Connect with us

California

Here's what we learned about California's wage increase after one quarter

Published

on

Here's what we learned about California's wage increase after one quarter


The second quarter was an important litmus test for restaurant operators with a footprint in California, as it marked the first reporting period following the state’s implementation of AB 1228 on April 1. The law raised the minimum wage at quick-service restaurants to $20 an hour, or by 25%.

The legislation initially raised some hell in the industry, to put things lightly. Some companies blamed the hike for layoffs, others for closures. Some operators vowed not to include California in their expansion plans. For public companies, however, the reaction has been a bit more measured. In summary, it’s full speed ahead in California, a state that is experiencing population growth for the first time in three years. But, it’s full speed ahead with significant price increases to offset the labor inflation, and those price increases have impacted traffic at many, if not most, concepts. According to Revenue Management Solutions, traffic in California has declined by 5.9% since January versus the U.S. average of negative 3.6%.

RMS’ data finds that menu prices in California have risen over four percentage points more than the U.S. average since January, or 7.5% compared to 3.1%. Domino’s, Shake Shack, and Chipotle are three such companies that took high-single-digital pricing increases in the state following the implementation of AB 1228.

Advertisement

Labor optimization

In addition to taking pricing, several chains are sharpening their focus on “labor optimization” to offset wage inflation. California-based The Habit Burger Grill is one of them.

“… A comprehensive store level labor optimization effort … contributed to an impressive 520 basis point expansion of restaurant level margins from the first quarter, despite a double-digit increase in restaurant level labor rates in California stores,” David Gibbs, CEO of parent company Yum Brands, said during his company’s earnings call earlier this month.

El Pollo Loco, which has a massive footprint in California, is exploring “labor productivity initiatives,” like deployment and scheduling, in addition to increased menu prices. CFO Ira Fils said traffic in California was “a little more” down compared to other markets, but overall, “we didn’t see a whole lot of difference between the markets.”

Sweetgreen is also making improvements to its labor optimization, according to CFO Mitch Reback, while Portillo’s is testing kiosks in the California market.

Advertisement

QSRs hit

Of course, QSRs have beared the brunt of this inflation and executives acknowledged as much during their respective Q2 calls. McDonald’s chief financial officer Ian Borden simply called wage pressures in California “a headwind we’re working through,” adding that margins could be “down a little bit” from 2023 accordingly, but still good considering the “overall context of what we’re working through.” McDonald’s experienced its first negative same-store sales quarter since 2020.

As for Wendy’s, CEO Kirk Tanner called California “unfortunate from a wage and labor standpoint,” adding that the company is focused on “driving more productivity.”

“If you look at where consumers are, our focus is on winning and competing well in this environment. And we’re doing that with that strategy, including places like California. It goes to delivering our core, having compelling innovation and having relevant value,” Tanner said. Wendy’s sales were essentially flat in Q2.

Jack in the Box felt a swift impact, with labor costs up 200 basis points from the prior year, while franchise-level margin was $74.6 million, compared to $75.3 million a year ago. CEO Darin Harris said the chain will “regain” its margin through improved sales, and “ongoing equipment, technology, and financial fundamentals initiatives.” The chain has adopted a new oil management process, for instance, and is in the process of testing a fryer automation system, while its sister chain, Del Taco, is testing kiosks. Jack in the Box also worked with its franchisees to take a “surgical approach” to pricing. Despite the early hit on margins and sales, executives remain optimistic about California.

Advertisement

“California fared substantially better than we thought,” CEO Darin Harris said.

“This was the first full quarter of operating under the increased minimum wage law and we are proud of how our teams executed through this change,” CFO Brian Scott said. “[For] Jack in the Box company-owned restaurants, which are predominantly in California, same-store sales performance was better than all but one market. Del Taco had a similar result, with California being one of their top markets in the quarter.”

Full-service insulated?

Despite the law only applying to QSRs, full-service wasn’t completely insulated. Consider Kura Sushi as an example here. The company’s second quarter performance fell well short of expectations, with chief executive officer Hajime Jimmy Uba citing AB 1228 as a main culprit given that comparable same-store sales decelerated in California in April.

“What we have seen … is a general perception that restaurants as a category have become expensive, introducing industry-wide pressures regardless of a given restaurant’s relative value,” he said.

Advertisement

Still, many full-service concepts have experienced no change at all, or even a small tailwind from the QSR-focused legislation. For example, Texas Roadhouse’s handful of California stores are doing “fine,” according to executives.

BJ’s Restaurants, which is headquartered in Huntington Beach, Calif., also hasn’t seen changing trends from its consumers, perhaps because gas prices have come down, according to chief financial officer Tom Houdek. BJ’s executives made it a point to also note that labor levels haven’t been impacted by higher wages at QSRs and that the company is “in a better place” than in 2019 with staffing. That said, Houdek called the statewide pricing increases a “sticker shock” for consumers.

Denny’s has leaned into a silver lining from California’s wage increases, expanding its virtual Banda Burrito brand to over 300 restaurants with a priority on the state to add the revenue channel. CEO Kelli Valade said traffic outperformed QSRs during the quarter because of lower menu prices relative to QSRs, as well as the expansion of Banda Burrito. Notably, Denny’s is also targeting California as one of its growth markets for its Keke’s brand.

“We have not experienced a material increase in team wages at our 22 California company restaurants as a result of AB 1228. We believe this is in part due to our servers earning well above the AB 1228 minimum wage when factoring in tip income,” CFO Robert Verostek said, adding,The [market share] gap we were experiencing to overall QSR, we’ve cut in half in California specifically.”

Cheesecake Factory is also seeing consistency across its geographies with no added pressure from California. CEO David Overton said the legislation mostly impacts QSRs, “which is positive for us.”

Advertisement

Notably, full-service brands aren’t the only ones with optimism. Wingstop had a meteoric second quarter relative to the rest of the industry, AB 1228 be damned. Wingstop did not experience transaction changes after implementing pricing increases to offset wage increases at its 400-ish California locations.

“In fact, the trends in California are following a very similar trend to what we see outside of California for our business,” CFO Alex Kaleida said.

Further, Dutch Bros experienced a 60-basis-point year-over-year increase in labor costs primarily driven by the wage increase in California, where about 20% of its system is located. The company took a 1.5% pricing increase to help offset the pressure but has otherwise been focused on business as usual.

“We had two of our top first week performers in California in the first half of this year,” CEO Christine Barone said. “We continue to be very bullish on our prospects in California and continue to look for sites and opening shops in California.”

Contact Alicia Kelso at [email protected]

Advertisement

 



Source link

California

California wants Verizon to compromise more on DEI

Published

on

California wants Verizon to compromise more on DEI


A CA judge recommends approval for Verizon/Frontier but thinks more DEI commitments are neededNotably, the judge determined Verizon’s letter to the FCC doesn’ | A state judge recommended California approve the Verizon/Frontier deal, if the operator agrees to some DEI and workforce commitments.



Source link

Continue Reading

California

California governor race heats up with uncertainty and potential surprises

Published

on

California governor race heats up with uncertainty and potential surprises


BAKERSFIELD, Calif. (KBAK/KBFX) As the race for California’s next governor intensifies, uncertainty looms with the primary election just six months away.

A recent Emerson College poll shows Republican Chad Bianco leading by a narrow margin of one point, while 31% of voters remain undecided.

California governor race heats up with uncertainty and potential surprises (KBFX)

“The field remains wide open,” said Tal Eslick, owner of Vista Consulting. “There’s a half dozen credible Democrats in the race. There’s really a couple – two – namely Republicans.”

Eslick noted that Bianco’s lead is more reflective of the crowded Democratic field than a shift toward Republicans statewide.

Advertisement
California governor race heats up with uncertainty and potential surprises (Photo: AdobeStock)

California governor race heats up with uncertainty and potential surprises (Photo: AdobeStock)

He suggested a “black horse candidate” could still emerge, possibly from Hollywood or outside politics.

With rising energy and gas prices, affordability is expected to be a key issue for voters.

California governor race heats up with uncertainty and potential surprises (AP Photo/Juliana Yamada, File)

California governor race heats up with uncertainty and potential surprises (AP Photo/Juliana Yamada, File)

“I think that you could also see voters vote with their pockets,” Eslick said, highlighting the potential for a non-traditional candidate to gain traction.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

California

California threatens Tesla with 30-day suspension of sales license for deceptive self-driving claims

Published

on

California threatens Tesla with 30-day suspension of sales license for deceptive self-driving claims


SAN FRANCISCO — California regulators are threatening to suspend Tesla’s license to sell its electric cars in the state early next year unless the automaker tones down its marketing tactics for its self-driving features after a judge concluded the Elon Musk-led company has been misleading consumers about the technology’s capabilities.

The potential 30-day blackout of Tesla’s California sales is the primary punishment being recommended to the state’s Department of Motor Vehicles in a decision released late Tuesday. The ruling by Administrative Law Judge Juliet Cox determined that Tesla had for years engaged in deceptive marketing practices by using the terms “Autopilot” and “Full Self-Driving” to promote the autonomous technology available in many of its cars.

After presiding over five days of hearings held in Oakland, California in July, Cox also recommended suspending Tesla’s license to manufacture cars at its plant in Fremont, California. But California regulators aren’t going to impose that part of the judge’s proposed penalty.

Tesla will have a 90-day window to make changes that more clearly convey the limits of its self-driving technology to avoid having its California sales license suspended. After California regulators filed its action against Tesla in 2023, the Austin, Texas, company already made one significant change by putting in wording that made it clear its Full Self-Driving package still required supervision by a human driver while it’s deployed.

Advertisement

“Tesla can take simple steps to pause this decision and permanently resolve this issue — steps autonomous vehicle companies and other automakers have been able to achieve,” said Steve Gordon, the director of the California Department of Motor Vehicles.

Tesla didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment Wednesday.

The automaker has already been plagued by a global downturn in demand that began during a backlash to Musk’s high-profile role overseeing cuts in the U.S. government budget overseeing the Department of Government that President Donald Trump created in his administration. Increased competition and an older lineup of vehicles also weighed on Tesla sales, although the company did revamp its Model Y, the world’s bestselling vehicle, and unveil less-expensive versions of the Model Y and Model X.

Although Musk left Washington after a falling out with Trump, the fallout has continued to weigh on Tesla’s auto sales, which had decreased by 9% from 2024 through the first nine months of this year.

Despite the slump and the threatened sales suspension in California, Tesla’s stock price touched an all-time high $495.28 during Wednesday’s early trading before backtracking later to fall below $470. Despite that reversal, Tesla’s shares are still worth slightly more than they were before Musk’s ill-fated stint in the Trump administration — a “somewhat successful” assignment he recently said he wouldn’t take on again.

Advertisement

The performance of Tesla’s stock against the backdrop of eroding auto sales reflects the increasing emphasis that investors are placing on Musk’s efforts to develop artificial intelligence technology to implant into humanoid robots and a fleet of self-driving Teslas that will operate as robotaxis across the U.S.

Musk has been promising Tesla’s self-driving technology would fulfill his robotaxi vision for years without delivering on the promise, but the company finally began testing the concept in Austin earlier this year, albeit with a human supervisor in the car to take over if something went awry. Just a few days ago, Musk disclosed Tesla had started tests of its robotaxis without a safety monitor in the vehicle.

California regulators are far from the first critic to accuse Tesla of exaggerating the capabilities of its self-driving technology in a potentially dangerous manner. The company has steadfastly insisted that information contained in its vehicle’s owner’s manual on its website have made it clear that its self-driving technology still requires human supervision, even while releasing a 2020 video depicting one of its cars purportedly driving on its own. The video, cited as evidence against Tesla in the decision recommending a suspension of the company’s California sales license, remained on its website for nearly four years.

Tesla has been targeted in a variety of lawsuits alleging its mischaracterizations about self-driving technology have lulled humans into a false of security that have resulted in lethal accidents. The company has settled or prevailed in several cases, but earlier this year a Miami jury held Tesla partly responsible for a lethal crash in Florida that occurred while Autopilot was deployed and ordered the automaker to pay more than $240 million in damages.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending