Connect with us

California

Here's what we learned about California's wage increase after one quarter

Published

on

Here's what we learned about California's wage increase after one quarter


The second quarter was an important litmus test for restaurant operators with a footprint in California, as it marked the first reporting period following the state’s implementation of AB 1228 on April 1. The law raised the minimum wage at quick-service restaurants to $20 an hour, or by 25%.

The legislation initially raised some hell in the industry, to put things lightly. Some companies blamed the hike for layoffs, others for closures. Some operators vowed not to include California in their expansion plans. For public companies, however, the reaction has been a bit more measured. In summary, it’s full speed ahead in California, a state that is experiencing population growth for the first time in three years. But, it’s full speed ahead with significant price increases to offset the labor inflation, and those price increases have impacted traffic at many, if not most, concepts. According to Revenue Management Solutions, traffic in California has declined by 5.9% since January versus the U.S. average of negative 3.6%.

RMS’ data finds that menu prices in California have risen over four percentage points more than the U.S. average since January, or 7.5% compared to 3.1%. Domino’s, Shake Shack, and Chipotle are three such companies that took high-single-digital pricing increases in the state following the implementation of AB 1228.

Advertisement

Labor optimization

In addition to taking pricing, several chains are sharpening their focus on “labor optimization” to offset wage inflation. California-based The Habit Burger Grill is one of them.

“… A comprehensive store level labor optimization effort … contributed to an impressive 520 basis point expansion of restaurant level margins from the first quarter, despite a double-digit increase in restaurant level labor rates in California stores,” David Gibbs, CEO of parent company Yum Brands, said during his company’s earnings call earlier this month.

El Pollo Loco, which has a massive footprint in California, is exploring “labor productivity initiatives,” like deployment and scheduling, in addition to increased menu prices. CFO Ira Fils said traffic in California was “a little more” down compared to other markets, but overall, “we didn’t see a whole lot of difference between the markets.”

Sweetgreen is also making improvements to its labor optimization, according to CFO Mitch Reback, while Portillo’s is testing kiosks in the California market.

Advertisement

QSRs hit

Of course, QSRs have beared the brunt of this inflation and executives acknowledged as much during their respective Q2 calls. McDonald’s chief financial officer Ian Borden simply called wage pressures in California “a headwind we’re working through,” adding that margins could be “down a little bit” from 2023 accordingly, but still good considering the “overall context of what we’re working through.” McDonald’s experienced its first negative same-store sales quarter since 2020.

As for Wendy’s, CEO Kirk Tanner called California “unfortunate from a wage and labor standpoint,” adding that the company is focused on “driving more productivity.”

“If you look at where consumers are, our focus is on winning and competing well in this environment. And we’re doing that with that strategy, including places like California. It goes to delivering our core, having compelling innovation and having relevant value,” Tanner said. Wendy’s sales were essentially flat in Q2.

Jack in the Box felt a swift impact, with labor costs up 200 basis points from the prior year, while franchise-level margin was $74.6 million, compared to $75.3 million a year ago. CEO Darin Harris said the chain will “regain” its margin through improved sales, and “ongoing equipment, technology, and financial fundamentals initiatives.” The chain has adopted a new oil management process, for instance, and is in the process of testing a fryer automation system, while its sister chain, Del Taco, is testing kiosks. Jack in the Box also worked with its franchisees to take a “surgical approach” to pricing. Despite the early hit on margins and sales, executives remain optimistic about California.

Advertisement

“California fared substantially better than we thought,” CEO Darin Harris said.

“This was the first full quarter of operating under the increased minimum wage law and we are proud of how our teams executed through this change,” CFO Brian Scott said. “[For] Jack in the Box company-owned restaurants, which are predominantly in California, same-store sales performance was better than all but one market. Del Taco had a similar result, with California being one of their top markets in the quarter.”

Full-service insulated?

Despite the law only applying to QSRs, full-service wasn’t completely insulated. Consider Kura Sushi as an example here. The company’s second quarter performance fell well short of expectations, with chief executive officer Hajime Jimmy Uba citing AB 1228 as a main culprit given that comparable same-store sales decelerated in California in April.

“What we have seen … is a general perception that restaurants as a category have become expensive, introducing industry-wide pressures regardless of a given restaurant’s relative value,” he said.

Advertisement

Still, many full-service concepts have experienced no change at all, or even a small tailwind from the QSR-focused legislation. For example, Texas Roadhouse’s handful of California stores are doing “fine,” according to executives.

BJ’s Restaurants, which is headquartered in Huntington Beach, Calif., also hasn’t seen changing trends from its consumers, perhaps because gas prices have come down, according to chief financial officer Tom Houdek. BJ’s executives made it a point to also note that labor levels haven’t been impacted by higher wages at QSRs and that the company is “in a better place” than in 2019 with staffing. That said, Houdek called the statewide pricing increases a “sticker shock” for consumers.

Denny’s has leaned into a silver lining from California’s wage increases, expanding its virtual Banda Burrito brand to over 300 restaurants with a priority on the state to add the revenue channel. CEO Kelli Valade said traffic outperformed QSRs during the quarter because of lower menu prices relative to QSRs, as well as the expansion of Banda Burrito. Notably, Denny’s is also targeting California as one of its growth markets for its Keke’s brand.

“We have not experienced a material increase in team wages at our 22 California company restaurants as a result of AB 1228. We believe this is in part due to our servers earning well above the AB 1228 minimum wage when factoring in tip income,” CFO Robert Verostek said, adding,The [market share] gap we were experiencing to overall QSR, we’ve cut in half in California specifically.”

Cheesecake Factory is also seeing consistency across its geographies with no added pressure from California. CEO David Overton said the legislation mostly impacts QSRs, “which is positive for us.”

Advertisement

Notably, full-service brands aren’t the only ones with optimism. Wingstop had a meteoric second quarter relative to the rest of the industry, AB 1228 be damned. Wingstop did not experience transaction changes after implementing pricing increases to offset wage increases at its 400-ish California locations.

“In fact, the trends in California are following a very similar trend to what we see outside of California for our business,” CFO Alex Kaleida said.

Further, Dutch Bros experienced a 60-basis-point year-over-year increase in labor costs primarily driven by the wage increase in California, where about 20% of its system is located. The company took a 1.5% pricing increase to help offset the pressure but has otherwise been focused on business as usual.

“We had two of our top first week performers in California in the first half of this year,” CEO Christine Barone said. “We continue to be very bullish on our prospects in California and continue to look for sites and opening shops in California.”

Contact Alicia Kelso at [email protected]

Advertisement

 



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

California

Biden creates 2 new national monuments, setting a conservation record

Published

on

Biden creates 2 new national monuments, setting a conservation record


A chuckwalla lizard sunbathes in this 2007 file photo from Amboy Crater National Natural Landmark in southern California. The lizard is the namesake for the new Chuckwalla National Monument.

David McNew/Getty Images


hide caption

Advertisement

toggle caption

David McNew/Getty Images

President Biden is creating two new national monuments in California on Tuesday, preserving the lands from development and setting a record for the most land and waters conserved by any president, the White House said.

Advertisement

The Sáttítla Highlands National Monument covers more than 224,000 acres in Northern California, and includes the ancestral homelands of the Pit River Tribe and Modoc Peoples. A dormant volcano is at its center, and it is home to the longest-known lava tube system in the world.

The Chuckwalla National Monument covers more than 624,000 acres south of Joshua Tree National Park in southern California, and includes sacred sites important to five groups of indigenous peoples and 50 rare species of plants and animals, including the Chuckwalla lizard.

The Chuckwalla monument is part of a corridor of protected lands stretching about 600 miles west through a total of close to 18 million acres in California, Nevada, Arizona and Utah that the White House is calling the Moab to Mojave Conservation Corridor.

In total, the White House said Biden protected 674 million acres of land and waters through monuments and other designations during his four years in office.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

California

California Winds Drive Severe Fire Danger in Rain-Starved LA

Published

on

California Winds Drive Severe Fire Danger in Rain-Starved LA


(Bloomberg) — Exceptionally powerful, dry winds expected across Southern California this week are set to send wildfire risk skyrocketing in a region that’s endured more than eight months without significant rain.

Most Read from Bloomberg

Forecasters predict the strongest Santa Ana wind event of the season will start Tuesday and extend late into the week. As offshore winds race down local mountain ranges, they’ll bring gusts of up to 80 miles (129 kilometers) per hour to densely-populated communities in Los Angeles and Ventura counties, putting more than 4.5 million residents at risk, according to the US Storm Prediction Center. Downtown Los Angeles hasn’t seen more than a half-inch of rain since April, according to National Weather Service data.

“This is one of those patterns that make the hair stand up a little bit,” said climatologist Daniel Swain at the University of California Los Angeles, who called the event an “atmospheric blow dryer.” The winds, he said Monday, would be strong enough to topple trees and power lines, block roads, trigger blackouts and cancel flights at airports. “This will probably affect more people more substantially than a major rainstorm.”

Advertisement

In a post on X Monday, forecasters for the National Weather Service in Los Angeles warned of “life-threatening, destructive” winds in areas not typically affected by Santa Ana events. Some of the region’s most affluent and exclusive communities — such as Beverly Hills and Malibu — are included.

In some mountain passes and foothill communities, gusts could reach 100 mph, drying the air and pushing humidity levels as low as 4%, said Nick Nauslar with the US Storm Prediction Center.

“That’s going to continue for two, three, perhaps four days,” said Nauslar, the center’s fire weather science and operations officer. With this combination of factors, he said, “you’re getting into the upper echelon of Santa Ana wind events in the last couple decades.”

Months without rain have parched the Southern California landscape, leaving dry grasses, shrubs and trees that can fuel wildfires. The amount of moisture stored inside local vegetation — which can prevent it from burning — is now “well below normal and approaching record low for this time of year,” Nauslar said.

Red flag fire warnings have been issued for much of the Los Angeles area and its suburbs. But high winds will extend far beyond the city, with strong gusts expected from Shasta County in far northern California all the way to the Mexican border. Wind advisories were also posted for the hills above the San Francisco Bay Area wine country, which has suffered a series of devastating fires in recent years.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

California

California Continues Targeting Food Additives, Dyes With Executive Order on Ultra-Processed Foods

Published

on

California Continues Targeting Food Additives, Dyes With Executive Order on Ultra-Processed Foods


California Governor Gavin Newsom has issued an executive order that mandates state agencies explore the food safety of ultra-processed foods, food dyes, and “generally recognized as safe” (GRAS) ingredients, and recommend actions to mitigate the adverse health effects.

The executive order characterizes ultra-processed foods and ingredients as “industrial formulations of chemically modified substances extracted from foods, along with additives to enhance taste, texture, appearance, and durability, with minimal to no inclusion of whole foods.” Common examples include packaged snacks, chips, crackers, cookies, candy, sugary beverages, and highly processed meats like hot dogs and lunch meats. It also calls attention to the myriad chemicals, such as food colorants, authorized for food use in the U.S., claiming that more than 10,000 such substances are currently present in the U.S. food supply, in comparison to the 300 authorized for use in the EU.

Many food chemicals enter the nation’s food supply through the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA’s) GRAS process, which lawmakers and scientists have criticized as a “loophole” allowing potentially toxic additives in food. In a recent article by Harvard medical and law experts, the authors called GRAS a “laissez-faire approach to monitoring the safety of ingredients” that poses a threat to public health.

In this context, California has passed several precedent-setting pieces of state legislation on chemical food additives and colorants in recent years, such as the California Food Safety Act and the California School Food Safety Act.

Advertisement

Continuing state efforts to crack down on chemical food additives, Gov. Newsom’s latest executive order includes, but is not limited to, the following mandates:

  1. No later than April 1, 2025, the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) will provide recommendations to the Governor’s office regarding potential actions to limit the harms associated with ultra-processed foods and food ingredients that pose a public health risk (e.g., the inclusion of warning labels on certain ultra-processed foods)
  2. The Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA), in consultation with CDPH, will investigate the adverse human health impacts of food dyes, and provide a briefing to the Governor’s office no later than April 1
  3. No later than April 1, CDPH and OEHHA will report to the Governor’s office on the feasibility of state-level evaluation of food additives considered GRAS, as well as state actions that can be taken if companies fail to notify FDA of certain food additives through the GRAS process

The executive order also includes actions aimed at decreasing the purchase of ultra-processed foods; increasing access to healthy foods; and improving the nutrition of and increasing the amount of fresh, local-grown ingredients used in California school meals.

Some groups have previously criticized California’s approach to food additives regulation for leading the charge on an emerging patchwork of state regulations, however. For example, prior to the passage of the California School Food Safety Act, the Consumer Brands Association (CBA) stated, “[The bill] sets a dangerous precedent for state politicians to substitute their own views on food safety ahead of the scientists and risk-based review system that stringently protects America’s food supply. Americans deserve unified guidance that follows the science, not a patchwork of confusing laws.” 



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending