Connect with us

California

California’s latest stupid reason for attacking recall elections

Published

on

California’s latest stupid reason for attacking recall elections


In one other assault on recall elections, California state legislators have superior a invoice (AB2582) that claims to eradicate what they’re calling “hyperpartisanship” on the native degree by stopping most cities and counties from holding a alternative race to fill the seat of a recalled elected official. It is a resolution looking for an issue: Partisanship doesn’t drive native remembers, and the proposed remedy is a stealthy assault on the voters’s direct democracy powers.

The fact is that few remembers, particularly on the native degree, are targeted on partisanship. Due to elements such because the Large Kind, gerrymandering, and the truth that individuals are likely to stay in like-minded communities, most political jurisdictions within the nation — from states to villages — are one-party dominated. The result’s that remembers are typically targeted on coverage points: firing a police chief, approving an actual property improvement, or elevating taxes.

Advertisement

A have a look at the latest main remembers in California present how this works. It’s true that state-level remembers regularly have a partisan bent. Recall campaigns in opposition to Gov. Gavin Newsom and state Sen. Josh Newman (one of many sponsors of AB2582) had been partisan-driven. However there’s little proof of partisanship within the native 2022 remembers. The campaigns in opposition to San Francisco District Lawyer Chesa Boudin and three San Francisco supervisors had been blue-on-blue campaigns: San Francisco has 9 occasions as many registered Democrats as Republicans, these remembers had been targeted on particular coverage arguments, and the voters knew that the replacements can be Democrats appointed by Democratic Mayor London Breed. And the one different California recall in 2022 (in opposition to a Shasta County supervisor) was a red-on-red marketing campaign to exchange a Republican with one other Republican. In these remembers, the partisanship was all on one facet of the aisle. That’s occasion insider battle, not partisan warfare.

The Legislature’s phantom hyperpartisanship idea appears to stream from the concept California has been recall loopy of late — which can be false. In 2019, zero remembers certified for the poll in California. Eleven certified in 2020. The 2021 Newsom recall attracted a lot consideration, however there have been solely six remembers on the poll that yr, and 4 had been in Vernon — California’s smallest metropolis by inhabitants. In 2022, simply six remembers certified: the 4 in San Francisco, one in Shasta County, and one in Redondo Seashore. There have been loads of recall efforts, however practically all didn’t qualify, even the high-profile try in opposition to Los Angeles District Lawyer George Gascon.

Advertisement

The Legislature’s proposed remedy exhibits that its actual intent is to neuter the native recall: AB2582 assaults the flexibility of native voters to decide on their very own officers. The brand new legislation would take away the alternative race and as a substitute use the “computerized alternative” or “changed by legislation” mannequin. If this turns into legislation, native officers would face the identical sure/no recall vote — however there will probably be no race for the alternative. As a substitute, alternative will probably be by no matter technique applies every time an official in that jurisdiction leaves workplace. Which may imply {that a} designated official is mechanically elevated to that put up; for instance, a vice mayor might mechanically substitute a recalled mayor. If there’s no designated alternative, native officers will select the alternative; for instance, San Francisco’s mayor named Boudin’s alternative after his recall.

AB2582 is dangerous for native voters, as a result of it reduces their energy, particularly their energy to decide on native officers. The recall is a big energy that voters have reserved to allow them to eject undesirable officers by gathering signatures to carry a re-vote. Within the authentic vote, the voters selected their official, and voters by now are well-used to the concept remembers lead to a brand new selection for the alternative. Taking the alternative course of away from voters transforms the recall from a extremely democratic system to at least one with zero voter selection within the alternative.

The Legislature could also be hoping that this may restrict remembers, and though it might discourage individuals who want to personally substitute the focused official, AB2582 might have the alternative impact of encouraging partisan remembers. Many remembers are multi-official efforts, the place a whole metropolis council or college board is focused . That’s as a result of the automated alternative mannequin encourages recall proponents to increase the group being focused to allow them to form the alternative candidate. That occurred in 2012, when recall proponents in Wisconsin added the lieutenant governor to the petition to forestall any risk {that a} courtroom might discover that official ought to have changed the governor. And computerized alternative provides native officers who will do the appointing or changing their very own political incentives in remembers; for instance, there was hypothesis that Breed was enjoying a quiet recreation within the Boudin recall so she might title his alternative.

Remembers attracted vital consideration in California just lately, and elected officers have seized the chance introduced by requires reform by making an attempt to cut back voter energy to have their say. That’s not shocking: Elected officers concern any risk to their seats. Voters ought to see via the “reform” sham to the reality: Remembers have little to do with hyperpartisanship, and beneath cowl of reforming the recall, the Legislature is stripping energy from voters.

Joshua Spivak is a Senior Fellow on the Hugh L. Carey Institute for Authorities Reform at Wagner School and a Senior Analysis Fellow on the Berkeley Regulation’s California Structure Heart. He’s the creator of Recall Elections: From Alexander Hamilton to Gavin Newsom and writes the Recall Elections Weblog. David A. Carrillo is the manager director of the California Structure Heart at Berkeley Regulation.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

California

STEVE HILTON: Five things California Democrats still don't get

Published

on

STEVE HILTON: Five things California Democrats still don't get


Join Fox News for access to this content

Plus special access to select articles and other premium content with your account – free of charge.

By entering your email and pushing continue, you are agreeing to Fox News’ Terms of Use and Privacy Policy, which includes our Notice of Financial Incentive.

Please enter a valid email address.

Having trouble? Click here.

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Advertisement

Along with most other Democratic politicians in California, Gov. Gavin Newsom still doesn’t seem to understand what happened in the 2024 election.

For years, Newsom, along with California cronies like former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and, of course, Vice President Kamala Harris, bragged about their state being a “model for the nation.”

In one sense–not the one they intended, of course–that’s true. California became a model of what not to do.

CALIFORNIA VOTERS NARROWLY REJECT $18 MINIMUM WAGE; FIRST SUCH NO-VOTE NATIONWIDE SINCE 1996

The terrible combination of elitism and extremism that has defined Democratic policymaking in my home state for at least the last decade has delivered failure on every front.

Advertisement

Despite having the highest taxes in the nation, despite the state’s budget nearly doubling in the last ten years (even as our population has been falling, in the exodus from blue state misrule), California has the highest rate of poverty in America. We have the highest housing costs, the lowest homeownership, highest gas and utility bills, and the worst business climate–ten years in a row.

This record of failure is exactly why Democrats lost so badly on November 5th. Voters had a clear choice: between more of the same Democrat policies that raised the cost of living and lowered their quality of life, or a return to the peace and prosperity of the Trump years.

GAVIN NEWSOM TO MEET WITH BIDEN AFTER VOWING TO PROTECT STATE’S PROGRESSIVE POLICIES AGAINST TRUMP ADMIN

In many ways, the contest between Donald Trump and Kamala Harris represented a battle between the ‘blue state model’ championed by Gavin Newsom in California, and the ‘red state model’ that has driven people and businesses out of California and into the arms of more welcoming states like Texas, Tennessee and Florida.

Of course, the red state model won and the blue state model was roundly rejected. 

Advertisement

You would think that would make blue state leaders like Newsom pause and reflect. But the exact opposite has happened. Gavin Newsom immediately called a “special session” of the California legislature to “Trump-proof” his state.

What California really needs is “Newsom-proofing.” 

Instead, California Democrats are doubling down on the exact same agenda that was defeated across the country – including in California, which saw the biggest shift from Democrats to the GOP in decades.

Here are the five things California Democrats still don’t get:

1. People want results, not lectures

Democrats and their media sycophants can do all the self-righteous, sanctimonious bloviating they like about “our democracy” and “equity”, but in the end people want the basics of the American Dream: a good job that pays enough to raise your family in a home of your own in a safe neighborhood with a good school so your kids can have a better life than you. No amount of moral superiority from the people in charge will make up for that if they fail to provide it.

Advertisement

2. Enough with the ‘climate’ extremism

“Climate” has become a religion for Democrats, and you see that especially clearly in California. But when you look at the main reason life is so unaffordable for working people, whether that’s gas prices, utility bills or housing costs, extreme climate policies are to blame. Working-class Americans can’t afford these ‘luxury beliefs.’

CLICK HERE FOR MORE FOX NEWS OPINION

3. Who cares about Hollywood? 

This election destroyed forever the myth that fancy celebrities can sway votes. Oprah, Beyonce, George Clooney, Taylor Swift…nobody cares! The new cultural powerhouses are the podcast hosts, comedians…the raw power of UFC is where it’s at, not the decadent Hollywood elite who won’t even turn up to support “their” candidate without a multimillion dollar paycheck.

Producer and actress Oprah Winfrey holds up Vice President and Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris’ hand as she arrives onstage during a campaign rally on the Benjamin Franklin Parkway in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, on November 4, 2024.  (Getty Images)

4. ‘Little tech’ beats Big Tech

Democrats may console themselves with the knowledge that California’s Big Tech monopolies are on their side. But in this election we saw the rise of what famed Silicon Valley investor Marc Andressen calls “little tech”, the upstarts and rebels who reject leftist groupthink. They got engaged in this election in a way we’ve never seen before. It’s a massive shift and will be a huge force for the future.

Advertisement

5. Working class beats the elite 

Back in 2016, after the Brexit vote, and then Donald Trump’s victory here, shocked the world, I predicted that the Republican Party had the opportunity to become a “multiracial working class coalition.” Trump’s 2024 victory has delivered that — a revolutionary shift in our political landscape. The other part of my prediction? Democrats will be left as the party of the “rich, white and woke.”

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Unless Democrats come to terms with these realities and change course, they can expect to lose elections for years to come. The reaction in California – epicenter of today’s Democrat elite — shows that there is zero sign of this happening. 

They just don’t get it.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM STEVE HILTON

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

California

California proposes its own EV buyer credit — which could cut out Elon Musk's Tesla

Published

on

California proposes its own EV buyer credit — which could cut out Elon Musk's Tesla


  • Gov. Gavin Newsom plans to revive California’s EV rebate if Trump ends the federal tax credit.
  • But Tesla, the largest maker of EVs, would be excluded under the proposal.
  • Elon Musk criticized Tesla’s potential exclusion from the rebate.

California Gov. Gavin Newsom is preparing to step in if President-elect Donald Trump fulfills his promise to axe the federal electric-vehicle tax credit — but one notable EV maker could be left out.

Newsom said Monday if the $7,500 federal tax credit is eliminated he would restart the state’s zero-emission vehicle rebate program, which was phased out in 2023.

“We will intervene if the Trump Administration eliminates the federal tax credit, doubling down on our commitment to clean air and green jobs in California,” Newsom said in a statement. “We’re not turning back on a clean transportation future — we’re going to make it more affordable for people to drive vehicles that don’t pollute.”

Advertisement

The rebates for EV buyers would come from the state’s Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund, which is funded by polluters of greenhouse gases under a cap-and-trade program, according to the governor’s office.

But Tesla’s vehicles could be excluded under the proposal’s market-share limitations, Bloomberg News first reported.

The governor’s office confirmed to Business Insider that the rebate program could include a market-share cap which could in turn exclude Tesla or other EV makers. The office did not share details about what market-share limit could be proposed and also noted the proposal would be subject to negotiations in the state legislature.

A market-share cap would exclude companies whose sales account for a certain amount of total electric vehicle sales. For instance, Tesla accounted for nearly 55% off all new electric vehicles registered in California in the first three quarters of 2024, according to a report from the California New Car Dealers Association. By comparison, the companies with the next highest EV market share in California were Hyundai and BMW with 5.6% and 5% respectively.

Advertisement

Tesla sales in California, the US’s largest EV market, have recently declined even as overall EV sales in the state have grown. Though the company still accounted for a majority of EV sales in California this year as of September, its market share fell year-over-year from 64% to 55%.

The governor’s office said the market-share cap would be aimed at promoting competition and innovation in the industry.

Elon Musk, who has expressed support for ending the federal tax credit, said in an X post it was “insane” for the California proposal exclude Tesla.

The federal electric vehicle tax credit, which was passed as part of the Biden administration’s Inflation Reduction Act in 2022, provides a $7,500 tax credit to some EV buyers.

Advertisement

Musk, who is working closely with the incoming Trump administration, has expressed support for ending the tax credit. He’s set to co-lead an advisory commission, the Department of Government Efficiency, which is aimed at slashing federal spending.

The Tesla CEO said on an earnings call in July that ending the federal tax credit might actually benefit the company.

“I think it would be devastating for our competitors and for Tesla slightly,” Musk said. “But long-term probably actually helps Tesla, would be my guess.”

Advertisement

BI’s Graham Rapier previously reported that ending the tax credit could help Tesla maintain its strong standing in the EV market by slowing its competitors growth.

Prior to the EV rebate proposal, Newsom has already positioned himself as a foil to the incoming Trump administration. Following Trump’s election win the governor called on California lawmakers to convene for a special session to discuss protecting the state from Trump’s second term.

“The freedoms we hold dear in California are under attack — and we won’t sit idle,” Newsom said in a statement at the time.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

California

California Gov. Gavin Newsom says state will provide rebates if Trump removes tax credit for electric vehicles

Published

on

California Gov. Gavin Newsom says state will provide rebates if Trump removes tax credit for electric vehicles


California Gov. Gavin Newsom said the state will provide rebates to residents if President-elect Donald Trump’s incoming administration does away with a federal tax credit for electric vehicles.

In a news release issued Monday, Newsom said he would restart the state’s Clean Vehicle Rebate Program, which provided financial incentives on more than 590,000 vehicles before it was phased out late 2023.

“We will intervene if the Trump Administration eliminates the federal tax credit, doubling down on our commitment to clean air and green jobs in California,” Newsom said. “We’re not turning back on a clean transportation future — we’re going to make it more affordable for people to drive vehicles that don’t pollute.”

The federal rebates on new and used electric vehicles were implemented in the Inflation Reduction Act that President Joe Biden signed into law in 2022. When Trump’s second term in office begins next year, he could work with Congress to change the rules around those rebates. Those potential changes could limit the federal rebates, including by reducing the amount of money available or limiting who is eligible.

Advertisement

Limiting federal subsidies on electric vehicle purchases would hurt many American automakers, including Ford, General Motors and the EV startup Rivian. Tesla, which also builds its automobiles in the United States, would take a smaller hit since that company currently sells more EVs and has a higher profit margin than any other EV manufacturer.

Newsom also announced earlier this month that he will convene a special session “to protect California values,” including fundamental civil rights and reproductive rights, that he said “are under attack by this incoming administration.”

“Whether it be our fundamental civil rights, reproductive freedom, or climate action — we refuse to turn back the clock and allow our values and laws to be attacked,” Newsom said on X on Nov. 7.

A spokesperson for Trump did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

This isn’t the first time California will be taking action against the Trump’s administration concerning clean transportation legislation.

Advertisement

In 2019, California and 22 other states sued his administration for revoking its ability to set standards for greenhouse gas emission and fuel economy standards for vehicles, The Associated Press reported.

California sued the Trump administration over 100 times during his first term, primarily on matters including gun control, health care, education and immigration, the Los Angeles Times reported.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending