Connect with us

California

Insurers say California’s inaction threatens auto policies

Published

on

Insurers say California’s inaction threatens auto policies


SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) — High U.S. insurance coverage corporations and associations say California is risking a disaster within the nation’s largest vehicle insurance coverage market by refusing to approve any price will increase for greater than two years, for the reason that begin of the coronavirus pandemic.

The businesses already are slicing again and say they’ll’t proceed working at a loss whereas Insurance coverage Commissioner Ricardo Lara delays price circumstances filed by corporations representing three-quarters of the California market. Allstate, Geico, Kemper, Liberty Mutual and State Farm all reported paying extra in claims than they collected in California premiums within the first half of the 12 months, although they had been worthwhile as lately as final 12 months.

It’s a part of Lara’s effort to compensate customers who he says had been overcharged in the course of the pandemic’s early months, when site visitors all however disappeared after California imposed the nation’s first stay-home order. His workplace couldn’t say how a lot it thinks insurers nonetheless owe, however the advocacy group Shopper Watchdog places the quantity at greater than $3 billion.

“Information we collected straight from the insurance coverage corporations themselves exhibits lots of them failed to totally return premiums that they overcharged customers,” stated Deputy Insurance coverage Commissioner Michael Soller. A part of the division’s effort is “to make it proper for customers who proceed to have been overcharged on premiums in the course of the pandemic.”

Advertisement

However a state appeals court docket dominated final 12 months that Lara can’t impose “retroactive charges and refunds.” The state Supreme Court docket declined overview, and whereas Lara’s workplace interprets the ruling narrowly, insurers say it’s a blanket ban on his makes an attempt to require additional refunds.

The dispute comes as Lara runs for reelection in opposition to Republican Robert Howell, who will not be anticipated to pose a critical menace to Lara’s re-election.

“The commissioner is an elected official and he’s making an attempt to serve his constituents in a means that doesn’t favor market forces,” stated David Russell, a professor of insurance coverage and finance at California State College, Northridge. “However in case you suppress charges, you’re going to get availability issues.”

Advertisement

It’s much like the dilemma corporations face in insuring houses in wildfire-prone areas or alongside the Florida coast, he stated.

“There’s an apparent, and avoidable, market disaster looming,” three associations representing insurers writing greater than 90% of California auto insurance coverage premiums warned Lara in April.

“Auto insurers can’t function indefinitely in California with out the flexibility to gather sufficient charges,” the Nationwide Affiliation of Mutual Insurance coverage Firms, the Private Insurance coverage Federation of California and the American Property Casualty Insurance coverage Affiliation (APCIA) stated of their joint letter. “Criticism of choices made in the course of the pandemic, together with allegations by some that insurers ought to have supplied extra reduction for purchasers, don’t justify ignoring the monetary realities of the current.”

Since pandemic restrictions eased, site visitors is again practically to what it was in 2019 earlier than the coronavirus struck, whereas drivers have change into much less secure so crashes, accidents and fatalities elevated, stated Bob Passmore, an APCIA vice chairman and auto claims knowledgeable. Deaths fell barely final spring for the primary time in two years, however any drop in these funds is offset by provide chain shortages and quickly rising inflation.

Insurers ought to pay again their pandemic windfall, however Lara hasn’t proposed the rules wanted to make them accomplish that, stated Shopper Watchdog founder Harvey Rosenfield.

Advertisement

“In truth, it’s not clear to us precisely what the commissioner is doing aside from … he’s not approving price will increase,” Rosenfield stated. “So whereas I don’t assume any firm ought to get a price improve till they’ve paid again what they illegally took from California motorists, it’s bought to be executed via a proper course of.”

Thirty-eight price improve filings at the moment are backed up, together with 5 new requests filed this month.

Since then, Geico in August closed its three-dozen brick-and-mortar storefronts in California and stopped permitting drivers to purchase insurance coverage by telephone, though it’s nonetheless permitting on-line gross sales.

Progressive President and Chief Govt Officer Tricia Griffith stated in an earnings name final month that the corporate was slowing its progress in California due to the moratorium, whereas Allstate has stopped utilizing impartial brokers and tried to restrict prospects’ cost choices till it was blocked from doing so by Lara’s workplace.

“To have them doing issues right here in California that signifies a pulling again as a lot as they feasibly can, that’s a sign of an unhealthy market, and we predict that’s straight tied to the truth that the insurance coverage commissioner has not reviewed a price submitting in 2 1/2 years,” stated Denni Ritter, APCIA’s vice chairman for state authorities relations.

Advertisement

Massachusetts and New York additionally stopped contemplating price improve requests in the course of the pandemic however have now began once more, the insurers stated.

Insurers “have gotten more and more much less keen to put in writing new enterprise” in California due to the moratorium, Joseph Lacher Jr., Kemper’s president, chief govt officer and chairman stated throughout an earnings name final month.

“Within the relative quick order, my private perception is we’ll begin to see the markets seize up,” he stated. “And I simply hope the commissioner doesn’t push it to that time as a result of it would take a very long time to restart it.”

Rosenfield doesn’t assume the trade is in hassle, however he fears that Lara’s inaction might give insurers grounds to problem him in court docket.

“If there’s one tactic the insurance coverage trade has perfected, it’s making an attempt to blackmail the general public by threatening to tug out,” he stated.

Advertisement

Rosenfield thinks the businesses are utilizing the chance to cherry-pick their finest prospects to spice up earnings by making it more durable for higher-risk customers to purchase insurance coverage. However he criticized Lara for “kind of precipitating a disaster” by not utilizing his regulatory authority to dam what he believes to be insurers’ discriminatory conduct.

Insurers collectively refunded $2.4 billion to California drivers in the course of the pandemic, although Lara calculated that the rebates fell far wanting what customers had been owed. The state has 137 licensed insurance coverage corporations that collected greater than $17 billion in personal passenger auto insurance coverage premiums in 2020, Soller stated.

“Californians have many selections at the moment for auto insurance coverage on this extremely aggressive market and we’ll be sure that it stays that means,” Soller stated.

Copyright 2022 The Related Press. All rights reserved. This materials will not be revealed, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed with out permission.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

California

California may exclude Tesla from EV rebate program

Published

on

California may exclude Tesla from EV rebate program


California Gov. Gavin Newsom may exclude Tesla and other automakers from an electric vehicle (EV) rebate program if the incoming Trump administration scraps a federal tax credit for electric car purchases.

Newsom proposed creating a new version of the state’s Clean Vehicle Rebate Program, which was phased out in 2023 after funding more than 594,000 vehicles and saving more than 456 million gallons of fuel, the governor’s office said in a news release on Monday.

Advertisement

“Consumers continue to prove the skeptics wrong – zero-emission vehicles are here to stay,” Newsom said in a statement. “We’re not turning back on a clean transportation future – we’re going to make it more affordable for people to drive vehicles that don’t pollute.”

The proposed rebates would be funded with money from the state’s Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund, which is funded by polluters under the state’s cap-and-trade program, the governor’s office said. Officials did not say how much the program would cost or save consumers.

NEBRASKA AG LAUNCHES ASSAULT AGAINST CALIFORNIA’S ELECTRIC VEHICLE PUSH

California Gov. Gavin Newsom on Monday proposed creating a new version of the state’s Clean Vehicle Rebate Program if the incoming Trump administration scraps a federal tax credit for electric car purchases. (Photo by Justin Sullivan/Getty Images, File / Getty Images)

They would also include changes to promote innovation and competition in the zero-emission vehicles market – changes that could prevent automakers like Tesla from qualifying for the rebates.

Advertisement

Tesla CEO Elon Musk, who relocated Tesla’s corporate headquarters from California to Texas in 2021, responded to the possibility of having Tesla EVs left out of the program.

Tesla automobile plugged in and charging a Supercharger rapid battery charging station for the electric vehicle company Tesla Motors, in the Silicon Valley town of Mountain View, California, August 24, 2016.

Tesla and other automakers may not qualify for the proposed tax credits, according to the governor’s office. (Getty Images, File / Getty Images)

“Even though Tesla is the only company who manufactures their EVs in California! This is insane,” Musk wrote on X, which he also owns.

BENTLEY PUSHES BACK ALL-EV LINEUP TIMELINE TO 2035

Those buying or leasing Tesla vehicles accounted for about 42% of the state’s rebates, The Associated Press reported, citing data from the California Air Resources Board.

Newsom’s office told Fox Business Digital that the proposal is intended to foster market competition, and any potential market cap is subject to negotiation with the state Legislature. 

Advertisement
Ticker Security Last Change Change %
TSLA TESLA INC. 338.59 -13.97 -3.96%

“Under a potential market cap, and depending on what the cap is, there’s a possibility that Tesla and other automakers could be excluded,” the governor’s office said. “But that’s again subject to negotiations with the legislature.”

Newsom’s office noted that such market caps have been part of rebate programs since George W. Bush’s administration in 2005.

Democrat California Gov. Gavin Newsom

Newsom has pushed Californians to replace gas-powered vehicles with zero-emission vehicles. (Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images / Getty Images)

Federal tax credits for EVs are currently worth up to $7,500 for new zero-emission vehicles. President-elect Trump has previously vowed to end the credit.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

California has surpassed 2 million zero-emission vehicles sold, according to the governor’s office. The state, however, could face a $2 billion budget deficit next year, Reuters reported, citing a non-partisan legislative estimate released last week.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

California

STEVE HILTON: Five things California Democrats still don't get

Published

on

STEVE HILTON: Five things California Democrats still don't get


Join Fox News for access to this content

Plus special access to select articles and other premium content with your account – free of charge.

By entering your email and pushing continue, you are agreeing to Fox News’ Terms of Use and Privacy Policy, which includes our Notice of Financial Incentive.

Please enter a valid email address.

Having trouble? Click here.

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Advertisement

Along with most other Democratic politicians in California, Gov. Gavin Newsom still doesn’t seem to understand what happened in the 2024 election.

For years, Newsom, along with California cronies like former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and, of course, Vice President Kamala Harris, bragged about their state being a “model for the nation.”

In one sense–not the one they intended, of course–that’s true. California became a model of what not to do.

CALIFORNIA VOTERS NARROWLY REJECT $18 MINIMUM WAGE; FIRST SUCH NO-VOTE NATIONWIDE SINCE 1996

The terrible combination of elitism and extremism that has defined Democratic policymaking in my home state for at least the last decade has delivered failure on every front.

Advertisement

Despite having the highest taxes in the nation, despite the state’s budget nearly doubling in the last ten years (even as our population has been falling, in the exodus from blue state misrule), California has the highest rate of poverty in America. We have the highest housing costs, the lowest homeownership, highest gas and utility bills, and the worst business climate–ten years in a row.

This record of failure is exactly why Democrats lost so badly on November 5th. Voters had a clear choice: between more of the same Democrat policies that raised the cost of living and lowered their quality of life, or a return to the peace and prosperity of the Trump years.

GAVIN NEWSOM TO MEET WITH BIDEN AFTER VOWING TO PROTECT STATE’S PROGRESSIVE POLICIES AGAINST TRUMP ADMIN

In many ways, the contest between Donald Trump and Kamala Harris represented a battle between the ‘blue state model’ championed by Gavin Newsom in California, and the ‘red state model’ that has driven people and businesses out of California and into the arms of more welcoming states like Texas, Tennessee and Florida.

Of course, the red state model won and the blue state model was roundly rejected. 

Advertisement

You would think that would make blue state leaders like Newsom pause and reflect. But the exact opposite has happened. Gavin Newsom immediately called a “special session” of the California legislature to “Trump-proof” his state.

What California really needs is “Newsom-proofing.” 

Instead, California Democrats are doubling down on the exact same agenda that was defeated across the country – including in California, which saw the biggest shift from Democrats to the GOP in decades.

Here are the five things California Democrats still don’t get:

1. People want results, not lectures

Democrats and their media sycophants can do all the self-righteous, sanctimonious bloviating they like about “our democracy” and “equity”, but in the end people want the basics of the American Dream: a good job that pays enough to raise your family in a home of your own in a safe neighborhood with a good school so your kids can have a better life than you. No amount of moral superiority from the people in charge will make up for that if they fail to provide it.

Advertisement

2. Enough with the ‘climate’ extremism

“Climate” has become a religion for Democrats, and you see that especially clearly in California. But when you look at the main reason life is so unaffordable for working people, whether that’s gas prices, utility bills or housing costs, extreme climate policies are to blame. Working-class Americans can’t afford these ‘luxury beliefs.’

CLICK HERE FOR MORE FOX NEWS OPINION

3. Who cares about Hollywood? 

This election destroyed forever the myth that fancy celebrities can sway votes. Oprah, Beyonce, George Clooney, Taylor Swift…nobody cares! The new cultural powerhouses are the podcast hosts, comedians…the raw power of UFC is where it’s at, not the decadent Hollywood elite who won’t even turn up to support “their” candidate without a multimillion dollar paycheck.

Producer and actress Oprah Winfrey holds up Vice President and Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris’ hand as she arrives onstage during a campaign rally on the Benjamin Franklin Parkway in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, on November 4, 2024.  (Getty Images)

4. ‘Little tech’ beats Big Tech

Democrats may console themselves with the knowledge that California’s Big Tech monopolies are on their side. But in this election we saw the rise of what famed Silicon Valley investor Marc Andressen calls “little tech”, the upstarts and rebels who reject leftist groupthink. They got engaged in this election in a way we’ve never seen before. It’s a massive shift and will be a huge force for the future.

Advertisement

5. Working class beats the elite 

Back in 2016, after the Brexit vote, and then Donald Trump’s victory here, shocked the world, I predicted that the Republican Party had the opportunity to become a “multiracial working class coalition.” Trump’s 2024 victory has delivered that — a revolutionary shift in our political landscape. The other part of my prediction? Democrats will be left as the party of the “rich, white and woke.”

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Unless Democrats come to terms with these realities and change course, they can expect to lose elections for years to come. The reaction in California – epicenter of today’s Democrat elite — shows that there is zero sign of this happening. 

They just don’t get it.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM STEVE HILTON

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

California

California proposes its own EV buyer credit — which could cut out Elon Musk's Tesla

Published

on

California proposes its own EV buyer credit — which could cut out Elon Musk's Tesla


  • Gov. Gavin Newsom plans to revive California’s EV rebate if Trump ends the federal tax credit.
  • But Tesla, the largest maker of EVs, would be excluded under the proposal.
  • Elon Musk criticized Tesla’s potential exclusion from the rebate.

California Gov. Gavin Newsom is preparing to step in if President-elect Donald Trump fulfills his promise to axe the federal electric-vehicle tax credit — but one notable EV maker could be left out.

Newsom said Monday if the $7,500 federal tax credit is eliminated he would restart the state’s zero-emission vehicle rebate program, which was phased out in 2023.

“We will intervene if the Trump Administration eliminates the federal tax credit, doubling down on our commitment to clean air and green jobs in California,” Newsom said in a statement. “We’re not turning back on a clean transportation future — we’re going to make it more affordable for people to drive vehicles that don’t pollute.”

Advertisement

The rebates for EV buyers would come from the state’s Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund, which is funded by polluters of greenhouse gases under a cap-and-trade program, according to the governor’s office.

But Tesla’s vehicles could be excluded under the proposal’s market-share limitations, Bloomberg News first reported.

The governor’s office confirmed to Business Insider that the rebate program could include a market-share cap which could in turn exclude Tesla or other EV makers. The office did not share details about what market-share limit could be proposed and also noted the proposal would be subject to negotiations in the state legislature.

A market-share cap would exclude companies whose sales account for a certain amount of total electric vehicle sales. For instance, Tesla accounted for nearly 55% off all new electric vehicles registered in California in the first three quarters of 2024, according to a report from the California New Car Dealers Association. By comparison, the companies with the next highest EV market share in California were Hyundai and BMW with 5.6% and 5% respectively.

Advertisement

Tesla sales in California, the US’s largest EV market, have recently declined even as overall EV sales in the state have grown. Though the company still accounted for a majority of EV sales in California this year as of September, its market share fell year-over-year from 64% to 55%.

The governor’s office said the market-share cap would be aimed at promoting competition and innovation in the industry.

Elon Musk, who has expressed support for ending the federal tax credit, said in an X post it was “insane” for the California proposal exclude Tesla.

The federal electric vehicle tax credit, which was passed as part of the Biden administration’s Inflation Reduction Act in 2022, provides a $7,500 tax credit to some EV buyers.

Advertisement

Musk, who is working closely with the incoming Trump administration, has expressed support for ending the tax credit. He’s set to co-lead an advisory commission, the Department of Government Efficiency, which is aimed at slashing federal spending.

The Tesla CEO said on an earnings call in July that ending the federal tax credit might actually benefit the company.

“I think it would be devastating for our competitors and for Tesla slightly,” Musk said. “But long-term probably actually helps Tesla, would be my guess.”

Advertisement

BI’s Graham Rapier previously reported that ending the tax credit could help Tesla maintain its strong standing in the EV market by slowing its competitors growth.

Prior to the EV rebate proposal, Newsom has already positioned himself as a foil to the incoming Trump administration. Following Trump’s election win the governor called on California lawmakers to convene for a special session to discuss protecting the state from Trump’s second term.

“The freedoms we hold dear in California are under attack — and we won’t sit idle,” Newsom said in a statement at the time.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending