California
Opinion: California’s Water Threatened by Overuse of Unregulated Pesticides and Herbicides
The water shortage California has been experiencing during the last 20 years is the results of the worst drought to hit the American Southwest prior to now 1,200 years. Whereas local weather change performs a major function in decreasing precipitations, the unsustainable use of groundwater aquifers additional diminishes the state’s restricted water provides.
This ongoing situation has been a major concern garnering Federal-level consideration, with the Senate passing the Infrastructure Investments and Jobs Act in August 2021 to enhance California’s important water infrastructure. Concurrently, points relating to water high quality come up as a result of state’s excessive use of pesticides in agriculture, with a number of Environmental Safety Company-reapproved poisonous herbicides not being regulated by state laws.
Unsustainable Agriculture Threatens Water High quality
From 2004 to 2015, over 2 billion kilos of pesticides have been utilized in California, with the newest numbers indicating an annual use of 209 million kilos. Although it represents solely 2-3% of whole U.S. cropland, the Golden State makes use of as much as 20% of all pesticides employed within the U.S.
Even when it’s a water-starved state, roughly 80% of California’s water provides are used for intensive agricultural practices, primarily within the San Joaquin/Central Valley. The remaining 20% of the state’s water supposed for the inhabitants is prone to contamination from pesticides used for demanding high-value crops like almonds, cotton, and pistachios.
Issues over water security usually are not misplaced. The EPA famous in 2002 that 635 miles of waterways crossing the Central Valley have been compromised by agricultural pesticides, rendering the water unsafe for fishing, swimming, or ingesting. Furthermore, runoff from cultivated land that reaches the Sacramento and San Joaquin rivers can contaminate ingesting water sources serving tens of millions of Californians, together with city areas like San Francisco, Los Angeles, and San Diego.
Over time, environmental advocacy teams have supported insurance policies and packages to advertise water security by decreasing extreme discharge from agricultural waste. Although progress is being made to deal with the difficulty, most laws are flawed with poor monitoring and an absence of enforceable requirements.
Poisonous Herbicides Stay Unregulated by Proposition 65
Since 1986, California’s Proposition 65 has ensured water security by imposing limits and laws for harmful substances. Whereas it regulates a listing of just about 900 chemical substances, a number of poisonous pesticides stay unregulated by the California Environmental Safety Company (CalEPA).
For instance, a poisonous herbicide nonetheless out there in the marketplace, paraquat, has been extensively used for weeds which have turn into immune to different harmful pesticides like glyphosate. Its elevated toxicity led to the substance being banned in 32 international locations, together with the EU and China.
California’s Workplace of Environmental Well being Hazard Evaluation (OEHHA), which updates the record of gear regulated by Proposition 65, doesn’t embrace paraquat within the few-provided and particular qualifying standards for inflicting most cancers, congenital disabilities, or reproductive hurt.
With 1,3 million kilos being utilized in California in 2018, paraquat has been documented to provide reproductive points in laboratory mice fashions, impacting human kidney and lung operate and rising the chance of Parkinson’s illness. Its widespread software within the agriculture-intensive San Joaquin Valley represents a real contamination risk to one of many state’s most necessary ingesting water sources.
EPA Reapproves Paraquat Till 2035
Regardless of proof indicating that it represents a extreme risk to human well being, in August 2021, the EPA accepted paraquat’s registration renewal for one more 15 years. Moreover, it additionally permits its aerial software with a 50-75 foot buffer zone in residential communities.
The company’s resolution was met with authorized motion from environmental, well being, and farmworker teams. They cite the EPA’s disregard for staff’ and communities’ security given paraquat’s antagonistic neurological results. Whereas the case is pending, California may use its in depth regulatory authority to make sure water high quality and scale back the chance of poisonous pollution.
This may be achieved by OEHHA increasing Proposition 65’s restricted qualifying standards to incorporate a number of kinds of hurt, together with respiratory, renal, and neurologic. This could permit setting definitive security requirements for paraquat and different unregulated herbicides that may find yourself in ingesting water.
Regardless that the EPA could dispute paraquat’s neurotoxic potential, the company wants to deal with the general threat that pesticide contamination of water sources represents for people and the setting. The company may assist states scale back pesticide air pollution by growing complete monitoring and speedy detection capabilities.
In 2021 the EPA launched the Water Toxicity Sensor Problem aiming to supply revolutionary concepts for cost-efficient electrochemical biosensors to quickly establish poisonous pesticides in water sources. Whereas the viability of electrochemical sensors has elevated over the previous decade, with sure fashions in a position to detect particular contaminants like paraquat at low concentrations, the EPA has but to launch any updates relating to its progress.
Making certain the standard of California’s water provide requires up to date regulation of gear used within the state’s very important agricultural sector and water administration reforms. CalEPA ought to rethink its analysis standards for authorized poisonous pesticides.
Within the meantime, so long as the federal EPA will reapprove dangerous herbicides, it may no less than attempt to offset their influence by offering states with higher skills to detect and quickly deal with contamination earlier than it poses an excellent higher public well being threat.
Stan Gottfredson serves as CEO of Atraxia Regulation, a San Diego-based agency that helps agricultural staff and their households affected by paraquat publicity compile the required info to help their Parkinson’s illness harm claims in opposition to liable producers.
California
STEVE HILTON: Five things California Democrats still don't get
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
Along with most other Democratic politicians in California, Gov. Gavin Newsom still doesn’t seem to understand what happened in the 2024 election.
For years, Newsom, along with California cronies like former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and, of course, Vice President Kamala Harris, bragged about their state being a “model for the nation.”
In one sense–not the one they intended, of course–that’s true. California became a model of what not to do.
CALIFORNIA VOTERS NARROWLY REJECT $18 MINIMUM WAGE; FIRST SUCH NO-VOTE NATIONWIDE SINCE 1996
The terrible combination of elitism and extremism that has defined Democratic policymaking in my home state for at least the last decade has delivered failure on every front.
Despite having the highest taxes in the nation, despite the state’s budget nearly doubling in the last ten years (even as our population has been falling, in the exodus from blue state misrule), California has the highest rate of poverty in America. We have the highest housing costs, the lowest homeownership, highest gas and utility bills, and the worst business climate–ten years in a row.
This record of failure is exactly why Democrats lost so badly on November 5th. Voters had a clear choice: between more of the same Democrat policies that raised the cost of living and lowered their quality of life, or a return to the peace and prosperity of the Trump years.
GAVIN NEWSOM TO MEET WITH BIDEN AFTER VOWING TO PROTECT STATE’S PROGRESSIVE POLICIES AGAINST TRUMP ADMIN
In many ways, the contest between Donald Trump and Kamala Harris represented a battle between the ‘blue state model’ championed by Gavin Newsom in California, and the ‘red state model’ that has driven people and businesses out of California and into the arms of more welcoming states like Texas, Tennessee and Florida.
Of course, the red state model won and the blue state model was roundly rejected.
You would think that would make blue state leaders like Newsom pause and reflect. But the exact opposite has happened. Gavin Newsom immediately called a “special session” of the California legislature to “Trump-proof” his state.
What California really needs is “Newsom-proofing.”
Instead, California Democrats are doubling down on the exact same agenda that was defeated across the country – including in California, which saw the biggest shift from Democrats to the GOP in decades.
Here are the five things California Democrats still don’t get:
1. People want results, not lectures
Democrats and their media sycophants can do all the self-righteous, sanctimonious bloviating they like about “our democracy” and “equity”, but in the end people want the basics of the American Dream: a good job that pays enough to raise your family in a home of your own in a safe neighborhood with a good school so your kids can have a better life than you. No amount of moral superiority from the people in charge will make up for that if they fail to provide it.
2. Enough with the ‘climate’ extremism
“Climate” has become a religion for Democrats, and you see that especially clearly in California. But when you look at the main reason life is so unaffordable for working people, whether that’s gas prices, utility bills or housing costs, extreme climate policies are to blame. Working-class Americans can’t afford these ‘luxury beliefs.’
CLICK HERE FOR MORE FOX NEWS OPINION
3. Who cares about Hollywood?
This election destroyed forever the myth that fancy celebrities can sway votes. Oprah, Beyonce, George Clooney, Taylor Swift…nobody cares! The new cultural powerhouses are the podcast hosts, comedians…the raw power of UFC is where it’s at, not the decadent Hollywood elite who won’t even turn up to support “their” candidate without a multimillion dollar paycheck.
4. ‘Little tech’ beats Big Tech
Democrats may console themselves with the knowledge that California’s Big Tech monopolies are on their side. But in this election we saw the rise of what famed Silicon Valley investor Marc Andressen calls “little tech”, the upstarts and rebels who reject leftist groupthink. They got engaged in this election in a way we’ve never seen before. It’s a massive shift and will be a huge force for the future.
5. Working class beats the elite
Back in 2016, after the Brexit vote, and then Donald Trump’s victory here, shocked the world, I predicted that the Republican Party had the opportunity to become a “multiracial working class coalition.” Trump’s 2024 victory has delivered that — a revolutionary shift in our political landscape. The other part of my prediction? Democrats will be left as the party of the “rich, white and woke.”
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
Unless Democrats come to terms with these realities and change course, they can expect to lose elections for years to come. The reaction in California – epicenter of today’s Democrat elite — shows that there is zero sign of this happening.
They just don’t get it.
CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM STEVE HILTON
California
California proposes its own EV buyer credit — which could cut out Elon Musk's Tesla
- Gov. Gavin Newsom plans to revive California’s EV rebate if Trump ends the federal tax credit.
- But Tesla, the largest maker of EVs, would be excluded under the proposal.
- Elon Musk criticized Tesla’s potential exclusion from the rebate.
California Gov. Gavin Newsom is preparing to step in if President-elect Donald Trump fulfills his promise to axe the federal electric-vehicle tax credit — but one notable EV maker could be left out.
Newsom said Monday if the $7,500 federal tax credit is eliminated he would restart the state’s zero-emission vehicle rebate program, which was phased out in 2023.
“We will intervene if the Trump Administration eliminates the federal tax credit, doubling down on our commitment to clean air and green jobs in California,” Newsom said in a statement. “We’re not turning back on a clean transportation future — we’re going to make it more affordable for people to drive vehicles that don’t pollute.”
The rebates for EV buyers would come from the state’s Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund, which is funded by polluters of greenhouse gases under a cap-and-trade program, according to the governor’s office.
But Tesla’s vehicles could be excluded under the proposal’s market-share limitations, Bloomberg News first reported.
The governor’s office confirmed to Business Insider that the rebate program could include a market-share cap which could in turn exclude Tesla or other EV makers. The office did not share details about what market-share limit could be proposed and also noted the proposal would be subject to negotiations in the state legislature.
A market-share cap would exclude companies whose sales account for a certain amount of total electric vehicle sales. For instance, Tesla accounted for nearly 55% off all new electric vehicles registered in California in the first three quarters of 2024, according to a report from the California New Car Dealers Association. By comparison, the companies with the next highest EV market share in California were Hyundai and BMW with 5.6% and 5% respectively.
Tesla sales in California, the US’s largest EV market, have recently declined even as overall EV sales in the state have grown. Though the company still accounted for a majority of EV sales in California this year as of September, its market share fell year-over-year from 64% to 55%.
The governor’s office said the market-share cap would be aimed at promoting competition and innovation in the industry.
Elon Musk, who has expressed support for ending the federal tax credit, said in an X post it was “insane” for the California proposal exclude Tesla.
The federal electric vehicle tax credit, which was passed as part of the Biden administration’s Inflation Reduction Act in 2022, provides a $7,500 tax credit to some EV buyers.
Musk, who is working closely with the incoming Trump administration, has expressed support for ending the tax credit. He’s set to co-lead an advisory commission, the Department of Government Efficiency, which is aimed at slashing federal spending.
The Tesla CEO said on an earnings call in July that ending the federal tax credit might actually benefit the company.
“I think it would be devastating for our competitors and for Tesla slightly,” Musk said. “But long-term probably actually helps Tesla, would be my guess.”
BI’s Graham Rapier previously reported that ending the tax credit could help Tesla maintain its strong standing in the EV market by slowing its competitors growth.
Prior to the EV rebate proposal, Newsom has already positioned himself as a foil to the incoming Trump administration. Following Trump’s election win the governor called on California lawmakers to convene for a special session to discuss protecting the state from Trump’s second term.
“The freedoms we hold dear in California are under attack — and we won’t sit idle,” Newsom said in a statement at the time.
California
California Gov. Gavin Newsom says state will provide rebates if Trump removes tax credit for electric vehicles
California Gov. Gavin Newsom said the state will provide rebates to residents if President-elect Donald Trump’s incoming administration does away with a federal tax credit for electric vehicles.
In a news release issued Monday, Newsom said he would restart the state’s Clean Vehicle Rebate Program, which provided financial incentives on more than 590,000 vehicles before it was phased out late 2023.
“We will intervene if the Trump Administration eliminates the federal tax credit, doubling down on our commitment to clean air and green jobs in California,” Newsom said. “We’re not turning back on a clean transportation future — we’re going to make it more affordable for people to drive vehicles that don’t pollute.”
The federal rebates on new and used electric vehicles were implemented in the Inflation Reduction Act that President Joe Biden signed into law in 2022. When Trump’s second term in office begins next year, he could work with Congress to change the rules around those rebates. Those potential changes could limit the federal rebates, including by reducing the amount of money available or limiting who is eligible.
Limiting federal subsidies on electric vehicle purchases would hurt many American automakers, including Ford, General Motors and the EV startup Rivian. Tesla, which also builds its automobiles in the United States, would take a smaller hit since that company currently sells more EVs and has a higher profit margin than any other EV manufacturer.
Newsom also announced earlier this month that he will convene a special session “to protect California values,” including fundamental civil rights and reproductive rights, that he said “are under attack by this incoming administration.”
“Whether it be our fundamental civil rights, reproductive freedom, or climate action — we refuse to turn back the clock and allow our values and laws to be attacked,” Newsom said on X on Nov. 7.
A spokesperson for Trump did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
This isn’t the first time California will be taking action against the Trump’s administration concerning clean transportation legislation.
In 2019, California and 22 other states sued his administration for revoking its ability to set standards for greenhouse gas emission and fuel economy standards for vehicles, The Associated Press reported.
California sued the Trump administration over 100 times during his first term, primarily on matters including gun control, health care, education and immigration, the Los Angeles Times reported.
-
Business1 week ago
Column: Molly White's message for journalists going freelance — be ready for the pitfalls
-
Science7 days ago
Trump nominates Dr. Oz to head Medicare and Medicaid and help take on 'illness industrial complex'
-
Politics1 week ago
Trump taps FCC member Brendan Carr to lead agency: 'Warrior for Free Speech'
-
Technology1 week ago
Inside Elon Musk’s messy breakup with OpenAI
-
Lifestyle1 week ago
Some in the U.S. farm industry are alarmed by Trump's embrace of RFK Jr. and tariffs
-
World1 week ago
Protesters in Slovakia rally against Robert Fico’s populist government
-
Health3 days ago
Holiday gatherings can lead to stress eating: Try these 5 tips to control it
-
News1 week ago
They disagree about a lot, but these singers figure out how to stay in harmony