have burned over a million acres and growing. Climate change is driving fires’ growing size and severity as warmer temperatures, high winds and dry conditions help fuel fires.

Contributing: Christopher Cann and Dinah Pulver of USA TODAY

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

California

California Still Has No Plan to Phase Out Oil Refineries – Inside Climate News

Published

on

California Still Has No Plan to Phase Out Oil Refineries – Inside Climate News


Gov. Gavin Newsom often touts California’s role as a global climate leader. Yet it’s hard to defend that claim as long as California remains one of the nation’s top oil-refining states, experts argued at a recent webinar calling for a phaseout of refineries.

The state has made major strides implementing policies to support the transition away from fossil fuels in the transportation and energy sectors, yet has largely ignored oil refineries.

This is an egregious oversight, policy experts and community advocates on the panel said, because refineries are the largest source of industrial fossil fuel pollution and one of the biggest threats to both health and the climate.

“There are significant acute and chronic public health and climate impacts from refiners,” said Woody Hastings, a policy expert at The Climate Center, a nonprofit that hosted the webinar and is working to rapidly reduce climate pollution. “There is no plan to phase them out.”

Advertisement

Election 2024

Explore the latest news about what’s at stake for the climate during this election season.

California can embrace its role as a global leader by charting a path to phasing out refineries that others can follow, as it’s done before, he said. When California passed a measure to cut vehicle tailpipe emissions in 2002, 13 other states followed suit. When it passed a 2018 law requiring that all electricity come from renewable sources by 2045, 10 other states and the federal government adopted the same goal, Hastings said.

The most recent climate Conference of the Parties, COP28 in Dubai, called for a transition away from fossil fuels and energy systems in a just, orderly and equitable manner, Hastings said. “Let’s have California create the model for how to do it.”

All the other major fossil fuel sectors—electricity, transportation and oil drilling—have some form of phaseout requirements and plan to lower emissions, said Alicia Rivera, an organizer with the nonprofit Communities for a Better Environment who works in Wilmington, a Los Angeles neighborhood dominated by oil wells and refineries. “Refineries have none.”

The costs of inaction are clear, she said. Almost all the census tracts near refineries are communities of color forced to endure very high toxic releases and other health harms, Rivera said.

Advertisement

“People on the other side of the refinery cannot see the emissions because they are invisible,” she said. “But they are large and they are always there, nonstop.”

Refineries convert crude oil into gasoline, diesel, jet fuel and other petroleum products like butane and propane. One refinery can cover thousands of acres, with massive heaters and boilers superheating the crude and separating the liquids that will become gas and other fuels. The refining process, storage tanks and flaring—the burning of excess hydrocarbons—all emit pollution and toxic gases like lung-damaging sulfur dioxides and cancer-causing benzene.

“People on the other side of the refinery cannot see the emissions because they are invisible. But they are large and they are always there, nonstop.”

Oil refineries must report annual benzene emissions. But various studies have shown that many refineries underestimate emissions of volatile organic compounds, including benzene, understating the health risks. 

“We’ve seen places where California has found significant risk from benzene without including that massive underestimation,” said Julia May, senior scientist with Communities for a Better Environment. “If you include the underestimation, that means the cancer risk is higher. It’s also a VOC that contributes to smog.”

Working Toward a Just Transition

California has failed to act partly because several cities benefit financially from contributing to the nearly 2 million barrels of crude oil refined a day in the state, May said, noting that regulators are under “severe pressure” to avoid phaseout requirements. 

Advertisement

But just two refinery products, gasoline and diesel, cause about half of California’s greenhouse gas emissions, she said. “You can’t solve the smog or climate disaster without phasing out oil refineries.” 

The state must start looking at ways to reduce refineries’ production on the road to a full shutdown, May urged. “We’re not talking about shutting down refineries tomorrow. All we’re asking for is, start a plan over the next two decades and start with gasoline and diesel.”

This story is funded by readers like you.

Our nonprofit newsroom provides award-winning climate coverage free of charge and advertising. We rely on donations from readers like you to keep going. Please donate now to support our work.

Donate Now

Advertisement

California policy is headed toward no more oil production, which will significantly reduce refining capacity in the state, said Kevin Slagle, spokesperson for the Western States Petroleum Association, which represents oil extractors and refiners. “An EV mandate that limits the sale of internal combustion cars may not say, ‘Hey refinery, you have to reduce production by X amount,’” he said. “But if you don’t have vehicles on the road that use that product, the refiners are probably not going to be here.”

Even without specific bills that mandate refinery reductions, Slagle said, California policy will lead to fewer refineries in the state, “probably quicker than folks expect.”

That phaseout needs to be managed in a way that doesn’t leave workers behind, the panelists argued. And that requires understanding that the phrase “just transition” means different things to different people, said Brian White, a longtime union leader and policy director for Eduardo Martinez, mayor of Richmond, home of the Chevron refinery, where a catastrophic fire and explosion in 2012 sent 15,000 people to the hospital.

White’s union, the United Steelworkers, coined the term “just transition,” he said. For refinery workers it means making sure they can shift to a job with dignity, benefits and pay. For environmentalists, he said, it’s moving from a dirty, dangerous industry to a cleaner, greener world. And for local governments, it means replacing revenue lost by closing refineries in order to continue providing the services communities need.

The different groups need to recognize that they’re working toward the same goals, White said. On that note, he added, the Richmond City Council recently voted to place a “polluters tax” on the November ballot. 

Advertisement

“Oil refining has negative impacts on the city, including environmental hazards, public health harms and stress on emergency services,” White said. The tax on oil refining—Chevron’s Richmond refinery is one of the biggest in the nation—aims to improve the city’s financial position and the quality of life for Richmond residents, he said, especially those most affected by the oil refinery.

How to coordinate policies designed to reduce demand for refinery products like gasoline and phase out refineries remains a major challenge, the panelists said.

One in every four new car sales in California is a zero-emission vehicle, said Siva Gunda, vice chair of the California Energy Commission. “We’ve crossed our peak demand of gasoline in California in 2017,” he said, noting a downward trend that he expects to continue. “Yet even if we are wildly successful with EVs, there will be some demand.”

Siva Gunda, vice chair of the California Energy Commission.Siva Gunda, vice chair of the California Energy Commission.
Siva Gunda, vice chair of the California Energy Commission.

For Gunda, it’s imperative to find ways to reduce demand for fossil fuel products while expanding access to zero-emission vehicles and renewable energy for all Californians, especially for fenceline communities where residents suffer from higher rates of respiratory problems like asthma attacks, heart disease and cancer.

Gunda saw firsthand the disproportionate burdens these communities endure when Rivera, the community organizer, took him on a tour of Wilmington. This predominantly Black and Latino community at Los Angeles’ southern edge sits atop the third-largest oil field in the country. Residents have such a distinctive way of clearing their throats it’s called the Wilmington cough. 

“It’s heartbreaking to imagine that some of us get to see our grandmothers a little bit longer than some of us, because of where we live,” Gunda said.

Advertisement

Yet the climate crisis will not affect only disadvantaged communities, the panelists warned.

Climate change is widespread and rapidly intensifying, May said. She pointed to a 2022 study from the First Street Foundation, a nonprofit that studies U.S. risks from climate change, which found that about a quarter of the country could be practically unlivable in 30 years, frequently reaching temperatures higher than 125 degrees Fahrenheit. “It’s really quite frightening,” she said. 

“We need just-transition planning to phase out refineries,” May said. “We need to deal with replacing the taxes. We need to support the workers. We need to support the communities and we need to survive catastrophic climate change. We can do it.”

About This Story

Perhaps you noticed: This story, like all the news we publish, is free to read. That’s because Inside Climate News is a 501c3 nonprofit organization. We do not charge a subscription fee, lock our news behind a paywall, or clutter our website with ads. We make our news on climate and the environment freely available to you and anyone who wants it.

That’s not all. We also share our news for free with scores of other media organizations around the country. Many of them can’t afford to do environmental journalism of their own. We’ve built bureaus from coast to coast to report local stories, collaborate with local newsrooms and co-publish articles so that this vital work is shared as widely as possible.

Advertisement

Two of us launched ICN in 2007. Six years later we earned a Pulitzer Prize for National Reporting, and now we run the oldest and largest dedicated climate newsroom in the nation. We tell the story in all its complexity. We hold polluters accountable. We expose environmental injustice. We debunk misinformation. We scrutinize solutions and inspire action.

Donations from readers like you fund every aspect of what we do. If you don’t already, will you support our ongoing work, our reporting on the biggest crisis facing our planet, and help us reach even more readers in more places?

Please take a moment to make a tax-deductible donation. Every one of them makes a difference.

Thank you,

Advertisement



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

California

California residents flee massive wildfire sparked by burning car

Published

on

California residents flee massive wildfire sparked by burning car


Thousands of Northern California residents were forced to evacuate their homes as a massive wildfire scorched more than 250 square miles. The Park Fire, California’s largest this year, was started by a man who pushed a burning car into a gully.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending