Uncommon Knowledge
Newsweek is committed to challenging conventional wisdom and finding connections in the search for common ground.
Katie Porter has claimed that California’s Senate primary race was “rigged” after she lost a vote on Wednesday.
Porter, a progressive Democrat, came third in the non-partisan primary, losing out to Adam Schiff, a centrist Democrat who has been vocal in his support for Israel.
In response to the results, she blamed billionaires for spending money on attack adverts against her.
Newsweek contacted representatives for Porter by X to comment on this story.
The Senate seat has become available after Dianne Feinstein, the longest-serving woman in the U.S. Senate, died in September 2023.
Porter, who has represented Orange County, California, since 2019, got 14 percent of the state vote in the election. Schiff got 33 percent of the vote and will face Republican Steve Garvey, a former professional baseball player, who got 32.6 percent of the vote.
It became the most expensive race in the state’s history. At least $65.3 million was spent on adverts, according to Politico, who cited data from political ad-tracking service AdImpact.
Schiff outspent the other candidates and raised more money, according to campaign finance data. He had $35 million on hand at the start of 2024 while Porter had $13.2 million.
Writing on X, formerly Twitter, Porter said: “Thank you to everyone who supported our campaign and voted to shake up the status quo in Washington. Because of you, we had the establishment running scared—withstanding 3 to 1 in TV spending and an onslaught of billionaires spending millions to rig this election.
“I also want to thank every person who supported us over the past six years. It’s clear Californians are hungry for leaders who break the mold, can’t be bought, and push for accountability in government and across our economy. And that’s exactly what we as Americans deserve.
“Special interests like politics as it is today because they control the politicians. As we’ve seen in this campaign, they spend millions to defeat someone who will dilute their influence and disrupt the status quo. But take my word for it: I’ll never stop fighting for you.”
In a statement added to X, she added: “‘Rigged’ means manipulated by dishonest means. A few billionaires spent $10 million+ on attack ads against me, including an ad rated ‘false’ by an independent fact checker. That is dishonest means to manipulate an outcome. I said ‘rigged by billionaires’ and our politics are—in fact—manipulated by big dark money. Defending democracy means calling that out. At no time have I ever undermined the vote count and election process in CA, which are beyond reproach.”
Following the result, Schiff’s victory speech was drowned out by people calling for a ceasefire in Gaza.
Adam Carlson, a former political pollster, said: “New York Democrats are the absolute worst, but California Democrats aren’t far behind,” in response to Porter’s claims.
It is likely Schiff will win the Senate seat in the November vote as California is a Democratic stronghold. Republicans have not won a state-wide California seat since 2006.
Update 3/7/24, 3:50 a.m. ET: This story was updated with additional information and background.
Newsweek is committed to challenging conventional wisdom and finding connections in the search for common ground.
Newsweek is committed to challenging conventional wisdom and finding connections in the search for common ground.
Be the first to know
Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.
California’s high-speed rail project, which aims to connect San Francisco and Los Angeles with a 494-mile route capable of speeds up to 220 mph, aims to continue construction in 2025.
Phase 1 of the project focuses on linking San Francisco in the north to Anaheim via Los Angeles in the south, with plans to extend the line north to Sacramento and south to San Diego in Phase 2.
The California High-Speed Rail Authority, which is overseeing the project says it has already generated significant economic benefits, including creating over 14,000 construction jobs and involving 875 small businesses.
But despite its transformative goals, the project remains politically contentious, with critics questioning its costs and viability. It has been in development since voters approved funding in 2008 and has faced delays, cost increases, and shifting timelines.
In a statement to Newsweek, the California High-Speed Rail Authority outlined its planned work for 2025, which focuses on continuing construction in the Central Valley between Merced and Bakersfield.
The 171-mile segment between Merced and Bakersfield will be the first part of the line to be operational, with services expected to start between 2030 and 2033. Of that section, 119 miles are currently under construction.
Of the planned structures in the Central Valley section, 85 are underway or completed out a total of 93 on the segment. Work will continue on these structures as well as on the tracks capable of handling high-speed trains.
By the end of 2025, civil construction on the 119-mile segment currently underway is expected to be completed and construction will begin on the next stretches to Merced and Bakersfield.
In 2025, the authority also plans to advance design and begin construction on its stations in the Central Valley. It also expects to select a manufacturer for the trains.
Although the initial operating segment will only run 171 miles from Merced to Bakersfield, environmental clearances have been obtained for 463 miles of the 494-mile Phase 1 route, completing the stretch between San Francisco and Los Angeles. Only the Los Angeles-to-Anaheim section is still awaiting approval.
The Authority said it plans to publish its draft environmental impact report for the Los Angeles-to-Anaheim section in 2025, a key milestone for the eventual full-approval of Phase 1.
More than $11 billion has been invested to date, with funding sources including state bonds, federal grants, and proceeds from California’s carbon emission trading auctions.
The authority has not yet received funding to construct the segments westwards from the Central Valley to the Bay Area or southwards to Los Angeles.
Despite this, the authority said it was committed to pushing on.
“California is the first in the nation to build a true high-speed rail system with speeds capable of reaching 220 mph,” the Authority told Newsweek. “The Authority remains committed and aggressive in moving this historic project forward while actively pursuing additional funding.”
Despite ongoing progress, the high-speed rail project continues to face political opposition, particularly from Republican leaders.
While President Joe Biden’s administration has invested billions in it since 2021, the incoming Republican administration, which will control the House of Representatives, the Senate, and the presidency, is unlikely to continue funding it at the same level.
Representative Sam Graves of Missouri, who chairs the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, has criticized the project’s costs and funding strategies.
In a statement to Newsweek, Graves described the rail line as a “highly troubled project” and raised concerns about its reliance on government subsidies.
He pointed out that the current funding supports only a limited segment between Merced and Bakersfield, which he estimated will cost $35 billion.
“Full cost estimates [for Phase 1, between San Francisco and Anaheim] now exceed $100 billion and growing,” Graves said, calling for a comprehensive review of the project before any additional funding is allocated.
“California high-speed rail must have a plan and prove that it can wisely and responsibly spend government money—something it’s failed to do so far.”
The congressman stated that over the next four years, he would oppose any further federal funding for the California high-speed rail project.
Instead, Graves advocated for efforts to redirect unspent funds and focus on improving existing transportation infrastructure, such as Amtrak.
Graves also emphasized the need for private-sector involvement in future rail projects, citing Brightline’s operations in Florida and Las Vegas as a successful example of private investment.
While Graves acknowledged the potential of high-speed rail, he argued that the California project has failed to meet the necessary criteria for viability and local demand.
The authority told Newsweek it would engage with the federal government to seek other funding sources.
“We continue to explore strategies aimed at stabilizing funding, potentially allowing the program to draw private financing and/or government loans,” it said.
HONOLULU (HawaiiNewsNow) – A Honolulu man who had his identity stolen had to fly to California to clear his name. He acted quickly to stop his bank account from being completely drained.
Jamie Dahl said he’s speaking out because identity theft can happen to anyone and he’s not sure how his personal information was stolen.
“I’m still mystified how he pulled it off,” Dahl said.
In late November, Dahl found some fraudulent charges on his credit card so he ordered a replacement card.
Two weeks later, he says went to his online bank account with Bank of America and discovered his identity had been stolen. The hacker had account access for instant money transfers.
“My phone number is missing, my email is missing, my mailing address. I live in Honolulu. It’s Mililani,” Dahl said.
He knew he was in trouble.
Dahl said two days after his discovered his identity had been stolen, he had to fly to California to clear his name because there are no Bank of America branches in Hawaii.
He brought several forms of ID to re-authenticate himself.
“It was just an incredible ordeal,” he said.
“The bad guys are shopping just like everybody else for Christmas,” said former HPD Deputy Chief John McCarthy, who investigated cybercrime.
McCarthy says check your bank account daily and having a local bank is helpful.
“If you don’t have a local bank, you are that much father away. I’ve had problems with banks that are on the East Coast,” he said.
“It takes a day to communicate with them, a day to get a response. That’s a lot of damage you can do in 24, 48, 72 hours,” McCarthy added.
McCarthy says most banks have streamlined their re-authentification process so you don’t have to see them in person.
Hawaii News Now contacted Bank of America to find out their process and are waiting to hear back.
Copyright 2024 Hawaii News Now. All rights reserved.
Google’s counteroffer to the government trying to break it up is unbundling Android apps
Novo Nordisk shares tumble as weight-loss drug trial data disappoints
Illegal immigrant sexually abused child in the U.S. after being removed from the country five times
'It's a little holiday gift': Inside the Weeknd's free Santa Monica show for his biggest fans
Think you can't dance? Get up and try these tips in our comic. We dare you!
Fox News AI Newsletter: OpenAI responds to Elon Musk's lawsuit
There’s a reason Metaphor: ReFantanzio’s battle music sounds as cool as it does
France’s new premier selects Eric Lombard as finance minister