Connect with us

California

California wildfires threaten nearly all of state’s cannabis crops

Published

on

California wildfires threaten nearly all of state’s cannabis crops


Hashish crops are disproportionately impacted by wildfires in California in comparison with different main crops within the state, in response to a research by the College of California, Berkeley.

Wildfires have ravaged California, with most of the energetic fires burning within the northern a part of the state, in response to reviews from Cal Fireplace. Hashish farmers usually find in northern California due to laws that prohibit rising in low-wildfire-risk areas such because the Central Valley.

Greater than 94 % of authorized hashish grows in scorching spots in California, the research revealed in Ecosphere final week discovered, and that for a wide range of causes, hashish is “uniquely susceptible” to wildfires.

Though hashish was legalized for leisure grownup use in California in 2016, a lot of the state’s crop continues to be farmed in rural areas due to its illicit historical past. Rules prohibit hashish farmers from rising in sure counties, akin to within the Central Valley space the place the specter of wildfire injury could be very low. This usually influences hashish farmers to find in rural areas extra susceptible to wildfires.

Advertisement
A Cal Berkeley research discovered that California’s hashish crops are disproportionately affected by wildfires.
Christopher Dillis, Van Butsic, Diana Moanga, Phoebe Parker-Shames, Ariani Wartenberg, Theodore E. Grantham/Ecosphere

In 9 of 11 cannabis-producing counties within the state, 75 % or extra of hashish farm space was positioned inside wildfire danger zones. Some counties akin to Humboldt, Trinity, Mendocino and Nevada noticed one hundred pc of hashish farm space positioned in scorching spots. Different counties akin to Sonoma and Yolo had lower than 25 % of their hashish farm areas concentrated in scorching spots.

Hit to the economic system

The Division of Hashish Management (DCC) informed Newsweek in an announcement that the financial impacts of wildfires impacting hashish crop require additional research however may probably “considerably” affect the state’s economic system.

“Primarily based on this report, we perceive that widespread hashish crop injury as a result of fireplace or different weather-related points may very well be extreme, particularly to native economies that depend on hashish tax income,” the assertion stated.

The research discovered that authorized gross sales for hashish in 2019 neared $3 billion.

“Hashish is already one of many high 5 grossing agricultural sectors in California, with fast progress anticipated within the coming decade,” the research stated. “In 2020, tax revenues from authorized hashish gross sales amounted to over $780 million. Contemplating hashish’ growing financial significance at state and county ranges, crop losses from wildfire have the potential for important impacts, notably in rural communities with a better direct social and financial dependence on hashish agriculture.”

Advertisement

Alternatives for hashish farms to spend money on crop insurance coverage to mitigate danger are scarce as hashish is federally unlawful. Insurance coverage premiums are also on the rise for farms positioned in high-risk-wildfire areas.

“This might disproportionately affect already marginalized small-scale hashish farmers who could not have sources to get well from wildfire-related losses,” the research discovered. “As evidenced by insurance coverage premiums rising exponentially [or policies being terminated altogether] for vineyards and different agriculture in fire-prone areas, the prospect of hashish being insured in equally hazardous areas seems unlikely.”

Cannabis Crops Are Impacted By California Wildfires
A marijuana plant is displayed through the 2016 Hashish Enterprise Summit & Expo on June 22, 2016 in Oakland, California. A Berkeley research discovered that hashish crops are disproportionately impacted by wildfires.
Photograph by Justin Sullivan/Getty Pictures

Underestimated injury

The research examined the variety of hashish farms immediately broken by wildfires in 2020. Though the direct affect was comparatively small at lower than 1 %, the authors stated {that a} a lot bigger proportion may very well be affected simply due to the crop’s proximity to wildfires.

Smoke publicity usually impacts different crops, akin to grapes, however little evaluation has been completed on comparable results to hashish crops. Examine authors stated that the true affect to hashish crop was possible “underestimated” as a result of the research examined solely hashish farms immediately impacted by wildfires.

“Whereas the adversarial results of wildfire smoke on the chemical composition and high quality of wine grapes [‘smoke taint’] are properly documented and have been proven to trigger important financial impacts the consequences of smoke on the standard of hashish merchandise are much less properly understood,” the research stated.

Wildfire smoke may result in a necessity for extra testing protocols from the state in a sector that’s already strict.

Advertisement

“Given California’s stringent testing necessities for hashish flower, the consequences of wildfire smoke add additional uncertainty to newly established testing protocols and there’s no publicly obtainable steering on potential mitigation measures,” the research stated. “The potential financial impacts to farmers as a result of testing failures are, at current, much more tough to estimate given the shortage of accessible information.”

Consideration ought to be directed towards assuaging location laws to encourage hashish farming in areas much less susceptible to wildfires, the research stated.

“Consideration also needs to be given to the social, political, and regulatory boundaries which might be excluding hashish from extra conventional and fewer fire-prone agricultural areas (e.g., the Central Valley),” the research stated. “For farms already established in high-risk areas, fire-safety packages are wanted to scale back the impacts of wildfire to crops and human well being. These may embody conventional fire-risk discount actions, akin to vegetation administration and fireplace breaks, however also needs to embody measures that tackle the dangers of wildfire smoke publicity to crops and farm staff.”

The research additionally inspired California to pursue avenues for crop insurance coverage obtainable to hashish farmers who usually are not eligible for federal packages.

“Collectively, these steps will assist bolster the resilience of the growing regulated hashish business to wildfire,” the research stated. “If profitable, efforts to deal with wildfire vulnerability of hashish farms may probably function a mannequin for decreasing the vulnerability of different types of rural agriculture, and their dependent communities, particularly in a altering local weather.”

Advertisement

Newsweek reached out to the College of California, Berkeley for remark.



Source link

California

STEVE HILTON: Five things California Democrats still don't get

Published

on

STEVE HILTON: Five things California Democrats still don't get


Join Fox News for access to this content

Plus special access to select articles and other premium content with your account – free of charge.

By entering your email and pushing continue, you are agreeing to Fox News’ Terms of Use and Privacy Policy, which includes our Notice of Financial Incentive.

Please enter a valid email address.

Having trouble? Click here.

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Advertisement

Along with most other Democratic politicians in California, Gov. Gavin Newsom still doesn’t seem to understand what happened in the 2024 election.

For years, Newsom, along with California cronies like former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and, of course, Vice President Kamala Harris, bragged about their state being a “model for the nation.”

In one sense–not the one they intended, of course–that’s true. California became a model of what not to do.

CALIFORNIA VOTERS NARROWLY REJECT $18 MINIMUM WAGE; FIRST SUCH NO-VOTE NATIONWIDE SINCE 1996

The terrible combination of elitism and extremism that has defined Democratic policymaking in my home state for at least the last decade has delivered failure on every front.

Advertisement

Despite having the highest taxes in the nation, despite the state’s budget nearly doubling in the last ten years (even as our population has been falling, in the exodus from blue state misrule), California has the highest rate of poverty in America. We have the highest housing costs, the lowest homeownership, highest gas and utility bills, and the worst business climate–ten years in a row.

This record of failure is exactly why Democrats lost so badly on November 5th. Voters had a clear choice: between more of the same Democrat policies that raised the cost of living and lowered their quality of life, or a return to the peace and prosperity of the Trump years.

GAVIN NEWSOM TO MEET WITH BIDEN AFTER VOWING TO PROTECT STATE’S PROGRESSIVE POLICIES AGAINST TRUMP ADMIN

In many ways, the contest between Donald Trump and Kamala Harris represented a battle between the ‘blue state model’ championed by Gavin Newsom in California, and the ‘red state model’ that has driven people and businesses out of California and into the arms of more welcoming states like Texas, Tennessee and Florida.

Of course, the red state model won and the blue state model was roundly rejected. 

Advertisement

You would think that would make blue state leaders like Newsom pause and reflect. But the exact opposite has happened. Gavin Newsom immediately called a “special session” of the California legislature to “Trump-proof” his state.

What California really needs is “Newsom-proofing.” 

Instead, California Democrats are doubling down on the exact same agenda that was defeated across the country – including in California, which saw the biggest shift from Democrats to the GOP in decades.

Here are the five things California Democrats still don’t get:

1. People want results, not lectures

Democrats and their media sycophants can do all the self-righteous, sanctimonious bloviating they like about “our democracy” and “equity”, but in the end people want the basics of the American Dream: a good job that pays enough to raise your family in a home of your own in a safe neighborhood with a good school so your kids can have a better life than you. No amount of moral superiority from the people in charge will make up for that if they fail to provide it.

Advertisement

2. Enough with the ‘climate’ extremism

“Climate” has become a religion for Democrats, and you see that especially clearly in California. But when you look at the main reason life is so unaffordable for working people, whether that’s gas prices, utility bills or housing costs, extreme climate policies are to blame. Working-class Americans can’t afford these ‘luxury beliefs.’

CLICK HERE FOR MORE FOX NEWS OPINION

3. Who cares about Hollywood? 

This election destroyed forever the myth that fancy celebrities can sway votes. Oprah, Beyonce, George Clooney, Taylor Swift…nobody cares! The new cultural powerhouses are the podcast hosts, comedians…the raw power of UFC is where it’s at, not the decadent Hollywood elite who won’t even turn up to support “their” candidate without a multimillion dollar paycheck.

Producer and actress Oprah Winfrey holds up Vice President and Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris’ hand as she arrives onstage during a campaign rally on the Benjamin Franklin Parkway in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, on November 4, 2024.  (Getty Images)

4. ‘Little tech’ beats Big Tech

Democrats may console themselves with the knowledge that California’s Big Tech monopolies are on their side. But in this election we saw the rise of what famed Silicon Valley investor Marc Andressen calls “little tech”, the upstarts and rebels who reject leftist groupthink. They got engaged in this election in a way we’ve never seen before. It’s a massive shift and will be a huge force for the future.

Advertisement

5. Working class beats the elite 

Back in 2016, after the Brexit vote, and then Donald Trump’s victory here, shocked the world, I predicted that the Republican Party had the opportunity to become a “multiracial working class coalition.” Trump’s 2024 victory has delivered that — a revolutionary shift in our political landscape. The other part of my prediction? Democrats will be left as the party of the “rich, white and woke.”

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Unless Democrats come to terms with these realities and change course, they can expect to lose elections for years to come. The reaction in California – epicenter of today’s Democrat elite — shows that there is zero sign of this happening. 

They just don’t get it.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM STEVE HILTON

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

California

California proposes its own EV buyer credit — which could cut out Elon Musk's Tesla

Published

on

California proposes its own EV buyer credit — which could cut out Elon Musk's Tesla


  • Gov. Gavin Newsom plans to revive California’s EV rebate if Trump ends the federal tax credit.
  • But Tesla, the largest maker of EVs, would be excluded under the proposal.
  • Elon Musk criticized Tesla’s potential exclusion from the rebate.

California Gov. Gavin Newsom is preparing to step in if President-elect Donald Trump fulfills his promise to axe the federal electric-vehicle tax credit — but one notable EV maker could be left out.

Newsom said Monday if the $7,500 federal tax credit is eliminated he would restart the state’s zero-emission vehicle rebate program, which was phased out in 2023.

“We will intervene if the Trump Administration eliminates the federal tax credit, doubling down on our commitment to clean air and green jobs in California,” Newsom said in a statement. “We’re not turning back on a clean transportation future — we’re going to make it more affordable for people to drive vehicles that don’t pollute.”

Advertisement

The rebates for EV buyers would come from the state’s Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund, which is funded by polluters of greenhouse gases under a cap-and-trade program, according to the governor’s office.

But Tesla’s vehicles could be excluded under the proposal’s market-share limitations, Bloomberg News first reported.

The governor’s office confirmed to Business Insider that the rebate program could include a market-share cap which could in turn exclude Tesla or other EV makers. The office did not share details about what market-share limit could be proposed and also noted the proposal would be subject to negotiations in the state legislature.

A market-share cap would exclude companies whose sales account for a certain amount of total electric vehicle sales. For instance, Tesla accounted for nearly 55% off all new electric vehicles registered in California in the first three quarters of 2024, according to a report from the California New Car Dealers Association. By comparison, the companies with the next highest EV market share in California were Hyundai and BMW with 5.6% and 5% respectively.

Advertisement

Tesla sales in California, the US’s largest EV market, have recently declined even as overall EV sales in the state have grown. Though the company still accounted for a majority of EV sales in California this year as of September, its market share fell year-over-year from 64% to 55%.

The governor’s office said the market-share cap would be aimed at promoting competition and innovation in the industry.

Elon Musk, who has expressed support for ending the federal tax credit, said in an X post it was “insane” for the California proposal exclude Tesla.

The federal electric vehicle tax credit, which was passed as part of the Biden administration’s Inflation Reduction Act in 2022, provides a $7,500 tax credit to some EV buyers.

Advertisement

Musk, who is working closely with the incoming Trump administration, has expressed support for ending the tax credit. He’s set to co-lead an advisory commission, the Department of Government Efficiency, which is aimed at slashing federal spending.

The Tesla CEO said on an earnings call in July that ending the federal tax credit might actually benefit the company.

“I think it would be devastating for our competitors and for Tesla slightly,” Musk said. “But long-term probably actually helps Tesla, would be my guess.”

Advertisement

BI’s Graham Rapier previously reported that ending the tax credit could help Tesla maintain its strong standing in the EV market by slowing its competitors growth.

Prior to the EV rebate proposal, Newsom has already positioned himself as a foil to the incoming Trump administration. Following Trump’s election win the governor called on California lawmakers to convene for a special session to discuss protecting the state from Trump’s second term.

“The freedoms we hold dear in California are under attack — and we won’t sit idle,” Newsom said in a statement at the time.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

California

California Gov. Gavin Newsom says state will provide rebates if Trump removes tax credit for electric vehicles

Published

on

California Gov. Gavin Newsom says state will provide rebates if Trump removes tax credit for electric vehicles


California Gov. Gavin Newsom said the state will provide rebates to residents if President-elect Donald Trump’s incoming administration does away with a federal tax credit for electric vehicles.

In a news release issued Monday, Newsom said he would restart the state’s Clean Vehicle Rebate Program, which provided financial incentives on more than 590,000 vehicles before it was phased out late 2023.

“We will intervene if the Trump Administration eliminates the federal tax credit, doubling down on our commitment to clean air and green jobs in California,” Newsom said. “We’re not turning back on a clean transportation future — we’re going to make it more affordable for people to drive vehicles that don’t pollute.”

The federal rebates on new and used electric vehicles were implemented in the Inflation Reduction Act that President Joe Biden signed into law in 2022. When Trump’s second term in office begins next year, he could work with Congress to change the rules around those rebates. Those potential changes could limit the federal rebates, including by reducing the amount of money available or limiting who is eligible.

Advertisement

Limiting federal subsidies on electric vehicle purchases would hurt many American automakers, including Ford, General Motors and the EV startup Rivian. Tesla, which also builds its automobiles in the United States, would take a smaller hit since that company currently sells more EVs and has a higher profit margin than any other EV manufacturer.

Newsom also announced earlier this month that he will convene a special session “to protect California values,” including fundamental civil rights and reproductive rights, that he said “are under attack by this incoming administration.”

“Whether it be our fundamental civil rights, reproductive freedom, or climate action — we refuse to turn back the clock and allow our values and laws to be attacked,” Newsom said on X on Nov. 7.

A spokesperson for Trump did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

This isn’t the first time California will be taking action against the Trump’s administration concerning clean transportation legislation.

Advertisement

In 2019, California and 22 other states sued his administration for revoking its ability to set standards for greenhouse gas emission and fuel economy standards for vehicles, The Associated Press reported.

California sued the Trump administration over 100 times during his first term, primarily on matters including gun control, health care, education and immigration, the Los Angeles Times reported.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending