Connect with us

California

Driver must stand trial for deadly Tesla crash in California

Published

on

Driver must stand trial for deadly Tesla crash in California


COMPTON, Calif. — The motive force of a Tesla working on autopilot should stand trial for a crash that killed two individuals in a Los Angeles suburb, a choose dominated Thursday.

There’s sufficient proof to strive Kevin George Aziz Riad, 27, on two counts of vehicular manslaughter, a Los Angeles County choose mentioned.

A choose dominated Thursday {that a} trial can proceed in opposition to a Tesla Mannequin S driver in a 2019 crash that left two individuals lifeless in Gardena.

It’s believed to be the primary felony prosecution within the U.S. in opposition to a driver utilizing {a partially} automated driving system.

Advertisement

Police mentioned the Tesla Mannequin S left a freeway and ran a crimson mild in Gardena and was doing 74 mph (119 kph) when it smashed right into a Honda Civic at an intersection on Dec. 29, 2019.

The crash killed Gilberto Alcazar Lopez, 40, of Rancho Dominguez and Maria Guadalupe Nieves-Lopez, 39, of Lynwood, who have been within the Civic and have been on their first date that night time, kin advised the Orange County Register.

Riad and a lady within the Tesla have been hospitalized with non-life-threatening accidents.

Prosecutors mentioned the Tesla’s Autosteer and Site visitors Conscious Cruise Management have been lively. A Tesla engineer testified that sensors indicated Riad had a hand on the steering wheel however crash information confirmed no brakes have been utilized within the six minutes earlier than the crash.

A police officer testified Thursday that a number of site visitors indicators warning motorists to decelerate have been posted close to the tip of the freeway.

Advertisement

Tesla has mentioned that Autopilot and a extra subtle “Full Self-Driving” system can’t drive themselves and that drivers should listen and be able to react at anytime.

The misuse of Autopilot, which might management steering, pace and braking, has occurred on quite a few events and is the topic of investigations by two federal businesses. The submitting of prices within the California crash may serve discover to drivers who use programs like Autopilot that they can not depend on them to manage autos.

The legal prices aren’t the primary involving an automatic driving system, however they’re the primary to contain a broadly used driver expertise. Authorities in Arizona filed a cost of negligent murder in 2020 in opposition to a driver Uber had employed to participate within the testing of a completely autonomous car on public roads. The Uber car, an SUV with the human backup driver on board, struck and killed a pedestrian.

In the meantime, the Nationwide Freeway Site visitors Security Administration on Wednesday confirmed that it had despatched a particular crash investigation group to find out whether or not a Tesla concerned in a Could 12 crash in Newport Seashore that killed three individuals was working on {a partially} automated driving system.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

California

Crash in Fernley kills California man

Published

on

Crash in Fernley kills California man


FERNLEY, Nev. (KOLO) – An April crash in Fernley killed a Mount Shasta, California man, Nevada State Police says.

On April 16, at around 5:18 a.m., Nevada State Police responded to a crash in Fernley.

Their preliminary investigation found that a gray 2013 Dodge Ram was driving east on I-80 in the far-left travel lane when the driver steered to right, causing the truck to travel from the number one travel lane through the number two travel lane.

NSP says the truck overturned multiple times before eventually coming to rest on its roof between the two travel lanes.

Advertisement

At the same time, an orange 2024 Freightliner towing an enclosed trailer was driving east on I-80 when it tried to avoid the overturned truck by braking and steering to the left. The front right of the Freightliner hit the side of the Dodge, causing it to rotate clockwise and come to rest on its roof facing south in the right shoulder dirt area. The Freightliner came to rest in the far-left lane.

The driver of the Dodge was identified as 31-year-old Joshua Fitzgerald. He was taken to the hospital with serious injuries, and ended up succumbing to them on April 24.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

California

California Regulators Consider Adding $24 Fixed Fee to Utility Bills | KQED

Published

on

California Regulators Consider Adding $24 Fixed Fee to Utility Bills | KQED


Loretta Lynch, former president of the CPUC, said on KQED’s Forum that it would hurt coastal dwellers in apartments and small houses, who don’t use a lot of air conditioning.

“That means virtually all low-income customers in San Francisco and Oakland, and maybe even farther than that — those people are going to pay more,” she said.

However, Cynthia Martinez, spokesperson for the Predictable Power Coalition, which includes California’s three biggest utility companies, argued that a flat rate would lower costs for families struggling to pay their bills.

“For people who live in hotter climates, who really have no choice but to run their air conditioning more often, they’re paying higher costs that go toward grid upkeep,” Martinez said. Separating electricity usage costs from the cost to maintain the grid, she added, is more equitable and “will provide fairness.”

Advertisement

Questions remain over incentive to electrify

Right now, in California, if you use a lot of electricity, you pay more. If you live an energy-efficient lifestyle, you pay less. Sylvie Ashford, an energy analyst for The Utility Reform Network, or TURN, said that won’t change.

The group supports the new proposal, which Ashford said would incentivize people to convert to clean energy.

“Consumers report one of the biggest barriers to buying electric vehicles and electric heat pumps to be the high and rising cost of electricity,” Ashford said. “When it becomes 8% to 10% cheaper on each kilowatt hour, your operating costs on your electric vehicle or your electric heat pump become that much more competitive with polluting gas alternatives.”





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

California

California regulators to vote on changing how power bills are calculated

Published

on

California regulators to vote on changing how power bills are calculated


SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) — California regulators on Thursday are likely to change how some power companies calculate their customers’ bills, a decision that would make it less expensive for people to charge electric cars and cool their homes in the summer but would increase prices for those who don’t use as much energy.

The California Public Utilities Commission will vote on whether to let the state’s big investor-owned utilities — including Pacific Gas & Electric — add a fixed charge to people’s power bills each month. For most people, the charge would be $24.15 per month and would pay for such things as installing and maintaining the equipment necessary to transmit electricity to homes. Residents with lower incomes who are enrolled in one of two discount programs would pay less, either $6 or $12 per month.

In exchange for the new charge, the price of electricity would drop by between 5 cents and 7 cents per kilowatt hour. One kilowatt hour is how much power it takes to use a 1,000-watt appliance — a coffee maker or vacuum cleaner, for instance — for one hour.

For people who use a lot of energy each month, this could could lower their monthly bills. People who live in Fresno — where temperatures can often exceed 100 degrees Fahrenheit (37.8 degrees Celsius) — would save about $33 running their air conditioners during the summer, according to the commission. That’s because the savings they would get from the price drop on electricity would be more than the amount they pay for the new fixed charge.

Advertisement

It would also benefit people who own electric cars and use other electric appliances, such as heat pumps. They would save an average of between $28 and $44 per month, according to the commission. In 2022, California accounted for 37% of the nation’s light-duty electric vehicles, or about six times more than Florida, the state in second place, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration.

“The new billing structure more evenly allocates fixed costs among customers and will encourage customers to adopt electric vehicles and replace gas appliances with electric appliances because it will be less expensive,” Administrative Law Judge Stephanie Wang wrote in a proposed decision explaining the charge.

For people who don’t use as much energy, the new fixed charge could increase their bill each month. This includes people who live in smaller apartments or who live in cooler areas and don’t use air conditioning as much. That’s because for them, the decrease in the price of electricity would not be enough to offset the amount of the new monthly charge.

Opponents argue it would act as a disincentive to conserve energy, something California has been urging people to do.

“If you wanted to design a policy instrument that would send the signal that conservation doesn’t count, this would be it,” said Ken Cook, president of the Environmental Working Group.

Advertisement

Most states already have fixed monthly charges on utility bills to pay for maintenance and infrastructure of the electric grid. But in California — where electric rates are among the highest in the nation — any move that could increase prices for anyone raises alarms among consumers and elected officials.

A group of 18 members of Congress from California have called on the commission to keep the rate low, noting the national average for fixed charges on utility bills is $11. Some Democrats and Republicans in the state Legislature have backed a bill that would cap the charge at $10 per month.

“We must do more to rein in the ever-growing cost of living in our state, not find new ways to add to it,” Republicans in the California Senate wrote in a letter urging the commission to reject the proposal.

The proposal is much lower than what the state’s investor-owned utility companies had asked for, which was a charge between $53 and $71 per month. The commission also argues the charge would not discourage conservation, noting utilities are already allowed to increase rates during peak hours.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Trending