Connect with us

California

California should reform child neglect laws

Published

on

California should reform child neglect laws


We’ve all read enough news coverage about government agencies to understand that they rarely handle basic responsibilities (filling potholes, etc.) in an efficient and competent manner. Given that track record, it’s not hard to imagine the problems that occur when government officials insert themselves into the most private and emotionally complex aspects of people’s lives.

We’re referring to Child Protective Services laws, which empower social workers to remove children from their homes and place them in foster care. These agencies have the power to break up families based on their judgment calls about the safety of children. They operate in a secretive manner because of laws designed to protect personal family information.

These agencies have a tough job, but they often are tarnished by scandal. Some involve incidents where social workers failed to protect a child, while others involve those who may have unnecessarily removed children or failed to follow the law in doing so. Regarding the former, in 2022 the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors approved a $32 million settlement after a lawsuit alleged the department didn’t property investigate abuse allegations that ultimately led to a child’s death.

One infamous case of the latter took place in Orange County more than a decade ago. The county was hit with a $4.9-million legal judgment following one Seal Beach woman’s six-plus-year effort to regain custody of her children. Two social workers were alleged to have filed false reports and withheld evidence that would have cleared the mom, per a 2011 Orange County Register report.

Advertisement

Our Legislature has rarely wanted to unravel a system that’s so complex. It’s admittedly hard to know how to change the rules to provide a fairer process and sometimes legislative efforts make matters worse. Obviously, we need a system to protect children from abuse – but there are many ways to make that system better.

An investigation from CalMatters points to one way to proceed. It zeroes in on “failure to protect” laws that allow social workers to take children from homes where domestic violence is present – such as from a mother who is abused by her partner. However, the law often has the perverse effect of encouraging moms to stay in abusive situations out of fear they might lose their kids and further traumatize the family.

“(O)ther states with similar laws have narrowed the criteria for when a welfare agency can remove a child,” according to the report. Almost all states have these laws, “but California’s is comparably vague, giving social workers wide latitude in deciding when to remove kids.” Critics say our state’s approach treats victims the same as perpetrators. Typical of government, these agencies don’t even tally the number of children taken each year under the law.

An article from USC’s Center for Health Journalism notes the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services typically opposes the use of these laws for reasons mentioned above – and that California offers no clear statewide guidance, leaving it in the hands of individual social workers and agencies. It seems like a good place to start, then, for legislators to come up with some sensible guidelines or limits for how local agencies implement them.

There’s no simple fix to these fraught situations, but more transparency and less governmental subjectivity certainly will help.

Advertisement



Source link

California

California sheriff running for governor seizes over 650,000 ballots from 2025 election

Published

on

California sheriff running for governor seizes over 650,000 ballots from 2025 election


A California sheriff who is running as a Republican for governor has seized more than 650,000 ballots from last year’s election, escalating an ongoing conflict with state officials.

Chad Bianco, Riverside county’s sheriff, says he is carrying out an investigation into allegations that ballots were unlawfully cast in last year’s election that resulted in the passage of Proposition 50. The proposition redrew congressional districts to help gerrymander the state in favor of Democrats, in response to similar measures in Republican states like Texas.

Election officials and the California attorney general, Rob Bonta, have both dismissed those allegations. The discrepancy between the machine count and the final count submitted to the state is only 103 votes, according to the Riverside Record.

Bianco’s investigators obtained the ballots after serving the registrar of voters with search warrants last month, he said Friday at a press conference. A Riverside superior court judge appointed a special master to count the ballots, Bianco said.

Advertisement

“This investigation is simple: physically count the ballots and compare that result with the total votes recorded,” Bianco said.

Bianco has pushed the investigation for months, after a group called the Riverside Election Integrity Team, composed of local residents, contended that a discrepancy of 45,896 votes exists between the final vote count and handwritten records that tallied hand-counted ballots.

“There is no indication, anywhere in the United States, of widespread voter fraud,” Bonta said in a statement, according to the Los Angeles Times. “Counts, recounts, hand counts, audits, and court cases all support this.”

Bonta, a Democrat, called Bianco’s move unprecedented and says it is designed to sow distrust in elections.

Bianco is one of the two most prominent Republicans running in California’s crowded gubernatorial primary that includes more than half a dozen Democrats. California runs a top-two primary system that puts all candidates on the same ballot, regardless of party, and sends the two candidates who get the most voters on to the November general election.

Advertisement

Bonta has repeatedly sent letters to Bianco’s office over the last two months saying his staff is not qualified to conduct a recount. In one of the letters, Bonta wrote that the ballot seizure was “unacceptable” and “sets a dangerous precedent and will only sow distrust in our elections”.

California voters last year decisively passed the redistricting ballot initiative championed by Gavin Newsom, the state’s governor, in response to Donald Trump’s attempts to gerrymander new conservative seats in red states. California Republicans, joined by the Trump administration, challenged the measure, but the US supreme court denied an emergency petition to keep the new maps from moving forward.

The Associated Press contributed reporting



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

California

California warns against Fresno company’s raw cheddar after multistate E. coli outbreak

Published

on

California warns against Fresno company’s raw cheddar after multistate E. coli outbreak


Saturday, March 21, 2026 11:35PM

California warns against Fresno company's raw cheddar after multistate E. coli outbreak

FRESNO, Calif. (KFSN) — The California Department of Public Health is advising consumers and businesses not to eat, serve, or sell raw cheddar cheese manufactured and distributed by Fresno-based company ‘RAW FARM.’

The products involved are “RAW FARM” block and shredded varieties from the facility located on Jameson Avenue.

The Food and Drug Administration says at least seven people total have gotten sick in Texas, California, and Florida. More than half of the illnesses are in children.

The FDA has suggested that the farm remove its raw cheese products from the market. The CDC is suggesting people consider not eating the cheese.

Advertisement

However, the company has declined, while also refusing to comply with a mandatory recall.

More information on the outbreak can be found on the FDA’s and CDC’s websites.

Copyright © 2026 KFSN-TV. All Rights Reserved.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

California

I booked a bedroom and a roomette on the same overnight Amtrak train. The bedroom is worth the splurge for longer rides.

Published

on

I booked a bedroom and a roomette on the same overnight Amtrak train. The bedroom is worth the splurge for longer rides.


If you’re traveling somewhere between Chicago and San Francisco, I highly suggest making a trip of it by taking the California Zephyr, an incredibly scenic overnight Amtrak train through the American West.

I’ve ridden it twice. In January 2025, I took a 15-hour leg of the route from Denver to Salt Lake City and booked a roomette for $400. Then, in February 2026, I took the entire 53-hour journey from Chicago to Emeryville, California, and booked a bedroom for $2,200.

If you’re wondering if the bedroom was worth the upgrade, I think it depends on how long your trip is. But I’ll give you all the details so you can decide for yourself.

I’ve taken two overnight train trips aboard the California Zephyr.


A parked double-decker Amtrak train on a platform with a mountain in the background

The California Zephyr stopped at a platform in Colorado. 

Joey Hadden/Business Insider

The California Zephyr is a double-decker Amtrak Superliner train that runs between Chicago and Emeryville, California.

The train has coach cars with regular seating and sleeper cars with private cabin accommodations — roomettes (the lowest tier), bedrooms, and bedroom suites (two joined bedrooms). There are also larger, family-sized bedrooms and accessible bedrooms.

Advertisement

First, I stayed in a roomette for a 15-hour trip from Colorado to Utah.


The author sits with her feet up in an Amtrak roomette looking out a window to the left

The author relaxes in a roomette on the California Zephyr. 

Joey Hadden/Business Insider

For the shorter journey from Denver to Salt Lake City, I booked a roomette for $400. With two seats and two beds, the roomette sleeps up to two passengers, though I was traveling alone.

Advertisement

Then I booked a bedroom for a 53-hour trip from Illinois to California.


The author standing smiling in the Amtrak bedroom with a bunk bed in the background

The author enjoys a bedroom in the California Zephyr. 

Joey Hadden/Business Insider

I booked a bedroom for the full journey from Chicago to Emeryville for $2,200. The bedroom is roughly twice the size of a roomette and also includes a full bathroom. The bedroom also sleeps two, but again, I was traveling solo.

Advertisement

At 50 square feet, the bedroom was more than twice the size of the roomette.


Inside an Amtrak bedroom with two seats across from eachother in front of a wide window

Inside the bedroom accommodation. 

Joey Hadden/Business Insider

The bedroom had a couch and a seat facing each other, with a table between them. I appreciated having a couch for the longer trip because I could stretch out and relax during the day.

I also liked that there was a bit more floor space in the bedroom.

Advertisement

In the roomette, the two chairs folded down to form a lower bunk.


A composite image of two train seats converted into a bed with a blue blanket

Seats in the roomette folded down into a bed. 

Joey Hadden/Business Insider

The bed was cushy and wide enough to snuggle up comfortably.

In the bedroom, the couch folded down to form a cot that appeared to be slightly wider than the roomette bunk.


A composite image of the bottom bunk in the Amtrak bedroom with sheets and a blue blanket on top, and the author lying in bed looking out the window

The author rests in the lower bunk in the bedroom. 

Joey Hadden/Business Insider

Advertisement

The lower bunk in the bedroom felt more spacious than the one in the roomette.

Both rooms also had a top bunk that pulled down from the ceiling.


The author lays on the top bunk in an Amtrak bedroom. There's a couch below and a ladder on the left

The author relaxes in the bedroom’s top bunk. 

Joey Hadden/Business Insider

Since I had two nights in the bedroom, I spent one night in each bunk.

Advertisement

The bedroom had a full en suite bathroom.


A composite image of a toilet behind a shower and a sink and vanity with a storage cabinet on the right in an Amtrak bedroom

The bathroom inside the bedroom. 

Joey Hadden/Business Insider

Inside the bedroom, there was a sink and vanity with a built-in cabinet where I found hand towels, soaps, toilet paper, and space to store my own toiletries. The toilet and shower were in a tiny space separated by a door.

For two nights on a train, I was thankful to have my own shower.

Advertisement

Roomette passengers shared a bathroom and a shower with other sleeper cabin passengers.


A composite image of a glass shower door with a skyline etching on it and the inside of the shower

The shared shower in the sleeper car. 

Joey Hadden/Business Insider

Since I only spent 15 hours in the roomette, I didn’t mind not having a bathroom in my room. I didn’t use the shared shower; instead, I washed up once I arrived at my destination.

Advertisement

The bedroom had more storage space than the roomette.


A composite image of luggage storage in the roomette and bedroom

Storage in the roomette (left) and bedroom (right). 

Joey Hadden/Business Insider

Each room had a mini closet with two hangers inside, as well as a shelf that appeared to be for storing luggage. In the roomette, the shelf was only large enough for my backpack, but in the bedroom, it held my carry-on suitcase.

On both trips, I also had access to shared luggage storage space in the train car.

Advertisement

The bedroom also had a larger mirror.


A composite image of the author in mirrors in the roomette and bedroom

The mirror in the roomette (left) and the bedroom (right). 

Joey Hadden/Business Insider

Both rooms had mirrors, but the roomette mirror was shorter and thinner. So I appreciated the wide, full-length mirror in the bedroom. It wasn’t just convenient for getting ready — it also made the space feel larger.

Advertisement

Both bookings included meals.


Inside an empty train dining car with blue booths

Inside the dining car on the California Zephyr. 

Joey Hadden/Business Insider

Passengers had the option of eating in the dining car or in their rooms.

I think I booked the right room for each trip.


A composite image of the author sitting in a seat inside an Amtrak train's roomette accommodation, looking out a window on the left, and the inside of an Amtrak bedroom with a sofa and closet on the left, a sink on the right, and a sliding door with a curtain in the middle

The author in the roomette (left) and a peek inside the bedroom (right). 

Joey Hadden/Business Insider

Advertisement

The bedroom served me well for the two-night journey, and I would splurge on it for any Amtrak trip 24 hours or longer. I think it’s worth the added price for the extra space and full bathroom.

At the same time, I’m glad I booked the roomette for the 15-hour journey. It was a short trip compared to other overnight rides, so sacrificing some comforts and privacy to save money was a good move for me.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Trending