Connect with us

California

California police officers have killed nearly 1,000 people in 6 years

Published

on

California police officers have killed nearly 1,000 people in 6 years


Officers in California have killed almost 1,000 folks in six years, in line with a Chronicle evaluate of state Division of Justice knowledge that reveals an image of the place violent police encounters happen within the state, and to whom.

However the statistics don’t but provide conclusive outcomes for current legislative makes an attempt to curtail police violence by toughening the principles of engagement for officers, requiring deescalation coaching and bringing in exterior investigators when unarmed civilians are killed.

Advertisement

In 2021, California’s regulation enforcement businesses recorded 628 use-of-force incidents leading to 233 folks shot and 149 killed.

These figures symbolize declines from 2020, when 172 police killings matched a six-year excessive and got here amid clashes between riot officers and racial justice marchers that prompted police brutality lawsuits and payments to restrict the usage of less-lethal artillery like rubber bullets and tear fuel.

The truth that final 12 months noticed 233 folks shot as a substitute of 238 the 12 months earlier than wasn’t notable sufficient to some use-of-force authorities.

“What it tells me is, we’re nonetheless capturing numerous civilians,” stated Roger Clark, who spent 27 years on the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Division, the place he investigated use-of-force incidents and educated deputies on the division’s coverage.

Advertisement

For the sixth straight 12 months, Los Angeles County was the setting for the most important quantity (172) and highest fee (27.4 incidents per 100,000 residents) of use-of-force incidents within the state final 12 months.

With regards to use-of-force charges calculated by inhabitants, Los Angeles County was adopted distantly by San Bernardino (11.3 incidents per 100,000 residents), San Diego (7.2), Riverside (6.1) and Orange (5.7) counties. No Bay Space county was within the high 5, although Alameda County made the highest six.

The ten businesses with probably the most use-of-force incidents final 12 months had been the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Division (60 incidents), Los Angeles Police Division (60), San Bernardino County Sheriff’s Division (39), California Freeway Patrol (28), San Diego County Sheriff’s Division (27), San Bernardino Police Division (20), Bakersfield Police Division (18), Alameda County Sheriff’s Workplace (16), and Riverside and Sacramento police departments (15 every).

Within the Bay Space, the businesses that reported probably the most violent encounters with civilians had been the Alameda County Sheriff’s Workplace (16), San Francisco Police Division (12), San Jose Police Division (11), Antioch Police Division (seven), whereas the police departments of Oakland, Napa and Vacaville tied for fifth place with 5 incidents every.

Advertisement

In Alameda County, which had a fee of 5.1 use-of-force incidents per 100,000 residents, 11 of the 32 incidents occurred after requires service, 10 whereas officers had been responding to crimes in progress or investigating suspicious circumstances, and 7 throughout in-custody occasions.

Advertisement

The most recent statewide use-of-force report additionally confirmed that worrying disparities have but to subside regardless of elevated consciousness and efforts to confront them.

Latino and Black Californians had been once more vastly overrepresented in use-of-force incidents final 12 months. Latinos make up 40.2% of the state inhabitants and had been on the receiving finish of fifty.6% of police power; African-People symbolize 6.5% of the inhabitants however 16.7% of police power incidents.

In the meantime, white cops concerned in violent encounters had been barely overrepresented and Latino and Black cops had been barely underrepresented.

Advertisement

Of the 1,462 officers concerned in violent confrontations, not all of whom reported utilizing power, 84% escaped harm.

In all, officers from California’s largest to smallest policing businesses killed 944 folks from 2016 by means of 2021, The Chronicle’s evaluation discovered. Inside these years, 2020 tied with 2017 for the most individuals killed by police across the state with 172.

“I don’t know if we will draw main conclusions on the numbers,” state Meeting Member Kevin McCarty, D-Sacramento, who’s pushed use-of-force reforms, stated of 2020’s spike in police killings.

If 2020 was marked by pandemic lockdowns and racial justice protests, it was additionally the 12 months when a landmark regulation was supposed to cut back the variety of deadly police encounters in California.

Advertisement

The laws, Meeting Invoice 392 from then-Meeting Member Shirley Weber, D-San Diego, and McCarty, tightened the definition of an imminent risk that an officer should declare to justify utilizing lethal power. The invoice, nonetheless, nonetheless permits an officer’s notion — and never the target information on the bottom — to find out whether or not a risk existed to the officer or the general public.

Final 12 months, officers perceived the civilians they used power towards to be armed 58% of the time; the civilians had been confirmed to be armed in 52% of circumstances, amounting to a 6-percentage-point differential in notion vs. actuality. In earlier years, the inaccuracy hole between an officer pondering a topic was armed and a topic being confirmed to be armed ranged between 12% in 2020 and 2018 to fifteen.5% in 2016.

One other piece of reform laws supposed to make a distinction was Meeting Invoice 1506 from McCarty. Spurred by the Could 2020 Minneapolis police killing of George Floyd and the following nationwide rebellion, the invoice was supposed to revive religion within the felony authorized system by empowering the California Division of Justice to research all police killings of unarmed civilians and a restricted variety of different lethal encounters.

Advertisement

Because the regulation took impact in July 2021, the state Justice Division that Legal professional Basic Rob Bonta instructions has opened 23 investigations into deadly police encounters across the state and closed none of them.

McCarty stated the state will achieve a greater understanding of how his regulation is performing as soon as these evaluations begin popping out. Whether or not the legal professional basic finds that officers acted appropriately or not, McCarty stated, “We’ll simply dwell by what the conclusions are.”

AB1506 was the Sacramento lawmaker’s third try and get such a invoice handed by means of the Legislature, a feat that was aided by regulation enforcement’s therapy of protesters, movies of which spurred outrage on social media. However, noting the circumstances of Floyd’s demise, choking underneath the knee of a Minneapolis police officer, McCarty stated he plans to introduce laws that will increase the legal professional basic’s scope of authority to all officer killings and shootings, whether or not the topics had been armed or not.

“After all, George Floyd was killed by an officer however he wasn’t killed by a firearm,” McCarty stated. “The irony is that demise wouldn’t be evaluated primarily based upon my regulation.”

James Burch, coverage director on the Anti Police-Terror Undertaking, stated he was hopeful that one other piece of laws would lower police violence in California. Senate Invoice 2, authored by state Sens. Steven Bradford, D-Gardena, and Toni G. Atkins, D-San Diego, handed final September and intends to root out drawback officers after it takes impact in January. It creates a decertification course of for officers after severe felony convictions or termination resulting from misconduct.

Advertisement

“Now we have to think about that can have some impression on the quantity of officers who’re doing probably the most filth within the state of California,” Burch stated.

Jason Williams, affiliate professor of justice research at Montclair State College in New Jersey, stated SB2 is the form of laws that may persuade officers that they’ll be held accountable in the event that they overstep.

“The psychological perspective, from the officer standpoint, could be very, essential,” Williams stated. “As a result of if I’m an officer on the beat, and I do know that there’s no actual accountability coming round, I’ve no incentive to alter my habits.”

Advertisement

Raheem Hosseini and Joshua Sharpe are San Francisco Chronicle employees writers. E mail: raheem.hosseini@sfchronicle.com, joshua.sharpe@sfchronicle.com Twitter: @raheemfh, @joshuawsharpe





Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

California

STEVE HILTON: Five things California Democrats still don't get

Published

on

STEVE HILTON: Five things California Democrats still don't get


Join Fox News for access to this content

Plus special access to select articles and other premium content with your account – free of charge.

By entering your email and pushing continue, you are agreeing to Fox News’ Terms of Use and Privacy Policy, which includes our Notice of Financial Incentive.

Please enter a valid email address.

Having trouble? Click here.

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Advertisement

Along with most other Democratic politicians in California, Gov. Gavin Newsom still doesn’t seem to understand what happened in the 2024 election.

For years, Newsom, along with California cronies like former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and, of course, Vice President Kamala Harris, bragged about their state being a “model for the nation.”

In one sense–not the one they intended, of course–that’s true. California became a model of what not to do.

CALIFORNIA VOTERS NARROWLY REJECT $18 MINIMUM WAGE; FIRST SUCH NO-VOTE NATIONWIDE SINCE 1996

The terrible combination of elitism and extremism that has defined Democratic policymaking in my home state for at least the last decade has delivered failure on every front.

Advertisement

Despite having the highest taxes in the nation, despite the state’s budget nearly doubling in the last ten years (even as our population has been falling, in the exodus from blue state misrule), California has the highest rate of poverty in America. We have the highest housing costs, the lowest homeownership, highest gas and utility bills, and the worst business climate–ten years in a row.

This record of failure is exactly why Democrats lost so badly on November 5th. Voters had a clear choice: between more of the same Democrat policies that raised the cost of living and lowered their quality of life, or a return to the peace and prosperity of the Trump years.

GAVIN NEWSOM TO MEET WITH BIDEN AFTER VOWING TO PROTECT STATE’S PROGRESSIVE POLICIES AGAINST TRUMP ADMIN

In many ways, the contest between Donald Trump and Kamala Harris represented a battle between the ‘blue state model’ championed by Gavin Newsom in California, and the ‘red state model’ that has driven people and businesses out of California and into the arms of more welcoming states like Texas, Tennessee and Florida.

Of course, the red state model won and the blue state model was roundly rejected. 

Advertisement

You would think that would make blue state leaders like Newsom pause and reflect. But the exact opposite has happened. Gavin Newsom immediately called a “special session” of the California legislature to “Trump-proof” his state.

What California really needs is “Newsom-proofing.” 

Instead, California Democrats are doubling down on the exact same agenda that was defeated across the country – including in California, which saw the biggest shift from Democrats to the GOP in decades.

Here are the five things California Democrats still don’t get:

1. People want results, not lectures

Democrats and their media sycophants can do all the self-righteous, sanctimonious bloviating they like about “our democracy” and “equity”, but in the end people want the basics of the American Dream: a good job that pays enough to raise your family in a home of your own in a safe neighborhood with a good school so your kids can have a better life than you. No amount of moral superiority from the people in charge will make up for that if they fail to provide it.

Advertisement

2. Enough with the ‘climate’ extremism

“Climate” has become a religion for Democrats, and you see that especially clearly in California. But when you look at the main reason life is so unaffordable for working people, whether that’s gas prices, utility bills or housing costs, extreme climate policies are to blame. Working-class Americans can’t afford these ‘luxury beliefs.’

CLICK HERE FOR MORE FOX NEWS OPINION

3. Who cares about Hollywood? 

This election destroyed forever the myth that fancy celebrities can sway votes. Oprah, Beyonce, George Clooney, Taylor Swift…nobody cares! The new cultural powerhouses are the podcast hosts, comedians…the raw power of UFC is where it’s at, not the decadent Hollywood elite who won’t even turn up to support “their” candidate without a multimillion dollar paycheck.

Producer and actress Oprah Winfrey holds up Vice President and Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris’ hand as she arrives onstage during a campaign rally on the Benjamin Franklin Parkway in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, on November 4, 2024.  (Getty Images)

4. ‘Little tech’ beats Big Tech

Democrats may console themselves with the knowledge that California’s Big Tech monopolies are on their side. But in this election we saw the rise of what famed Silicon Valley investor Marc Andressen calls “little tech”, the upstarts and rebels who reject leftist groupthink. They got engaged in this election in a way we’ve never seen before. It’s a massive shift and will be a huge force for the future.

Advertisement

5. Working class beats the elite 

Back in 2016, after the Brexit vote, and then Donald Trump’s victory here, shocked the world, I predicted that the Republican Party had the opportunity to become a “multiracial working class coalition.” Trump’s 2024 victory has delivered that — a revolutionary shift in our political landscape. The other part of my prediction? Democrats will be left as the party of the “rich, white and woke.”

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Unless Democrats come to terms with these realities and change course, they can expect to lose elections for years to come. The reaction in California – epicenter of today’s Democrat elite — shows that there is zero sign of this happening. 

They just don’t get it.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM STEVE HILTON

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

California

California proposes its own EV buyer credit — which could cut out Elon Musk's Tesla

Published

on

California proposes its own EV buyer credit — which could cut out Elon Musk's Tesla


  • Gov. Gavin Newsom plans to revive California’s EV rebate if Trump ends the federal tax credit.
  • But Tesla, the largest maker of EVs, would be excluded under the proposal.
  • Elon Musk criticized Tesla’s potential exclusion from the rebate.

California Gov. Gavin Newsom is preparing to step in if President-elect Donald Trump fulfills his promise to axe the federal electric-vehicle tax credit — but one notable EV maker could be left out.

Newsom said Monday if the $7,500 federal tax credit is eliminated he would restart the state’s zero-emission vehicle rebate program, which was phased out in 2023.

“We will intervene if the Trump Administration eliminates the federal tax credit, doubling down on our commitment to clean air and green jobs in California,” Newsom said in a statement. “We’re not turning back on a clean transportation future — we’re going to make it more affordable for people to drive vehicles that don’t pollute.”

Advertisement

The rebates for EV buyers would come from the state’s Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund, which is funded by polluters of greenhouse gases under a cap-and-trade program, according to the governor’s office.

But Tesla’s vehicles could be excluded under the proposal’s market-share limitations, Bloomberg News first reported.

The governor’s office confirmed to Business Insider that the rebate program could include a market-share cap which could in turn exclude Tesla or other EV makers. The office did not share details about what market-share limit could be proposed and also noted the proposal would be subject to negotiations in the state legislature.

A market-share cap would exclude companies whose sales account for a certain amount of total electric vehicle sales. For instance, Tesla accounted for nearly 55% off all new electric vehicles registered in California in the first three quarters of 2024, according to a report from the California New Car Dealers Association. By comparison, the companies with the next highest EV market share in California were Hyundai and BMW with 5.6% and 5% respectively.

Advertisement

Tesla sales in California, the US’s largest EV market, have recently declined even as overall EV sales in the state have grown. Though the company still accounted for a majority of EV sales in California this year as of September, its market share fell year-over-year from 64% to 55%.

The governor’s office said the market-share cap would be aimed at promoting competition and innovation in the industry.

Elon Musk, who has expressed support for ending the federal tax credit, said in an X post it was “insane” for the California proposal exclude Tesla.

The federal electric vehicle tax credit, which was passed as part of the Biden administration’s Inflation Reduction Act in 2022, provides a $7,500 tax credit to some EV buyers.

Advertisement

Musk, who is working closely with the incoming Trump administration, has expressed support for ending the tax credit. He’s set to co-lead an advisory commission, the Department of Government Efficiency, which is aimed at slashing federal spending.

The Tesla CEO said on an earnings call in July that ending the federal tax credit might actually benefit the company.

“I think it would be devastating for our competitors and for Tesla slightly,” Musk said. “But long-term probably actually helps Tesla, would be my guess.”

Advertisement

BI’s Graham Rapier previously reported that ending the tax credit could help Tesla maintain its strong standing in the EV market by slowing its competitors growth.

Prior to the EV rebate proposal, Newsom has already positioned himself as a foil to the incoming Trump administration. Following Trump’s election win the governor called on California lawmakers to convene for a special session to discuss protecting the state from Trump’s second term.

“The freedoms we hold dear in California are under attack — and we won’t sit idle,” Newsom said in a statement at the time.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

California

California Gov. Gavin Newsom says state will provide rebates if Trump removes tax credit for electric vehicles

Published

on

California Gov. Gavin Newsom says state will provide rebates if Trump removes tax credit for electric vehicles


California Gov. Gavin Newsom said the state will provide rebates to residents if President-elect Donald Trump’s incoming administration does away with a federal tax credit for electric vehicles.

In a news release issued Monday, Newsom said he would restart the state’s Clean Vehicle Rebate Program, which provided financial incentives on more than 590,000 vehicles before it was phased out late 2023.

“We will intervene if the Trump Administration eliminates the federal tax credit, doubling down on our commitment to clean air and green jobs in California,” Newsom said. “We’re not turning back on a clean transportation future — we’re going to make it more affordable for people to drive vehicles that don’t pollute.”

The federal rebates on new and used electric vehicles were implemented in the Inflation Reduction Act that President Joe Biden signed into law in 2022. When Trump’s second term in office begins next year, he could work with Congress to change the rules around those rebates. Those potential changes could limit the federal rebates, including by reducing the amount of money available or limiting who is eligible.

Advertisement

Limiting federal subsidies on electric vehicle purchases would hurt many American automakers, including Ford, General Motors and the EV startup Rivian. Tesla, which also builds its automobiles in the United States, would take a smaller hit since that company currently sells more EVs and has a higher profit margin than any other EV manufacturer.

Newsom also announced earlier this month that he will convene a special session “to protect California values,” including fundamental civil rights and reproductive rights, that he said “are under attack by this incoming administration.”

“Whether it be our fundamental civil rights, reproductive freedom, or climate action — we refuse to turn back the clock and allow our values and laws to be attacked,” Newsom said on X on Nov. 7.

A spokesperson for Trump did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

This isn’t the first time California will be taking action against the Trump’s administration concerning clean transportation legislation.

Advertisement

In 2019, California and 22 other states sued his administration for revoking its ability to set standards for greenhouse gas emission and fuel economy standards for vehicles, The Associated Press reported.

California sued the Trump administration over 100 times during his first term, primarily on matters including gun control, health care, education and immigration, the Los Angeles Times reported.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending