Connect with us

California

Debate grows over parched California’s thirsty crops

Published

on

Debate grows over parched California’s thirsty crops


LOS ANGELES — It is simply 9 within the morning in jap Riverside County’s Palo Verde Valley and farmer Jack Seiler’s workday is already half completed.   

He stopped to scrutinize a bushy shrub of cotton that he’s cultivating in Blythe. 

“Hopefully, these will stick and make a ball,” he stated as he considered and rotated the plant in his hand.  

On this desert farming neighborhood on the Arizona border, daytime temperatures routinely exceed 100 levels and that is no drawback for these crops. 

Advertisement

“Cotton likes the warmth,” Seiler remarked.  

 One other crop that may thrive in excessive warmth? Afalfa. On his farm, Seiler grows 1000’s of acres of it. As soon as matured, the crop is mowed, baled and ready for transport. He pointed to a loaded truck headed for a dairy in Bakersfield.

“It is a scorching commodity,” Seiler stated. “They’re coming for it.”

Alfalfa is what dairy cows eat and California is large in dairy manufacturing. Dairy merchandise and milk are priceless commodities, pulling in near $7.5 billion per yr however, in a drought, many individuals query whether or not crops like alfalfa ought to be grown right here. 

UC Riverside economist Chris Thornberg is one such critic. 

Advertisement

“The very last thing you do is give water to farmers to waste it by rising stuff within the desert that ought to by no means be grown, ”  Thornberg stated. 

Thornberg’s gripe with Seiler’s farm and others right here is the quantity of water they use.

Seiler’s farm borders the Colorado River. His household has owned the land since 1967 and it got here with the precise to make use of as a lot river water as wanted to develop any crop he chooses. 

Bart Fisher can also be an alfalfa grower in Blythe. 

“My grandfather settled right here 104 years in the past at a time when the federal authorities wished to feed and populate the West,” Fisher stated.  

Advertisement

He defined how his forefathers constructed a collection of irrigation canals and staked a authorized declare on Colorado River water. 

“In Western water legislation, you might have ‘first in use, first in proper,’” Fisher stated.

Imperial and Palo Verde Valley farmers have been first to put declare to the river’s water, which means they’re final to be impacted by water restrictions.  

Fisher and Seiler promote the majority of the alfalfa hay they develop to dairy farms in California and Arizona.  

“If you open the following cup of yogurt, a few of that in there got here from alfalfa,” Seiler stated.  

Advertisement

That type of argument does not transfer Dr. Thornberg.   

“The concept that we have to develop hay within the desert to feed livestock is nonsensical,” Thornberg stated.

Thornberg factors out how 16 % of the alfalfa grown in California is shipped all the way in which to Saudi Arabia to feed the dairy cattle in that desert realm. The irony? Saudi Arabia banned rising alfalfa due to water shortages there. 

“I can’t agree that we must always permit Saudi Arabian cows and horses the next deference to our personal surroundings,”  Thornberg stated. 

Saudi cows apart, as much as 80 % of all California water is presently used for agriculture. 

Advertisement

Given California’s megadrought, Thornberg stated that is an excessive amount of.

“We over allocate this extremely scarce useful resource on the idea of 100-year-old contracts,” Thornberg famous. 

Thornberg’s answer is to develop these crops in cooler, wetter states and ship the water saved to Southern California cities.

That mind-set didn’t sit effectively with the farmers.

“Oh, you’ll be able to say, ‘Simply develop the hay in Arkansas.’ However what about all of the dairies in California?”  Fisher requested. 

Advertisement

“Nicely, we’re first-priority proper right here and we’re hoping that, , meaning one thing,” Seiler added. 

Thornberg shouldn’t be persuaded.  

“You owned a hunk of land for 50 years? OK, I purchased a hunk of land in Los Angeles and — rattling it! — I feel I ought to be capable of develop grass in my entrance yard. How are my rights any much less necessary than your rights?” he requested.

Gerri Fixed contributed to this report

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

California

California proposes its own EV buyer credit — which could cut out Elon Musk's Tesla

Published

on

California proposes its own EV buyer credit — which could cut out Elon Musk's Tesla


  • Gov. Gavin Newsom plans to revive California’s EV rebate if Trump ends the federal tax credit.
  • But Tesla, the largest maker of EVs, would be excluded under the proposal.
  • Elon Musk criticized Tesla’s potential exclusion from the rebate.

California Gov. Gavin Newsom is preparing to step in if President-elect Donald Trump fulfills his promise to axe the federal electric-vehicle tax credit — but one notable EV maker could be left out.

Newsom said Monday if the $7,500 federal tax credit is eliminated he would restart the state’s zero-emission vehicle rebate program, which was phased out in 2023.

“We will intervene if the Trump Administration eliminates the federal tax credit, doubling down on our commitment to clean air and green jobs in California,” Newsom said in a statement. “We’re not turning back on a clean transportation future — we’re going to make it more affordable for people to drive vehicles that don’t pollute.”

Advertisement

The rebates for EV buyers would come from the state’s Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund, which is funded by polluters of greenhouse gases under a cap-and-trade program, according to the governor’s office.

But Tesla’s vehicles could be excluded under the proposal’s market-share limitations, Bloomberg News first reported.

The governor’s office confirmed to Business Insider that the rebate program could include a market-share cap which could in turn exclude Tesla or other EV makers. The office did not share details about what market-share limit could be proposed and also noted the proposal would be subject to negotiations in the state legislature.

A market-share cap would exclude companies whose sales account for a certain amount of total electric vehicle sales. For instance, Tesla accounted for nearly 55% off all new electric vehicles registered in California in the first three quarters of 2024, according to a report from the California New Car Dealers Association. By comparison, the companies with the next highest EV market share in California were Hyundai and BMW with 5.6% and 5% respectively.

Advertisement

Tesla sales in California, the US’s largest EV market, have recently declined even as overall EV sales in the state have grown. Though the company still accounted for a majority of EV sales in California this year as of September, its market share fell year-over-year from 64% to 55%.

The governor’s office said the market-share cap would be aimed at promoting competition and innovation in the industry.

Elon Musk, who has expressed support for ending the federal tax credit, said in an X post it was “insane” for the California proposal exclude Tesla.

The federal electric vehicle tax credit, which was passed as part of the Biden administration’s Inflation Reduction Act in 2022, provides a $7,500 tax credit to some EV buyers.

Advertisement

Musk, who is working closely with the incoming Trump administration, has expressed support for ending the tax credit. He’s set to co-lead an advisory commission, the Department of Government Efficiency, which is aimed at slashing federal spending.

The Tesla CEO said on an earnings call in July that ending the federal tax credit might actually benefit the company.

“I think it would be devastating for our competitors and for Tesla slightly,” Musk said. “But long-term probably actually helps Tesla, would be my guess.”

Advertisement

BI’s Graham Rapier previously reported that ending the tax credit could help Tesla maintain its strong standing in the EV market by slowing its competitors growth.

Prior to the EV rebate proposal, Newsom has already positioned himself as a foil to the incoming Trump administration. Following Trump’s election win the governor called on California lawmakers to convene for a special session to discuss protecting the state from Trump’s second term.

“The freedoms we hold dear in California are under attack — and we won’t sit idle,” Newsom said in a statement at the time.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

California

California Gov. Gavin Newsom says state will provide rebates if Trump removes tax credit for electric vehicles

Published

on

California Gov. Gavin Newsom says state will provide rebates if Trump removes tax credit for electric vehicles


California Gov. Gavin Newsom said the state will provide rebates to residents if President-elect Donald Trump’s incoming administration does away with a federal tax credit for electric vehicles.

In a news release issued Monday, Newsom said he would restart the state’s Clean Vehicle Rebate Program, which provided financial incentives on more than 590,000 vehicles before it was phased out late 2023.

“We will intervene if the Trump Administration eliminates the federal tax credit, doubling down on our commitment to clean air and green jobs in California,” Newsom said. “We’re not turning back on a clean transportation future — we’re going to make it more affordable for people to drive vehicles that don’t pollute.”

The federal rebates on new and used electric vehicles were implemented in the Inflation Reduction Act that President Joe Biden signed into law in 2022. When Trump’s second term in office begins next year, he could work with Congress to change the rules around those rebates. Those potential changes could limit the federal rebates, including by reducing the amount of money available or limiting who is eligible.

Advertisement

Limiting federal subsidies on electric vehicle purchases would hurt many American automakers, including Ford, General Motors and the EV startup Rivian. Tesla, which also builds its automobiles in the United States, would take a smaller hit since that company currently sells more EVs and has a higher profit margin than any other EV manufacturer.

Newsom also announced earlier this month that he will convene a special session “to protect California values,” including fundamental civil rights and reproductive rights, that he said “are under attack by this incoming administration.”

“Whether it be our fundamental civil rights, reproductive freedom, or climate action — we refuse to turn back the clock and allow our values and laws to be attacked,” Newsom said on X on Nov. 7.

A spokesperson for Trump did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

This isn’t the first time California will be taking action against the Trump’s administration concerning clean transportation legislation.

Advertisement

In 2019, California and 22 other states sued his administration for revoking its ability to set standards for greenhouse gas emission and fuel economy standards for vehicles, The Associated Press reported.

California sued the Trump administration over 100 times during his first term, primarily on matters including gun control, health care, education and immigration, the Los Angeles Times reported.



Source link

Continue Reading

California

45 Years Later, California Murder Mystery Solved Through DNA Evidence

Published

on

45 Years Later, California Murder Mystery Solved Through DNA Evidence


A 45-year-old cold case of a 17-year-old girl brutally raped and murdered has been resolved, bringing closure to the family. On February 9, 1979, Esther Gonzalez walked from her parents’ home to her sister’s in Banning, California, roughly 137 km east of Los Angeles. She never arrived. The next day, her body was discovered in a snowpack near a highway in Riverside County, California. Authorities determined she had been raped and bludgeoned to death, leading to an investigation that spanned decades.

The lab was able to match the DNA to a man named Lewis Randolph “Randy” Williamson, who died in 2014. Williamson, a US Marine Corps veteran, called authorities on the fateful day to report finding Ms Gonzalez’s body. At the time, he claimed he could not identify whether the body was male or female. Described as “argumentative” by deputies, Williamson was asked to take a polygraph test, which he passed, clearing him of suspicion in the pre-DNA era. He had faced assault allegations in the past but was never convicted of any violent crimes, according to the Los Angeles Times.

Advertisement

Despite limited leads, the Riverside County cold case homicide team didn’t give up. A semen sample recovered from Ms Gonzalez’s body in 1979 was preserved but remained unmatched in the national Combined DNA Index System (CODIS) for decades.

In 2023, forensic technology finally caught up. The homicide team collaborated with a genetic lab in Texas that specialises in forensic genealogy. A sample of Williamson’s blood from his 2014 autopsy provided the DNA match needed to confirm him as the 17-year-old’s rapist and killer.

The Gonzalez family had mixed emotions—relief at finally having answers and sadness knowing Williamson would not face justice, as he died in Florida ten years ago. Ms Gonzalez, remembered by her family as a shy yet funny and mild-mannered young woman, was the fourth of seven children. Her oldest brother, Eddie Gonzalez, wrote on Facebook, “The Gonzalez family would like to thank the Riverside County Sheriff’s Department on a job well done. After 40 years, the Gonzalez family has closure.”

Advertisement

“We are very happy that we finally have closure,” Ms Gonzalez’s sister, Elizabeth, 64, shared with CNN. “We are happy about it but, since the guy has died, a little sad that he won’t spend any time for her murder.”




Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending