California
California removes hurdles to building teacher housing
Jefferson Union Excessive College District in Daly Metropolis opened 705 Serramonte in Could 2022 with 122 flats for lecturers and different workers.
Jefferson Union Excessive College District in Daly Metropolis opened 705 Serramonte in Could 2022 with 122 flats for lecturers and different workers.
Newly signed laws loosening zoning necessities will quickly make it simpler for California college districts to construct inexpensive housing for his or her lecturers and different workers.
It’s the newest in a collection of payments handed by lawmakers over the past seven years to take away hurdles round constructing instructor housing. The brand new laws, a part of a set of 41 housing payments signed by Gov. Gavin Newsom final week, will permit workers housing to be constructed on any property owned by a college district with out requiring the district to request zoning adjustments from metropolis or county officers.
It will likely be in impact from Jan. 1, 2024 to Jan. 1, 2033.
“Lecturers and workers are leaving as a result of the skyrocketing price of dwelling and stagnant salaries make it virtually not possible to afford dwelling within the communities the place they train,” stated Assemblyman Richard Bloom, the creator of the laws. “We’re hemorrhaging proficient lecturers, which finally negatively impacts the standard of a public training for our children. We are able to do higher. AB 2295 offers college districts a vital software in addressing staffing challenges by using properties they already personal.”
A 2021 report by CityLAB on the College of California discovered that the state’s college districts personal greater than 150,000 acres of land and that 75,000 acres might be developed into inexpensive housing. At 30 items per acre. there might be 2.3 million items of housing, in accordance with the report.
There are workforce housing developments in Santa Clara, Los Angeles and Daly Metropolis, however greater than 40 different districts are contemplating related initiatives, in accordance with the report.
The added flexibility comes with restrictions. The challenge should have at the very least 10 housing items and be on a vacant parcel in an space that’s already largely developed. It additionally should be adjoining to a parcel zoned residential.
These housing initiatives additionally will probably be exempt from some federal and state necessities governing the development and sale of faculty property, though native constructing necessities and design requirements will nonetheless apply so long as they don’t battle with the housing density and 30-foot top permitted by the invoice.
The regulation is supposed to maintain metropolis and county governments from placing up roadblocks to new initiatives by including restrictions over and above the usual zoning, stated Troy Flint, spokesman for the California College Boards Affiliation, which co-sponsored the laws. The invoice was signed by Newsom Wednesday.
“I’m thrilled that Gov. Newsom has signed AB 2295 and demonstrated his help for training workforce housing,” stated Vernon M. Billy, government director of CSBA. “Our members throughout the state have expressed a powerful and rising curiosity in inventive efforts to deal with the instructor scarcity.”
Excessive lease and home costs have lengthy made it troublesome for lecturers, particularly these on the backside of the pay scale, to seek out inexpensive properties. Even lecturers incomes common or the very best salaries confronted struggles paying the lease, particularly within the high-cost coastal and metro areas, in accordance with a 2019 EdSource evaluation of the problem.
To handle this downside, the invoice requires {that a} majority of the items on the property be inexpensive to tenants with reasonable incomes and at the very least 30 % be inexpensive to lower-income households. Unrented items may be made out there to staff of adjoining college districts after which to public staff dwelling inside district boundaries.
An Meeting evaluation of the invoice says reasonable incomes are usually not more than 120 % of the realm median revenue and decrease incomes are lower than 80 % of the realm median revenue.
Meeting Invoice 2295 is the newest laws to make it extra inexpensive for lecturers to dwell in California. The Trainer Housing Act of 2016 paved the best way for district-provided instructor housing by permitting college districts to supply inexpensive housing particularly for district staff and their households. Earlier state regulation required that properties or flats be open to anybody who meets the low-income requirement in the event that they used state and federal low-income housing funds or tax credit.
Meeting Invoice 1157, accredited by Gov. Jerry Brown in 2017, exempted college districts from some necessities associated to the sale or lease of property if will probably be used for worker housing. Districts now not have needed to convene an advisory committee once they need to promote, lease or lease surplus property due to this piece of laws. The invoice additionally exempts the district from property tax on the complicated.
Lately eight college districts have tried to cross college bonds or different native propositions to fund housing for college staff. Six handed, in accordance with the Meeting evaluation of the invoice.
Districts see providing housing as a technique to give them a aggressive edge when competing for lecturers and different workers.
“College districts are keen to deal with these points by changing unused or underutilized property to inexpensive housing for college workers however are slowed or stymied by present rules,” in accordance with a press release from the California College Boards Affiliation. “Underneath present regulation, growth of surplus college property into training workforce housing can usually take seven years to finish. By eradicating administrative limitations, whereas nonetheless permitting for a strong group engagement course of, AB 2295 would shorten that timeline most often, making it simpler for native instructional businesses to construct housing on their property.”
To get extra experiences like this one, click on right here to enroll in EdSource’s no-cost every day e-mail on newest developments in training.
California
California may exclude Tesla from EV rebate program
California Gov. Gavin Newsom may exclude Tesla and other automakers from an electric vehicle (EV) rebate program if the incoming Trump administration scraps a federal tax credit for electric car purchases.
Newsom proposed creating a new version of the state’s Clean Vehicle Rebate Program, which was phased out in 2023 after funding more than 594,000 vehicles and saving more than 456 million gallons of fuel, the governor’s office said in a news release on Monday.
“Consumers continue to prove the skeptics wrong – zero-emission vehicles are here to stay,” Newsom said in a statement. “We’re not turning back on a clean transportation future – we’re going to make it more affordable for people to drive vehicles that don’t pollute.”
The proposed rebates would be funded with money from the state’s Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund, which is funded by polluters under the state’s cap-and-trade program, the governor’s office said. Officials did not say how much the program would cost or save consumers.
NEBRASKA AG LAUNCHES ASSAULT AGAINST CALIFORNIA’S ELECTRIC VEHICLE PUSH
They would also include changes to promote innovation and competition in the zero-emission vehicles market – changes that could prevent automakers like Tesla from qualifying for the rebates.
Tesla CEO Elon Musk, who relocated Tesla’s corporate headquarters from California to Texas in 2021, responded to the possibility of having Tesla EVs left out of the program.
“Even though Tesla is the only company who manufactures their EVs in California! This is insane,” Musk wrote on X, which he also owns.
BENTLEY PUSHES BACK ALL-EV LINEUP TIMELINE TO 2035
Those buying or leasing Tesla vehicles accounted for about 42% of the state’s rebates, The Associated Press reported, citing data from the California Air Resources Board.
Newsom’s office told Fox Business Digital that the proposal is intended to foster market competition, and any potential market cap is subject to negotiation with the state Legislature.
Ticker | Security | Last | Change | Change % |
---|---|---|---|---|
TSLA | TESLA INC. | 338.59 | -13.97 | -3.96% |
“Under a potential market cap, and depending on what the cap is, there’s a possibility that Tesla and other automakers could be excluded,” the governor’s office said. “But that’s again subject to negotiations with the legislature.”
Newsom’s office noted that such market caps have been part of rebate programs since George W. Bush’s administration in 2005.
Federal tax credits for EVs are currently worth up to $7,500 for new zero-emission vehicles. President-elect Trump has previously vowed to end the credit.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
California has surpassed 2 million zero-emission vehicles sold, according to the governor’s office. The state, however, could face a $2 billion budget deficit next year, Reuters reported, citing a non-partisan legislative estimate released last week.
California
STEVE HILTON: Five things California Democrats still don't get
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
Along with most other Democratic politicians in California, Gov. Gavin Newsom still doesn’t seem to understand what happened in the 2024 election.
For years, Newsom, along with California cronies like former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and, of course, Vice President Kamala Harris, bragged about their state being a “model for the nation.”
In one sense–not the one they intended, of course–that’s true. California became a model of what not to do.
CALIFORNIA VOTERS NARROWLY REJECT $18 MINIMUM WAGE; FIRST SUCH NO-VOTE NATIONWIDE SINCE 1996
The terrible combination of elitism and extremism that has defined Democratic policymaking in my home state for at least the last decade has delivered failure on every front.
Despite having the highest taxes in the nation, despite the state’s budget nearly doubling in the last ten years (even as our population has been falling, in the exodus from blue state misrule), California has the highest rate of poverty in America. We have the highest housing costs, the lowest homeownership, highest gas and utility bills, and the worst business climate–ten years in a row.
This record of failure is exactly why Democrats lost so badly on November 5th. Voters had a clear choice: between more of the same Democrat policies that raised the cost of living and lowered their quality of life, or a return to the peace and prosperity of the Trump years.
GAVIN NEWSOM TO MEET WITH BIDEN AFTER VOWING TO PROTECT STATE’S PROGRESSIVE POLICIES AGAINST TRUMP ADMIN
In many ways, the contest between Donald Trump and Kamala Harris represented a battle between the ‘blue state model’ championed by Gavin Newsom in California, and the ‘red state model’ that has driven people and businesses out of California and into the arms of more welcoming states like Texas, Tennessee and Florida.
Of course, the red state model won and the blue state model was roundly rejected.
You would think that would make blue state leaders like Newsom pause and reflect. But the exact opposite has happened. Gavin Newsom immediately called a “special session” of the California legislature to “Trump-proof” his state.
What California really needs is “Newsom-proofing.”
Instead, California Democrats are doubling down on the exact same agenda that was defeated across the country – including in California, which saw the biggest shift from Democrats to the GOP in decades.
Here are the five things California Democrats still don’t get:
1. People want results, not lectures
Democrats and their media sycophants can do all the self-righteous, sanctimonious bloviating they like about “our democracy” and “equity”, but in the end people want the basics of the American Dream: a good job that pays enough to raise your family in a home of your own in a safe neighborhood with a good school so your kids can have a better life than you. No amount of moral superiority from the people in charge will make up for that if they fail to provide it.
2. Enough with the ‘climate’ extremism
“Climate” has become a religion for Democrats, and you see that especially clearly in California. But when you look at the main reason life is so unaffordable for working people, whether that’s gas prices, utility bills or housing costs, extreme climate policies are to blame. Working-class Americans can’t afford these ‘luxury beliefs.’
CLICK HERE FOR MORE FOX NEWS OPINION
3. Who cares about Hollywood?
This election destroyed forever the myth that fancy celebrities can sway votes. Oprah, Beyonce, George Clooney, Taylor Swift…nobody cares! The new cultural powerhouses are the podcast hosts, comedians…the raw power of UFC is where it’s at, not the decadent Hollywood elite who won’t even turn up to support “their” candidate without a multimillion dollar paycheck.
4. ‘Little tech’ beats Big Tech
Democrats may console themselves with the knowledge that California’s Big Tech monopolies are on their side. But in this election we saw the rise of what famed Silicon Valley investor Marc Andressen calls “little tech”, the upstarts and rebels who reject leftist groupthink. They got engaged in this election in a way we’ve never seen before. It’s a massive shift and will be a huge force for the future.
5. Working class beats the elite
Back in 2016, after the Brexit vote, and then Donald Trump’s victory here, shocked the world, I predicted that the Republican Party had the opportunity to become a “multiracial working class coalition.” Trump’s 2024 victory has delivered that — a revolutionary shift in our political landscape. The other part of my prediction? Democrats will be left as the party of the “rich, white and woke.”
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
Unless Democrats come to terms with these realities and change course, they can expect to lose elections for years to come. The reaction in California – epicenter of today’s Democrat elite — shows that there is zero sign of this happening.
They just don’t get it.
CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM STEVE HILTON
California
California proposes its own EV buyer credit — which could cut out Elon Musk's Tesla
- Gov. Gavin Newsom plans to revive California’s EV rebate if Trump ends the federal tax credit.
- But Tesla, the largest maker of EVs, would be excluded under the proposal.
- Elon Musk criticized Tesla’s potential exclusion from the rebate.
California Gov. Gavin Newsom is preparing to step in if President-elect Donald Trump fulfills his promise to axe the federal electric-vehicle tax credit — but one notable EV maker could be left out.
Newsom said Monday if the $7,500 federal tax credit is eliminated he would restart the state’s zero-emission vehicle rebate program, which was phased out in 2023.
“We will intervene if the Trump Administration eliminates the federal tax credit, doubling down on our commitment to clean air and green jobs in California,” Newsom said in a statement. “We’re not turning back on a clean transportation future — we’re going to make it more affordable for people to drive vehicles that don’t pollute.”
The rebates for EV buyers would come from the state’s Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund, which is funded by polluters of greenhouse gases under a cap-and-trade program, according to the governor’s office.
But Tesla’s vehicles could be excluded under the proposal’s market-share limitations, Bloomberg News first reported.
The governor’s office confirmed to Business Insider that the rebate program could include a market-share cap which could in turn exclude Tesla or other EV makers. The office did not share details about what market-share limit could be proposed and also noted the proposal would be subject to negotiations in the state legislature.
A market-share cap would exclude companies whose sales account for a certain amount of total electric vehicle sales. For instance, Tesla accounted for nearly 55% off all new electric vehicles registered in California in the first three quarters of 2024, according to a report from the California New Car Dealers Association. By comparison, the companies with the next highest EV market share in California were Hyundai and BMW with 5.6% and 5% respectively.
Tesla sales in California, the US’s largest EV market, have recently declined even as overall EV sales in the state have grown. Though the company still accounted for a majority of EV sales in California this year as of September, its market share fell year-over-year from 64% to 55%.
The governor’s office said the market-share cap would be aimed at promoting competition and innovation in the industry.
Elon Musk, who has expressed support for ending the federal tax credit, said in an X post it was “insane” for the California proposal exclude Tesla.
The federal electric vehicle tax credit, which was passed as part of the Biden administration’s Inflation Reduction Act in 2022, provides a $7,500 tax credit to some EV buyers.
Musk, who is working closely with the incoming Trump administration, has expressed support for ending the tax credit. He’s set to co-lead an advisory commission, the Department of Government Efficiency, which is aimed at slashing federal spending.
The Tesla CEO said on an earnings call in July that ending the federal tax credit might actually benefit the company.
“I think it would be devastating for our competitors and for Tesla slightly,” Musk said. “But long-term probably actually helps Tesla, would be my guess.”
BI’s Graham Rapier previously reported that ending the tax credit could help Tesla maintain its strong standing in the EV market by slowing its competitors growth.
Prior to the EV rebate proposal, Newsom has already positioned himself as a foil to the incoming Trump administration. Following Trump’s election win the governor called on California lawmakers to convene for a special session to discuss protecting the state from Trump’s second term.
“The freedoms we hold dear in California are under attack — and we won’t sit idle,” Newsom said in a statement at the time.
-
Business1 week ago
Column: Molly White's message for journalists going freelance — be ready for the pitfalls
-
Science7 days ago
Trump nominates Dr. Oz to head Medicare and Medicaid and help take on 'illness industrial complex'
-
Politics1 week ago
Trump taps FCC member Brendan Carr to lead agency: 'Warrior for Free Speech'
-
Technology1 week ago
Inside Elon Musk’s messy breakup with OpenAI
-
Lifestyle1 week ago
Some in the U.S. farm industry are alarmed by Trump's embrace of RFK Jr. and tariffs
-
World1 week ago
Protesters in Slovakia rally against Robert Fico’s populist government
-
Health4 days ago
Holiday gatherings can lead to stress eating: Try these 5 tips to control it
-
News1 week ago
They disagree about a lot, but these singers figure out how to stay in harmony