Connect with us

California

Did You Know: California water woes – Santa Barbara News-Press

Published

on

Did You Know: California water woes – Santa Barbara News-Press


COURTESY IMAGE

written by Bonnie Donovan

Did You Know was considerably greatly surprised on the sudden realization by Governor Gavin Newsom that California can not save itself from the continual lack of ingesting water brought on by continuous droughts, by merely utilizing much less water?  

How does this co-exist with Newsom’s demand for two.5 Million new properties to be constructed by 2031, when the typical house makes use of greater than 300 gallons of water per day? That’s an extra 750,000,000 gallons a day for the two.5 million new properties or 273.75 billion gallons of extra water a yr.

Why did town of Santa Barbara and county not reject this preposterous quantity, when it means 8,000 new properties to be inbuilt eight years inside metropolis limits alone? The quantity for the county as an entire is 24,856 extra properties.

Advertisement

The place had been/are our elected officers in rejecting these numbers from the state?

In 2016 SB County had a inhabitants of 444,341, by 2022 it’s 448,656, a progress of 4,315 in 7 years.

The goal of 24,856 new properties for the County by 2031 assumes a inhabitants progress fee far in extra of current historical past if one assumes a mean occupancy fee of two.5 individuals per house. That will be 62,140 extra individuals, or 8,080 per yr, double the speed of enhance over the past eight years.

Identical questions. The place are the roles, and the place does the water come from? What investments in providers and infrastructure at what prices are wanted to help this progress?

The inhabitants of town of Santa Barbara decreased from 90,922 in 2016 to 88,255 in 2021.

Advertisement

The discount from 2000 to 2021 was 1.5%.

Subsequently, why is there a necessity for an extra 8,000 properties over the following 8 years? 

The place are the extra jobs coming from? What new industries are transferring in? Or, is the idea that retail and hospitality will present the roles? Retail is declining and folks don’t need jobs in eating places and accommodations.

Will the desalination plant must work full time to offer an extra 300 gallons of water per day, three hundred and sixty five days a yr to eight,000 new properties? That’s 876,000,000 extra gallons of water we want only for these new properties. We gained’t even carry up all the brand new lodge rooms stepping into. 

It took 14 years to supply a desalination plant in Carlsbad. Australia, with 30 desalination crops, achieved time frames of 8 years. How lengthy will an organized statewide water recycling take? 

Advertisement

Lower than 3% of the earth’s water is freshwater. Most of that water is inaccessible. Over 68% of that freshwater is present in glaciers, sheet ice, and icecaps. Simply over 3% is present in groundwater. Solely about 0.3% of freshwater is discovered within the floor water of lakes, rivers, streams and swamps. 99% of water is unavailable to be used by people.

Glaciers, sheet ice and snow caps are melting quickly into the oceans, and they don’t seem to be being changed.

A mean wholesome human being can reside for less than 3 – 4 days with out water. 

We concluded, as has Gov. Newsom, that utilizing much less water is critical however inadequate. We can not postpone the mandatory investments on a statewide degree to ensure enough provides of freshwater for the longer term. Which is nearer than we expect.

A century of offers in apportioning rights to water from the Colorado river was made between Colorado, Wyoming, Utah, New Mexico, California, Arizona, Nevada and Mexico, plus quite a few Indian tribes. California is entitled to greater than a 3rd of the river’s pure stream.

Advertisement

In 2019, a contingency plan efficient by way of 2026 was agreed to laying out which state will get cuts in water provide from the decrease Colorado River Basin. California’s cutback begins when Lake Mead’s water ranges attain between 1,040 toes and 1,045 toes. Lake Mead will likely be beneath 1,040 toes by year-end 2022. The technology of electrical energy from the Hoover Dam will likely be below stress.

On July 22, Lake Mead was at 27% of capability and falling. Lake Powell, additionally on the Colorado River, is at 24.81% of capability and falling. Shasta Lake in California was solely 37% full in February 2022. Oroville Lake was 42% of the full capability on January 12.

In California, an increasing number of water is being drawn from aquifers at a a lot quicker fee than it may be replenished by pure water flows from rain, snow, rivers and man-made replenishment sources. The outcomes are devastating. Tens of millions of acre-feet of water have been completely faraway from aquifers that are our final pure useful resource in opposition to eventual water hunger.

Within the examples beneath, accessible water in aquifers has fallen by greater than 100 toes between 1930/1950 and 2016/2017. This can be a large lack of capability. The pure replenishment of aquifer water ranges from floor water, rain and snowmelt can not sustain with the water extraction charges as a result of, on the similar time, these water sources are declining from years of lengthy droughts. 

In California, agriculture is a $50 billion a yr business that makes use of 80% of the obtainable water in California.

Advertisement

In 1920, the inhabitants of California was 3,426,861. In the present day, the inhabitants of California is 39,185,605. That may be a progress of 11.43 instances the 1920 inhabitants. 

In Fresno, the depth to achieve groundwater within the aquifer in 1930 was 25 toes. By 2016, the depth of groundwater had elevated to 130 ft. The inhabitants grew from about 70,000 to 550,000. In Clovis, the depth to achieve groundwater was 25 toes in 1950. By 2017 it was 145 toes. The inhabitants grew from round 13,000 to about 120,000.

Fresno County is a part of The North Kings Groundwater Sustainability Company. In 2020 it proposed a plan to carry into stability the utilization and replenishment of the aquifers. California wants activated aquifer utilization/replenishment stability actions in place all over the place aquifers are getting used to switch misplaced floor water provides resulting from steady droughts.

We all know that we aren’t doing practically sufficient to recycle water on a large scale. We aren’t doing sufficient to replenish misplaced water within the many aquifers now substituting for floor water. We aren’t doing practically sufficient to seize and retailer water from rain and snowmelt, each of that are declining in quantity and frequency yearly. We aren’t doing sufficient to seize and convert brackish water and sea water into potable water, nor sufficient to seize water from the humid air in our lengthy coastal areas. California needs to be a frontrunner in water administration analysis and know-how.

Sure, most likely, there are plans in place to do a few of this in California. However the place is the urgency, the funding, the contracts and even the accelerated approvals course of? If California’s expertise with high-speed rail is our information, we’re in bother.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

California

California proposes its own EV buyer credit — which could cut out Elon Musk's Tesla

Published

on

California proposes its own EV buyer credit — which could cut out Elon Musk's Tesla


  • Gov. Gavin Newsom plans to revive California’s EV rebate if Trump ends the federal tax credit.
  • But Tesla, the largest maker of EVs, would be excluded under the proposal.
  • Elon Musk criticized Tesla’s potential exclusion from the rebate.

California Gov. Gavin Newsom is preparing to step in if President-elect Donald Trump fulfills his promise to axe the federal electric-vehicle tax credit — but one notable EV maker could be left out.

Newsom said Monday if the $7,500 federal tax credit is eliminated he would restart the state’s zero-emission vehicle rebate program, which was phased out in 2023.

“We will intervene if the Trump Administration eliminates the federal tax credit, doubling down on our commitment to clean air and green jobs in California,” Newsom said in a statement. “We’re not turning back on a clean transportation future — we’re going to make it more affordable for people to drive vehicles that don’t pollute.”

Advertisement

The rebates for EV buyers would come from the state’s Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund, which is funded by polluters of greenhouse gases under a cap-and-trade program, according to the governor’s office.

But Tesla’s vehicles could be excluded under the proposal’s market-share limitations, Bloomberg News first reported.

The governor’s office confirmed to Business Insider that the rebate program could include a market-share cap which could in turn exclude Tesla or other EV makers. The office did not share details about what market-share limit could be proposed and also noted the proposal would be subject to negotiations in the state legislature.

A market-share cap would exclude companies whose sales account for a certain amount of total electric vehicle sales. For instance, Tesla accounted for nearly 55% off all new electric vehicles registered in California in the first three quarters of 2024, according to a report from the California New Car Dealers Association. By comparison, the companies with the next highest EV market share in California were Hyundai and BMW with 5.6% and 5% respectively.

Advertisement

Tesla sales in California, the US’s largest EV market, have recently declined even as overall EV sales in the state have grown. Though the company still accounted for a majority of EV sales in California this year as of September, its market share fell year-over-year from 64% to 55%.

The governor’s office said the market-share cap would be aimed at promoting competition and innovation in the industry.

Elon Musk, who has expressed support for ending the federal tax credit, said in an X post it was “insane” for the California proposal exclude Tesla.

The federal electric vehicle tax credit, which was passed as part of the Biden administration’s Inflation Reduction Act in 2022, provides a $7,500 tax credit to some EV buyers.

Advertisement

Musk, who is working closely with the incoming Trump administration, has expressed support for ending the tax credit. He’s set to co-lead an advisory commission, the Department of Government Efficiency, which is aimed at slashing federal spending.

The Tesla CEO said on an earnings call in July that ending the federal tax credit might actually benefit the company.

“I think it would be devastating for our competitors and for Tesla slightly,” Musk said. “But long-term probably actually helps Tesla, would be my guess.”

Advertisement

BI’s Graham Rapier previously reported that ending the tax credit could help Tesla maintain its strong standing in the EV market by slowing its competitors growth.

Prior to the EV rebate proposal, Newsom has already positioned himself as a foil to the incoming Trump administration. Following Trump’s election win the governor called on California lawmakers to convene for a special session to discuss protecting the state from Trump’s second term.

“The freedoms we hold dear in California are under attack — and we won’t sit idle,” Newsom said in a statement at the time.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

California

California Gov. Gavin Newsom says state will provide rebates if Trump removes tax credit for electric vehicles

Published

on

California Gov. Gavin Newsom says state will provide rebates if Trump removes tax credit for electric vehicles


California Gov. Gavin Newsom said the state will provide rebates to residents if President-elect Donald Trump’s incoming administration does away with a federal tax credit for electric vehicles.

In a news release issued Monday, Newsom said he would restart the state’s Clean Vehicle Rebate Program, which provided financial incentives on more than 590,000 vehicles before it was phased out late 2023.

“We will intervene if the Trump Administration eliminates the federal tax credit, doubling down on our commitment to clean air and green jobs in California,” Newsom said. “We’re not turning back on a clean transportation future — we’re going to make it more affordable for people to drive vehicles that don’t pollute.”

The federal rebates on new and used electric vehicles were implemented in the Inflation Reduction Act that President Joe Biden signed into law in 2022. When Trump’s second term in office begins next year, he could work with Congress to change the rules around those rebates. Those potential changes could limit the federal rebates, including by reducing the amount of money available or limiting who is eligible.

Advertisement

Limiting federal subsidies on electric vehicle purchases would hurt many American automakers, including Ford, General Motors and the EV startup Rivian. Tesla, which also builds its automobiles in the United States, would take a smaller hit since that company currently sells more EVs and has a higher profit margin than any other EV manufacturer.

Newsom also announced earlier this month that he will convene a special session “to protect California values,” including fundamental civil rights and reproductive rights, that he said “are under attack by this incoming administration.”

“Whether it be our fundamental civil rights, reproductive freedom, or climate action — we refuse to turn back the clock and allow our values and laws to be attacked,” Newsom said on X on Nov. 7.

A spokesperson for Trump did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

This isn’t the first time California will be taking action against the Trump’s administration concerning clean transportation legislation.

Advertisement

In 2019, California and 22 other states sued his administration for revoking its ability to set standards for greenhouse gas emission and fuel economy standards for vehicles, The Associated Press reported.

California sued the Trump administration over 100 times during his first term, primarily on matters including gun control, health care, education and immigration, the Los Angeles Times reported.



Source link

Continue Reading

California

45 Years Later, California Murder Mystery Solved Through DNA Evidence

Published

on

45 Years Later, California Murder Mystery Solved Through DNA Evidence


A 45-year-old cold case of a 17-year-old girl brutally raped and murdered has been resolved, bringing closure to the family. On February 9, 1979, Esther Gonzalez walked from her parents’ home to her sister’s in Banning, California, roughly 137 km east of Los Angeles. She never arrived. The next day, her body was discovered in a snowpack near a highway in Riverside County, California. Authorities determined she had been raped and bludgeoned to death, leading to an investigation that spanned decades.

The lab was able to match the DNA to a man named Lewis Randolph “Randy” Williamson, who died in 2014. Williamson, a US Marine Corps veteran, called authorities on the fateful day to report finding Ms Gonzalez’s body. At the time, he claimed he could not identify whether the body was male or female. Described as “argumentative” by deputies, Williamson was asked to take a polygraph test, which he passed, clearing him of suspicion in the pre-DNA era. He had faced assault allegations in the past but was never convicted of any violent crimes, according to the Los Angeles Times.

Advertisement

Despite limited leads, the Riverside County cold case homicide team didn’t give up. A semen sample recovered from Ms Gonzalez’s body in 1979 was preserved but remained unmatched in the national Combined DNA Index System (CODIS) for decades.

In 2023, forensic technology finally caught up. The homicide team collaborated with a genetic lab in Texas that specialises in forensic genealogy. A sample of Williamson’s blood from his 2014 autopsy provided the DNA match needed to confirm him as the 17-year-old’s rapist and killer.

The Gonzalez family had mixed emotions—relief at finally having answers and sadness knowing Williamson would not face justice, as he died in Florida ten years ago. Ms Gonzalez, remembered by her family as a shy yet funny and mild-mannered young woman, was the fourth of seven children. Her oldest brother, Eddie Gonzalez, wrote on Facebook, “The Gonzalez family would like to thank the Riverside County Sheriff’s Department on a job well done. After 40 years, the Gonzalez family has closure.”

Advertisement

“We are very happy that we finally have closure,” Ms Gonzalez’s sister, Elizabeth, 64, shared with CNN. “We are happy about it but, since the guy has died, a little sad that he won’t spend any time for her murder.”




Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending