Connect with us

California

Overview of California’s Ports

Published

on

Overview of California’s Ports




California has 12 ports, via which giant volumes of products are each imported and exported internationally. These ports fluctuate in dimension, operations, and funds. For instance, the state comprises the nation’s two largest ports, the Port of Los Angeles and the Port of Lengthy Seaside—each operated by public entities—as properly as a small, privately owned port, the Port of Benicia. In recent times, California’s ports have confronted a number of challenges, together with congestion and air air pollution from related amenities and automobiles. Each the California state authorities in addition to the federal authorities have engaged in legislative, regulatory, and budgetary efforts to assist ports handle these challenges. Particularly, the Legislature has prioritized ports in current periods by convening informational hearings, proposing and adopting coverage payments, and offering focused funding within the state price range. On this submit, we offer some background on ports in California. We describe how ports throughout the state function and are funded, summarize two necessary points regarding ports—port congestion and air high quality, and assessment current state and federal actions concerning ports.

Ports within the Bigger Items Motion System

Companies Transfer Items Utilizing A number of Modes of Transportation. With a view to produce and ship items and companies to customers, companies usually have to move them from one place to a different. Companies would possibly use a number of modes of transportation to maneuver items, akin to ships, freight rail, planes, and industrial vehicles. Items are moved via various kinds of amenities, akin to ports, distribution facilities, and warehouses. For example, Determine 1 reveals one pathway which items that originate from abroad may take from the purpose of manufacturing to the patron.

Ports Are an Vital Element of Worldwide Commerce. Ports are amenities the place items are loaded and unloaded from ships, in addition to the place items are processed and ready for additional distribution to retailers and customers. Ports deal with a good portion of worldwide commerce. For instance, waterborne vessels have been the main transportation mode for worldwide freight in 2020, transferring 40 % of U.S. worldwide freight worth (price greater than $1.5 trillion) and 70 % of freight by weight (virtually 1.5 trillion tons).

California Ports’ Operations and Funding

California Ports Differ in Measurement and Varieties of Items Dealt with. California has a complete of 12 ports. Eleven of those are publicly owned, and one—the Port of Benicia—is privately owned. These ports course of about 40 % of all containerized imports and 30 % of all exports in the USA. The Ports of Los Angeles and Lengthy Seaside are the most important ports in the USA, as measured by container quantity. Every California port differs within the kinds of items it processes, as proven in Determine 2. For instance, among the Port of Oakland’s highest worth exports are meals associated—fruits and nuts, meats, and wines and spirits—as a result of of its position in transporting items from agricultural companies within the area. In distinction, the Humboldt Bay Harbor District primarily imports and exports logs and wooden chips because of the lumber companies in its area.

Advertisement

Determine 2

Overview of California’s Ports

Port

Working Entity

Whole Tons of Cargo Transported (2020)

Advertisement

Highest‑Worth Exports

Highest‑Worth Imports

Port of Lengthy Seaside

Metropolis of Lengthy Seaside Harbor Division

79,178,087

Advertisement

Petroleum Coke, Waste Paper, Chemical compounds, Scrap Metallic

Crude Oil, Electronics, Plastics, Furnishings,

Port of Los Angeles

Metropolis of Los Angeles Harbor Division

59,452,139

Advertisement

Wastepaper, Animal Feeds, Scrap Metallic, Material, Soybeans

Furnishings, Clothes, Vehicle Components, Digital Merchandise

Port of Richmond

Metropolis of Richmond

21,050,741

Advertisement

Vegetable Oils, Scrap Metallic, Coke, Coal

Autos, Petroleum, Minerals, Vegetable Oils

Port of Oakland

Metropolis of Oakland

19,439,762

Advertisement

Fruits and Nuts, Meats, Equipment, Wine and Spirits

Equipment, Electronics, Furnishings, Plastics

Port of Stockton

Stockton Port District

4,613,258

Advertisement

Iron Ore, Sulfur, Coal, Wheat, Rice

Liquid Fertilizer, Molasses, Bulk Fertilizer, Cement

Port of San Francisco

Metropolis and County of San Francisco

2,188,681

Advertisement

Tallow, Vegetable Oil

Metal Merchandise, Boats, Wind Generators, Mixture

Port of Redwood Metropolis

Metropolis of Redwood Metropolis

1,934,358

Advertisement

Iron Scrap

Aggregates, Sand, Gypsum

Port of Hueneme

Oxnard Harbor District

1,844,182

Advertisement

Autos, Produce, Basic Cargo

Autos, Produce, Liquid Fertilizer, Bulk Liquid

Port of San Diego

San Diego Unified Port District

1,542,384

Advertisement

Equipment, Metals, Autos, Heavy Tools

Autos, Perishables, Development Supplies, Heavy Tools

Port of West Sacramento

Metropolis of West Sacramento

1,200,184

Advertisement

Agricultural and Industrial Merchandise

Agricultural and Industrial Merchandise

Humboldt Bay Harbor District

Humboldt Bay Harbor, Recreation and Conservation District

Unknown

Advertisement

Logs, Wooden Chips

Logs, Petroleum, Wooden Chips

Port of Benicia

Amports

Unknown

Advertisement

Petroleum Coke

Cars

A number of State Companies Help California’s Ports. State involvement with ports in California is distributed throughout a number of companies, together with the California Division of Transportation (Caltrans), California State Transportation Company (CalSTA), California Air Sources Board (CARB), and Governor’s Workplace of Enterprise and Financial Improvement (GO-Biz). Every entity has totally different tasks concerning each ports in addition to items motion usually. Caltrans leads the state planning processes for freight transportation, which incorporates ports. CARB regulates the emissions of ports and enforces state targets for ports to transition to zero-emission applied sciences. GO-Biz assists ports by facilitating conferences with native, state, and federal representatives on points impacting California’s freight motion. As mentioned beneath, the state additionally lately established a brand new freight coverage workforce at CalSTA.

Ports Are Eligible to Apply for Few State Grants. Ports in California are primarily funded by lease and price revenues from delivery companies and freight operators. Presently, no ongoing state funding is devoted to port operations or infrastructure initiatives. As a substitute, port initiatives are eligible to obtain funding via a number of aggressive state funding packages designed primarily for growing and sustaining infrastructure. These packages embrace the Commerce Hall Enhancement Program (TCEP) (about $400 million in state funds and $120 million in federal funds obtainable yearly), a number of Low Carbon Transportation packages administered by CARB (funding varies yearly), and a few packages administered by the California Power Fee for charging infrastructure. Ports have acquired some funding via these packages in recent times. For instance, in 2021-22, TCEP supplied $4.4 million to the Port of Stockton for rail enhancements and $8 million to the Port of Lengthy Seaside for rail enlargement. (Personal companies that function inside ports—such as truck owner-operators—additionally are eligible for some aggressive state grants, primarily to buy zero-emission automobiles.) Most of those packages are funded with particular funds, such because the Greenhouse Fuel Discount Fund (which receives revenues from the state’s cap-and-trade program). Along with these packages, the state lately supplied $1.2 billion on a one-time foundation for port infrastructure, which is mentioned in a later part of this submit. As a result of funding is awarded on a aggressive foundation, state funding doesn’t make up a good portion of ports’ budgets. For instance, state funds contributed lower than 1.2 % of the Port of Lengthy Seaside’s price range in 2020-21.

Ports Are Additionally Eligible for A number of Federal Grants. Just like state funding, there isn’t any ongoing federal funding devoted to California’s port operations or infrastructure initiatives. Port initiatives are eligible to obtain funding from a number of aggressive federal packages, together with the Port Infrastructure Improvement Program (PIDP) and the Marine Freeway Program. In 2021, PIDP supplied $241 million in grants and the Marine Freeway Program awarded $12.6 million in grants, nationwide. (These packages have been considerably augmented for the following a number of years because of the federal Infrastructure and Funding Jobs Act (IIJA), which we talk about in a later part of this submit.) California initiatives have recurrently acquired funding via PIDP within the final a number of years, together with $32.7 million in 2019, $10 million in 2020, and $57.5 million in 2021. Ports are additionally eligible for aggressive federal packages that fund various kinds of transportation initiatives. For instance, the Native and Regional Undertaking Help Grants Program funds transportation initiatives which have important native or regional impacts. Ports are eligible candidates, together with different entities akin to states, different native authorities companies, and tribes. As with state funds, federal funds sometimes make up a comparatively small share of ports’ budgets. For instance, federal funds contributed lower than 1 % of the Port of San Francisco’s price range in 2020-21.

Advertisement

California Ports and Air High quality

Autos and Tools at Ports Are Vital Sources of Air Air pollution. Ships, vehicles, and cargo dealing with gear at ports are sometimes fueled by diesel and due to this fact emit air pollution akin to particulate matter (PM) and nitrogen oxides (NOx). Because of this, the Ports of Los Angeles and Lengthy Seaside are among the largest sources of air air pollution within the South Coast Air Basin. These ports are accountable for about 10 % of the basin’s complete NOx emissions. As mentioned beneath, an increase in congestion at California’s ports has additional elevated their airborne emissions in recent times.

Port-Associated Air Air pollution Impacts Public Well being and the Atmosphere. Air air pollution from port actions has important public well being and environmental implications. For instance, publicity to air air pollution is related to an elevated threat of coronary heart and lung illness, elevated most cancers threat, and elevated respiratory signs. Dangerous emissions even have been related to unfavorable impacts on delivery and developmental outcomes, akin to contributing to low delivery weight, untimely births, and decrease lung operate in kids. As well as, diesel gas consumption emits greenhouse gases, which accelerates local weather change.

Port-Associated Air Air pollution Disproportionately Impacts Deprived Communities. Communities that neighbor ports face the very best publicity of air pollution from port operations. Because of this, these communities are inclined to expertise a disproportionate share of the air pollution burden within the state. For instance, almost all the census tracts that encompass the Ports of Lengthy Seaside and Los Angeles are ranked within the prime one-third of essentially the most air pollution burdened within the state, in accordance with the California Communities Environmental Well being Screening Instrument (CalEnviroScreen), a instrument which assesses communities’ air pollution burden and vulnerability. Along with higher publicity, these communities are also comparatively extra susceptible to air pollution impacts. It is because these areas are inclined to have (1) the next share of delicate populations—these with physiological circumstances, akin to bronchial asthma and coronary heart illness, that make them extra susceptible to pollution—and (2) socioeconomic elements related to increased air pollution vulnerability, akin to poverty and decrease instructional attainment. This mixture of disproportionately excessive air pollution publicity and vulnerability leads to the neighborhoods adjoining to the Lengthy Seaside and Los Angeles ports scoring within the prime quartile for his or her general CalEnviroScreen evaluation. Such a rating signifies excessive ranges of cumulative environmental and well being impacts, and identifies these areas as “deprived communities” eligible for prioritized funding from sure state packages.

State and Native Regulators Have Elevated Efforts to Handle Ports’ Air High quality Impacts. Within the final a number of years, CARB has adopted a number of laws geared toward controlling air air pollution from each ships and automobiles at ports. For instance, in 2007, CARB adopted an “At-Berth Regulation” that requires ships to regulate air pollution whereas docked. As one other instance, in 2018, CARB adopted laws which require all drayage vehicles to be registered with CARB and meet particular emission requirements. Native regulators even have elevated their efforts to control air air pollution in and round ports. For instance, the South Coast Air High quality Administration District, which encompasses the Ports of Lengthy Seaside and Los Angeles, presently is growing laws that will require ports to considerably cut back emissions from their operations. Although the precise particulars of the laws usually are not but finalized, they might embrace measures akin to port-wide common emissions targets. The laws are anticipated to be finalized in 2023.

Ports Are Planning Electrification Tasks to Meet State Air High quality Regulatory Necessities and Objectives. Many ships, vehicles, and cargo dealing with gear at ports nonetheless use diesel gas, which, as famous above, leads to the emission of a number of dangerous air pollution. To scale back these emissions in the long run, ports might want to electrify their heavy-duty fleets. Nevertheless, a number of limitations impede ports’ progress in pursuing this purpose, together with: (1) sure electrical automobiles and gear usually are not but broadly obtainable, (2) prices are excessive, and (3) present battery reliability could not swimsuit port operations. Given these uncertainties, the time line related to implementing zero-emission applied sciences at ports is unclear and prices seemingly are excessive. Given the scope of the kinds of gear and automobiles that can have to be electrified throughout all California ports, the prices may simply attain billions of {dollars}.

Advertisement

Current Rise in Port Congestion

Current Enhance in Items Quantity Has Resulted in Port Congestion. Within the final 12 months, ports have skilled increased than regular ranges of congestion. A number of elements, together with higher client demand for items, labor disputes and protests, in addition to COVID-19-related port closures and labor shortages, have helped result in a document quantity of cargo accumulating at many ports.

Port Congestion Seemingly Contributing to Rising Client Costs. Throughout all items and companies bought by U.S. customers, costs have risen by 8.5 % over the previous 12 months, which displays a significantly sooner progress price than current historical past. Growing client costs primarily end result from a surge within the quantity of products customers wish to purchase, mixed with companies struggling to provide and ship these items. One results of this dynamic is a dramatic improve in ocean freight prices, which companies could move on to customers via increased costs. Port congestion seems to be a key driver of rising freight prices. Port congestion additionally could cut back the provision of some items to retailers, which may, in flip, improve the costs of a few of these items for customers.

Congestion Has Elevated Emissions at Ports. Resulting from higher congestion, extra ships have needed to anchor offshore, ready to load and offload items. Anchored ships require using auxiliary engines, which emit NOx and PM. Because of this, containership emissions have been significantly excessive within the fall of 2021. Based on CARB’s estimates, as of October 2021, elevated port congestion resulted in general containership emissions will increase of 20 tons per day (tpd) of NOx and 0.5 tpd of PM within the South Coast Air Basin relative to common pre-pandemic baseline ranges. Whereas containership emissions at ports have since returned to baseline ranges—primarily on account of lately applied insurance policies that require ships to attend additional offshore—general port-related emissions have continued to exceed pre-pandemic ranges. That is because of the increased than regular quantity of products at ports resulting in elevated exercise from cargo dealing with gear and drayage vehicles transferring items to and from ships and different modes of transport. These automobiles usually are powered by gas combustion engines which additionally emit air pollution akin to NOx and PM. Because of this, CARB estimates that over the past a number of months, NOx and PM emissions from port-related gear, akin to port vehicles, regional rail, and cargo dealing with gear, have exceeded baseline ranges by 6.3 tpd of NOx and 0.1 tpd of PM.

Elevated Demand for Items Has Led to Requires Increasing Ports’ Capability. Many port infrastructure initiatives assist enhance the capability of ports to course of items. For instance, port deepening initiatives make navigation channels deeper and wider, which helps to accommodate bigger ships that may carry extra items. As one other instance, a mission increasing freight railyards at ports may improve items motion capability if extra freight rail can choose up and drop off items. As a result of the current improve in demand for items has strained ports’ items motion capability, ports have begun planning infrastructure initiatives to make enhancements. As an example, in accordance with the California Affiliation of Ports (which represents all the publicly operated ports within the state), port authorities have recognized $3.6 billion in infrastructure initiatives that may very well be potential candidates for state or federal infrastructure grant packages.

Current State Actions to Tackle Port Congestion and Air High quality

Governor Issued Government Order Aimed toward Decreasing Port Congestion. In October 2021, Governor Newsom issued Government Order N-19-21, which directed state companies to determine extra methods to alleviate congestion at California’s ports. In response, the Division of Basic Providers (DGS) recognized six surplus state properties in proximity to extremely congested ports which may retailer as much as 20,000 containers. The state plans to lend these properties to help port operations for one 12 months, with an choice to renew for an additional 12 months. On the time of this writing, DGS had leased these properties to a warehousing firm that can work with importers to retailer containers on these websites. As well as, CalSTA and the U.S. Division of Transportation (USDOT) entered into an Rising Tasks Settlement, beneath which CalSTA developed an inventory of products motion infrastructure initiatives for which USDOT will present technical help to develop and apply for federal funding alternatives.

Advertisement

Legislature Has Prioritized Ports in Current Periods. In recent times, the Legislature has engaged on a number of price range and coverage efforts concerning ports. For instance, as proven in Determine 3, the Legislature has dedicated almost $1.9 billion in one-time funds over the following a number of years for port-related points, akin to infrastructure initiatives, workforce growth, and operational enhancements. The Legislature has prioritized port points via nonbudgetary channels as properly, akin to by convening the Meeting Choose Committee on Ports and Items Motion for 2 hearings, one on congestion (November 2021) and one other on the affect of port congestion on agriculture (February 2022). The Legislature can also be contemplating various coverage payments which can be nonetheless pending on the time of this writing.

Determine 3

Current State Budgets Have Included Funding for Portsa

(In Tens of millions)

Division

Advertisement

Merchandise

2021‑22

2022‑23

2023‑24

2024‑25

Advertisement

CalSTA

Port of Oakland

$280

Advertisement

SLC

Financial Help for Ports

250

Advertisement

CalSTA

Provide Chain Resilience Bundle

Advertisement

$600

$600

CWDB

Items Motion Workforce Coaching Campus

Advertisement

30

40

$40

GO‑Biz

Advertisement

Operational and Course of Enchancment at Ports

30

Advertisement

2022-23 Funds Consists of Funding for Freight Coverage Group at CalSTA. With the purpose of supporting a extra cohesive method in direction of freight coverage—together with at ports—the 2022-23 price range bundle established a brand new freight coverage workforce beneath CalSTA to play a coordinating position and included positions for the workforce on a three-year, limited-term foundation with a reporting requirement on its efforts. This report is meant to tell future choices on an ongoing method to bettering coordination of statewide freight coverage.

Current Federal Actions to Tackle Port Congestion and Air High quality

Vital New Funding for Port Infrastructure. In November 2021, IIJA was signed into legislation. The act supplies $1.2 trillion for infrastructure nationwide, together with about $17 billion for ports and waterways. Most of this funding is focused for federally owned infrastructure, via the Military Corps of Engineers, Basic Providers Administration, U.S. Customs and Border Safety, and Division of Homeland Safety. About $2.7 billion is offered for non-federally owned port infrastructure, to be distributed via three aggressive packages over the following 5 years: (1) $2.3 billion via PIDP, (2) $400 million via the brand new Discount of Truck Emissions at Port Amenities Program, and (3) $25 million via the Marine Highways Program. California’s ports are eligible to use for these funds. Presently, all of those federal packages have begun the funding allocation course of for federal fiscal 12 months 2022. Every of those packages require a 20 % funding match from a nonfederal supply, which may embrace state funding.

Along with the funding included in IIJA, the federal authorities lately enacted the Inflation Discount Act of 2022, which incorporates $3 billion for ports to scale back air air pollution and carbon emissions. Of this quantity, about $2.3 billion can be obtainable on a aggressive foundation for all ports and $750 million via aggressive grants for ports in areas that don’t meet federal air high quality requirements. A number of ports in California seemingly can be eligible for the latter grant.

White Home Issued Motion Plan for Ports and Waterways. Alongside the enactment of IIJA, in November 2021, the Biden administration introduced a set of near- and longer-term actions to enhance port and waterway infrastructure. These included efforts to speed up federal grant awards, determine and develop port infrastructure initiatives, and facilitate information sharing to help provide chain effectivity.

Conclusion

California’s ports have important implications for each the state’s financial system in addition to the surroundings. As a vital element of the worldwide provide chain, effectivity and capability at ports are important to make sure the cost-effectiveness and timeliness of products motion, each for customers in addition to companies. As well as, ports stay important sources of air air pollution and emissions, that are related to unfavorable public well being outcomes and are detrimental to the state’s local weather change mitigation efforts. These points have solely heightened with the current port congestion challenges—highlighting the necessity for port infrastructure to develop capability and effectivity in addition to enhance applied sciences and gear to scale back air high quality impacts. These points will confront the Legislature within the coming years because it seeks to additional enhance items motion and air high quality at California’s ports.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

California

California proposes its own EV buyer credit — which could cut out Elon Musk's Tesla

Published

on

California proposes its own EV buyer credit — which could cut out Elon Musk's Tesla


  • Gov. Gavin Newsom plans to revive California’s EV rebate if Trump ends the federal tax credit.
  • But Tesla, the largest maker of EVs, would be excluded under the proposal.
  • Elon Musk criticized Tesla’s potential exclusion from the rebate.

California Gov. Gavin Newsom is preparing to step in if President-elect Donald Trump fulfills his promise to axe the federal electric-vehicle tax credit — but one notable EV maker could be left out.

Newsom said Monday if the $7,500 federal tax credit is eliminated he would restart the state’s zero-emission vehicle rebate program, which was phased out in 2023.

“We will intervene if the Trump Administration eliminates the federal tax credit, doubling down on our commitment to clean air and green jobs in California,” Newsom said in a statement. “We’re not turning back on a clean transportation future — we’re going to make it more affordable for people to drive vehicles that don’t pollute.”

Advertisement

The rebates for EV buyers would come from the state’s Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund, which is funded by polluters of greenhouse gases under a cap-and-trade program, according to the governor’s office.

But Tesla’s vehicles could be excluded under the proposal’s market-share limitations, Bloomberg News first reported.

The governor’s office confirmed to Business Insider that the rebate program could include a market-share cap which could in turn exclude Tesla or other EV makers. The office did not share details about what market-share limit could be proposed and also noted the proposal would be subject to negotiations in the state legislature.

A market-share cap would exclude companies whose sales account for a certain amount of total electric vehicle sales. For instance, Tesla accounted for nearly 55% off all new electric vehicles registered in California in the first three quarters of 2024, according to a report from the California New Car Dealers Association. By comparison, the companies with the next highest EV market share in California were Hyundai and BMW with 5.6% and 5% respectively.

Advertisement

Tesla sales in California, the US’s largest EV market, have recently declined even as overall EV sales in the state have grown. Though the company still accounted for a majority of EV sales in California this year as of September, its market share fell year-over-year from 64% to 55%.

The governor’s office said the market-share cap would be aimed at promoting competition and innovation in the industry.

Elon Musk, who has expressed support for ending the federal tax credit, said in an X post it was “insane” for the California proposal exclude Tesla.

The federal electric vehicle tax credit, which was passed as part of the Biden administration’s Inflation Reduction Act in 2022, provides a $7,500 tax credit to some EV buyers.

Advertisement

Musk, who is working closely with the incoming Trump administration, has expressed support for ending the tax credit. He’s set to co-lead an advisory commission, the Department of Government Efficiency, which is aimed at slashing federal spending.

The Tesla CEO said on an earnings call in July that ending the federal tax credit might actually benefit the company.

“I think it would be devastating for our competitors and for Tesla slightly,” Musk said. “But long-term probably actually helps Tesla, would be my guess.”

Advertisement

BI’s Graham Rapier previously reported that ending the tax credit could help Tesla maintain its strong standing in the EV market by slowing its competitors growth.

Prior to the EV rebate proposal, Newsom has already positioned himself as a foil to the incoming Trump administration. Following Trump’s election win the governor called on California lawmakers to convene for a special session to discuss protecting the state from Trump’s second term.

“The freedoms we hold dear in California are under attack — and we won’t sit idle,” Newsom said in a statement at the time.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

California

California Gov. Gavin Newsom says state will provide rebates if Trump removes tax credit for electric vehicles

Published

on

California Gov. Gavin Newsom says state will provide rebates if Trump removes tax credit for electric vehicles


California Gov. Gavin Newsom said the state will provide rebates to residents if President-elect Donald Trump’s incoming administration does away with a federal tax credit for electric vehicles.

In a news release issued Monday, Newsom said he would restart the state’s Clean Vehicle Rebate Program, which provided financial incentives on more than 590,000 vehicles before it was phased out late 2023.

“We will intervene if the Trump Administration eliminates the federal tax credit, doubling down on our commitment to clean air and green jobs in California,” Newsom said. “We’re not turning back on a clean transportation future — we’re going to make it more affordable for people to drive vehicles that don’t pollute.”

The federal rebates on new and used electric vehicles were implemented in the Inflation Reduction Act that President Joe Biden signed into law in 2022. When Trump’s second term in office begins next year, he could work with Congress to change the rules around those rebates. Those potential changes could limit the federal rebates, including by reducing the amount of money available or limiting who is eligible.

Advertisement

Limiting federal subsidies on electric vehicle purchases would hurt many American automakers, including Ford, General Motors and the EV startup Rivian. Tesla, which also builds its automobiles in the United States, would take a smaller hit since that company currently sells more EVs and has a higher profit margin than any other EV manufacturer.

Newsom also announced earlier this month that he will convene a special session “to protect California values,” including fundamental civil rights and reproductive rights, that he said “are under attack by this incoming administration.”

“Whether it be our fundamental civil rights, reproductive freedom, or climate action — we refuse to turn back the clock and allow our values and laws to be attacked,” Newsom said on X on Nov. 7.

A spokesperson for Trump did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

This isn’t the first time California will be taking action against the Trump’s administration concerning clean transportation legislation.

Advertisement

In 2019, California and 22 other states sued his administration for revoking its ability to set standards for greenhouse gas emission and fuel economy standards for vehicles, The Associated Press reported.

California sued the Trump administration over 100 times during his first term, primarily on matters including gun control, health care, education and immigration, the Los Angeles Times reported.



Source link

Continue Reading

California

45 Years Later, California Murder Mystery Solved Through DNA Evidence

Published

on

45 Years Later, California Murder Mystery Solved Through DNA Evidence


A 45-year-old cold case of a 17-year-old girl brutally raped and murdered has been resolved, bringing closure to the family. On February 9, 1979, Esther Gonzalez walked from her parents’ home to her sister’s in Banning, California, roughly 137 km east of Los Angeles. She never arrived. The next day, her body was discovered in a snowpack near a highway in Riverside County, California. Authorities determined she had been raped and bludgeoned to death, leading to an investigation that spanned decades.

The lab was able to match the DNA to a man named Lewis Randolph “Randy” Williamson, who died in 2014. Williamson, a US Marine Corps veteran, called authorities on the fateful day to report finding Ms Gonzalez’s body. At the time, he claimed he could not identify whether the body was male or female. Described as “argumentative” by deputies, Williamson was asked to take a polygraph test, which he passed, clearing him of suspicion in the pre-DNA era. He had faced assault allegations in the past but was never convicted of any violent crimes, according to the Los Angeles Times.

Advertisement

Despite limited leads, the Riverside County cold case homicide team didn’t give up. A semen sample recovered from Ms Gonzalez’s body in 1979 was preserved but remained unmatched in the national Combined DNA Index System (CODIS) for decades.

In 2023, forensic technology finally caught up. The homicide team collaborated with a genetic lab in Texas that specialises in forensic genealogy. A sample of Williamson’s blood from his 2014 autopsy provided the DNA match needed to confirm him as the 17-year-old’s rapist and killer.

The Gonzalez family had mixed emotions—relief at finally having answers and sadness knowing Williamson would not face justice, as he died in Florida ten years ago. Ms Gonzalez, remembered by her family as a shy yet funny and mild-mannered young woman, was the fourth of seven children. Her oldest brother, Eddie Gonzalez, wrote on Facebook, “The Gonzalez family would like to thank the Riverside County Sheriff’s Department on a job well done. After 40 years, the Gonzalez family has closure.”

Advertisement

“We are very happy that we finally have closure,” Ms Gonzalez’s sister, Elizabeth, 64, shared with CNN. “We are happy about it but, since the guy has died, a little sad that he won’t spend any time for her murder.”




Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending