Connect with us

California

Northern California ranchers told to stop diverting water, defying rules amid drought

Published

on

Northern California ranchers told to stop diverting water, defying rules amid drought


California has warned a bunch of farmers and ranchers close to the Oregon state line to cease diverting water from an space already wracked by excessive drought and a wildfire that killed tens of 1000’s of fish.

The State Water Assets Management Board issued a draft cease-and-desist order Friday to the Shasta Water Assn., warning it to cease taking water from the Shasta River watershed.

The affiliation has 20 days to request a listening to or the order turns into ultimate and will topic the group to fines of as much as $10,000 a day, in response to the state water company.

Advertisement

The diversions had been persevering with as of Tuesday, mentioned Ailene Voisin, a state water board info officer.

Since final yr, the state company has curtailed water use within the watershed as a way to hold water flowing within the Shasta River, a major tributary of the Klamath River and a nursery for a fragile and federally protected salmon species.

Three weeks in the past, salmon and different species of fish turned up useless alongside a miles-long stretch of the Klamath.

Biologists consider a flash flood brought on by heavy rains despatched mud and particles from an enormous wildfire burning upstream into the river, dropping the oxygen stage to zero for a few days, mentioned Craig Tucker, pure sources advisor for the Karuk Tribe.

A tough estimate is that fifty,000 to 100,000 suckerfish died together with an unknown variety of salmon and different species, Tucker mentioned.

Advertisement

Then, starting on Aug. 17 and 18, the Shasta River move dropped to about half of the minimal emergency move requirement of fifty cubic toes per second, the state water company mentioned.

As of Tuesday afternoon, the move was at 14 cubic toes per second, in response to state figures.

Fifty cubic toes per second is the estimated move of water mandatory for fish within the river, a refuge for salmon that run year-round because of chilly springs fed by glaciers on Mt. Shasta, Tucker mentioned.

Ranchers look like pumping water from the river or diverting springs on or close to their land to irrigate cattle pastures or alfalfa fields, Tucker mentioned, though tribal members haven’t ventured onto non-public property to analyze.

The Shasta River Water Assn. Inc. is a tax-exempt irrigation group, based mostly in Grenada, Calif., that represents about 80 agricultural members. A message to an electronic mail related to the affiliation wasn’t instantly returned Tuesday.

Advertisement

Nevertheless, in an Aug. 17 letter to the water board, the group mentioned it believed exemptions allowed it to cut back its diversion by solely 15% and mentioned it could begin pumping water to provide livestock in sizzling climate and to fill ponds for fireplace suppression.

“The curtailment has dried the Shasta Valley to the purpose of endangerment to well being and lifetime of the general public and residents who stay right here, with obvious disregard to the livestock and pet well being inside this watershed,” the letter mentioned.

The priority over low move within the Shasta is that the autumn salmon breeding season is close to. Fish will start heading up the river in a few weeks to spawn and if the water stage is simply too low, they might be unable to seek out the protected swimming pools they should hold their eggs from being washed away or devoured, Tucker mentioned.

The salmon are revered by the Karuk Tribe and the Yurok Tribe, California’s second-largest Native American tribe.

The species has suffered from low flows within the Klamath River in recent times, and a parasite that’s lethal to salmon flourished within the hotter, slower-moving water final summer season, killing fish in enormous numbers.

Advertisement

“What we’re doing right here can be a barometer for the remainder of the state,” Tucker mentioned. “If the state can’t implement its personal rules relating to river flows, California fisheries don’t stand an opportunity.”

It’s solely one of many battles being fought over water within the West, particularly alongside the California-Oregon state line the place agriculture competes with conservation and quite a lot of stakeholders and the federal government are struggling to cope with shrinking provides.

In southern Oregon, the Klamath Irrigation District mentioned it plans to defy a U.S. authorities order issued final week for a halt to water deliveries to farmers within the drought-stricken basin.

Scientists have mentioned local weather change has made the West hotter and drier during the last three many years and can proceed to make climate extra excessive and wildfires extra frequent and damaging. Throughout the American West, a 22-year megadrought deepened a lot in 2021 that the area is now within the driest spell in at the least 1,200 years.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

California

California proposes its own EV buyer credit — which could cut out Elon Musk's Tesla

Published

on

California proposes its own EV buyer credit — which could cut out Elon Musk's Tesla


  • Gov. Gavin Newsom plans to revive California’s EV rebate if Trump ends the federal tax credit.
  • But Tesla, the largest maker of EVs, would be excluded under the proposal.
  • Elon Musk criticized Tesla’s potential exclusion from the rebate.

California Gov. Gavin Newsom is preparing to step in if President-elect Donald Trump fulfills his promise to axe the federal electric-vehicle tax credit — but one notable EV maker could be left out.

Newsom said Monday if the $7,500 federal tax credit is eliminated he would restart the state’s zero-emission vehicle rebate program, which was phased out in 2023.

“We will intervene if the Trump Administration eliminates the federal tax credit, doubling down on our commitment to clean air and green jobs in California,” Newsom said in a statement. “We’re not turning back on a clean transportation future — we’re going to make it more affordable for people to drive vehicles that don’t pollute.”

Advertisement

The rebates for EV buyers would come from the state’s Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund, which is funded by polluters of greenhouse gases under a cap-and-trade program, according to the governor’s office.

But Tesla’s vehicles could be excluded under the proposal’s market-share limitations, Bloomberg News first reported.

The governor’s office confirmed to Business Insider that the rebate program could include a market-share cap which could in turn exclude Tesla or other EV makers. The office did not share details about what market-share limit could be proposed and also noted the proposal would be subject to negotiations in the state legislature.

A market-share cap would exclude companies whose sales account for a certain amount of total electric vehicle sales. For instance, Tesla accounted for nearly 55% off all new electric vehicles registered in California in the first three quarters of 2024, according to a report from the California New Car Dealers Association. By comparison, the companies with the next highest EV market share in California were Hyundai and BMW with 5.6% and 5% respectively.

Advertisement

Tesla sales in California, the US’s largest EV market, have recently declined even as overall EV sales in the state have grown. Though the company still accounted for a majority of EV sales in California this year as of September, its market share fell year-over-year from 64% to 55%.

The governor’s office said the market-share cap would be aimed at promoting competition and innovation in the industry.

Elon Musk, who has expressed support for ending the federal tax credit, said in an X post it was “insane” for the California proposal exclude Tesla.

The federal electric vehicle tax credit, which was passed as part of the Biden administration’s Inflation Reduction Act in 2022, provides a $7,500 tax credit to some EV buyers.

Advertisement

Musk, who is working closely with the incoming Trump administration, has expressed support for ending the tax credit. He’s set to co-lead an advisory commission, the Department of Government Efficiency, which is aimed at slashing federal spending.

The Tesla CEO said on an earnings call in July that ending the federal tax credit might actually benefit the company.

“I think it would be devastating for our competitors and for Tesla slightly,” Musk said. “But long-term probably actually helps Tesla, would be my guess.”

Advertisement

BI’s Graham Rapier previously reported that ending the tax credit could help Tesla maintain its strong standing in the EV market by slowing its competitors growth.

Prior to the EV rebate proposal, Newsom has already positioned himself as a foil to the incoming Trump administration. Following Trump’s election win the governor called on California lawmakers to convene for a special session to discuss protecting the state from Trump’s second term.

“The freedoms we hold dear in California are under attack — and we won’t sit idle,” Newsom said in a statement at the time.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

California

California Gov. Gavin Newsom says state will provide rebates if Trump removes tax credit for electric vehicles

Published

on

California Gov. Gavin Newsom says state will provide rebates if Trump removes tax credit for electric vehicles


California Gov. Gavin Newsom said the state will provide rebates to residents if President-elect Donald Trump’s incoming administration does away with a federal tax credit for electric vehicles.

In a news release issued Monday, Newsom said he would restart the state’s Clean Vehicle Rebate Program, which provided financial incentives on more than 590,000 vehicles before it was phased out late 2023.

“We will intervene if the Trump Administration eliminates the federal tax credit, doubling down on our commitment to clean air and green jobs in California,” Newsom said. “We’re not turning back on a clean transportation future — we’re going to make it more affordable for people to drive vehicles that don’t pollute.”

The federal rebates on new and used electric vehicles were implemented in the Inflation Reduction Act that President Joe Biden signed into law in 2022. When Trump’s second term in office begins next year, he could work with Congress to change the rules around those rebates. Those potential changes could limit the federal rebates, including by reducing the amount of money available or limiting who is eligible.

Advertisement

Limiting federal subsidies on electric vehicle purchases would hurt many American automakers, including Ford, General Motors and the EV startup Rivian. Tesla, which also builds its automobiles in the United States, would take a smaller hit since that company currently sells more EVs and has a higher profit margin than any other EV manufacturer.

Newsom also announced earlier this month that he will convene a special session “to protect California values,” including fundamental civil rights and reproductive rights, that he said “are under attack by this incoming administration.”

“Whether it be our fundamental civil rights, reproductive freedom, or climate action — we refuse to turn back the clock and allow our values and laws to be attacked,” Newsom said on X on Nov. 7.

A spokesperson for Trump did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

This isn’t the first time California will be taking action against the Trump’s administration concerning clean transportation legislation.

Advertisement

In 2019, California and 22 other states sued his administration for revoking its ability to set standards for greenhouse gas emission and fuel economy standards for vehicles, The Associated Press reported.

California sued the Trump administration over 100 times during his first term, primarily on matters including gun control, health care, education and immigration, the Los Angeles Times reported.



Source link

Continue Reading

California

45 Years Later, California Murder Mystery Solved Through DNA Evidence

Published

on

45 Years Later, California Murder Mystery Solved Through DNA Evidence


A 45-year-old cold case of a 17-year-old girl brutally raped and murdered has been resolved, bringing closure to the family. On February 9, 1979, Esther Gonzalez walked from her parents’ home to her sister’s in Banning, California, roughly 137 km east of Los Angeles. She never arrived. The next day, her body was discovered in a snowpack near a highway in Riverside County, California. Authorities determined she had been raped and bludgeoned to death, leading to an investigation that spanned decades.

The lab was able to match the DNA to a man named Lewis Randolph “Randy” Williamson, who died in 2014. Williamson, a US Marine Corps veteran, called authorities on the fateful day to report finding Ms Gonzalez’s body. At the time, he claimed he could not identify whether the body was male or female. Described as “argumentative” by deputies, Williamson was asked to take a polygraph test, which he passed, clearing him of suspicion in the pre-DNA era. He had faced assault allegations in the past but was never convicted of any violent crimes, according to the Los Angeles Times.

Advertisement

Despite limited leads, the Riverside County cold case homicide team didn’t give up. A semen sample recovered from Ms Gonzalez’s body in 1979 was preserved but remained unmatched in the national Combined DNA Index System (CODIS) for decades.

In 2023, forensic technology finally caught up. The homicide team collaborated with a genetic lab in Texas that specialises in forensic genealogy. A sample of Williamson’s blood from his 2014 autopsy provided the DNA match needed to confirm him as the 17-year-old’s rapist and killer.

The Gonzalez family had mixed emotions—relief at finally having answers and sadness knowing Williamson would not face justice, as he died in Florida ten years ago. Ms Gonzalez, remembered by her family as a shy yet funny and mild-mannered young woman, was the fourth of seven children. Her oldest brother, Eddie Gonzalez, wrote on Facebook, “The Gonzalez family would like to thank the Riverside County Sheriff’s Department on a job well done. After 40 years, the Gonzalez family has closure.”

Advertisement

“We are very happy that we finally have closure,” Ms Gonzalez’s sister, Elizabeth, 64, shared with CNN. “We are happy about it but, since the guy has died, a little sad that he won’t spend any time for her murder.”




Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending