Connect with us

California

California Just Banned Gun Shows on State Property. Will Other States Follow?

Published

on

California Just Banned Gun Shows on State Property. Will Other States Follow?


Final month, California turned the primary state to ban the sale of firearms and ammunition on state property, a transfer that may put an finish to gun reveals on county fairgrounds, the place they’re usually held. Gun security activists have lengthy argued that the reveals perpetuate gun violence and result in unlawful firearm gross sales.

Whereas California has the strictest gun legal guidelines within the nation, by permitting gun reveals on its property, the state nonetheless was within the enterprise of gun distribution, mentioned state Sen. Dave Min, who sponsored the invoice that was supported solely by fellow Democratic lawmakers. The measure was a part of a broad gun security package deal that Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom signed in July.

“The state of California shouldn’t revenue on what is actually blood cash,” Min advised Stateline.


Final 12 months, California state lawmakers banned firearm gross sales on public property in Orange County. Officers in Los Angeles, San Diego and San Mateo counties had beforehand banned the sale of firearms and ammunition at gun reveals at public fairgrounds and different county-run occasion facilities inside their respective communities.

Advertisement

For many years, gun violence researchers have linked gun reveals with firearms utilized in crimes, as unofficial transactions between attendees usually skirted nationwide legal guidelines that require background checks on purchases from federally licensed distributors. Lately, the proliferation of untraceable components for “ghost weapons” bought at gun reveals has added one other layer of concern.

Whereas a handful of states regulate gun reveals, usually by requiring background checks on all purchases or setting a minimal age for occasion entry, California is the primary to place an finish to reveals on state property. Gun security advocates within the Golden State hope they’re laying the groundwork for different states to comply with, however gun rights advocates are fiercely against curbs on gun reveals.

California’s measure is “a slap within the face of hundreds of thousands of Californians,” mentioned Michael Schwartz, government director of San Diego County Gun Homeowners PAC. Gun homeowners and gun reveals, he mentioned, are being villainized.

“Tying gun reveals to mass shootings is ludicrous,” he mentioned. “It’s offensive. We’re not doing something mistaken. We’re not doing something immoral. We’re good, upstanding taxpayers like anybody else.”

The brand new regulation is not only “disappointing” for gun homeowners, mentioned Rob Templeton, vice chairman of Crossroads of the West, a Utah-based firm that may run 50 gun reveals this 12 months all through Arizona, California, Colorado, Nevada and Utah. It additionally ignores the strict legal guidelines that already ruled gun reveals in California, he mentioned.

Advertisement

All firearm transactions at California gun reveals should undergo a federally licensed supplier, which means all purchases are topic to a background verify and 10-day ready interval. California additionally bans any non-public transactions in parking heaps exterior gun reveals. Gun present promoters are also topic to a background verify by the state’s Division of Justice.

A handful of different states regulate gun reveals to a lesser extent. Colorado, Connecticut, New York, Oregon and Virginia additionally require background checks on all firearm purchases at gun reveals, whereas Maryland requires a particular supplier license to promote handguns and assault weapons at gun reveals.

Whereas the California ban goes into impact subsequent 12 months, counties will nonetheless honor present contracts for future gun reveals. For greater than three many years, these occasions have given California gun fanatics an area to collect with like-minded individuals to debate their ardour for the firearm custom, Templeton mentioned.

“I actually want that individuals who didn’t learn about weapons or who’re fearful about firearms, I want they’d simply go to a gun present and see what it’s like,” he mentioned in an interview shortly after ending a gun present on the fairgrounds Kern County, California. Gun reveals probably will proceed in Kern County within the coming years due to present contracts, he mentioned.

Though most transactions at gun reveals are professional, individuals can’t ignore that gun reveals have been the supply of firearms trafficking all through the nation, mentioned Dr. Garen Wintemute, an emergency doctor and director of the Violence Prevention Analysis Program on the College of California, Davis, a number one supply of analysis on gun reveals.

Advertisement

It’s unlawful to knowingly promote a gun to an individual prohibited from proudly owning one, comparable to a convicted home abuser or somebody with a felony conviction. However that doesn’t cease each transaction: Personal firearm gross sales turn out to be a “don’t ask, don’t inform” scenario at gun reveals, he mentioned.

“What goes on at gun reveals is barely a small a part of what contributes to widespread availability of firearms in america,” he mentioned. “Doing one thing about gun reveals will not be the treatment to firearm violence. It could be a part of the treatment.”

As with different items of gun security laws, Wintemute expects different states will quickly comply with California’s lead. Whereas Min has spoken with lawmakers in different states about his invoice, he has not but heard of any lawmaker who plans on introducing related laws within the subsequent session.

For practically a decade, gun security activists in California had tried to ban gun reveals on public property, protesting exterior gun reveals, gathering hundreds of signatures for petitions and lobbying state and native officers. They noticed their first huge win in 2018 when the truthful board in Del Mar, a seashore city north of San Diego, bowed to public strain to droop gun reveals.

Gun-show organizer Crossroads of the West sued the fairgrounds and gained a $500,000 settlement in 2020 for breach of contract. Del Mar Fairgrounds had hosted gun reveals for 3 many years. However the lengthy historical past has not dissuaded activists.

Advertisement

“We don’t want that tradition of violence that’s being perpetuated at gun reveals,” mentioned Rose Ann Sharp, founding father of NeverAgainCA, one of many gun security teams that has led these efforts in California. “That’s not what our communities need their state-owned fairgrounds for use for.”

In additional gun-friendly states, gun security activists have sought to ban gun reveals on the native stage with restricted success. Up to now three years, solely Roanoke, Virginia, and Knoxville, Tennessee, have banned gun reveals on metropolis property, in keeping with Stateline analysis.

Knoxville Councilwoman Gwen McKenzie mentioned gun reveals had no place in her East Knoxville group, which has struggled with gun violence. In 2019, the town council voted 8-1 to ban gun reveals on city-owned property. Whereas McKenzie braced for authorized challenges to the decision, none got here.

“We must always all be vigilant to see the place weapons are being bought in cities throughout the nation,” she mentioned. “It’s incumbent on us to say, ‘We don’t want it right here; we don’t need it right here.’”

Related efforts have struggled elsewhere. In southern Arizona, gun security activist Molly McKasson has been attempting to ban gun reveals in Pima County because the 2018 college capturing in Parkland, Florida.

Advertisement

In need of that, she desires all gun gross sales to undergo a background verify.

“I went to a gun present and was simply blown away by folding tables filled with AR-15s simply laying out,” mentioned McKasson, a former Tucson metropolis council member who based the gun security group Residents for a Safer Pima County. “It was simply completely regular, prefer it was a swap meet. That feeling simply registered as an enormous quantity of hazard.”

Standing in the way in which, nonetheless, is an Arizona regulation that doesn’t permit native jurisdictions to implement gun statutes which can be stricter than state laws. Some native officers need to change that.

Earlier this month, three out of 5 Pima County supervisors voted to cross a measure that calls on the state legislature to repeal the state’s regulation that preempts native gun ordinances. It additionally calls on the Pima County Legal professional’s workplace to compile choices for a authorized problem to the state regulation by mid-November.

Gun violence is a public well being disaster, and the county ought to have the proper to handle it, mentioned Supervisor Rex Scott, who proposed the measure.

Advertisement

He added, “Actually what we’re calling for greater than something is each native management and customary sense.”

This text was first printed by Stateline, an initiative of The Pew Charitable Trusts. Learn the unique article.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

California

California proposes its own EV buyer credit — which could cut out Elon Musk's Tesla

Published

on

California proposes its own EV buyer credit — which could cut out Elon Musk's Tesla


  • Gov. Gavin Newsom plans to revive California’s EV rebate if Trump ends the federal tax credit.
  • But Tesla, the largest maker of EVs, would be excluded under the proposal.
  • Elon Musk criticized Tesla’s potential exclusion from the rebate.

California Gov. Gavin Newsom is preparing to step in if President-elect Donald Trump fulfills his promise to axe the federal electric-vehicle tax credit — but one notable EV maker could be left out.

Newsom said Monday if the $7,500 federal tax credit is eliminated he would restart the state’s zero-emission vehicle rebate program, which was phased out in 2023.

“We will intervene if the Trump Administration eliminates the federal tax credit, doubling down on our commitment to clean air and green jobs in California,” Newsom said in a statement. “We’re not turning back on a clean transportation future — we’re going to make it more affordable for people to drive vehicles that don’t pollute.”

Advertisement

The rebates for EV buyers would come from the state’s Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund, which is funded by polluters of greenhouse gases under a cap-and-trade program, according to the governor’s office.

But Tesla’s vehicles could be excluded under the proposal’s market-share limitations, Bloomberg News first reported.

The governor’s office confirmed to Business Insider that the rebate program could include a market-share cap which could in turn exclude Tesla or other EV makers. The office did not share details about what market-share limit could be proposed and also noted the proposal would be subject to negotiations in the state legislature.

A market-share cap would exclude companies whose sales account for a certain amount of total electric vehicle sales. For instance, Tesla accounted for nearly 55% off all new electric vehicles registered in California in the first three quarters of 2024, according to a report from the California New Car Dealers Association. By comparison, the companies with the next highest EV market share in California were Hyundai and BMW with 5.6% and 5% respectively.

Advertisement

Tesla sales in California, the US’s largest EV market, have recently declined even as overall EV sales in the state have grown. Though the company still accounted for a majority of EV sales in California this year as of September, its market share fell year-over-year from 64% to 55%.

The governor’s office said the market-share cap would be aimed at promoting competition and innovation in the industry.

Elon Musk, who has expressed support for ending the federal tax credit, said in an X post it was “insane” for the California proposal exclude Tesla.

The federal electric vehicle tax credit, which was passed as part of the Biden administration’s Inflation Reduction Act in 2022, provides a $7,500 tax credit to some EV buyers.

Advertisement

Musk, who is working closely with the incoming Trump administration, has expressed support for ending the tax credit. He’s set to co-lead an advisory commission, the Department of Government Efficiency, which is aimed at slashing federal spending.

The Tesla CEO said on an earnings call in July that ending the federal tax credit might actually benefit the company.

“I think it would be devastating for our competitors and for Tesla slightly,” Musk said. “But long-term probably actually helps Tesla, would be my guess.”

Advertisement

BI’s Graham Rapier previously reported that ending the tax credit could help Tesla maintain its strong standing in the EV market by slowing its competitors growth.

Prior to the EV rebate proposal, Newsom has already positioned himself as a foil to the incoming Trump administration. Following Trump’s election win the governor called on California lawmakers to convene for a special session to discuss protecting the state from Trump’s second term.

“The freedoms we hold dear in California are under attack — and we won’t sit idle,” Newsom said in a statement at the time.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

California

California Gov. Gavin Newsom says state will provide rebates if Trump removes tax credit for electric vehicles

Published

on

California Gov. Gavin Newsom says state will provide rebates if Trump removes tax credit for electric vehicles


California Gov. Gavin Newsom said the state will provide rebates to residents if President-elect Donald Trump’s incoming administration does away with a federal tax credit for electric vehicles.

In a news release issued Monday, Newsom said he would restart the state’s Clean Vehicle Rebate Program, which provided financial incentives on more than 590,000 vehicles before it was phased out late 2023.

“We will intervene if the Trump Administration eliminates the federal tax credit, doubling down on our commitment to clean air and green jobs in California,” Newsom said. “We’re not turning back on a clean transportation future — we’re going to make it more affordable for people to drive vehicles that don’t pollute.”

The federal rebates on new and used electric vehicles were implemented in the Inflation Reduction Act that President Joe Biden signed into law in 2022. When Trump’s second term in office begins next year, he could work with Congress to change the rules around those rebates. Those potential changes could limit the federal rebates, including by reducing the amount of money available or limiting who is eligible.

Advertisement

Limiting federal subsidies on electric vehicle purchases would hurt many American automakers, including Ford, General Motors and the EV startup Rivian. Tesla, which also builds its automobiles in the United States, would take a smaller hit since that company currently sells more EVs and has a higher profit margin than any other EV manufacturer.

Newsom also announced earlier this month that he will convene a special session “to protect California values,” including fundamental civil rights and reproductive rights, that he said “are under attack by this incoming administration.”

“Whether it be our fundamental civil rights, reproductive freedom, or climate action — we refuse to turn back the clock and allow our values and laws to be attacked,” Newsom said on X on Nov. 7.

A spokesperson for Trump did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

This isn’t the first time California will be taking action against the Trump’s administration concerning clean transportation legislation.

Advertisement

In 2019, California and 22 other states sued his administration for revoking its ability to set standards for greenhouse gas emission and fuel economy standards for vehicles, The Associated Press reported.

California sued the Trump administration over 100 times during his first term, primarily on matters including gun control, health care, education and immigration, the Los Angeles Times reported.



Source link

Continue Reading

California

45 Years Later, California Murder Mystery Solved Through DNA Evidence

Published

on

45 Years Later, California Murder Mystery Solved Through DNA Evidence


A 45-year-old cold case of a 17-year-old girl brutally raped and murdered has been resolved, bringing closure to the family. On February 9, 1979, Esther Gonzalez walked from her parents’ home to her sister’s in Banning, California, roughly 137 km east of Los Angeles. She never arrived. The next day, her body was discovered in a snowpack near a highway in Riverside County, California. Authorities determined she had been raped and bludgeoned to death, leading to an investigation that spanned decades.

The lab was able to match the DNA to a man named Lewis Randolph “Randy” Williamson, who died in 2014. Williamson, a US Marine Corps veteran, called authorities on the fateful day to report finding Ms Gonzalez’s body. At the time, he claimed he could not identify whether the body was male or female. Described as “argumentative” by deputies, Williamson was asked to take a polygraph test, which he passed, clearing him of suspicion in the pre-DNA era. He had faced assault allegations in the past but was never convicted of any violent crimes, according to the Los Angeles Times.

Advertisement

Despite limited leads, the Riverside County cold case homicide team didn’t give up. A semen sample recovered from Ms Gonzalez’s body in 1979 was preserved but remained unmatched in the national Combined DNA Index System (CODIS) for decades.

In 2023, forensic technology finally caught up. The homicide team collaborated with a genetic lab in Texas that specialises in forensic genealogy. A sample of Williamson’s blood from his 2014 autopsy provided the DNA match needed to confirm him as the 17-year-old’s rapist and killer.

The Gonzalez family had mixed emotions—relief at finally having answers and sadness knowing Williamson would not face justice, as he died in Florida ten years ago. Ms Gonzalez, remembered by her family as a shy yet funny and mild-mannered young woman, was the fourth of seven children. Her oldest brother, Eddie Gonzalez, wrote on Facebook, “The Gonzalez family would like to thank the Riverside County Sheriff’s Department on a job well done. After 40 years, the Gonzalez family has closure.”

Advertisement

“We are very happy that we finally have closure,” Ms Gonzalez’s sister, Elizabeth, 64, shared with CNN. “We are happy about it but, since the guy has died, a little sad that he won’t spend any time for her murder.”




Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending